Virtual field experiences in introductory geology: Addressing a capacity problem, but finding a pedagogical one

References

• Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. (2000). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 665. doi: 10.1080/09500690050044044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrowsmith, C., Counihan, A., & McGreevy, D. (2005). Development of a multi-scaled virtual field trip for the teaching and learning of geospatial science. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 1(3), 42–56.
   Google Scholar
• Atchison, C. L. (2011). The significance of access: Students with mobility impairments constructing geoscience knowledge through field-based learning experiences (Doctoral dissertation 3476983). The Ohio State University, Ohio. Retrieved from https://etd.ohiolink.edu/!etd.send_file?accession=osu1306333072&disposition=inline
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, J., Whitmeyer, S., & DePoar, D. (2012). Introduction: The application of google geo tools to geoscience education and research. In S. J. Whitmeyer, J.E. Bailey, D. G. De Paor & T. Ornduff (Eds.), Google earth and virtual visualizations in geoscience education and research (Vol.492, pp. vii–xix). Denver, CO: Geological Society of America.
   Google Scholar
• Bentley, C. (2014, October). Telling the story of the Canadian Rockies via Google Earth and gigapan. Paper presented at the 2014 Geological Society of America Annual Meeting and Exposition, Vancouver, BC.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, A., Maguire, S., Martin, A., Milsom, C., Nash, R., Rawlinson, S., … Conchie, S. (2007). Fieldwork is good: The student perception and the affective domain. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 31(2), 299–317. doi: 10.1080/03098260601063628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bybee R. W. (2006). Scientific inquiry and science teaching. In L. B. Flick & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and nature of science: Implications for teaching, learning, and teacher education (pp. 1–14). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Çaliskan, O. (2011). Virtual field trips in education of Earth and environmental sciences. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 3239–3243. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.278
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, A. (2013). What is this thing called science? Queensland, Australia: University of Queensland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chamberlin, T. C. (1965). The method of multiple working hypotheses (reprint of the 1890 version). Science, 148, 754–759.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, A. (2011). Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. London, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clary, R. M., & Wandersee, J. H. (2010). Virtual field exercises in the online classroom: Practicing science teachers’ perceptions of effectiveness, best practices, and implementation. Journal of College Science Teaching, 39(4), 50–58.
   Google Scholar
• Cleland, C. E. (2013). Common cause explanation and the search for smoking gun. In V. R. Baker (Ed.), Rethinking the fabric of geology: Geologic Society of America Special Paper 502 (pp. 1–9) Denver, CO: Geologic Society of America.
   Google Scholar
• Clement, J. J. (2008). Creative model construction in scientists and students: The role of imagery, analogy, and mental simulation. Dordercht, Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cutler, A. (2003). The seashell on the mountaintop: A story of science, sainthood, and the humble genius who discovered a new history of the Earth. New York, NY: EP Dutton.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dodick, J., & Orion, N. (2003). Cognitive factors affecting student understanding of geologic time. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(4), 415–442. doi: 10.1002/tea.10083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodick, J., & Orion, N. (2006). Building an understanding of geologic time: A cognitive synthesis of the "macro" and "micro" scales of time. In C. A. Manduca & D. W. Mogk (Eds.), Earth and mind: How geologists think and learn about the earth: Geological Society of America Special Paper 413. Denver, CO: Geological Society of America.
   Google Scholar
• Dolphin, G., & Benoit, W. (2016). Students’ mental model development during historically contextualized inquiry: How the ‘tectonic plate’ metaphor impeded the process. International Journal of Science Education, 38(2), 2–22. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1140247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drummond, C. N., & Markin, J. M. (2008). An analysis of the Bachelor of Science geology degree as offered in the United States. Journal of Geoscience Education, 56(2), 13–119. doi: 10.5408/1089-9995-56.2.113
   Google Scholar
• Elkins, J. T., & Elkins, N. M. L. (2007). Teaching geology in the field: Significant geoscience concept inventory gains in entirely field-based introductory geology courses. Journal of Geoscience Education, 55(2), 126–132. doi: 10.5408/1089-9995-55.2.126
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, S., France, D., Moore, K., & Robinson, G. (2002). Fieldwork education and technology: A GEES perspective. Planet, 7(1), 17–19. doi: 10.11120/plan.2002.00070017
   Google Scholar
• Frankel, H. (2012). Paleomagnetism and confirmation of drift (Vol. 2). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frodeman, R. (1995). Geological reasoning: Geology as an interpretive and historical science. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 107, 960–968. doi: 10.1130/0016-7606(1995)107<0960:GRGAAI>2.3.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasparatou, R. (2017). Scientism and scientific thinking: A note on science education. Science and Education, 26, 799–812. doi: 10.1007/s11191-017-9931-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giere, R. N. (1988). Explaining science: A cognitive approach. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilley, B., Atchison, C., Feig, A., & Stokes, A. (2015). Impact of inclusive field trips. Nature Geoscience, 8, 579–580. doi: 10.1038/ngeo2500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glen, W. (1982). The road to Jaramillo: Critical years of the revolution in earth science. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gobert, J. D. (2005). The effects of different learning tasks on model-building in plate tectonics: diagramming versus explaining. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53(4), 444–455. doi: 10.5408/1089-9995-53.4.444
   Google Scholar
• Hesthammer, J., Fossen, H., Sautter, M., Saether, B., & Johansen, S. E. (2002). The use of information technology to enhance learning in geological field trips. Journal of Geoscience Education, 50(5), 528–538. doi: 10.5408/1089-9995-50.5.528
   Google Scholar
• Hurst, S. D. (1998). Use of “virtual” field trips in teaching introductory geology. Computers and Geosciences, 24(7), 653–658. doi: 10.1016/S0098-3004(98)00043-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchins, E., & Renner, N. (2012). Situated and embodied learning in the field. In K. A. Kastens & C. A. Manduca (Ed.), Earth and mind II: A synthesis on research on thinking and learning in the geosciences: Geological society of America special paper 486. (Vol. 2, pp. 181–182). Denver, CO: Geological Society of America.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, A. R., Militello, R., & Baveye, P. C. (2009). Development of computer-assisted virtual field trips to support multidisciplinary learning. Computers and Education, 52(3), 571–580. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. K., & Reynolds, S. J. (2005). Concept sketches: Using student- and instructor-generated, annotated sketches for learning, teaching, and assessment in geology courses. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53(1), 85–95. doi: 10.5408/1089-9995-53.1.85
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow (1st ed.). New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Kastens, K. A., & Ishikawa, T. (2006). Spatial thinking in the geosciences and cognitive sciences: A cross-disciplinary look at the intersection of the two fields. Special Papers (413), 53–76.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, N. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present and future. In S. Abell & N. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research in science education (pp. 831–880). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Li, S., & Liu, Q. (2003). Interactive groundwater (IGW): An innovative digital laboratory for groundwater education and research. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 11(4), 179–202. doi: 10.1002/cae.10052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litherland, K., & Stott, T. A. (2012). Virtual field sites: Losses and gains in authenticity with semantic technologies. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 21(2), 213–230. doi: 10.1080/1475939X.2012.697773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mogk, D. W., & Goodwin, C. (2012). Learning in the field: Synthesis of research on thinking and learning in the geosciences. In K. A. Kastens & C. A. Manduca (Eds.), Earth and Mind II: A synthesis of research on thinking and learning in the geosciences (Vol.2, pp. 131–164). Denver, CO: Geological Society of America.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2006). America’s lab report: Investigations in high school science. Retrieved from https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11311/americas-lab-report-investigations-in-high-school-science
   Google Scholar
• Oreskes, N. (1999). The rejection of continental drift: Theory and method in American earth science. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oreskes, N., & LeGrand, H. E. (2001). Plate tectonics: An insider’s history of the modern theory of the Earth. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parcell, W. C., & Parcell, L. M. (2009). Evaluating and communicating geologic reasoning with semiotics and certainty estimation. Journal of Geoscience Education, 57(5), 379–389. doi: 10.5408/1.3544288
   Google Scholar
• Peat, M., & Taylor, C. (2005). Virtual biology: How well can it replace authentic activities. CAL-Laborate, 13, 21–24.
   Google Scholar
• Petcovic, H. L., Stokes, A., & Caulkins, J. L. (2014). Geoscientists’ perceptions of the value of undergraduate field education. GSA Today, 24(7), 4–10. doi: 10.1130/GSATG196A.1
   Google Scholar
• Read, H. H. (1957). The granite controversy. London, UK: Thomas Murby & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Repcheck, J. (2003). The man who found time: James Hutton and the discovery of the Earth’s antiquity. Cambridge, MA: Perseus.
   Google Scholar
• Rudwick, M. J. S. (1985). The great Devonian controversy: The shaping of scientific knowledge among gentlemanly specialists. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rudwick, M. J. S. (2014). Earth’s deep history: How it was discovered and why it matters. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Şengör, A. M. C. (2001). Is the present the key to the past or is the past the key to the present? James Hutton and Adam Smith versus Abraham Gottlob Werner and Karl Marx in interpreting history (Vol. 355). Boulder, CO: Geological Society of America.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, L. (2011). Embodied cognition. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stainfield, J., Fisher, P., Ford, B., & Solem, M. (2000). International virtual field trips: A new direction? Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 24(2), 255–262. doi: 10.1080/713677387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stott, T., and Nuttall, A. (2010, October). Design, development and student evaluation of interactive virtual field guides for teaching geosciences at Liverpool John Moores University, UK. Paper presented at the Tunku Abdul Rahman TAR) College Second International Conference on Learning and teaching (TIC2010), Emerging Trends in Higher Education Learning and Teaching, Kuala Lampur.
   Google Scholar
• Stumpf, R. J., Douglass, J., and Dorn, R. I. (2008). Learning desert geomorphology virtually versus in the field. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 32(3), 378–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taber, K. S. (2003). Mediating mental models of metals: Acknowledging the priority of the learner's prior learning. Science Education, 87(5), 732–758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thagard, P. (2012). The cognitive science of science: Explanation, discovery, and conceptual change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, D. (2013). Historical geology: Methodology and metaphysics. In V. R. Baker (Ed.), Rethinking the fabric of geology: Geological Society of America Special Paper 502 (pp. 11–18). Denver, CO: Geological Society of America.
   Google Scholar