638
Views
21
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Examining shifts in preservice teachers’ beliefs and attitudes toward writing instruction

Pages 142-156 | Received 11 Feb 2015, Accepted 16 Jul 2015, Published online: 09 May 2016

References

  • Atwell, N. (1987). In the middle: Writing, reading, and learning with adolescents. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. New York, NY: General Learning Press.
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Worth Publishers.
  • Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
  • Bandura, A., & Schunk, D. (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 586–598. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.41.3.586
  • Batchelor, K. E., Morgan, D. N., Kidder-Brown, M. K., & Zimmerman, B. S. (2014). Investigating the unit of study approach as a way to teach writing to early childhood education preservice teachers. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 35(3), 276–289. doi:10.1080/10901027.2014.936073
  • Calkins, L. M. (1983). Lessons from a child: On the teaching and learning of writing. Exeter, NH: Heinemann.
  • Cho, H.-S., Kim, J., & Choi, D. H. (2003). Early childhood teachers’ attitudes toward science teaching: A scale validation study. Educational Research Quarterly, 27, 33–42.
  • Colby, S. A., & Stapleton, J. N. (2006). Preservice teachers teach writing: Implications for teacher educators. Reading Research and Instruction, 45(4), 353–376. doi:10.1080/19388070609558455
  • Coleman, D., & Pimentel, S. (2011). Publishers’ criteria for the Common Core state standards in English language arts and literacy, grades 3–12. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/assets/Publishers_Criteria_for_3-12.pdf
  • Cross, D. I. (2009). Alignment, cohesion, and change: Examining mathematics teachers’ belief structures and their influence on instructional practices. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12, 325–346. doi:10.1007/s10857-009-9120-5
  • Cutler, L., & Graham, S. (2008). Primary grade writing instruction: A national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 907–919. doi:10.1037/a0012656
  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). How teacher education matters. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(3), 166–173. doi:10.1177/0022487100051003002
  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Fletcher, R., & Portalupi, J. (2001). Writing workshop: The essential guide. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  • Fox, M., & Vivas, J. (1989). Wilfrid Gordon McDonald Partridge (1st American paperback [ed].). Brooklyn, NY: Kane/Miller Book Publishers.
  • Graham, S., Berninger, V., & Fan, W. (2007). The structural relationship between writing attitude and writing achievement in first and third grade students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 516–536. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.01.002
  • Graham, S., Bollinger, A., Booth Olson, C., D’Aoust, C., MacArthur, C., McCutchen, D., & Olinghouse, N. (2012). Teaching elementary school students to be effective writers: A practice guide (NCEE 2012- 4058). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/publications_reviews.aspx#pubsearch
  • Graham, S., Harris, K. R., Fink, B., & MacArthur, C. (2001). Teacher efficacy in writing: A construct validation with primary grade teachers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 177–202. doi:10.1207/S1532799Xssr0502_3
  • Graves, D. H. (1983). Writing: Teachers and children at work. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  • Grisham, D. L., & Wolsey, T. D. (2011). Writing instruction for teacher candidates: Strengthening a weak curricular area. Literacy Research and Instruction, 50, 348–364. doi:10.1080/19388071.2010.532581
  • Grossman, P., McDonald, M., Hammerness, K., & Ronfeldt, M. (2008). Dismantling dichotomies in teacher education. In M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman-Nemser, D. J. McIntyre, & K. E. Demers (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring questions in changing contexts (3rd ed., pp. 243–248). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Hall, A. H., & Grisham-Brown, J. (2011). Writing development over time: Examining preservice teachers’ attitudes and beliefs about writing. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 32, 148–158.
  • Hall, A. H., Toland, M. D., & Guo, Y. (in press). The Writing Attitude Scale for Teachers (WAST). International Journal of Quantitative Research in Education.
  • Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • McCarrier, A., Pinnell, G. S., & Fountas, I. C. (2000). Interactive writing: How language and literacy come together, K-2. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  • Mezirow, J. (1990). How critical reflection triggers transformative learning. In J. Mezirow (Ed.), Fostering critical reflection in adulthood (pp. 1–20). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  • Moore-Hart, M. A., & Carpenter, R. (2008, December). Improving preservice teachers’ attitudes toward writing: An avenue to enhanced instructional practices. Paper presented at the National Reading Conference, Orlando, FL.
  • Morgan, D. N. (2010). Preservice teachers as writers. Literacy Research and Instruction, 49, 352–365. doi:10.1080/19388070903296411
  • National Commission on Writing for America’s Families, Schools and Colleges. (2003). The neglected “R”: The need for a writing revolution. Retrieved from http://www.writingcommission.org
  • National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards for English language arts. Washington, DC: Authors.
  • Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook (Vol. 300). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Ng, W., Nicholas, H., & Williams, A. (2010). School experience influences on pre-service teachers’ evolving beliefs about effective teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 278–289. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.03.010
  • Norman, K. A., & Spencer, B. H. (2005). Our lives as writers: Examining preservice teachers’ experiences and beliefs about the nature of writing and writing instruction. Teacher Education Quarterly, 32(1), 25–40.
  • Ray, K. W., & Glover, M. (2008). Already ready. Nurturing writers in preschool and kindergarten. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  • Robinson, S. O., & Adkins, G. L. (2002). The effects of mathematics methods courses on preservice teachers’ attitudes towards mathematics and mathematics teaching. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED474445)
  • Saldaña, J. (2014). Thinking qualitatively: Methods of mind. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
  • Sheils, M. (1975). Why Johnny can’t write. Newsweek, 92(8), 58–65.
  • Street, C. (2003). Pre-service teachers’ attitudes about writing and learning to teach writing: Implications for teacher educators. Teacher Education Quarterly, 30(3), 33–50.
  • Tschannen-Moran, M., & McMaster, P. (2009). Sources of self-efficacy: Four professional development formats and their relationship to self-efficacy and implementation of a new teaching strategy. The Elementary School Journal, 110, 228–245. doi:10.1086/605771
  • Tulley, C. E. (2013). What are preservice teachers taught about the teaching of writing? A survey of Ohio’s undergraduate writing methods course. Teaching/Writing: The Journal of Writing Teacher Education, 2(1), 38–48.
  • Williams, T. L., & Baumann, J. F. (2008). Contemporary research on effective elementary teachers. In Y. Kim, V. J. Risko, D. L. Compton, D. K. Dickinson, M. K. Hundley, R. T. Jimenez … D. W. Rowe (Eds.), 57th yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 357–372). Oak Creek, WI: National Reading Conference.
  • Zimmerman, B. S., Morgan, D. N., & Kidder-Brown, M. K. (2014). The use of conceptual and pedagogical tools as mediators of preservice teachers’ perceptions of self as writers and future teachers of writing. Action in Teacher Education, 36(2), 141–156. doi:10.1080/01626620.2014.898598

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.