Publication Cover
Culture and Education
Cultura y Educación
Volume 26, 2014 - Issue 2
342
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Report / Informes de Investigación

Transforming collaborative writing tasks into opportunities for learning: educational assistance and the use of rubrics in Higher Education / Transformando las tareas de escritura colaborativa en oportunidades para aprender: ayuda educativa y uso de rúbricas en la Educación Superior

, &
Pages 298-348 | Received 02 Nov 2011, Accepted 25 Apr 2013, Published online: 23 Jul 2014

References / References

  • Andrade, H. (2010). Students as the definitive source of formative assessment: Academic self-assessment and the self-regulation of learning. In H. J. Andrade & G. J. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 90–106). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Applebee, A. N. (1996). Currículo as conversation: Transforming traditions of teaching and learning. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Arvaja, M., Rasku-Puttonen, H., Häkkinen, P., & Eteläpelto, A. (2003). Constructing knowledge through a role-play in a web–based learning environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 28, 319–341. doi:10.2190/4FAV-EK1T-XV4H-YNXF
  • Badia, A., Becerril, L., & Romero, M. (2010). La construcción colaborativa de conocimiento en las redes de comunicación asíncrona y escrita (RCAE): una revisión de los instrumentos analíticos. Cultura y Educación, 22, 455–474. doi:10.1174/113564010793351821
  • Castelló, M. (2009). Aprender a escribir textos académicos. ¿Copistas, escribas, compiladores o escritores? In J. L. Pozo & M. del Puy Pérez (Eds.), Psicología del aprendizaje universitario: la formación en competencias (pp. 120–133). Madrid: Morata.
  • Cazden, C. B. (1991). Classroom discourse. The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  • Cerratto-Pragman, T. (2003). Collaborating with writing tools. An instrumental perspective on the problem of computer-supported collaborative activities. Interacting with Computers, 15, 737–757.
  • Coll, C., Bustos, A., & Engel, A. (2011). Perfiles de participación y presencia docente distribuida en redes asíncronas de aprendizaje: la articulación del análisis estructural y de contenido. Revista de Educación, 354, 657–688.
  • Coll, C., Colomina, R., Onrubia, J., & Rochera, Mª. J. (1992). Actividad conjunta y habla: una aproximación al estudio de los mecanismos de influencia educativa. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 59–60, 189–232. doi:10.1080/02103702.1992.10822356
  • Coll, C., Mauri, T., & Onrubia, J. (2008). La utilización de las tecnologías de la información y de la comunicación en la educación: del diseño tecno-pedagógico a las prácticas de uso. In C. Coll & C. Monereo (Eds.), La Psicología de la educación Virtual. Enseñar y aprender con las tecnologías de la información y la comunicación (pp. 74–104). Madrid: Morata.
  • Coll, C., Onrubia, J., & Mauri, T. (2008). Ayudar a aprender en contextos educativos: el ejercicio de la influencia educativa y el análisis de la enseñanza. Revista de Educación, 346, 33–70.
  • De Wever, B., Van Keer, H., Schellens, T., & Valcke, M. (2009). Structuring asynchronous discussion groups: The impact of role assignment and self-assessment on students’ levels of knowledge construction through social negotiation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25, 177–188. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2008.00292.x
  • Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL. Can we support CSCL (pp. 61–91). Heerlen: Open Universiteit Nederland.
  • Forman, E., & McPhail, J. (1993). A Vygotskian perspective on children’s collaborative problem solving activities. In E. A. Forman, N. Minick, & C. A. Stone (Eds.), Contexts for learning, sociocultural dynamics in children’s development (pp. 213–229). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Halliday, M. A., & Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing science. Literacy and discursive power. London: The Falmer Press.
  • Huba, M. E., & Freed, J. E. (2000). Learned–centered assessment on college composes: Shifting the focus from teaching to learning. Boston, MA: Ally & Bacon.
  • Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kanselaar, G., & Jaspers, J. (2007). Visualization of participation: Does it contribute to successful computer-supported collaborative learning? Computers & Education, 49, 1037–1065. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.01.004
  • Jermann, P. (2002). Task and interaction regulation in controlling a traficc simulation. In G. Sthal (Ed.), Computer support for collaborative learning proceedings of CSCL 2002 (pp. 301–302). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Kneser, C., & Ploetzner, R. (2001). Collaboration on the basis of complementary domain knowledge: Observed dialogue structures and their relation to learning success. Learning and Instruction, 11, 53–83. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00015-3
  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lemke, J. L. (1997). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
  • Lipponen, L. (2002). Exploring foundations for computer-supported collaborative Learning. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Computer support for collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community (pp. 72–81). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Mauri, T., Clarà, M., & Remesal, A. (2011). La naturaleza del discurso en la escritura colaborativa online: intersubjetividad y elaboración del significado. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 34, 219–233. doi:10.1174/021037011795377629
  • Mauri, T., Colomina, R., Clarà, M., & Ginesta, A. (2011). Ayudas al aprendizaje en tareas colaborativas con Moodle. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 9, 1103–1128.
  • Mauri, T., Colomina, R., & De Gispert, I. (2009). Diseño de propuestas docentes con TIC para la enseñanza de la autorregulación en la educación superior. Revista de Educación, 348, 377–399.
  • Mercer, N. (1995). The guided construction of knowledge: Talk amongst teachers and learners. Clevendon: Multilingual Matters.
  • Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds. London: Routledge.
  • Newell, G. E. (2006). Writing to learn. How alternative theories of school writing account for student performance. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham & I. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 235–247). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Onrubia, J., & Engel, A. (2009). Strategies for collaborative writing and phases of knowledge construction in CSCL environments. Computers & Education, 53, 1256–1265. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.008
  • Panadero, E., & Jonsson, A. (2013). The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: A review. Educational Research Review, 9(9), 129–144. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.002
  • Prior, P. (2006). A sociocultural theory of writing. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham & I. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 54–66). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Reddy, Y. M., & Andrade, H. (2010). A review of rubric use in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 435–448. doi:10.1080/02602930902862859
  • Rourke, L., & Kanuka, H. (2007). Barriers to online critical discourse. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2, 105–126. doi:10.1007/s11412-007-9007-3
  • Shuters, D. D. (2010). Roles of computacional scripts. In F. Fischer, I. Kollar, H. Mandl, & J. M. Haake (Eds.), Scripting computer–supported collaborative learning: cognitive, computacional and educational perspectives (pp. 177–189). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Slof, B., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P. A., Janssen, J., & Phielix, C. (2010). Fostering complex learning task performance through scripting student use of computer supported representational tools. Computers & Education, 55, 1707–1720. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.016
  • Sthal, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of learning sciences (pp. 409–426). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://GerryStahl.net/cscl/CSCL_English.pdf
  • Strijbos, J. W., de Laat, M., Martens, R. L., & Jochems, W. M. G. (2005). Functional versus spontaneous roles during CSCL. In T. Koschmann, D. Suthers, & T. W. Cahn (Eds.), Computer supported collaborative learning 2005. The next ten years! (pp. 567–576). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Taggart, G. L., & Wood, M. (1998). Rubrics: A cross‐curricular approach to assessment. In G. L. Taggart, S. J. Phifer, J. A. Nixon, & M. Wood (Eds.), Rubrics: A handbook for construction and use (pp. 57–74). Lancaster, PA: Technomic.
  • Tharp, R. G., Estrada, P., Dalton, S., & Yamauchi, L. A. (2000). Teaching transformed. Achieving excellence, fairness, inclusion, and harmony. Boulder: Westview Press.
  • Topping, K. J. (2001). Thinking reading writing: A practical guide to paired learning whit peers, parents & volunteers. New York & London: Continuum International.
  • Van Drie, J., Van Boxtel, C., Jaspers, J., & Kanselaar, G. (2005). Effects of representational guidance on domain specific reasoning in CSCL. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 575–602. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.10.024
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Webb, N. (1991). Task-related verbal interaction and mathematics learning in small groups. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 366–389. doi:10.2307/749186
  • Weinberger, A., Ertl, B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Epistemic and social scripts in computer? Supported collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 33, 1–30. doi:10.1007/s11251-004-2322-4
  • Wells, G. (1986). The meaning makers: Children learning to talk and talking to learn. NH: Heinemann Portsmouth.
  • Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wertsch, J. V. (1988). Vygotsky and social formation of mind. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.