Incivility on Diaoyu Island sovereignty in Tianya Club

REFERENCES

• Abramson, J.B., Arterton, F.C., & Orren, G.R. (1988) The electronic commonwealth: The impact of new media technologies on democratic politics, New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, K. (2003) ‘Blair Interview: The Transcript’, The Observer, July 6, http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2003/jul/06/interviews.tonyblair
   Google Scholar
• Barton, M.D. (2005) ‘The future of rational-critical debate in online public spheres’, Computers and Composition, 22(2), pp.177–90. 10.1016/j.compcom.2005.02.002
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, R. (2004) ‘Michael Oakeshott on civility, civil society and civil association’, Political Studies, 52(3), pp.603–622. 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2004.00498.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brook, T. & Frolic, B.M. (1997) ‘The ambiguous challenge of civil society’, in T. Brook & B. Michael Frolic (eds) Civil society in China, ME Sharpe, Armonk, New York, pp.3–18.
   Google Scholar
• Bunk, J.A. & Magley, V.J. (2013) ‘The role of appraisals and emotions in understanding experiences of workplace incivility’, Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 18(1), pp.87–105. 10.1037/a0030987
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J.T., Berntson, G.G., Larsen, J.T., Poehlmann, K.M., & Ito, T.A. (2000) ‘The psychophysiology of emotion’, In M. Lewis & J.M. Haviland-Jones (eds) Handbook of emotions, 2nd ed. Guilford, New York, pp.173–91.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, A.S.Y. (2009) ‘A study of cyber-violence and internet service providers’ liability: Lessons from china’, Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal, 18(2), pp.323.
   Google Scholar
• Connery, B.A. (1997) ‘MHO: Authority and egalitarian rhetoric in the virtual coffeehouse’, in D. Porter (ed) Internet culture, Routledge, New York, pp.161–80.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J.W. (1998) Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, L. (2001) ‘Computer-mediated communication and the public sphere: A critical analysis’,Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 7(1).
   Google Scholar
• Downey, J. & Fenton, N. (2003) ‘New media, counter publicity and the public sphere’, New Media & Society, 5(2), pp.185–202. 10.1177/1461444803005002003
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E. (1984) The division of labor in society, New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, D. (1991) ‘Categories are for talking: On the cognitive and discursive bases of categorization’, Theory & Psychology, 1(4), pp.515–42. 10.1177/0959354391014007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, D. (1999) ‘Emotion discourse’, Culture & Psychology, 5(3), pp.271–91. 10.1177/1354067X9953001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elias, N. (1987) Involvement and detachment, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Elias, N. (1978) The civilising process, Vol. I: The history of manners, Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, C.M. (2003) Civil society and democracy: A comparative review essay’, in C.M. Elliott (ed) Civil society and democracy: A reader, Oxford University Press, New Delhi, pp.1–39.
   Google Scholar
• Gao, F. (2012) Patterns of participation in new media in China: Analysis from apublic health crisis. Presented at AEJMC, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1971) Relations in public, London: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, K. & D’Ambrosio, L. (2004) ‘Framing emotional response’, Political Psychology, 25(1), pp.1–29. 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00354.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J., Lennox, S., & Lennox, F. (1974) ‘The public sphere: An encyclopedia article (1964)’, New German Critique, 1(3), pp.49–55. 10.2307/487737
   Google Scholar
• Huang, P.C.C. (1993) ‘“Public sphere”/“civil society’’ in china?: The third realm between state and society’, Modern China, 19(2), pp.216–40. 10.1177/009770049301900207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamieson, K.H. & Annenberg Public Policy Center (1997) Civility in the house of representatives: A background report, Annenberg Public Policy Center.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, S.G. (1997) ‘The internet and its social landscape’, in S.G. Jones (ed) Virtualculture: identity and communication in cybersociety, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp.7–35.
   Google Scholar
• Knapp, J.A. (1997) ‘Essayistic messages: Internet newsgroups as an electronic public sphere’, in D. Porter (ed) Internet culture, Routledge, New York, pp.181–200.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, R. (1998) ‘Civility in the house of representatives’, American Prospect, 41, pp.84–91.
   Google Scholar
• Kesler, C.R. (1992) ‘Civility and citizenship in the American founding’, in E.C. Banfield (ed) Civility and citizenship, PWPA (Professors World Peace Academy), New York, pp.57–74.
   Google Scholar
• Kingwell, M. (1995) A civil tongue: Justice, dialogue, and the politics of pluralism, University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G. (1987) Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, R. (2006) ‘Civility and its discontents: Or, getting in your face’, in R. Lakoff & S. Ide (eds) Broadening the horizon of linguistic politeness, John Benjamins, Philadelphia, PA, pp.23–43.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarus, R.S. (1991) ‘Progress on a cognitive-motivational-relational theory of emotion’, American Psychologist, 46(8), pp.819–34. 10.1037/0003-066X.46.8.819
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarus, R.S. (2001) Relational meaning and discrete emotions, New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, S. (2008) Language and sexism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, S. (2009) ‘Impoliteness in a cultural context’, Journal of Pragmatics, 41(5), pp.1047–60. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.10.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, M. & Ogan, C. (1996) ‘The Internet as mass medium’, Journal of Communication, 46(1), pp.39–50. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1996.tb01460.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muddiman, A. (2012) ‘Emotion and incivility: The indirect effects of incivility on future news use and political trust’, Manuscript submitted to the APS Political Communication Pre-Conference on August 19.
   Google Scholar
• Mutz, D.C. & Reeves, B. (2005) ‘The new videomalaise: Effects of televised incivility on political trust’, American Political Science Review, 99(1), pp.1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Z. (2002) ‘The virtual sphere: The Internet as public sphere’, in F. Webster (ed) The information society reader, Routledge, New York, pp.379–92.
   Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Z. (2004) ‘Democracy online: Civility, politeness, and the democratic potential of online political discussion groups’, New Media & Society, 6(2), pp.259–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen, D.M. (1997) ‘Psychological functions of privacy’, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17(2), pp.147–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, T. & Smith, P. (2004) ‘Emotional and behavioral responses to everyday incivility: Challenging the fear/avoidance paradigm’, Journal of Sociology, 40(4), pp.378–99. 10.1177/1440783304048382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plutchik, Robert (1980) Emotion—A psychoevolutionary synthesis, New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Poster, M. (1997) ‘Cyberdemocracy: Internet and the public sphere’, in D. Porter (ed) Internet culture, Routledge, New York, pp.201–18.
   Google Scholar
• Reader, B. (2012) ‘Free press vs. free speech? The rhetoric of ‘Civility’ in regard to anonymous online comments’, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 89(3), pp.495–513. 10.1177/1077699012447923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sapiro, Virginia. (1999) ‘Considering political civility historically: A case study of the UnitedStates’,’Presented at the 1999 annual meeting of the International for Political Psychology in Amsterdam, The Netherland.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, J. (1998) ‘Civility, enlightenment, and society: Conceptual confusions and Kantian remedies’, American Political Science Review, 92, pp.419–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, S.M. (1996) ‘Creating a democratic public sphere through political discussion’, Social Science Computer Review, 14(4), pp.373–93. 10.1177/089443939601400401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shils, E. (1992) ‘Civility and civil society’, in E.C. Banfield (ed) Civility and citizenship, PWPA (Professors World Peace Academy), New York, pp. 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Shirk, S.L. (2010) Changing media, changing China, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C.A. & Lazarus, R.S. (1990) ‘Emotion and adaptation’, in L.A. Pervin (ed) Handbook of personality: Theory and research, Guildford Press, New York, pp.609–37.
   Google Scholar
• So, J. (2013) ‘A further extension of the extended parallel process model (E-EPPM): Implications of cognitive appraisal theory of emotion and dispositional coping style’, Health Communication, 28(1), pp.72–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon, R.C. (1976) The passions, New York: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens, T. (2004) ‘Do Manners Make a Safer Nation?’, Sydney Morning Herald, 29 January.
   Google Scholar
• Stivale, C.J. (1997) ‘Spam: Heteroglossia and harassment in cyberspace’, in D. Porter (ed) Internet culture, Routledge, New York, pp.133–44.
   Google Scholar
• Strachan, J.C. & Wolf, M.R. (2012) ‘Political civility: Introduction to political civility’, Political Science & Politics, 45(3), pp.401–04. 10.1017/S1049096512000455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warkentin, Craig. (2001) Reshaping world politics: NGOs, the Internet, and global civil society, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Wellman, B. & Gulia, M. (1999) ‘Virtual communities as communities: Net surfers don't ride alone’, in M.A. Smith & P. Kollock (eds) Communities in cyberspace, Routledge, London, pp.167–99.
   Google Scholar
• Wierzbicka, A. (1992) Semantics, culture and cognition: Universal human concepts in culture-specific configurations, New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wierzbicka, A. (1994) ‘Emotion, language, and cultural scripts’, in S. Kitayama & H. Markus (eds) Emotion and culture: Empirical studies of mutual influence, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp.130–98.
   Google Scholar
• Wimmer, R.D. & Dominick, J.R. (2011) Mass media research: An introduction, 9th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, S. & Street, J. (2007) ‘Democracy, deliberation and design: The case of online discussion forums’, New Media & Society, 9( October), 849–869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeitlin, D.M. & Westwood, R.A. (1986) ‘Measuring emotional response’, Journal of Advertising Research, 26(5), 34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar