References
- Anderson, A., & Lynch, T. (1988). Listening. London: Oxford University Press.
- Anderson, J. R. (1995). Cognitive psychology and its implications. New York, NY: Freeman.
- Benson, M. J. (1994). Lecture listening in an ethnographic perspective. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic listening: Research perspectives (pp. 181–198). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139524612.015
- Brown, G. (2008). Selective listening. System: an International Journal of Educational Technology and Applied Linguistics, 36, 10–21. doi:10.1016/j.system.2007.11.002
- Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
- Brown, J. D., & Rodgers, T. S. (2002). Doing second language research. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
- Buck, G. (1991). The testing of listening comprehension: An introspective study. Language Testing, 8, 67–91. doi:10.1177/026553229100800105
- Buck, G. (1992). Listening comprehension: Construct validity and trait characteristics. Language Learning, 42, 313–357. doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1992.tb01339.x
- Buck, G. (2001). Assessing Listening. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
- Carroll, J. B. (1972). Defining language comprehension: Some speculations. In R. O. Freedle & J. B. Carroll (Eds.), Language comprehension and the acquisition of knowledge (pp. 1–29). Washington, DC: Winston.
- Clark, H. H., & Clark, E. V. (1977). Psychology and language: An introduction to psycholinguistics. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
- Coniam, D. (1993). Co-text or no-text? A study of an adapted cloze technique for testing comprehension/summary skills. Hong Kong Papers in Linguistics and Language Teaching, 16, 1–10.
- Courchêne, R., & Bayliss, D. (1995). Summary cloze: What is it? What does it measure? In R. Courchêne, S. Burger, C. Cornaire, R. LeBlanc, S. Paribakht, & H. Seguin (Eds.), Twenty-five years of second language teaching at the University of Ottawa (pp. 305–327). Ottawa, Ontario: Second Language Institute, University of Ottawa.
- Cumming, A., Laia, C., & Cho, H. (2016). Students’ writing from sources for academic purposes: A synthesis of recent research. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 23, 47–58. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2016.06.002
- Deroey, K. L. B. (2015). Marking importance in lectures: Interactive and textual orientation. Applied Linguistics, 36, 51–72. doi:10.1093/applin/amt029
- Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Faerch, G., & Kasper, G. (1983). Strategies in interlanguage communication. London, England: Longman.
- Field, J. (2009). A cognitive validation of the lecture-listening component of the IELTS listening paper. In P. Thompson (Ed.), International English Language Testing System: volume 9: Research reports 2009. British Council/IELTS Australia/ Cambridge ESOL, England.
- Field, J. (2011). Into the mind of the academic listener. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10, 102–112. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2011.04.002
- Field, J. (2013). Cognitive validity. In A. Geranpayeh & L. Taylor (Eds.), Examining listening (pp. 77–151). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
- Flowerdew, J. (1994). Research of relevance to second language lecture comprehension-an overview. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic listening: Research perspectives (pp. 7–29). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139524612.004
- Gellert, A., & Elbro, C. (2013). Cloze tests may be quick, but are they dirty? Development and preliminary validation of a cloze test of reading comprehension. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 31, 16–28. doi:10.1177/0734282912451971
- Goh, C. (2005). Second language listening expertise. In K. Johnson (Ed.), Expertise in second language learning and teaching (pp. 64–84). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9780230523470_4
- Goh, C. (2010). Listening as process: Learning activities for self-appraisal and self-regulation. In N. Harwood (Ed.), Materials in ELT: Theory and practice (pp. 179–206). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
- Greene, B. B. (2001). Testing reading comprehension of theoretical discourse with Cloze. Journal of Research in Reading, 24, 82–98. doi:10.1111/1467-9817.00134
- Hansen, C., & Jensen, C. (1994). Evaluating lecture comprehension. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic listening: Research perspectives (pp. 241–268). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139524612.019
- Hulstijn, J. (2010, April). Basic language cognition and the construct of language proficiency: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. Paper presented at the 32nd Language Testing Research Colloquium, (LTRC), Cambridge.
- Hyon, S. (1997). Models of lecture discourse: Applications for academic listening and future research directions. Colloquium on academic listening within the EAP curriculum. Washington, DC: Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse.
- Jin, Y., & Fan, J. (2011). Test for English majors (TEM) in China. Language Testing, 28, 589–596. doi:10.1177/0265532211414852
- Jung, E. H. (2003). The role of discourse signaling cues in second language listening comprehension. Modern Language Journal, 87, 562–577. doi:10.1111/1540-4781.00208
- Kiely, R. N. (2004). Learning to critique in EAP. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 3, 211–227. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2003.11.004
- Kintsch, W., & Kozminsky, E. (1977). Summarizing stories after reading and listening. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 491–499. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.69.5.491
- Kintsch, W., & Van Dijk, T. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363–394. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.85.5.363
- Lee, J. J. (2009). Size matters: An exploratory comparison of small- and large-class university lecture introductions. English for Specific Purposes, 28, 42–57. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2008.11.001
- Lewkowicz, J. A. (1992). Testing listening comprehension using listening summary cloze. JALT Journal, 14, 7–22.
- Lynch, T. (2004). Study listening: A course in listening to lectures and note-taking. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
- Lynch, T. (2006). Academic listening: Marrying top and bottom. In E. Usó-Juan & A. Martinez-Flor (Eds.), Current trends in the development and teaching of the four language skills (pp. 91–110). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
- Lynch, T. (2011). Academic listening in the 21st century: Reviewing a decade of research. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10, 79–88. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2011.03.001
- NACFLT. (2004). Syllabus for TEM8. Shanghai, China: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
- Pashler, H., & Johnson, J. C. (1998). Attentional limitations in dual task performance. In H. Pashler (Ed.), Attention (pp. 155–189). Hove, England: Psychology Press.
- Richards, J. C. (1983). Listening comprehension: Approach, design, procedure. TESOL Quarterly, 17, 219–240. doi:10.2307/3586651
- Rost, M. (1990). Listening in language learning. London, England: Longman.
- Rost, M. (1994). Online summaries as representations of lecture understanding. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic listening: Research perspectives (pp. 93–127). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139524612.009
- Rowley-Jolivet, E. (2002). Visual discourse in scientific conference papers: A genre-based study. English for Specific Purposes, 21, 19–40. doi:10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00024-7
- Shang, H. (2005). An investigation of cognitive operations on L2 listening comprehension performance: An exploratory study. International Journal of Listening, 19, 51–62. doi:10.1080/10904018.2005.10499074
- Storey, P. (1997). Examining the test-taking process: A cognitive perspective on the discourse cloze test. Language Testing, 14, 214–231. doi:10.1177/026553229701400205
- Taylor, L. (2013). Testing reading through summary: Investigating summary completion tasks for assessing reading comprehension ability. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
- Taylor, L., & Geranpayeh, A. (2011). Assessing listening for academic purposes: Defining and operationalizing the test construct. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10, 89–101. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2011.03.002
- Tyler, A. (1992). Discourse structuring and the perception of incoherence in international teaching assistants’ spoken discourse. TESOL Quarterly, 26, 713–729. doi:10.2307/3586870
- Vandergrift, L. (2007). Recent developments in second and foreign language listening comprehension research. Language Teaching, 40, 191–210. doi:10.1017/S0261444807004338
- Waggoner, M. (1984). The new technologies versus the lecture tradition in higher education: Is change possible? Educational Technology, 24, 7–12.
- Young, L. (1994). University lectures—Macro-structure and micro-features. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic listening: Research perspectives (pp. 159–176). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139524612.013
- Yu, G. (2005). Towards a model of using summarization tasks as a measure of reading comprehension. Unpublished PhD Dissertation. Bristol, England: University of Bristol
- Yu, G. (2013). The use of summarization tasks: Some lexical and conceptual analyses. Language Assessment Quarterly, 10, 96–109. doi:10.1080/15434303.2012.750659
- Zou, S. (2004). How to achieve interactiveness in listening tests-designing the new TEM-8 listening subtest. Computer-Assisted Foreign Language Education, 12, 33–37. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-5795.2004.06.007