A multiple case study of inclusive learning communities enabling active participation in geoscience field courses for students with physical disabilities

References

• American Geosciences Institute. (2015). Consensus statement regarding access and inclusion of individuals living with disabilities in the geosciences. Retrieved from https://www.americangeosciences.org/community/disability-consensus-statement
   Google Scholar
• Atchison, C. L. (2011). The significance of access: Students with mobility impairments constructing geoscience knowledge through field-based learning experiences. Columbus: The Ohio State University. Retrieved from https://etd.ohiolink.edu/pg_10?0::NO:10:P10_ETD_SUBID:74240
   Google Scholar
• Baker, D. (1996). Cleaveland avenue tour trail map. Mammoth Cave, KY: Cave Research Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Carabajal, I. G., Marshall, A. M., & Atchison, C. L. (2017). A synthesis of instructional strategies in geoscience education literature that address barriers to inclusion for students with disabilities. Journal of Geoscience Education, 65(4), 531–541. doi:10.5408/16-211.1
   Google Scholar
• Chávez, A. F. (2007). Islands of empowerment: Facilitating multicultural learning communities in college. International Journal of Teaching & Learning in Higher Education, 19(3), 274–288.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, T., Davies, S., & Gaved, M. (2016). Enabling remote activity: Widening participation in field study courses. In D. Kennepohl (Ed.), Teaching science online: Practical guidance for effective instruction and lab work (pp. 183–195). Sterling, VA: Stylus. Retrieved from https://sty.presswarehouse.com/Books/BookDetail.aspx?productID=393126
   Google Scholar
• Collins, T., Gaved, M., & Lea, J. (2010). Remote fieldwork: Using portable wireless networks and backhaul links to participate remotely in fieldwork. Presented at the Ninth World Conference on Mobile and Contextual Learning (mlearn 2010), Valletta, Malta. Retrieved from http://oro.open.ac.uk/24711/
   Google Scholar
• Connor, D. J., Gabel, S. L., Gallagher, D. J., & Morton, M. (2008). Disability studies and inclusive education—Implications for theory, research, and practice. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 12(5-6), 441–457. doi:10.1080/13603110802377482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkins, J., & Elkins, N. (2007). Teaching geology in the field: Significant geoscience concept gains in entirely field-based introductory geology courses. Journal of Geoscience Education, 55(2), 126–132. doi:10.5408/1089-9995-55.2.126
   Google Scholar
• Fink, J. E., & Hummel, M. L. (2015). With educational benefits for all: Campus inclusion through learning communities designed for underserved student populations. New Directions for Student Services, 2015(149), 29–40. doi:10.1002/ss.20115
   Google Scholar
• Finley, A., & McNair, T. (2013). Assessing underserved students’ engagement in high-impact practices. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities. Retrieved from https://www.aacu.org/assessinghips/report
   Google Scholar
• Gardiner, V., & Anwar, N. (2001). Providing learning support for disabled students undertaking fieldwork and related activities. Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, UK: Geography Discipline Network (GDN), Geography & Environmental Management Research Unit (GEMRU), University of Gloucestershire. Retrieved from https://gdn.glos.ac.uk/disabil/mobility/mobility.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, J., & Endsley, G. (2005). Field-based geoscience education–A valid experience in outdoor education. The Texas Science Teacher, 34, 23–29.
   Google Scholar
• Gaved, M. B., McCann, L., & Valentine, C. (2006). ERA (Enabling Remote Activity): A KMi designed system to support remote participation by mobility disabled students in geology field trips (Technical Report No. kmi-06-15). Milton Keynes, UK: Knowledge Media Institute, The Open University. Retrieved from http://kmi.open.ac.uk/publications/pdf/kmi-06-15.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Geological Society of America. (2010). GSA position statement–Diversity in the geosciences community. Retrieved from https://www.geosociety.org/GSA/Science_Policy/Position_Statements/gsa/positions/position15.aspx
   Google Scholar
• The Geological Society of London. (2017). A strategy for the Geological Society, 2017–2027. Retrieved from https://www.geolsoc.org.uk/strategy
   Google Scholar
• Haddock, A., O’Brien, M., Vinson, G., Todd, A. C., Pritchard, C. E., Sullivan, B., … Atchison, C. L. (2017). Differences between traditional and digital field notebooks for inclusive geoscience courses. Presented at the GSA Annual Meeting in Seattle, Washington, USA. https://doi.org/10.1130/abs/2017AM-304839.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, T., Healey, M., & Harrison, M. (2002). Fieldwork and disabled students: Discourses of exclusion and inclusion. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 27(2), 213–231. doi:10.1111/1475-5661.00050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, S. R., & Quaye, S. J. (2008). Beyond sameness, with engagement and outcomes for all. In S. R. Harper & S. J. Quaye (Eds.), Student engagement in higher education: Theoretical perspectives and practical approaches for diverse populations (pp. 1–15). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, M., Jenkins, A., Leach, J., & Roberts, C. (2001). Issues in providing learning support for disabled students undertaking fieldwork and related activities. Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, UK: Geography Discipline Network (GDN), Geography & Environmental Management Research Unit (GEMRU), University of Gloucestershire. Retrieved from https://gdn.glos.ac.uk/disabil/overview/overview.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jehangir, R. R. (2009). Cultivating voice: First-generation students seek full academic citizenship in multicultural learning communities. Innovative Higher Education, 34(1), 33–49. doi:10.1007/s10755-008-9089-5
   Google Scholar
• Jessup‐Anger, J. E. (2015). Theoretical foundations of learning communities. New Directions for Student Services, 2015(149), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/ss.20114.
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kuh, G. D. (2008). High-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
   Google Scholar
• Lenning, O. T., Hill, D. M., Saunders, K. P., Solan, A., Stokes, A., & Tinto, V. (2013). Powerful learning communities: A guide to developing student, faculty, and professional learning communities to improve student success and organizational effectiveness (2nd ed.). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, A. M. S. (2018). Evaluation of academic and social engagement in a technology-based collaborative approach to inclusive geoscience field learning (Doctoral dissertation). University of South Florida, Tampa.
   Google Scholar
• Maskall, J., & Stokes, A. (2007). Designing effective fieldwork for the environmental and natural sciences. Plymouth, Devon, UK: Higher Education Academy. Retrieved from https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/gees_guides_jmas_designing_effective_fieldwork.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, R. S., Smith, B. L., & MacGregor, J. (2012). The evolution of learning communities: A retrospective. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2012(132), 99–111. doi:10.1002/tl.20039
   Google Scholar
• Nairn, K. (1999). Embodied fieldwork. Journal of Geography, 98(6), 272–282. doi:10.1080/00221349908978941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riggs, E. M., Lieder, C. C., & Balliet, R. (2009). Geologic problem solving in the field: Analysis of field navigation and mapping by advanced undergraduates. Journal of Geoscience Education, 57(1), 48–63. doi:10.5408/1.3559525
   Google Scholar
• Skop, E. (2009). Creating field trip-based learning communities. Journal of Geography, 107(6), 230–235. doi:10.1080/00221340802620164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, B. L., MacGregor, J., Matthews, R., & Gabelnick, F. (2004). Learning communities: Reforming undergraduate education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Streule, M., J., & Craig, L. E. (2016). Social learning theories-an important design consideration for geoscience fieldwork. Journal of Geoscience Education, 64(2), 101–107. doi:10.5408/15-119.1
   Google Scholar
• Thatcher, S., Vinson, G., Haddock, A., Todd, A. C., O’Brien, M., Pritchard, C. E., … Atchison, C. L. (2017). Student perspectives on wireless communication technologies to facilitate inclusion in field activities. Presented at the GSA Annual Meeting in Seattle, Washington, USA. https://doi.org/10.1130/abs/2017AM-304912.
   Google Scholar
• Tinto, V. (2000). Learning better together: The impact of learning communities on student success in higher education. Journal of Institutional Research, 9, 48–53.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.), Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar