Social network sites as a threat to users’ self-determination and security: A framing analysis of German newspapers

References

• Acquisti, A. & Gross, R. (2006) ‘Imagined communities: Awareness, information sharing, and privacy on the Facebook’, in D. Hutchison, T. Kanade, J. Kittler, J.M. Kleinberg, F. Mattern & J.C. Mitchell (eds) Lecture notes in computer science. Privacy enhancing technologies. Springer, Berlin, pp.36–58.
   Google Scholar
• Ahn, J. (2012) ‘Teenagers’ experiences with social network sites: Relationships to bridging and bonding social capital’, The Information Society, 28(2), pp.99–109. doi:10.1080/01972243.2011.649394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman, I. (1975) The environment and social behavior. Privacy, personal space, territory, crowding, Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Altman, I. (1977) ‘Privacy regulation: Culturally universal or culturally specific?’, Journal of Social Issues, 33(3), pp.66–84. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1977.tb01883.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman, I. & Vinsel, A.M. (1977) ‘Personal space’, in I. Altman & J.F. Wohlwill (eds) Human behavior and environment. Advances in theory and research Volume 2, Springer US, Boston, MA, pp.181–259.
   Google Scholar
• Andsager, J.L. (2000) ‘Groups attempt to shape public opinion news frames’, Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(3), pp.577–92. doi: 10.1177/107769900007700308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball-Rockeach, S.J., Power, G.J., Guthrie, K.K., & Waring, H.R. (1990) ‘Value-farming abortion in the United States: An application of media system dependency theory’, International Journal of Public Opinion, 2(3), pp.249–73. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/2.3.249
   Google Scholar
• Banczyk, B., Krämer, N.C., & Senokozlieva, M. (2008, May 22–26) ‘ The wurst’ meets “fatless” in MySpace. The relationship between self-esteem, personality and self-presentation in an online community’, Annual Conference of the International Communication Association, Montreal, Canada. http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/2/3/2/8/0/p232801_index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, S.B. (2006) ‘A privacy paradox: Social networking in the United States’, First Monday, 11(9). doi:10.5210/fm.v11i9.1394.
   Google Scholar
• Beckert, B. & Riehm, U. (2013) Breitbandversorgung, Medienkonvergenz, Leitmedien: Strukturwandel der Massenmedien und Herausforderungen für die Medienpolitik. Studien des Büros für Technikfolgen-Abschätzung beim Deutschen Bundestag [Broadband supply, media convergence, leading media: Structural change of mass media and challenges for media policy. Studies of the agency for technology assessment of the German Bundestag], Vol. 36. Berlin: Ed. Sigma.
   Google Scholar
• boyd, D. (2011) ‘Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications’, in Z. Papacharissi (eds) A networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites, Routledge, New York, pp.39–58.
   Google Scholar
• boyd, d. & Ellison, N.B. (2007) ‘Social networking sites: Definition, history, and scholarship’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, pp.210–30. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blöbaum, B. (2011) ‘Wandel von Qualitätsmedien [Quality media in transition]’, in R. Blum, H. Bonfadelli, K. Imhof, & O. Jarren (eds) Krise der leuchttürme öffentlicher kommunikation. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, pp. 49–63.
   Google Scholar
• Brandtzæg, P.B., Lüders, M., & Skjetne, J.H. (2010) ‘Too many Facebook “friends”? Content sharing and sociability versus the need for privacy in social network sites’, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 26(11–12), pp.1006–30. doi:10.1080/10447318.2010.516719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, P.R. (2001) ‘Value words and lizard brains: Do citizens deliberate about appeals to their core values?’, Political Psychology, 22(1), pp.45–64. doi:10.1111/0162-895X.00225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, P.R. (2002) ‘Framing, value words, and citizens’ explanations of their issue opinions’, Political Communication, 19(3), pp.303–16. doi: 10.1080/01957470290055510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brosius, H.-B. & Eps, P. (1995) ‘Prototyping through key events: News selection in the case of violence against aliens and asylum seekers in Germany’, European Journal of Communication, 10(3), pp.391–412. doi:10.1177/0267323195010003005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgoon, J.K. (1982) ‘Privacy in communication’, in M. Burgoon (ed) Communication yearbook 6. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, pp.206–49.
   Google Scholar
• Burgoon, J. K., Parrott, R., Le Poire, B. A., Kelley, D. L., Walther, J. B., & Perry, D. (1989) ‘Maintaining and restoring privacy through communication in different types of relationships’, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 6, pp.131–158. doi: 10.1177/026540758900600201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacciatore, M.A., Anderson, A.A., Choi, D.H., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D.A., Liang, X., Ladwig, P.J., Xenos, M. & Dudo, A. (2012) ‘Coverage of emerging technologies: A comparison between print and online media’, New Media & Society, 14(6), pp.1039–59. doi:10.1177/1461444812439061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, D. & Druckman, J.N. (2007) ‘Framing public opinion in competitive democracies’, American Political Science Review, 101(04), pp.637–55. doi:10.1017/S0003055407070554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, L.A. & Roberts, S.J. (2010) ‘Employer's use of social networking sites: A socially irresponsible practice’, Journal of Business Ethics, 95(4), pp.507–25. doi:10.2307/40836197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, C.C., Atun, J.M., Fille, E. & Monterola, C. (2011) ‘Finding frames: Comparing two methods of frame analysis’, Communication Methods and Measures, 5(4), pp.329–351. doi:10.1080/19312458.2011.624873.
   Google Scholar
• Debatin, B., Lovejoy, J.P., Horn, A.K. & Hughes, B.N. (2009) ‘Facebook and online privacy: Attitudes, behaviors, and unintended consequences’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15(1), pp.83–108. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01494.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domke, D., Shah, D.V., & Wackman, D.B. (1998) ‘Media priming effects: Accessibility, association, and activation’, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 10(1), pp.51–74. doi:10.1093/ijpor/10.1.51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison, N.B., Gray, R., Lampe, C., & Fiore, A.T. (2014) ‘Social capital and resource requests on Facebook’, New Media & Society, 16(7), pp.1104–21. doi:10.1177/1461444814543998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entman, R.D. (1993) ‘Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm’, Journal of Communication, 43(4), pp.51–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feierabend, S., Plankenhorn, T., & Rathgeb, T. (2014) ‘JIM 2014. jugend, information, (multi-) media: Basisstudie zum Medienumgang 12- bis 19-Jähriger in Deutschland [Youth, information and (multi) media. Basis study on media use of 12 to 19 year olds in Germany]’, Medienpädagogischer Forschungsverbund Südwest, Stuttgart, http://www.mpfs.de/fileadmin/JIM-pdf14/JIM-Studie_2014.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gehrau, V. & Neuberger, C. (2011) ‘StudiVZ als Forschungsgegenstand. Zur Einführung. [StudiVZ as research topic. An introduction]’, in C. Neuberger & V. Gehrau (eds) StudiVZ. Diffusion, Nutzung und Wirkung eines sozialen Netzwerks im Internet, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, pp.7–19.
   Google Scholar
• Hölig, S. & Hasebrink, U. (2014) ‘ Nachrichtennutzung im Wandel: Neue Plattformen, Endgeräte und Zugänge: International vergleichende Befunde auf Basis des Reuters Institute Digital News Survey 2014 [Changing news reception: New platforms, terminals, and forms of access. Internationally comparative results from the Reuters Institute Digital News Survey 2014]’. Media Perspektiven, 11/2014, pp.530–538.
   Google Scholar
• Humprecht, E. & Buchel, F. (2013) ‘More of the same or marketplace of opinions? A cross-national comparison of diversity in online news reporting’, The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(4), pp.436–61. doi:10.1177/1940161213497595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indian, M. & Grieve, R. (2014) ‘When Facebook is easier than face-to-face: Social support derived from Facebook in socially anxious individuals’, Personality and Individual Differences, 59, pp.102–6. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.11.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IVW. (2012) ‘ Auflagenzahlen des 3’, Quartals 2012, http://daten.ivw.eu/index.php?menuid=1111&u=&p=&b=a&t=Tageszeitungen+Gesamtliste.
   Google Scholar
• Jandura, O. & Brosius, H.B. (2011) ‘Wer liest sie (noch)? Das Publikum der Qualitätszeitungen [Who is (still) reading them? The readership of quality papers]’, in R. Blum, H. Bonfadelli, K. Imhof & O. Jarren (eds) Krise der Leuchttürme öffentlicher Kommunikation, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, pp.195–206.
   Google Scholar
• Krasnova, H. & Veltri, N.F. (2010, January 5–8) Privacy calculus on social networking sites: Explorative evidence from Germany and USA. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Honolulu, HI.
   Google Scholar
• Langenheinrich, M. (2001) ‘ Privacy by design – principles of privacy – aware ubiquitous systems’, http://cs.gmu.edu/~jpsousa/classes/699/papers/privacy%20Langheinrich.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• lid. (2006, September 9) ‘Facebook verärgert seine Nutzer: Mitglieder des Online-Forums fürchten um ihre Privatsphäre [Facebook offends its users. Members of the online forum fear for their privacy]’, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, p.14.
   Google Scholar
• magr. (2012, August 7) ‘Der Preis des Kostenlosen [The price of no-cost]’, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, p.12.
   Google Scholar
• Mayring, P. (2010) ‘Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse [Qualitative content analysis]’, in G. Mey & K. Mruck (eds) Handbuch Qualitative Forschung in der Psychologie. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, pp.601–613.
   Google Scholar
• Matthes, J. & Kohring, M. (2008) ‘The content analysis of media frames: Toward improving reliability and validity’, Journal of Communication, 58(2), pp.258–79. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00384.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osel, J. (2012, March 26) ‘ Mobbing im Netz endet nie: Attacken im Internet: Was Experte Torsten Porsch unbedarften Schülern und ratlosen Lehrern rät [Mobbing on the Internet never stops: Attacks on the Internet: Expert Torsten Porsch advises naive pupils and helpless parents]’, Sueddeutsche Zeitung, p.38.
   Google Scholar
• Peel, Q. & Fontanella-Khan, J. (2013, July 14) ‘Angela Merkel calls for EU-wide agreement on data protection’, Financial Times. http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/7a4b26d8-eca6-11e2-a0a4-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2fhjbVJdG
   Google Scholar
• Peter, J. (2004) ‘Our long ‘return to the concept of powerful mass media. A cross-national comparative investigation of the effects of consonant media coverage’, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 16(2), pp.144–68. doi:10.1093/ijpor/16.2.144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, V., Nir, L., & Cappella, J. (2005) ‘ Framing public discussion of gay civil unions’, Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Price, V., Tewksbury, D. & Powers, E. (1997) ‘Switching trains of thought: The impact of news frames on readers’ cognitive responses’, Communication Research, 24(5), pp.481–506. doi:10.1177/009365097024005002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reese, S.D. (2001) ‘Prologue’, in S.D. Reese, O.H. Gandy & A.E. Grant (eds) LEA's communication series. Framing public life. Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp.7–31.
   Google Scholar
• Reinecke, L. & Trepte, S. (2014) ‘Authenticity and well-being on social network sites: A two-wave longitudinal study on the effects of online authenticity and the positivity bias in SNS communication’, Computers in Human Behavior, 30(1), pp.95–102. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, M. (1956) ‘Cognitive structure and attitudinal affect’, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 53(3), pp.367–372. doi: 10.1037/h0044579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schemer, C., Wirth, W., & Matthes, J. (2012) ‘Value resonance and value framing effects on voting intentions in direct-democratic campaigns’, American Behavioral Scientist, 56(3), pp.334–352. doi:10.1177/0002764211426329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheufele, B. (2004) ‘Framing-effects approach: A theoretical and methodological critique’, Communications, 29(4), pp.401–428. doi: 10.1515/comm.2004.29.4.401
   Google Scholar
• Scheufele, B., Kordes, C., Meyer, H., Teutsch, D., Tretter, K., & Schieb, C. (2012) ‘Gefahr oder Garant: Ein Medienwirkungsexperiment zur Instrumentalität des Value-Framing [Threat or guarantor: A media effects experiment on the instrumentality of value framing]’, Medien und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 60(3), pp.432–51. doi: 10.5771/1615-634x-2012-3-432
   Google Scholar
• Shen, F. & Edwards, H. (2005) ‘Economic individualism, humanitarianism, and welfare reform: A value-based account of framing effects’, Journal of Communication, 55(4), pp.795–809. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb03023.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smock, A.D., Ellison, N.B., Lampe, C., & Wohn, D.Y. (2011) ‘Facebook as a toolkit: A uses and gratification approach to unbundling feature use’, Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), pp.2322–29. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.07.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinfield, C., Ellison, N.B., & Lampe, C. (2008) ‘Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis’, Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29(6), pp.434–45. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2008.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trepte, S., Dienlin, T., & Reinecke, L. (2014a) ‘Influence of social support received in online and offline contexts on satisfaction with social support and satisfaction with life: A longitudinal study’, Media Psychology, 18(1), pp.74–105. doi:10.1080/15213269.2013.838904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trepte, S., Dienlin, T., & Reinecke, L. (2014b) ‘Risky behaviors: How online experiences influence privacy behaviors’, in B. Stark, O. Quiring & N. Jackob (eds) Schriftenreihe der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Publizistik- und Kommunikationswissenschaft: Vol. 41. Von der Gutenberg-Galaxis zur Google-Galaxis. Alte und neue Grenzvermessungen nach 50 Jahren DGPuK, 1st ed, UVK, Konstanz, pp.225–44.
   Google Scholar
• Vitak, J. (2012) ‘The impact of context collapse and privacy on social network site disclosures’, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(4), pp.451–70. doi:10.1080/08838151.2012.732140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westin, A.F. (1967) Privacy and freedom, New York: Atheneum.
   Google Scholar
• Wohn, D.Y., Ellison, N.B., Khan, M.L., Fewins-Bliss, R., & Gray, R. (2013) ‘The role of social media in shaping first-generation high school students’ college aspirations: A social capital lens’, Computers & Education, 63, pp.424–36. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, A.L. & Quan-Haase, A. (2013) ‘Privacy protection strategies on Facebook’, Information, Communication & Society, 16(4), pp.479–500. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2013.777757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar