The Role of Comprehension Monitoring in Predicting Reading Comprehension Among French Immersion Children

References

• Baker, L. (1984). Spontaneous versus instructed use of multiple standards for evaluating comprehension: Effects of age, reading proficiency, and type of standard. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 38(2), 289–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(84)90127-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bialystok, E. (2009). Bilingualism: The good, the bad, and the indifferent. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728908003477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blything, L. P., Davies, R., & Cain, K. (2015). Young children’s comprehension of temporal relations in complex sentences: The influence of memory on performance. Child Development, 86(6), 1922–1934. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12412
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cain, K., Oakhill, J. V., Barnes, M. A., & Bryant, P. E. (2001). Comprehension skill, inference-making ability, and their relation to knowledge. Memory & Cognition, 29(6), 850–859. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. (2004). Children’s reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.31
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catts, H. W., Fey, M. E., Zhang, X., & Tomblin, J. B. (2001). Estimating the risk of future reading difficulties in kindergarten children. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 32(1), 38–50. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2001/004)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chall, J. S. (1983). Learning to read: The great debate. McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Currie, N. K., Francey, G., Davies, R., Gray, S., Bridges, M. S., Restrepo, M. A., Thompson, M. S., Ciraolo, M. F., Hu, J., & Cain, K. (2021). The process and product of coherence monitoring in young readers: Effects of reader and text characteristics. Scientific Studies of Reading, 25(2), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2020.1831503
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’angelo, N., Krenca, K., & Chen, X. (2020). The overlap of poor reading comprehension in English and French. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 120. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jong, P. F., & van der Leij, A. (2002). Effects of phonological abilities and linguistic comprehension on the development of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6(1), 51–77. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532799XSSR0601_03
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, D. M. (2007). Peabody picture vocabulary test (4th Edn ed.). NCS, Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, L. M., Theriault-Whalen, C. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1993). Échelle de Vocabulaire en Images Peabody (EVIP). Psycan.
   Google Scholar
• Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. The American Psychologist, 34(10), 906. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García, J. R., & Cain, K. (2014). Decoding and reading comprehension: A meta-analysis to identify which reader and assessment characteristics influence the strength of the relationship in English. Review of Educational Research, 84(1), 74–111. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313499616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genesee, F., & Jared, D. (2008). Literacy development in early French immersion programs. Canadian Psychology, 49(2), 140–147. https://doi.org/10.1037/0708-5591.49.2.140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genesee, F., & Lindholm Leary, K. (2013). Two case studies of content-based language education. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 1(1), 3–33. https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.1.1.02gen
   Google Scholar
• Gersten, R., Fuchs, L. S., Williams, J. P., & Baker, S. (2001). Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities: A review of research. Review of Educational Research, 71(2), 279–320. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543071002279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial Special Education, 7(1), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258600700104
   Google Scholar
• Helder, A., Van Leijenhorst, L., & van den Broek, P. (2016). Coherence monitoring by good and poor comprehenders in elementary school: Comparing offline and online measures. Learning and Individual Differences, 48, 17–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, T., Bridges, M. S., Justice, L. M., & Cain, K. (2011). Increasing higher level language skills to improve reading comprehension. Focus on Exceptional Children, 44(3), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.17161/foec.v44i3.6688
   Google Scholar
• Jeong, J., McCoy, D. C., & Fink, G. (2017). Pathways between paternal and maternal education, caregivers’ support for learning, and early child development in 44 low-and middle-income countries. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 41, 136–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2017.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Language and Reading Research Consortium, Jiang, H., & Logan, J. (2019). Improving reading comprehension in the primary grades: Mediated effects of a language-focused classroom intervention. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 62(8), 2812–2828.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. K., & Swain, M. (1997). Immersion education: International perspectives. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524667
   Google Scholar
• Keenan, J. M., & Meenan, C. E. (2014). Test differences in diagnosing reading comprehension deficits. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47(2), 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219412439326
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, D. (1975). Cross-lagged panel correlation: A test for spuriousness. Psychological Bulletin, 82(6), 887–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.82.6.887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. S. G. (2015). Developmental, component based model of reading fluency: An investigation of predictors of word reading fluency, text reading fluency, and reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 50(4), 459–481. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. S., & Phillips, B. (2014). Cognitive correlates of listening comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 49(3), 269–281. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.74
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. S. G., & Phillips, B. (2016). Five minutes a day to improve comprehension monitoring in oral language contexts. Topics in Language Disorders, 36(4), 356–367. https://doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0000000000000103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. S. G., & Pilcher, H. (2016). What is listening comprehension and what does it take to improve listening comprehension?. In R. Schiff & R. M. Joshi (Eds.), Interventions in learning disabilities: A handbook on systematic training programs for individuals with learning disabilities (pp. 159–173). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krenca, K., Gottardo, A., Geva, E., & Chen, X. (2020). English phonological specificity predicts early French reading difficulty in emerging bilingual children. Annals of Dyslexia, 70, 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-019-00188-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Language and Reading Research Consortium. (2015). The dimensionality of language ability in young children. Child Development, 86(6), 1948–1965. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12450
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K., & Chen, X. (2019). An emergent interaction between reading fluency and vocabulary in the prediction of reading comprehension among French immersion elementary students. Reading and Writing, 32(7), 1657–1679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9920-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesaux, N. K., Crosson, A. C., Kieffer, M. J., & Pierce, M. (2010). Uneven profiles: Language minority learners’ word reading, vocabulary, and reading comprehension skills. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 31(6), 475–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2010.09.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, R. J. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83(404), 1198–1202. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1988.10478722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacGinitie, W. H., & MacGinitie, R. K. (1992). Gates-MacGinitie reading tests (2nd ed.). Toronto, CA: Nelson Canada.
   Google Scholar
• MacGinitie, W. H., MacGinitie, R. K., Maria, K., & Dreyer, L. G. (2000). Gates- MacGinitie reading tests (4th Edn ed.). Riverside Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, L. (2004). Comprehension monitoring in first and second language reading. Canadian Modern Language Review, 61(1), 77–107. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.61.1.77
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Münte, T. F., Schiltz, K., & Kutas, M. (1998). When temporal terms belie conceptual order. Nature, 395(6697), 71–73. https://doi.org/10.1038/25731
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naglieri, J. A. (1985). Matrix analogies test – short form. The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• National Reading Panel (US), National Institute of Child Health, Human Development (US), National Reading Excellence Initiative, National Institute for Literacy (US), & United States Department of Health. (2000). Report of the national reading panel: teaching children to read: an evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: reports of the subgroups. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health.
   Google Scholar
• Oakhill, J. V., & Cain, K. (2012). The precursors of reading ability in young readers: Evidence from a four-year longitudinal study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16(2), 91–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2010.529219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakhill, J., Hartt, J., & Samols, D. (2005). Levels of comprehension monitoring and working memory in good and poor comprehenders. Reading and Writing, 18(7–9), 657–686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-3355-z
   Google Scholar
• Oster, L. (2001). Using the think-aloud for reading instruction. The Reading Teacher, 55(1), 64–69. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20205012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paradis, J., Emmerzael, K., & Duncan, T. S. (2010). Assessment of English language learners: Using parent report on first language development. Journal of Communication Disorders, 43(6), 474–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2010.01.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyykkönen, P., & Järvikivi, J. (2012). Children and situation models of multiple events. Developmental Psychology, 48(2), 521. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025526
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skarakis-Doyle, E. (2002). Young children’s detection of violations in familiar stories and emerging comprehension monitoring. Discourse Processes, 33(2), 175–197. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950DP3302_04
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, M., & Wagner, R. K. (2018). The comprehension problems of children with poor reading comprehension despite adequate decoding: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 88(3), 366–400. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317749187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strasser, K., & Río, F. D. (2014). The role of comprehension monitoring, theory of mind, and vocabulary depth in predicting story comprehension and recall of kindergarten children. Reading Research Quarterly, 49(2), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.68
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2005). The evolving sociopolitical context of immersion education in Canada: Some implications for program development. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15(2), 169–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2005.00086.x
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• van den Broek, P., Risden, K., & Husebye-Hartmann, E. (1995). The role of readers’ standards for coherence in the generation of inferences during reading. In R. F. Lorch Jr & E. J. O’Brien (Eds.), Sources of coherence in text comprehension (pp. 353–373). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• van der Schoot, M., Reijntjes, A., & van Lieshout, E. C. (2012). How do children deal with inconsistencies in text? An eye fixation and self-paced reading study in good and poor reading comprehenders. Reading and Writing, 25(7), 1665–1690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9337-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., Rashotte, C. A., & Pearson, N. A. (2013). CTOPP-2: Comprehensive test of phonological processing (2nd ed.). PRO-ED.
   Google Scholar
• Wassenburg, S. I., Beker, K., van den Broek, P., & van der Schoot, M. (2015). Children’s comprehension monitoring of multiple situational dimensions of a narrative. Reading and Writing, 28(8), 1203–1232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9568-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wassenburg, S. I., Bos, L. T., de Koning, B. B., & van der Schoot, M. (2015). Effects of an inconsistency-detection training aimed at improving comprehension monitoring in primary school children. Discourse Processes, 52(5–6), 463–488. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2015.1025203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (2005). Wechsler individual achievement test (2nd ed.). Canadian). Pearson Canada Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III tests of achievement. Riverside Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Language and Reading Research Consortium, & Yeomans-Maldonado, G. (2017). Development of comprehension monitoring in beginner readers. Reading and Writing, 30(9), 2039–2067. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9765-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar