795
Views
26
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research

Affective factors during field research that influence intention to persist in the geosciences

, &
Pages 133-151 | Received 13 Sep 2018, Accepted 02 Aug 2019, Published online: 18 Sep 2019

References

  • Atchison, C. L., Marshall, A. M., & Collins, T. D. (2019). A multiple case study of inclusive learning communities enabling active participation in geoscience field courses for students with physical disabilities. Journal of Geoscience Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/10899995.2019.1600962
  • Baber, L. D., Pifer, M. J., Colbeck, C., & Furman, T. (2010). Increasing diversity in the geosciences: Recruitment programs and student self-efficacy. Journal of Geoscience Education, 58(1), 32–42. doi:10.5408/1.3544292
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  • Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71–81): New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Bauer, K. W., & Bennett, J. S. (2003). Alumni perceptions used to assess undergraduate research experience. The Journal of Higher Education, 74(2), 210–230. doi:10.1080/00221546.2003.11777197
  • Bergin, D. A. (1999). Influences on classroom interest. Educational Psychologist, 34(2), 87–98. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3402_2
  • Bernard, R. E., & Cooperdock, E. H. (2018). No progress on diversity in 40 years. New York, NY: Nature Publishing Group.
  • Brandt, L., & Hayes, J. (2012). Broader impacts of undergraduate research at a community college: Opening doors to new ideas. CUR Quarterly, 33(1), 17–21.
  • Brownell, S. E., & Kloser, M. J. (2015). Toward a conceptual framework for measuring the effectiveness of course-based undergraduate research experiences in undergraduate biology. Studies in Higher Education, 40(3), 525–544. doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1004234
  • Callahan, C. N., LaDue, N. D., Baber, L. D., Sexton, J., van der Hoeven Kraft, K. J., & Zamani-Gallaher, E. M. (2017). Theoretical perspectives on increasing recruitment and retention of underrepresented students in the geosciences. Journal of Geoscience Education, 65(4), 563–576. doi:10.5408/16-238.1
  • Cardace, D., Hoehler, T., McCollom, T., Schrenk, M., Carnevale, D., Kubo, M., & Twing, K. (2013). Establishment of the Coast Range ophiolite microbial observatory (CROMO): Drilling objectives and preliminary outcomes. Scientific Drilling, 16, 45–55. doi:10.5194/sd-16-45-2013
  • Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187–1218. doi:10.1002/tea.20237
  • Chen, G., Gully, S. M., & Eden, D. (2001). Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organizational Research Methods, 4(1), 62–83. doi:10.1177/109442810141004
  • Creswell, J. W. (2014). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
  • Erlandson, D. A., Harris, E. L., Skipper, B. L., & Allen, S. D. (1993). Doing naturalistic inquiry: A guide to methods. Sage.
  • Feig, A. D. (2011). Methodology and location in the context of qualitative data and theoretical frameworks in geoscience education research. In A. D. Feig & A. Stokes (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry in geoscience education research (Geological Society of America, Special Paper, vol. 474, pp. 1–10). Boulder, CO: Geological Society of America.
  • Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968). The discovery of grounded theory; strategies for qualitative research. Nursing Research, 17(4), 364. doi:10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014
  • Gregerman, S. R., Lerner, J. S., von Hippel, W., Jonides, J., & Nagda, B. A. (1998). Undergraduate student–faculty research partnerships affect student retention. The Review of Higher Education, 22(1), 55–72. doi:10.1353/rhe.1998.0016
  • Hallar, A. G., McCubbin, I. B., Hallar, B., Levine, R., Stockwell, W. R., Lopez, J. P., & Wright, J. M. (2010). Science in the mountains: A unique research experience to enhance diversity in the geosciences. Journal of Geoscience Education, 58(2), 95–100. doi:10.5408/1.3534851
  • Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
  • Hilpert, J. C., Stempien, J., van der Hoeven Kraft, K. J., & Husman, J. (2013). Evidence for the latent factor structure of the MSLQ: A new conceptualization of an established questionnaire. SAGE open, 3(4), 2158244013510305. doi:10.1177/2158244013510305
  • Houlton, H. R. (2010). Academic provenance: Investigation of pathways that lead students into the geosciences (Dissertation). Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
  • Huntoon, J. E., & Lane, M. J. (2007). Diversity in the geosciences and successful strategies for increasing diversity. Journal of Geoscience Education, 55(6), 447–457. doi:10.5408/1089-9995-55.6.447
  • Huntoon, J. E., Tanenbaum, C., & Hodges, J. (2015). Increasing diversity in the geosciences. Eos, 96. doi:10.1029/2015EO025897
  • Jones, S. R., & McEwen, M. K. (2000). A conceptual model of multiple dimensions of identity. Journal of College Student development, 41(4), 405–414. doi:10.1353/csd.2007.0000
  • Kortz, K. M., & van der Hoeven Kraft, K. J. (2016). Geoscience education research project: Student benefits and effective design of a course-based undergraduate research experience. Journal of Geoscience Education, 64(1), 24–36. doi:10.5408/15-11.1
  • LaDue, N. D., & Pacheco, H. A. (2013). Critical experiences for field geologists: Emergent themes in interest development. Journal of Geoscience Education, 61(4), 428–436.
  • Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79–122. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027
  • Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (2002). Social cognitive career theory. Career Choice and Development, 4, 255–311.
  • Levine, R., González, R., Cole, S., Fuhrman, M., & Le Floch, K. C. (2007). The geoscience pipeline: A conceptual framework. Journal of Geoscience Education, 55(6), 458–468. doi:10.5408/1089-9995-55.6.458
  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry (Vol. 75). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Lopatto, D. (2004). Survey of undergraduate research experiences (SURE): First findings. Cell Biology Education, 3(4), 270–277. doi:10.1187/cbe.04-07-0045
  • McConnell, D. A., & van Der Hoeven Kraft, K. J. (2011). Affective domain and student learning in the geosciences. Journal of Geoscience Education, 59(3), 106–110. doi:10.5408/1.3604828
  • Mogk, D. W., & Goodwin, C. (2012). Learning in the field: Synthesis of research on thinking and learning in the geosciences. Geological Society of America Special Papers, 486, 131–163.
  • Multon, K. D., Brown, S. D., & Lent, R. W. (1991). Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38(1), 30. doi:10.1037//0022-0167.38.1.30
  • Osborn, J. M., & Karukstis, K. K. (2009). The benefits of undergraduate research, scholarship, and creative activity. In M. Boyd & J. Wesemann (Eds.), Broadening participation in undergraduate research: Fostering excellence and enhancing the impact (pp. 41–53). Washington, DC: Council on Undergraduate Research.
  • Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543–578. doi:10.3102/00346543066004543
  • Petcovic, H. L., Stokes, A., & Caulkins, J. L. (2014). Geoscientists’ perceptions of the value of undergraduate field education. GSA Today, 24(7), 4–10. doi:10.1130/GSATG196A.1
  • Pintrich, P. R. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) (Technical Report No. 91-B-004). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
  • Russell, S. H., Hancock, M. P., & McCullough, J. (2007). Benefits of undergraduate research experiences. Science (Washington), 316(5824), 548–549. doi:10.1126/science.1140384
  • Seymour, E., Hunter, A. B., Laursen, S. L., & DeAntoni, T. (2004). Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences: First findings from a three‐year study. Science Education, 88(4), 493–534. doi:10.1002/sce.10131
  • Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63–75. doi:10.3233/EFI-2004-22201
  • Stajkovic, A. D., & Luthans, F. (1998). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 240. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.240
  • Stokes, Levine, R., & Flessa, K. W. (2015). Choosing the geoscience major: Important factors, race/ethnicity, and gender. Journal of Geoscience Education, 63(3), 250–263. doi:10.5408/14-038.1
  • Stokes, A., & Boyle, A. P. (2009). The undergraduate geoscience fieldwork experience: Influencing factors and implications for learning. Field Geology Education: Historical Perspectives and Modern Approaches, 461, 291.
  • Streule, M., & Craig, L. (2016). Social learning theories—An important design consideration for geoscience fieldwork. Journal of Geoscience Education, 64(2), 101–107. doi:10.5408/15-119.1
  • van der Hoeven Kraft, K. J. (2017). Developing student interest: An overview of the research and implications for geoscience education research and teaching practice. Journal of Geoscience Education, 65(4), 594–603. doi:10.5408/16-215.1
  • van der Hoeven Kraft, K. J., Srogi, L., Husman, J., Semken, S., & Fuhrman, M. (2011). Engaging students to learn through the affective domain: A new framework for teaching in the geosciences. Journal of Geoscience Education, 59(2), 71–84. doi:10.5408/1.3543934a
  • Wilson, C. E. (2016). Status of the Geoscience Workforce 2016. Alexandria, VA: American Geosciences Institute.
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 82–91. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1016

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.