Between expert and student perspectives: on the intersection of affect and heuristic-didactic discourse in the undergraduate classroom

References

• Alcock, L., & Simpson, A. (2004). Convergence of sequences and series: Interactions between visual reasoning and the learner’s beliefs about their own role. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 57(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDUC.0000047051.07646.92
   Google Scholar
• Alsina, C. (2002). Why the professor must be a stimulating teacher: Towards a new paradigm of teaching mathematics at university level. In D. Holton, M. Artigue, U. Kirchgräber, J. Hillel, M. Niss, & A. H. Schoenfeld (Eds.), The teaching and learning of mathematics at university level (Vol. 7, pp. 3–12). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bergsten, C. (2007). Investigating quality of undergraduate mathematics lectures. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 19(3), 48–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217462
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university. Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bligh, D. A. (1972). What’s the use of lectures? (2nd ed.). New Barnet.
   Google Scholar
• Calderhead, J. (1981). Stimulated recall: A method for research on teaching. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 51(2), 211–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1981.tb02474.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb, P., Boufi, A., McClain, K., & Whitenack, J. (1997). Reflective discourse and collective reflection. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(3), 258–277. https://doi.org/10.2307/749781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, J. L., & Robinson, P. (2000). The argument for making large classes seem small. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2000(81), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.8101
   Google Scholar
• DeBellis, V. A., & Goldin, G. A. (2006). Affect and meta-affect in mathematical problem solving: A representational perspective. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(2), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9026-4
   Google Scholar
• Ellsworth, P. C., & Scherer, K. R. (2003). Appraisal processes in emotion. In R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer, & H. H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 572–695). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J., Morgan, C., & Tsatsaroni, A. (2006). Discursive positioning and emotion in school mathematics practices. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(2), 209–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9029-1
   Google Scholar
• Featherstone, H. (2000). “-Pat + Pat = 0”: Intellectual play in elementary mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 20(2), 14–23.
   Google Scholar
• Fukawa-Connelly, T. P. (2012). A case study of one instructor’s lecture-based teaching of proof in abstract algebra: Making sense of her pedagogical moves. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 81(3), 325–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9407-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldin, G. A. (2000). Affective pathways and representation in mathematical problem solving. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 2(3), 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327833MTL0203_3
   Google Scholar
• Goldin, G. A. (2014). Perspectives on emotion in mathematical engagement, learning, and problem solving. In R. Pekrun & L. Linnenbrink-Garcia (Eds.), International handbook of emotions in education (pp. 391–414). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goldin, G. A., Epstein, Y. M., Schorr, R. Y., & Warner, L. B. (2011). Beliefs and engagement structures: Behind the affective dimension of mathematical learning. ZDM Mathematics Education, 43(4), 547–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-011-0348-z
   Google Scholar
• Gómez-Chacón, I. M. (2017). Emotions and heuristics: The state of perplexity in mathematics. ZDM Mathematics Education, 49(3), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0854-8
   Google Scholar
• Güçler, B. (2013). Examining the discourse on the limit concept in a beginning-level calculus classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82(3), 439–453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9438-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güçler, B. (2016). Making implicit metalevel rules of the discourse on function explicit topics of reflection in the classroom to foster student learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 91(3), 375–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9636-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannula, M. S. (2006). Motivation in mathematics: Goals reflected in emotions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(2), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-005-9019-8
   Google Scholar
• Hannula, M. S. (2012). Exploring new dimensions of mathematics-related affect: Embodied and social theories. Research in Mathematics Education, 14(2), 137–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2012.694281
   Google Scholar
• Hannula, M. S. (2015). Emotions in problem solving. In S. J. Cho (Ed.), Selected regular lectures from the 12th international congress on mathematical education (pp. 269–288). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Harré, R., & Gillett, G. (1994). The discursive mind. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hernandez-Martinez, P., Williams, J., Black, L., Davis, P., Pampaka, M., & Wake, G. (2011). Students’ views on their transition from school to college mathematics: Rethinking ‘transition’ as an issue of identity. Research in Mathematics Education, 13(2), 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2011.585824
   Google Scholar
• Heyd-Metzuyanim, E., & Sfard, A. (2012). Identity struggles in the mathematics classroom: On learning mathematics as an interplay of mathematizing and identifying. International Journal of Educational Research, 51-52, 128–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2011.12.015
   Google Scholar
• Hinton, C., Miyamoto, K., & Della-Chiesa, B. (2008). Brain research, learning and emotions: Implications for education research, policy and practice. European Journal of Education, 43(1), 87–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2007.00336.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodkinson, P., & Hodkinson, H. (2001). The strengths and limitations of case study research. In Learning and Skills Development Agency Conference. Cambridge, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Jaworski, B. (2002). Sensitivity and challenge in university mathematics tutorial teaching. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 51(1/2), 71–94. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022491404298
   Google Scholar
• Kieran, C. (2001). The mathematical discourse of 13-year-old partnered problem solving and its relation to the mathematics that emerges. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46(1/3), 187–228. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014040725558
   Google Scholar
• Koichu, B. (2019). A discursively oriented conceptualization of mathematical problem solving. In P. Felmer, P. Liljedahl, & B. Koichu (Eds.), Problem solving in mathematics instruction and teacher professional development (pp. 43–66). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kontorovich, I., Herbert, R., & Yoon, C. (2019). Students resolve a commognitive conflict between colloquial and calculus discourses on steepness. In J. Monaghan, E. Nardi, & T. Dreyfus (Eds.), Calculus in upper secondary and beginning university mathematics – Conference proceedings (pp. 70–73). MatRIC.
   Google Scholar
• LaBar, K. S., & Cabeza, R. (2006). Cognitive neuroscience of emotional memory. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7(1), 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1825
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lester, F. K. (2013). Thoughts about research on mathematical problem-solving instruction. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 10(1), 245–278. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/tme/vol10/iss1/12
   Google Scholar
• Lew, K., Fukawa-Connelly, T. P., Mejia-Ramos, J. P., & Weber, K. (2016). Lectures in advanced mathematics: Why students might not understand what the mathematics professor is trying to convey. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 47(2), 162–198. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.47.2.0162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liljedahl, P. G. (2005). Mathematical discovery and affect: The effect of AHA! Experiences on undergraduate mathematics students. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 36(2–3), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390412331316997
   Google Scholar
• Ludmer, R., Dudai, Y., & Rubin, N. (2011). Uncovering camouflage: Amygdala activation predicts long-term memory of induced perceptual insight. Neuron, 69(5), 1002–1014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2011.02.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malmivuori, M.-L. (2006). Affect and self-regulation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(2), 149–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9022-8
   Google Scholar
• Marmur, O. (2017). Undergraduate student learning during calculus tutorials: Key memorable events (Doctoral dissertation). Technion – Israel Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Marmur, O. (2019). Key memorable events: A lens on affect, learning, and teaching in the mathematics classroom. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 54, 100673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2018.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marmur, O., & Koichu, B. (2016). Surprise and the aesthetic experience of university students: A design experiment. Journal of Humanistic Mathematics, 6(1), 127–151. https://doi.org/10.5642/jhummath.201601.09
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Planell, R., & Gaisman, M. T. (2012). Students’ understanding of the general notion of a function of two variables. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 81(3), 365–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9408-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Sierra, G., & García-González, M. D. S. (2016). Undergraduate mathematics students’ emotional experiences in Linear Algebra courses. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 91(1), 87–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9634-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, J. (2002). Mathematics teaching practice: Guide for university and college lecturers. Horwood.
   Google Scholar
• McGee, D. L., & Martínez-Planell, R. (2014). A study of semiotic registers in the development of the definite integral of functions of two and three variables. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(4), 883–916. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9437-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, D. B. (1992). Research on affect in mathematics education: A reconceptualization. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 575–596). Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, D. B., & Adams, V. M. (Eds.). (1989). Affect and mathematical problem solving: A new perspective. Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Moors, A., Ellsworth, P. C., Scherer, K. R., & Frijda, N. H. (2013). Appraisal theories of emotion: State of the art and future development. Emotion Review, 5(2), 119–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073912468165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Movshovitz-Hadar, N., & Hazzan, O. (2004). How to present it? On the rhetoric of an outstanding lecturer. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 35(6), 813–827. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390412331271384
   Google Scholar
• Nardi, E., Jaworski, B., & Hegedus, S. (2005). A spectrum of pedagogical awareness for undergraduate mathematics: From “tricks” to “techniques.” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36(4), 284–316. https://doi.org/10.2307/30035042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nardi, E., Ryve, A., Stadler, E., & Viirman, O. (2014). Commognitive analyses of the learning and teaching of mathematics at university level: The case of discursive shifts in the study of Calculus. Research in Mathematics Education, 16(2), 182–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2014.918338
   Google Scholar
• Nardi, E., & Winsløw, C. (2018). INDRUM2016 special issue editorial. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 4(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-018-0074-9
   Google Scholar
• Op’t Eynde, P., De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (2006). “Accepting emotional complexity”: A socio-constructivist perspective on the role of emotions in the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(2), 193–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9034-4
   Google Scholar
• Park, J. (2015). Is the derivative a function? If so, how do we teach it? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 89(2), 233–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9601-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto, A. (2019). Variability in the formal and informal content instructors convey in lectures. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 54, 100680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2018.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirie, S. E. B. (1996). Classroom video-recording: When, why and how does it offer a valuable data source for qualitative research? Presented at The Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Panama City, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Prediger, S., Bikner-Ahsbahs, A., & Arzarello, F. (2008). Networking strategies and methods for connecting theoretical approaches: First steps towards a conceptual framework. ZDM Mathematics Education, 40(2), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-008-0086-z
   Google Scholar
• Pritchard, D. (2010). Where learning starts? A framework for thinking about lectures in university mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 41(5), 609–623. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207391003605254
   Google Scholar
• Radford, L. (2015). Of love, frustration, and mathematics: A cultural-historical approach to emotions in mathematics teaching and learning. In B. Pepin & B. Roesken-Winter (Eds.), From beliefs to dynamic affect systems in mathematics education: Exploring a mosaic of relationships and interactions (pp. 25–49). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rodd, M. (2003). Witness as participation: The lecture theatre as site for mathematical awe and wonder. For the Learning of Mathematics, 23(1), 15–21.
   Google Scholar
• Rogalski, M. (2000). The teaching experimented in Lille. In J.-L. Dorier (Ed.), On the teaching of linear algebra (pp. 133–150). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, W.-M., & Radford, L. (2011). A cultural-historical perspective on mathematics teaching and learning. Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Runesson, U. (2005). Beyond discourse and interaction. Variation: A critical aspect for teaching and learning mathematics. Cambridge Journal of Education, 35(1), 69–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764042000332506
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, T. L., & Lester, F. K. (1989). Understanding mathematics via problem solving. In P. Trafton (Ed.), New directions for elementary school mathematics (pp. 31–42). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Schukajlow, S., Rakoczy, K., & Pekrun, R. (2017). Emotions and motivation in mathematics education: Theoretical considerations and empirical contributions. ZDM Mathematics Education, 49(3), 307–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0864-6
   Google Scholar
• Schwandt, T. A. (2007). The SAGE dictionary of qualitative inquiry (3rd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as communicating: Human development, the growth of discourses, and mathematizing. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sfard, A. (2014). University mathematics as a discourse – Why, how, and what for? Research in Mathematics Education, 16(2), 199–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2014.918339
   Google Scholar
• Sfard, A., & Kieran, C. (2001). Cognition as communication: Rethinking learning-by-talking through multi-faceted analysis of students’ mathematical interactions. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 8(1), 42–76. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327884MCA0801_04
   Google Scholar
• Shkedi, A. (2003). Milim Hamensot Laga’at: Mechkar Eichutani - Teorya Veyisum [Words of Meaning: Qualitative Research - Theory and Practice]. Ramot Publishing House.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, M. A. (1995). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(2), 114–145. https://doi.org/10.2307/749205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair, N. (2004). The roles of the aesthetic in mathematical inquiry. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(3), 261–284. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0603_1
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, N., & Heyd-Metzuyanim, E. (2014). Learning number with TouchCounts: The role of emotions and the body in mathematical communication. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 19(1–2), 81–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-014-9212-x
   Google Scholar
• Szydlik, J. E. (2000). Mathematical beliefs and conceptual understanding of the limit of a function. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(3), 258–276. https://doi.org/10.2307/749807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tall, D. (1992). The transition to advanced mathematical thinking: Functions, limits, infinity, and proof. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 495–511). Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C., Midgley, C., Meyer, D. K., Gheen, M., Anderman, E. M., Kang, Y., & Patrick, H. (2002). The classroom environment and students’ reports of avoidance strategies in mathematics: A multimethod study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 88–106. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.1.88
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viirman, O. (2015). Explanation, motivation and question posing routines in university mathematics teachers’ pedagogical discourse: A commognitive analysis. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 46(8), 1165–1181. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2015.1034206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, K. (2008). The role of affect in learning real analysis: A case study. Research in Mathematics Education, 10(1), 71–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794800801916598
   Google Scholar
• Weinberg, A., Wiesner, E., & Fukawa-Connelly, T. (2014). Students’ sense-making frames in mathematics lectures. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 33, 168–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.11.005
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, P. (2006). The role of meaning and emotion in learning. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2006(110), 35–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.217
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2011). Qualitative research from start to finish. The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, C., Kensington-Miller, B., Sneddon, J., & Bartholomew, H. (2011). It’s not the done thing: Social norms governing students’ passive behaviour in undergraduate mathematics lectures. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 42(8), 1107–1122. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2011.573877
   Google Scholar
• Zan, R., Brown, L., Evans, J., & Hannula, M. S. (2006). Affect in mathematics education: An introduction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(2), 113–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9028-2
   Google Scholar