1,705
Views
27
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Internal quality of coated eggs with soy protein isolate and montmorillonite: Effects of storage conditions

, , , , &
Pages 1921-1934 | Received 09 Mar 2016, Accepted 11 Aug 2016, Published online: 28 Dec 2016

References

  • Freeland-Graves, J.H.; Peckman, G.C. Eggs. Foundation of Food Preparation. Macmillan Publishing Company: New York, 1987, 415–440.
  • Lucisano, M.; Hidalgo, A.; Comelli, E.M.; Rossi, M. Evolution of Chemical and Physical Albumen Characteristics During the Storage of Shell Eggs. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 1996, 44(5), 1235–1240.
  • Stadelman, W.J. The Preservation of Quality in Shell Eggs. Egg Science and Technology Press: Macmillan Education, UK, 1986.
  • Stadelman, W.J. Quality Identification of Shell Eggs. Egg Science and Technology Press: Macmillan Education, UK, 1986.
  • Kim, S.H.; No, H.K.; Prinyawiwatkul, W. Effect of Molecular Weight, Type of Chitosan, and Chitosan Solution pH on the Shelf‐Life and Quality of Coated Eggs. Journal of Food Science 2007, 72(1), S044–S048.
  • Xie, L.; Hettiarachchy, N.S.; Ju, Z.Y.; Meullenet, J.; Wang, H.; Slavik, M.F.; Janes, M.E. Edible Film Coating to Minimize Eggshell Breakage and Reduce Post‐Wash Bacterial Contamination Measured by Dye Penetration in Eggs. Journal of Food Science 2002, 67(1), 280–284.
  • Kim, K.; Daeschel, M.; Zhao, Y. Edible Coatings for Enhancing Microbial Safety and Extending Shelf Life of Hard‐Boiled Eggs. Journal of Food Science 2008, 73(5), M227–M235.
  • Jirangrat, W. Effects of Mineral Oil Coating on Internal Quality of Chicken Eggs Under Refrigerated Storage. International Journal of Food Science & Technology 2010, 45(3), 490–495.
  • Wardy, W. Chitosan-Soybean Oil Emulsion Coating Affects Physico-Functional and Sensory Quality of Eggs During Storage. LWT–Food Science and Technology 2011, 44(10), 2349–2355.
  • Nongtaodum, S. Oil Coating Affects Internal Quality and Sensory Acceptance of Selected Attributes of Raw Eggs During Storage. Journal of Food Science 2013, 78(2), S329–S335.
  • Caner, C. Whey Protein Isolate Coating and Concentration Effects on Egg Shelf Life. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 2005, 85(13), 2143–2148.
  • Meyer, R.; Spencer, J.V. The Effect of Various Coatings on Shell Strength and Egg Quality. Poultry Science 1973, 52(2), 703–711.
  • Rhim, J.W.; Weller, C.L.; Gennadios, A. Effects of Soy Protein Coating on Shell Strength and Quality of Shell Eggs. Food Science and Biotechnology 2004, 13(4), 455–459.
  • Wong, Y.; Herald, T.; Hachmeister, K. Evaluation of Mechanical and Barrier Properties of Protein Coatings on Shell Eggs. Poultry Science 1996, 75(3), 417–422.
  • Park, S. Mechanical Properties and Water-Vapor Permeability of Soy-Protein Films Affected by Calcium Salts and Glucono-δ-Lactone. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2001, 49(5), 2308–2312.
  • Chiou, B.S. Extruded Starch–Nanoclay Nanocomposites: Effects of Glycerol and Nanoclay Concentration. Polymer Engineering & Science 2007, 47(11), 1898–1904.
  • Cyras, V.P. Physical and Mechanical Properties of Thermoplastic Starch/Montmorillonite Nanocomposite Films. Carbohydrate Polymers 2008, 73(1), 55–63.
  • Kumar, P.; Sandeep, K.P.; Alavi, S.; Truong, V.D.; Gorga, R.E. Preparation and Characterization of Bio-Nanocomposite Films Based on Soy Protein Isolate and Montmorillonite Using Melt Extrusion. Journal of Food Engineering 2010, 100(3), 480–489.
  • Lee, H.H.; Hong, S.I.; Kim, D. Microbiological and Visual Quality of Fresh-Cut Cabbage As Affected by Packaging Treatments. Food Science and Biotechnology 2011, 20(1), 229–235.
  • Lee, S.; No, H.; Jeong, Y. Effect of Chitosan Coating on Quality of Egg During Storage. Journal of the Korean Society of Food and Nutrition (Korea Republic) 1996 25(2), 288–293.
  • Wardy, W. Viscosity Changes of Chitosan Solution Affect Physico-Functional Properties and Consumer Perception of Coated Eggs During Storage. LWT–Food Science and Technology 2014, 55(1), 67–73.
  • Suppakul, P.; Jutakorn, K.; Bangchokedee, Y. Efficacy of Cellulose-Based Coating on Enhancing the Shelf Life of Fresh Eggs. Journal of Food Engineering 2010, 98(2), 207–213.
  • Garnjanagoonchorn, W. Eggs and Egg Products. Food Science and Technology 1996, 449(127C), 230–242.
  • Suresh, P.V.; Raj, K.R.; Nidheesh, T.; Pal, G.K.; Sakhare, P.Z. Application of Chitosan for Improvement of Quality and Shelf Life of Table Eggs Under Tropical Room Conditions. Journal of Food Science And Technology 2015, 52(10), 6345–6354.
  • Leleu, S.; Herman, L.; Heyndrickx, M.; De, R.K.; Michiels, C.W.; De Baerdemaeker, J.; Messens, W. Effects on Salmonella Shell Contamination and Trans-Shell Penetration of Coating Hens’ Eggs with Chitosan. International Journal of Food Microbiology 2011, 145(1), 43–48.
  • Zhang, H.J.; Wang, S.N.; Zheng, X.Z.; Jiang, L.Z.; Lv, X.P.; Shi, Y.J.; Li, L. Effect of Glycosylation on the Mechanical Properties of Edible Soy Protein Packaging Film. European Food Research and Technology 2014, 238(6), 1049–1055.
  • Figueiredo, T.C.; Assis, D.C.S.; Menezes, L.D.M.; Oliveira, D.D.; Lima, A.L.; Souza, M.R.; Heneine, L.G.D.; Cancado, S.V. Effects of Packaging, Mineral Oil Coating, and Storage Time on Biogenic Amine Levels and Internal Quality of Eggs. Poultry Science 2014, 93(12), 3171–3178.
  • Echeverría, I.; Eisenberg, P.; Mauri, A.N. Nanocomposites Films Based on Soy Proteins and Montmorillonite Processed by Casting. Journal of Membrane Science 2014, 449, 15–26.
  • Lee, J.E.; Kim, K.M. Characteristics of Soy Protein Isolate-Montmorillonite Composite Films. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 2010, 118(4), 2257–2263.
  • Bhale, S.; No, H.K.; Prinyawiwatkul, W.; Farr, A.J.; Nadarajah, K.; Meyers, S.P. Chitosan Coating Improves Shelf Life of Eggs. Journal of Food 2003, 68(7), 2378–2383.
  • Caner, C. The Effect of Edible Eggshell Coatings on Egg Quality and Consumer Perception. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 2005, 85(11), 1897–1902.
  • Yuceer, M.; Caner, C. Antimicrobial Lysozyme–Chitosan Coatings Affect Functional Properties and Shelf Life of Chicken Eggs During Storage. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 2014, 94(1), 153–162.
  • Herald, T.J.; Gnanasambandam, R.; McGuire, B.H.; Hachmeister, K.A. Degradable Wheat Gluten Films: Preparation, Properties and Applications. Journal of Food Science 1995, 60(5), 1147–1150.
  • Mountney, G. Reduced Sodium Usage in Poultry Muscle Foods. Food Technology 1976, 7, 60.
  • Wardy, W.; Torrico, D.D.; Corredor, J.A.H.; No, H.K.; Zhang, X.M.; Xu, Z.M.; Prinyawiwatkul, W. Soybean Oil-Chitosan Emulsion Affects Internal Quality and Shelf-Life Of Eggs Stored at 25 and 4 Degrees C. International Journal of Food Science and Technology 2013, 48(6), 1148–1156.
  • Keener, K.; LaCrosse, J.; Babson, J. Chemical Method for Determination of Carbon Dioxide Content in Egg Yolk and Egg Albumen. Poultry Science 2001, 80(7), 983–987.
  • Wardy, W.; Torrico, D.D.; No, H.K.; Prinyawiwatkul, W. Edible Coating Affects Physico‐Functional Properties and Shelf Life of Chicken Eggs During Refrigerated and Room Temperature Storage. International Journal of Food Science & Technology 2010, 45(12), 2659–2668.
  • Biladeau, A.; Keener, K. The Effects of Edible Coatings on Chicken Egg Quality Under Refrigerated Storage. Poultry Science 2009, 88(6), 1266–1274.
  • Torrico, D.D.; No, H.K.; Prinyawiwatkul, W.; Janes, M.; Corredor, J.A.H.; Osorio, L.F. Mineral Oil–Chitosan Emulsion Coatings Affect Quality and Shelf‐Life of Coated Eggs During Refrigerated and Room Temperature Storage. Journal of Food Science 2011, 76(4), S262–S268.
  • Rhim, J.-W.; Hong, S.-I.; Park, H.-M.; Ng, P.K. Preparation and Characterization of Chitosan-Based Nanocomposite Films with Antimicrobial Activity. Journal of Agricultural & Food Chemistry 2006, 54(16), 5814–5822.
  • Zeng, Q.H.; Yu, A.B.; Lu, G.Q.; Paul, D.R. Clay-Based Polymer Nanocomposites: Research and Commercial Development. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology 2005, 5, 1574–1592.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.