Conceptualizing Perseverance in Problem Solving as Collective Enterprise

References

• Altshuler, R., & Kassinove, H. (1975). The effects of skill and chance instructional sets, schedule of reinforcement, and sex on children’s temporal persistence. Child Development, 46, 258–262. doi:10.2307/1128861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angier, C., & Povey, H. (1999). One teacher and a class of school students: Their perception of the culture of their mathematics classroom and its construction. Educational Review, 51(2), 147–160. doi:10.1080/00131919997588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barron, B. (2000). Achieving coordination in collaborative problem-solving groups. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(4), 403–436. doi:10.1207/S15327809JLS0904_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(3), 307–359. doi:10.1207/S15327809JLS1203_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bass, H., & Ball, D. L. (2015). Beyond “You can do it!”: Developing mathematical perseverance in elementary school. Retrieved from www.spencer.org
   Google Scholar
• Berry, R. Q., III, & Thunder, K. (2015). Black learners’ perseverance with mathematics: A qualitative metasynthesis. Retrieved from www.spencer.org
   Google Scholar
• Boaler, J. (2008). Promoting ‘relational equity’ and high mathematics achievement through an innovative mixed-ability approach. British Educational Research Journal, 34(2), 167–194. doi:10.1080/01411920701532145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boaler, J. (2009). The elephant in the classroom: Helping children learn & love maths. London, UK: Souvenir Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boaler, J. (2015). What’s math got to do with it?: How teachers and parents can transform mathematics learning and inspire success. New York, NY: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Boaler, J., & Sengupta-Irving, T. (2016). The many colors of algebra: The impact of equity focused teaching upon student learning and engagement. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 41, 179–190. doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2015.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boaler, J., & Staples, M. (2008). Creating mathematical futures through an equitable teaching approach: The case of Railside School. The Teachers College Record, 110(3), 608–645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briggs, A., & Johnson, D. M. (1942). A note on the relation between persistence and achievement on the final examination. Journal of Educational Psychology, 33(8), 623. doi:10.1037/h0063193
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Franke, M. L., Levi, L., & Empson, S. B. (1999). Children’s mathematics: Cognitively guided instruction. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, E. G., Brody, C. M., & Sapon-Shevin, M. (2004). Teaching cooperative learning: The challenge for teacher education. New York, NY: Suny Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, E. G., & Lotan, R. A. (2004). Equity in heterogeneous classrooms. In J. A. Banks & C. A. M. Banks (Eds.),Handbook of research on multicultural education (2nd ed., pp. 736–752). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, E. G., & Lotan, R. A. (2014). Designing groupwork: Strategies for the heterogeneous classroom (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Common Core Standards Initiative. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org
   Google Scholar
• DeBellis, V. A., & Goldin, G. A. (2006). Affect and meta-affect in mathematical problem solving: A representational perspective. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(2), 131–147. doi:10.1007/s10649-006-9026-4
   Google Scholar
• De Guerrero, M., & Villamil, O. S. (2000). Activating the ZPD: Mutual scaffolding in L2 peer revision. The Modern Language Journal, 84(1), 51–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekker, R., & Elshout-Mohr, M. (2004). Teacher interventions aimed at mathematical level raising during collaborative learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 56(1), 39–65. doi:10.1023/B:EDUC.0000028402.10122.ff
   Google Scholar
• Del Rio, P., & Alvarez, A. (2007). Inside and outside the zone of proximal development: An ecofunctional reading of Vygotsky. In H. Daniels, M. Cole, & J.V. Wertsch (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Vygotsky (pp. 276–303). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education and Employment. (1999). The national curriculum: Handbook for primary teachers in England. London, UK: DfEE.
   Google Scholar
• Derry, S. J., Pea, R. D., Barron, B., Engle, R. A., Erickson, F., Goldman, R., … Sherin, B. L. (2010). Conducting video research in the learning sciences: Guidance on selection, analysis, technology, and ethics. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(1), 3–53. doi:10.1080/10508400903452884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiCerbo, K. E. (2014). Game-based assessment of persistence. Educational Technology & Society, 17(1), 17–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doolittle, P. E. (1997). Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development as a theoretical foundation for cooperative learning. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 8(1), 83–103.
   Google Scholar
• Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engle, R. A., Langer-Osuna, J. M., & McKinney de Royston, M. (2014). Toward a model of influence in persuasive discussions: Negotiating quality, authority, privilege, and access within a student-led argument. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(2), 245–268. doi:10.1080/10508406.2014.883979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• English, L. D., & Gainsburg, J. (2016). Problem solving in a 21st century mathematics curriculum. In L. D. English and D. Kirshner (Eds.), In Handbook of International Research in Mathematics Education (3rd ed.) (Vol. 3, pp. 313-335). New York, NY: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• English, L. D., & Warren, E. A. (1998). Introducing the variable through pattern exploration. Mathematics Teacher, 91(2), 166–170.
   Google Scholar
• Esmonde, I., & Langer-Osuna, J. M. (2013). Power in numbers: Student participation in mathematical discussions in heterogeneous spaces. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 288–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feather, N. T. (1961). The relationship of persistence at a task to expectation of success and achievement related motives. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63(3), 552. doi:10.1037/h0045671
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feather, N. T. (1966). Effects of prior success and failure on expectations of success and subsequent performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3(3), 287. doi:10.1037/h0022965
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forman, E. A. (1989). The role of peer interaction in the social construction of mathematical knowledge. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 55–70. doi:10.1016/0883-0355(89)90016-5
   Google Scholar
• Forman, E. A. (1992). Discourse, intersubjectivity, and the development of peer collaboration: A Vygotskian approach. Children’s Development within Social Context, 1, 143–159.
   Google Scholar
• Forman, E. A., & McPhail, J. (1993). Vygotskian perspective on children’s collaborative problem-solving activities. In E. A. Forman, N. Minick, & C. A. Stone (Eds.), 57Contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children’s development (pp. 213–229). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldin, G. A. (2000). Affective pathways and representation in mathematical problem solving. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 2(3), 209–219. doi:10.1207/S15327833MTL0203_3
   Google Scholar
• Goos, M., Galbraith, P., & Renshaw, P. (2002). Socially mediated metacognition: Creating collaborative zones of proximal development in small group problem solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49(2), 193–223. doi:10.1023/A:1016209010120
   Google Scholar
• Gresalfi, M. S. (2009). Taking up opportunities to learn: Constructing dispositions in mathematics classrooms. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(3), 327–369. doi:10.1080/10508400903013470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gresalfi, M. S., & Cobb, P. (2006). Cultivating students’ discipline-specific dispositions as a critical goal for pedagogy and equity. Pedagogies, 1(1), 49–57. doi:10.1207/s15544818ped0101_8
   Google Scholar
• Hiebert, J., & Grouws, D. A. (2007). The effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students’ learning. Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 1, 371–404.
   Google Scholar
• Horn, I. S. (2007). Fast kids, slow kids, lazy kids: Framing the mismatch problem in mathematics teachers’ conversations. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(1), 37–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Human Resources Development Working Group. (2009). Analysis of mathematics and science standards from the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation. Retrieved from http://publications.apec.org/publication-detail.php?pub_id=163
   Google Scholar
• Jansen, A. (2012). Developing productive dispositions during small-group work in two sixth-grade mathematics classrooms: Teachers’ facilitation efforts and students’ self-reported benefits. Middle Grades Research Journal, 7(1), 37.
   Google Scholar
• Kapur, M. (2010). Productive failure in mathematical problem solving. Instructional Science, 38(6), 523–550. doi:10.1007/s11251-009-9093-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapur, M. (2014). Productive failure in learning math. Cognitive Science, 38(5), 1008–1022. doi:10.1111/cogs.2014.38.issue-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (Eds.). (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Mathematics Learning Study Committee, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kotsopoulos, D. (2010). When collaborative is not collaborative: Supporting student learning through self-surveillance. International Journal of Educational Research, 49(4), 129–140. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2010.11.002
   Google Scholar
• Langer-Osuna, J. M. (2011). How Brianna became bossy and Kofi came out smart: Understanding the trajectories of identity and engagement for two group leaders in a project-based mathematics classroom. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 11(3), 207–225. doi:10.1080/14926156.2011.595881
   Google Scholar
• Langer-Osuna, J. M. (2016). The social construction of authority among peers and its implications for collaborative mathematics problem solving. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 18(2), 107–124. doi:10.1080/10986065.2016.1148529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leikin, R., & Zaslavsky, O. (1997). Facilitating student interactions in mathematics in a cooperative learning setting. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(3), 331–354. doi:10.2307/749784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindberg, S. W., & McGuffey, W. H. (1976). The annotated McGuffey. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
   Google Scholar
• Lotan, R. A. (2003). Group-worthy tasks. Educational Leadership, 60(6), 72–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maher, C. A. (2002). How students structure their own investigations and educate us: What we’ve learned from a fourteen year study. In A. D. Cockburn, & E. Nardi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting for the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 31–46). Norwich, UK: University of East Anglia.
   Google Scholar
• Maher, C. A., & Martino, A. M. (1996). The development of the idea of mathematical proof: A 5-year case study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 194–214. doi:10.2307/749600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R. (1985). Reclaiming a conversation. New Haven, CT: Yale.
   Google Scholar
• Megowan-Romanowicz, M. C., Middleton, J. A., Ganesh, T., & Joanou, J. (2013). Norms for participation in a middle school mathematics classroom and its effect on student motivation. Middle Grades Research Journal, 8(1), 51.
   Google Scholar
• Middleton, J. A., Tallman, M. A., Hatfield, N., & Davis, O. (2015). Taking the severe out of perseverance: Strategies for building mathematical determination. Retrieved from www.spencer.org
   Google Scholar
• Miell, D., & MacDonald, R. (2000). Children’s creative collaborations: The importance of friendship when working together on a musical composition. Social Development, 9(3), 348–369. doi:10.1111/sode.2000.9.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasir, N. S., Cabana, C., Shreve, B., Woodbury, E., & Louie, N. (2014). Mathematics for equity: A framework for successful practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council, & Mathematics Learning Study Committee. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Council for Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. Reston, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, D., Griffin, P., & Cole, M. (1984). Social constraints in laboratory and classroom tasks. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context (pp. 172–193). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nyikos, M., & Hashimoto, R. (1997). Constructivist theory applied to collaborative learning in teacher education: In search of ZPD. The Modern Language Journal, 81(4), 506–517. doi:10.1111/modl.1997.81.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pai, H. H., Sears, D. A., & Maeda, Y. (2015). Effects of small-group learning on transfer: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 27, 79–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, R. (2009). Patterns: Foundations for algebraic reasoning. The Mathematics Education Collaborative. Retrieved from www.mec-math.org
   Google Scholar
• Parrish, S. (2010). Number talks: Helping children build mental math and computation strategies. Sausalito, CA: Math Solutions.
   Google Scholar
• Phelps, E., & Damon, W. (1989). Problem solving with equals: Peer collaboration as a context for learning mathematics and spatial concepts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(4), 639. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.81.4.639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pólya, G. (1981). Mathematical discovery: On understanding, learning, and teaching problem solving (Combined ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Pólya, G. (2014). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, A. B., Francisco, J. M., & Maher, C. A. (2003). An analytical model for studying the development of learners’ mathematical ideas and reasoning using videotape data. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22(4), 405–435. doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2003.09.002
   Google Scholar
• Ryans, D. G. (1938a). The meaning of persistence. The Journal of General Psychology, 19(1), 79–96. doi:10.1080/00221309.1938.9711188
   Google Scholar
• Ryans, D. G. (1938b). An experimental attempt to analyze persistent behavior: I. measuring traits presumed to involve “persistence”. The Journal of General Psychology, 19(2), 333–353. doi:10.1080/00221309.1938.9711208
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem-solving. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem-solving, metacognition, and sense-making in mathematics. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook for research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334–370). New York: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Schofield, W. (1943). An attempt to measure ‘persistence’ in its relationship to scholastic achievement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33(5), 440. doi:10.1037/h0060235
   Google Scholar
• Sengupta-Irving, T. (2014). Affinity through mathematical activity: Cultivating democratic learning communities. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 7(2), 31–54.
   Google Scholar
• Sengupta-Irving, T. (2016). Doing things: Organizing for agency in mathematical learning. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 41, 210–218. doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2015.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sengupta-Irving, T., & Enyedy, N. (2015). Why engaging in mathematical practices may explain stronger outcomes in affect and engagement: Comparing student-driven with highly-guided inquiry. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 24(4), 550–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sengupta-Irving, T., Redman, E., & Enyedy, N. (2013). Re-storying practice: Using stories about students to advance mathematics education reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 31, 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2012.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sfard, A., & Kieran, C. (2001). Cognition as communication: Rethinking learning-by-talking through multi-faceted analysis of students’ mathematical interactions. Mind, Culture and Activity, 8(1), 42–76. doi:10.1207/S15327884MCA0801_04
   Google Scholar
• Sherin, M. G. (2002). A balancing act: Developing a discourse community in a mathematics classroom. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5(3), 205–233. doi:10.1023/A:1020134209073
   Google Scholar
• Sigman, M., Cohen, S. E., Beckwith, L., & Topinka, C. (1987). Task persistence in 2-year-old preterm infants in relation to subsequent attentiveness and intelligence. Infant Behavior and Development, 10(3), 295–305. doi:10.1016/0163-6383(87)90018-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver, E., & Smith, M. (1996). Building discourse communities in mathematics classrooms: A worthwhile but challenging journey. In P. C. Elliott, & M. J. Kenney (Eds.), Communication in mathematics: K–12 and beyond—1996 yearbook (pp. 20–28). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, M. A., & Tzur, R. (2004). Explicating the role of mathematical tasks in conceptual learning: An elaboration of the hypothetical learning trajectory. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(2), 91–104. doi:10.1207/s15327833mtl0602_2
   Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E. (2011). Instruction based on cooperative learning. In R. E. Mayer & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning and instruction (pp. 344–360). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Star, J. R. (2015). When not to persevere: Nuances related to perseverance in mathematical problem solving. Retrieved from www.spencer.org
   Google Scholar
• Stein, M. K., & Smith, M. (2011). 5 practices for orchestrating productive mathematics discussions. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, H., & Stigler, J. (1992). The learning gap: Why our schools are failing and what we can learn from Japanese and Chinese education. New York: Summit Books.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, E. V. (2015). Cultural considerations in support of mathematical perseverance: The role of context activation. Retrieved from www.spencer.org
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The psychology of higher mental functions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warshauer, H. (2014). Productive struggle in middle school mathematics classrooms. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 17(4). doi:10.1007/s10857-014-9286-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 458–477. doi:10.2307/749877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yackel, E., Cobb, P., & Wood, T. (1991). Small-group interactions as a source of learning opportunities in second-grade mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 390–408. doi:10.2307/749187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar