2,160
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

A descriptive sensory evaluation of edible insects in Czechia: do the species and size matter?

, , &
Pages 218-230 | Received 13 Sep 2022, Accepted 16 Dec 2022, Published online: 28 Dec 2022

References

  • Oonincx, D. G. A. B.; Finke, M. D. Nutritional Value of Insects and Ways to Manipulate Their Composition. J. Insects Food Feed. 2021, 7(5), 639–659. DOI: 10.3920/jiff2020.0050.
  • Mlček, J.; Adámková, A.; Adámek, M.; Borkovcová, M.; Bednářová, M.; Knížková, I. Fat from Tenebrionidae Bugs – Sterols Content, Fatty Acid Profiles, and Cardiovascular Risk Indexes. Pol. J. Food Nutr. Sci. 2019, 69(3), 247–254. DOI: 10.31883/PJFNS/109666.
  • Oonincx, D. G. A. B.; Laurent, S.; Veenenbos, M. E.; van Loon, J. J. A. Dietary Enrichment of Edible Insects with Omega 3 Fatty Acids. Insect Sci. 2020, 1744–7917.12669. DOI: 10.1111/1744-7917.12669.
  • van Huis, A. Edible Insects: Challenges and Prospects. Entomol. Res. 2022, 52(4), 161–177. DOI: 10.1111/1748-5967.12582.
  • Jongema, Y. List of edible insects of the world. Table, Lab. Entomol., Wageningen Univ., Neth https://www.wur.nl/en/Research-Results/Chair-groups/Plant-Sciences/Laboratoryof-Entomology/Edible-insects/Worldwide-species-list.htm. 2019.
  • Belluco, S.; Halloran, A.; Ricci, A. New Protein Sources and Food Legislation: The Case of Edible Insects and EU Law. Food Secur. 2017, 9(4), 803–814. DOI: 10.1007/S12571-017-0704-0/FIGURES/1.
  • Mlcek, J.; Rop, O.; Borkovcova, M.; Bednarova, M. A Comprehensive Look at the Possibilities of Edible Insects as Food in Europe - A Review. Pol. J. Food Nutr. Sci. 2014, 64(3), 147–157. DOI: 10.2478/v10222-012-0099-8.
  • Mancini, S.; Moruzzo, R.; Riccioli, F.; Paci, G. European Consumers’ Readiness to Adopt Insects as Food. A Review. Food Res. Int. 2019, 122, 661–678. DOI: 10.1016/J.FOODRES.2019.01.041.
  • Kulma, M.; Tumová, V.; Fialová, A.; Kouřimská, L. Insect Consumption in the Czech Republic: What the Eye Does Not See, the Heart Does Not Grieve Over. J. Insects Food Feed. 2020, 6(5), 525–535. DOI: 10.3920/JIFF2020.0020.
  • Orsi, L.; Voege, L. L.; Stranieri, S. Eating Edible Insects as Sustainable Food? Exploring the Determinants of Consumer Acceptance in Germany. Food Res. Int. 2019, 125, 108573. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108573.
  • Zielińska, E.; Zieliński, D.; Karaś, M.; Jakubczyk, A. Exploration of Consumer Acceptance of Insects as Food in Poland. J. Insects Food Feed. 2020, 6(4), 383–392. DOI: 10.3920/JIFF2019.0055.
  • House, J. Consumer Acceptance of Insect-Based Foods in the Netherlands: Academic and Commercial Implications. Appetite. 2016, 107, 47–58. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.07.023.
  • Ardoin, R.; Prinyawiwatkul, W. Consumer Perceptions of Insect Consumption: A Review of Western Research since 2015. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 56(10), 4942–4958. DOI: 10.1111/IJFS.15167.
  • Lombardi, A.; Vecchio, R.; Borrello, M.; Caracciolo, F.; Cembalo, L. Willingness to Pay for Insect-Based Food: The Role of Information and Carrier. Food. Qual. Prefer. 2019, 72, 177–187. DOI: 10.1016/J.FOODQUAL.2018.10.001.
  • van Huis, A. Edible Insects Contributing to Food Security? Agric. Food Secur. 2015, 4(1), 1–9. DOI: 10.1186/s40066-015-0041-5.
  • Kröger, T.; Dupont, J.; Büsing, L.; Fiebelkorn, F. Acceptance of Insect-Based Food Products in Western Societies: A Systematic Review. Front Nutr. 2022, 8, 759885. DOI: 10.3389/FNUT.2021.759885/FULL.
  • Adamczyk, D.; Modlinska, K.; Maison, D.; Goncikowska, K.; Ekström, S. S.; Pisula, W. Creepy Crawlies or Beauty Queens? The Effect of Type of Insect on the Evaluation of Foods Containing Insects. Journal of Insects as Food and Feed. 2022, 1–18. DOI: 10.3920/JIFF2022.0007.
  • Kulma, M.; Kouřimská, L.; Homolková, D.; Božik, M.; Plachý, V.; Vrabec, V. Effect of Developmental Stage on the Nutritional Value of Edible Insects. A Case Study with Blaberus Craniifer and Zophobas Morio. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2020, 92, 1035702. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfca.2020.103570.
  • Schmidt, A.; Call, L. M.; Macheiner, L.; Mayer, H. K. Determination of Vitamin B 12 in Four Edible Insect Species by Immunoaffinity and Ultra-High Performance Liquid Chromatography. Food Chem. 2019, 281, 124–129. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.12.039.
  • Soares Araújo, R. R.; Dos Santos Benfica, T. A. R.; Ferraz, V. P.; Moreira Santos, E. Nutritional Composition of Insects Gryllus Assimilis and Zophobas Morio: Potential Foods Harvested in Brazil. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2019, 76, 22–26. DOI: 10.1016/J.JFCA.2018.11.005.
  • Yi, L.; Lakemond, C. M. M.; Sagis, L. M. C.; Eisner-Schadler, V.; van Huis, A.; van Boekel, M. A. J. S. Extraction and Characterisation of Protein Fractions from Five Insect Species. Food Chem. 2013, 141(4), 3341–3348. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.05.115.
  • ISO 8589. General Guidance for the Design of Test Rooms; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, 2007.
  • ISO 8586. Sensory Analysis. General Guidelines for the Selection, Training, and Monitoring of Selected Assessors and Expert Sensory Assessors; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, 2012.
  • ISO 13299. Sensory Analysis – Methodology – General Guidance for Establishing a Sensory Profile; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, 2016.
  • ISO 5495. Sensory Analysis — Methodology — Paired Comparison Test; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, 2005.
  • ISO 8587. Sensory Analysis-Methodology-Ranking; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, 2006.
  • Melgaard, C.; Civille, G.; Carr, B. Sensory Evaluation Techniques; Taylor & Francis Group: Boca Raton, 2016.
  • Mishyna, M.; Chen, J.; Benjamin, O. Sensory Attributes of Edible Insects and Insect-Based Foods – Future Outlooks for Enhancing Consumer Appeal. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 95, 141–148. DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2019.11.016.
  • Ghosh, S.; Jung, C.; Meyer-Rochow, V. B. What Governs Selection and Acceptance of Edible Insect Species?. Edible Insects in Sustainable Food Systems Halloran A, Flore R, Vantomme P, Roos N. 2018 (Cham: Springer), 331–351. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-74011-9_20/COVER.
  • Meyer-Rochow, V. B.; Gahukar, R. T.; Ghosh, S.; Jung, C. Chemical Composition, Nutrient Quality and Acceptability of Edible Insects are Affected by Species, Developmental Stage, Gender, Diet, and Processing Method. Foods 2021. 2021, 10, 1036. DOI: 10.3390/FOODS10051036.
  • Turck, D.; Castenmiller, J.; de Henauw, S.; Hirsch-Ernst, K.; Kearney, J.; Maciuk, A.; Mangelsdorf, I.; McArdle, H.; Naska, A.; Pelaez, C., et al. Safety of Frozen and Dried Formulations from Migratory Locust (Locusta Migratoria) as a Novel Food Pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2015/2283. EFSA J. 2021, 19, 7. DOI: 10.2903/J.EFSA.2021.6667.
  • Turck, D.; Bohn, T.; Castenmiller, J.; de Henauw, S.; Hirsch-Ernst, K.; Maciuk, A.; Mangelsdorf, I.; McArdle, H.; Naska, A.; Pelaez, C., et al. Safety of Frozen and Dried Formulations from Whole House Crickets (Acheta Domesticus) as a Novel Food Pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2015/2283. EFSA J. 2021, 19, 8. DOI: 10.2903/J.EFSA.2021.6779.
  • Turck, D.; Castenmiller, J.; de Henauw, S.; Hirsch-Ernst, K.; Kearney, J.; Maciuk, A.; Mangelsdorf, I.; McArdle, H.; Naska, A.; Pelaez, C., et al. Safety of Dried Yellow Mealworm (Tenebrio Molitor Larva) as a Novel Food Pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2015/2283. EFSA J. 2021, 19, 1. DOI: 10.2903/J.EFSA.2021.6343.
  • Wilkinson, K.; Muhlhausler, B.; Motley, C.; Crump, A.; Bray, H.; Ankeny, R. Australian Consumers’ Awareness and Acceptance of Insects as Food. Insects. 2018, 9(2), 44. DOI: 10.3390/insects9020044.
  • Dion-Poulin, A.; Turcotte, M.; Lee-Blouin, S.; Perreault, V.; Provencher, V.; Doyen, A.; Turgeon, S. L. Acceptability of Insect Ingredients by Innovative Student Chefs: An Exploratory Study. Int. J. Gastron. Food. Sci. 2021, 24, 100362. DOI: 10.1016/J.IJGFS.2021.100362.
  • Meyer-Rochow, V. B.; Hakko, H. Can Edible Grasshoppers and Silkworm Pupae Be Tasted by Humans When Prevented to See and Smell These Insects? J. Asia. Pac. Entomol. 2018, 21(2), 616–619. DOI: 10.1016/J.ASPEN.2018.04.002.
  • Grabowski, T. N.; Chhay, T.; Lertpatarakomol, R.; Mitchaothai, J.; Keo, S.; Plötz, M. Sensorial Properties of Raw and Heated, Fresh and Spoiled Mediterranean Crickets (Gryllus Bimaculatus). In INSECTA 2022 International Conference Book of Abstracts, Giessen; Durek, J., Ojha, S., Schlüter, O. K., Hadjiali, S., Piofczyk, T., Bothe, S., Eds.; Leibniz Institute for Agricultural Engineering and Bioeconomy (ATB): Postdam, 2022; p 65.
  • Mandolesi, S.; Naspetti, S.; Zanoli, R. Exploring Edible Insects’ Acceptance through Subjective Perceptions: A Visual Q Study. J. Insects Food Feed. 2022, 8(5), 565–577. DOI: 10.3920/JIFF2021.0016/SUPPL_FILE/JIFF2021.0016_ESM.PDF.
  • Tuccillo, F.; Marino, M. G.; Torri, L. Italian Consumers’ Attitudes Towards Entomophagy: Influence of Human Factors and Properties of Insects and Insect-Based Food. Food Res. Int. 2020, 137, 109619. DOI: 10.1016/J.FOODRES.2020.109619.
  • Piha, S.; Pohjanheimo, T.; Lähteenmäki-Uutela, A.; Křečková, Z.; Otterbring, T. The Effects of Consumer Knowledge on the Willingness to Buy Insect Food: An Exploratory Cross-Regional Study in Northern and Central Europe. Food. Qual. Prefer. 2018, 70, 1–10. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.12.006.
  • Kouřimská, L.; Kotrbová, V.; Kulma, M.; Adámková, A.; Mlček, J.; Sabolová, M.; Homolková, D. Attitude of Assessors in the Czech Republic to the Consumption of House Cricket Acheta Domestica L. – A Preliminary Study. Czech J. Food Sci. 2020, 38(1), 72–76. DOI: 10.17221/49/2019-CJFS.
  • Makkar, H. P. S.; Tran, G.; Heuzé, V.; Ankers, P. State-of-the-Art on Use of Insects as Animal Feed. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2014, 197, 1–33. DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.07.008.
  • Caparros Megido, R.; Sablon, L.; Geuens, M.; Brostaux, Y.; Alabi, T.; Blecker, C.; Drugmand, D.; Haubruge, É.; Francis, F. Edible Insects Acceptance by Belgian Consumers: Promising Attitude for Entomophagy Development. J. Sens. Stud. 2014, 29(1), 14–20. DOI: 10.1111/joss.12077.
  • Żołnierczyk, A. K.; Szumny, A. Sensory and Chemical Characteristic of Two Insect Species: Tenebrio Molitor and Zophobas Morio Larvae Affected by Roasting Processes. Molecules. 2021, 26(9), 2697. DOI: 10.3390/MOLECULES26092697.
  • la Barbera, F.; Verneau, F.; Amato, M.; Grunert, K. Understanding Westerners’ Disgust for the Eating of Insects: The Role of Food Neophobia and Implicit Associations. Food. Qual. Prefer. 2018, 64, 120–125. DOI: 10.1016/J.FOODQUAL.2017.10.002.
  • Kowalski, S.; Mikulec, A.; Mickowska, B.; Skotnicka, M.; Mazurek, A. Wheat Bread Supplementation with Various Edible Insect Flours. Influence of Chemical Composition on Nutritional and Technological Aspects. LWT. 2022, 159, 113220. DOI: 10.1016/J.LWT.2022.113220.
  • de Oliveira, L. M.; da Silva Lucas, A. J.; Cadaval, C. L.; Mellado, M. S. Bread Enriched with Flour from Cinereous Cockroach (Nauphoeta Cinerea). Innovative Food Sci. Emerging Technol. 2017, 44, 30–35. DOI: 10.1016/j.ifset.2017.08.015.
  • Mafu, A.; Ketnawa, S.; Phongthai, S.; Schönlechner, R.; Rawdkuen, S. Whole Wheat Bread Enriched with Cricket Powder as an Alternative Protein. Foods. 2022, 11(14), 2142. DOI: 10.3390/FOODS11142142.
  • Dutcosky, S. D. Sensory Analysis of Foods, 3. ed.; Editora Universitária Champagnat: Curitiba, 2011.
  • Osimani, A.; Milanović, V.; Cardinali, F.; Roncolini, A.; Garofalo, C.; Clementi, F.; Pasquini, M.; Mozzon, M.; Foligni, R.; Raffaelli, N., et al. Bread Enriched with Cricket Powder (Acheta Domesticus): A Technological, Microbiological and Nutritional Evaluation. Innovative Food Sci. Emerging Technol. 2018, 48, 150–163. DOI: 10.1016/J.IFSET.2018.06.007.
  • Roncolini, A.; Milanović, V.; Cardinali, F.; Osimani, A.; Garofalo, C.; Sabbatini, R.; Clementi, F.; Pasquini, M.; Mozzon, M.; Foligni, R., et al. Protein Fortification with Mealworm (Tenebrio Molitor L.) Powder: Effect on Textural, Microbiological, Nutritional and Sensory Features of Bread. PLoS One.2019, 14(2), e0211747. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211747.
  • Bawa, M.; Songsermpong, S.; Kaewtapee, C.; Chanput, W. N. Sensory, and Texture Quality of Bread and Cookie Enriched with House Cricket (Acheta Domesticus) Powder. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2020, 44(8), e14601. DOI: 10.1111/JFPP.14601.
  • Althwab, S. A.; Alhomaid, R. M.; Ali, R. F. M.; Mohammed El-Anany, A.; Mousa, H. M. Effect of Migratory Locust (Locusta Migratoria) Powder Incorporation on Nutritional and Sensorial Properties of Wheat Flour Bread. Br. Food J. 2021, 123(11), 3576–3591. DOI: 10.1108/BFJ-11-2020-1052/FULL/XML.
  • Castro Delgado, M.; Chambers, E.; Carbonell-Barrachina, A.; Noguera Artiaga, L.; Vidal Quintanar, R.; Burgos Hernandez, A. Consumer Acceptability in the USA, Mexico, and Spain of Chocolate Chip Cookies Made with Partial Insect Powder Replacement. J. Food Sci. 2020, 85(6), 1621–1628. DOI: 10.1111/1750-3841.15175.
  • Min, K.-T.; Kang, M.-S.; Kim, M.-J.; Lee, S.-H.; Han, J.-S.; Kim, A.-J. Manufacture and Quality Evaluation of Cookies Prepared with Mealworm (Tenebrio Molitor) Powder. Korean J. Food Nutr. 2016, 29(1), 12–18. DOI: 10.9799/KSFAN.2016.29.1.012.
  • Lucchese-Cheung, T.; Kluwe de Aguiar, L. A.; Spers, E. E.; De lima, L. M. The Brazilians’ Sensorial Perceptions for Novel Food – Cookies with Insect Protein. J. Insects Food Feed. 2021, 7(3), 287–299. DOI: 10.3920/JIFF2020.0080.
  • Çabuk, B. Influence of Grasshopper (Locusta Migratoria) and Mealworm (Tenebrio Molitor) Powders on the Quality Characteristics of Protein Rich Muffins: Nutritional, Physicochemical, Textural and Sensory Aspects. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2021, 15(4), 3862–3872. DOI: 10.1007/S11694-021-00967-X/FIGURES/4.