Scanpath Regularity as an Index of Reading Comprehension

References

• Bax, S., & Chan, S. (2019). Using eye-tracking research to investigate language test validity and design. System, 83, 64–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benfatto, M. N., Seimyr, G. Ö., Ygge, J., Pansell, T., Rydberg, A., & Jacobson, C. (2016). Screening for dyslexia using eye tracking during reading. PLoS ONE, 11(12), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berzak, Y., Katz, B., & Levy, R. (2018). Assessing language proficiency from eye movements in reading. ArXiv Preprint, arXiv, 1804.07329.
   Google Scholar
• Christianson, K., Luke, S. G., Hussey, E. K., & Wochna, K. L. (2017). Why reread? Evidence from garden-path and local coherence structures. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(7), 1380–1405. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2016.1186200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifton, C., Jr., Staub, A., & Rayner, K. (2007). Eye movements in reading words and sentences Van Gompel, Roger P. G., Fischer, Martin H., Murray, Wayne S., Hill, Robin L. eds. Eye Movements: A Window on Mind and Brain, 341–371. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Copeland, L., & Gedeon, T. (2013). Measuring reading comprehension using eye movements. 4th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications, CogInfoCom 2013 - Proceedings. Budapest, Hungary, (pp. 791–796).
   Google Scholar
• Copeland, L., Gedeon, T., & Caldwell, S. (2016). Effects of text difficulty and readers on predicting reading comprehension from eye movements. 6th IEEE Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications, CogInfoCom 2015 - Proceedings Gyor, Hungary, (pp. 407–412).
   Google Scholar
• Copeland, L., Gedeon, T., & Mendis, S. (2014). Predicting reading comprehension scores from eye movements using artificial neural networks and fuzzy output error. Artificial Intelligence Research, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.5430/air.v3n3p35
   Google Scholar
• D’Mello, S. K., Southwell, R., & Gregg, J. (2020). Machine-learned computational models can enhance the study of text and discourse: A case study using eye tracking to model reading comprehension. Discourse Processes, 57(5–6), 420–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2020.1739600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (1982). Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 14(2), 178–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(82)90008-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., Goodrich, B., Gabry, J., & Vehtari, A. (2019). R-squared for Bayesian regression models. The American Statistician.
   Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., Hwang, J., & Vehtari, A. (2014). Understanding predictive information criteria for Bayesian models. Statistics and Computing, 24(6), 997–1016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11222-013-9416-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inhoff, A. W., Gregg, J., & Radach, R. (2018). Eye movement programming and reading accuracy. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2016.1226907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaakinen, J. K., & Hyönä, J. (2010). Task effects on eye movements during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 36(6), 1561–1566. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020693
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keenan, J. M., Betjemann, R. S., & Olson, R. K. (2008). Reading comprehension tests vary in the skills they assess: Differential dependence on decoding and oral comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12(3), 281–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430802132279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. S. G., Petscher, Y., & Vorstius, C. (2019). Unpacking eye movements during oral and silent reading and their relations to reading proficiency in beginning readers. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 58(March), 102–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.03.002
   Google Scholar
• Martínez-Gómez, P., & Aizawa, A. (2014). Recognition of understanding level and language skill using measurements of reading behavior. International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, Proceedings IUI. Haifa, Israel, (pp. 95–104).
   Google Scholar
• Melville, J. (2020). Uwot: The Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) method for dimensionality reduction. R package version 0.1.10.
   Google Scholar
• Meseguer, E., Carreiras, M., & Clifton, C. (2002). Overt reanalysis strategies and eye movements during the reading of mild garden path sentences. Memory & Cognition, 30(4), 551–561. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194956
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mézière, D. C., Yu, L., Reichle, E., von der Malsburg, T., & McArthur, G. (2023). Using eye-tracking measures to predict reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 0(0), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.498
   Google Scholar
• Nation, K., & Snowling, M. (1997). Assessing reading difficulties: The validity and utility of current measures of reading skill. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67(3), 359–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1997.tb01250.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O’Reilly, T., Sabatini, J., Bruce, K., Pillarisetti, S., & McCormick, C. (2012). Middle school reading assessment: measuring what matters under a RTI Framework. Reading Psychology, 33(1–2), 162–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2012.631865
   Google Scholar
• Parshina, O., Sekerina, I. A., Lopukhina, A., & von der Malsburg, T. (2021). Monolingual and bilingual reading processes in Russian: An exploratory scanpath analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 57(2), 469–492. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radach, R., Huestegge, L., & Reilly, R. (2008). The role of global top-down factors in local eye-movement control in reading. Psychological Research, 72(6), 675–688. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-008-0173-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movements and attention in reading, scene per- ception, and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457–1506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Reich, D. R., Prasse, P., Tschirner, C., Haller, P., Goldhammer, F., & Jäger, L. A. (2022, June). Inferring native and non-native human reading comprehension and subjective text difficulty from scanpaths in reading. In 2022 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications. Seattle, WA, USA, (pp. 1–8).
   Google Scholar
• Rello, L., & Ballesteros, M. (2015). Detecting readers with dyslexia using machine learning with eye-tracking measures. Web for All Conference. Florence, Italy, (pp. 16–23).
   Google Scholar
• Schotter, E. R., Bicknell, K., Howard, I., Levy, R., & Rayner, K. (2014). Task effects reveal cognitive flexibility responding to frequency and predictability: Evidence from eye movements in reading and proofreading. Cognition, 131(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.11.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schotter, E. R., Tran, R., & Rayner, K. (2014). Don’t believe what you read (Only Once): Comprehension is supported by regressions during reading. Psychological Science, 25(6), 1218–1226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614531148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scrucca, L., Fop, M., Murphy, T. B., & Raftery, A. E. (2016). Mclust 5: Clustering, classification and density estimation using Gaussian finite mixture models. The R Journal, 8(1), 289–317. https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2016-021
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Snowling, M. J., Stothard, S. E., Clarke, P., Bowyer-Crane, C., Harrington, A., Truelove, E., Nation, K., & Hulme, C. (2009). YARC York Assessment of Reading for Comprehension passage reading. GL Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Southwell, R., Gregg, J., Bixler, R., & D’Mello, S. K. (2020). What eye movements reveal about later comprehension of long connected texts. Cognitive Science, 44(10). https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12905
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vehtari, A., Gelman, A., & Gabry, J. (2017). Practical Bayesian model evaluation using leave-one-out cross-validation and WAIC. Statistics and Computing, 27(5), 1413–1432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11222-016-9696-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venables, W. N., & Ripley, B. D. (2002). Modern applied statistics with S (4 th ed.). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• von der Malsburg, T. (2018). Scanpath: Tools for analyzing spatio-temporal patterns in eye movements. R package version 1.06.
   Google Scholar
• von der Malsburg, T., Kliegl, R., & Vasishth, S. (2015). Determinants of scanpath regularity in reading. Cognitive Science, 39(7), 1675–1703. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von der Malsburg, T., & Vasishth, S. (2011). What is the scanpath signature of syntactic reanalysis? Journal of Memory and Language, 65(2), 109–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2011.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von der Malsburg, T., & Vasishth, S. (2013). Scanpaths reveal syntactic underspecification and reanalysis strategies. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(10), 1545–1578. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2012.728232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von der Malsburg, T., Vasishth, S., & Kliegl, R. (2012, December). Scanpaths in reading are informative about sentence processing. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Eye-tracking and Natural Language Processing. Mumbai, India, (pp. 37–54).
   Google Scholar
• Wiederholt, J. L., & Bryant, B. R. (2012). Gray oral reading tests–5. Gray Oral Reading Tests–5, GORT–5.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, G. S., & Robertson, G. J. (2006). Wide Range Achievement Test 4 (WRAT4). Psychological Assessment Resources, Lutz.
   Google Scholar
• Wonnacott, E., Joseph, H. S. S. L., Adelman, J. S., & Nation, K. (2016). Is children’s reading “good enough”? Links between online processing and comprehension as children read syntactically ambiguous sentences. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(5), 855–879. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1011176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar