How does selective exposure affect partisan polarisation? Media consumption on electoral campaigns

References

• Abramowitz, A. I., and K. L. Saunders. 2008. “Is Polarization a Myth?” The Journal of Politics 70 (2): 542–555. doi:10.1017/S0022381608080493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahler, D. J. 2014. “Self-Fulfilling Misperceptions of Public Polarization.” The Journal of Politics 76 (3): 607–620. doi:10.1017/S0022381614000085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bail, C. A., L. P. Argyle, T. W. Brown, J. P. Bumpus, H. Chen, M. F. Hunzaker, J. Lee, M. Mann, F. Merhout, and A. Volfovsky. 2018. “Exposure to Opposing Views on Social Media Can Increase Political Polarization.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115 (37): 9216–9221. doi:10.1073/pnas.1804840115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barberá, P. 2015. “How Social Media Reduces Mass Political Polarization.” Evidence from Germany, Spain, and the US. Working Paper 2015 APSA Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Baum, M. A., and T. Groeling. 2008. “New Media and the Polarization of American Political Discourse.” Political Communication 25 (4): 345–365. doi:10.1080/10584600802426965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., and S. Iyengar. 2008. “A New Era of Minimal Effects? The Changing Foundations of Political Communication.” Journal of Communication 58 (4): 707–731. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00410.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bou-Hamad, I., and N. A. Yehya. 2020. “Partisan Selective Exposure in TV Consumption Patterns: A Polarized Developing Country Context.” Communication Research 47 (1): 55–81. doi:10.1177/0093650216681896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bright, J. 2018. “Explaining the Emergence of Political Fragmentation on Social Media: The Role of Ideology and Extremism.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 23 (1): 17–33. doi:10.1093/jcmc/zmx002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardenal, A., C. Aguilar-Paredes, C. Cristancho, and S. Majó-Vázquez. 2019. “Echo-chambers in Online News Consumption: Evidence from Survey and Navigation Data in Spain.” European Journal of Communication 34 (4): 360–376. doi:10.1177/0267323119844409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casero-Ripollés, A. 2012. Periodismo político en España: concepciones, tensiones y elecciones. La Laguna: Sociedad Latina de Comunicación Social.
   Google Scholar
• Casero-Ripollés, A., and P. López-Rabadan. 2016. Periodistas y políticos en España. Barcelona: UOC.
   Google Scholar
• Chaffee, S. H., and Y. Miyo. 1983. “Selective Exposure and the Reinforcement Hypothesis: An Intergenerational Panel Study of the 1980 Presidential Campaign.” Communication Research 10 (1): 3–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordero, G., and J. Montero. 2015. “Against Bipartyism, Towards Dealignment? The 2014 European Election in Spain.” South European Society and Politics 20 (3): 357–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delli Carpini, M. X. 2004. “Mediating Democratic Engagement: The Impact of Communications on Citizens’ Involvement in Political and Civic Life.” In Handbook of Political Communication Research, edited by L. L. Kaid, 395–434. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Druckman, J., E. Peterson, and R. Slothuus. 2013. “How Elite Partisan Polarization Affects Public Opinion Formation.” American Political Science Review 107 (1): 57–79. doi:10.1017/S0003055412000500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feenstra, R. A., S. Tormey, R. A. Casero, and J. Keane. 2017. Refiguring Democracy: The Spanish Political Laboratory. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández-García, B., and Ó Luengo. 2018. “Populist Parties in Western Europe. An Analysis of the Three Core Elements of Populism.” Comunicación y Sociedad 3: 57–76. doi:10.15581/003.31.3.57-76.
   Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. 1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fiorina, M. P., S. J. Abrams, and J. C. Pope. 2005. Culture war? The Myth of a Polarized America. New York: Pearson Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, R., A. Cornia, and R. Kleis Nielsen. 2020. “How Polarized Are Online and Offline News Audiences? A Comparative Analysis of Twelve Countries.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 25 (2): 169–195. doi:10.1177%2F1940161219892768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, R., and R. K. Nielsen. 2017. “Are News Audiences Increasingly Fragmented? A Cross-National Comparative Analysis of Cross-Platform News Audience Fragmentation and Duplication.” Journal of Communication 67 (4): 476–498. doi:10.1111/jcom.12315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraile, M., and X. Meilán. 2009. Los medios de comunicación y la información política en las elecciones europeas de 2009». In Las Elecciones Europeas de 2009, edited by J. Font and M. Torcal. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, R. K. 2009. “Echo Chambers Online?: Politically Motivated Selective Exposure among Internet News Users.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 14 (2): 265–285. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01440.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, S. K., and D. C. Mutz. 2011. “The Friendly Media Phenomenon: A Cross-National Analysis of Cross-Cutting Exposure.” Political Communication 28 (1): 42–66. doi:10.1080/10584609.2010.544280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graf, J., and S. Aday. 2008. “Selective Attention to Online Political Information.” Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 52 (1): 86–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grechyna, D. 2016. “On the Determinants of Political Polarization.” Economics Letters 144: 10–14. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2016.04.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunther, R., J. R. Montero, and J. I. Wert. 1999. The Media and Politics in Spain: From Dictatorship to Democracy. WP no. 176, Institut de Ciències Polítiques i Socials.
   Google Scholar
• Hallin, D. C., and P. Mancini. 2004. Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hobolt, S., T. Leeper, and J. Tilley. 2020. “Divided by the Vote: Affective Polarization in the Wake of the Brexit Referendum.” British Journal of Political Science, 1–18. doi:10.1017/S0007123420000125.
   Google Scholar
• Hollander, B. A. 2008. “Tuning Out or Tuning Elsewhere? Partisanship, Polarization, and Media Migration from 1998 to 2006.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 85 (1): 23–40.
   Google Scholar
• Huckfeldt, R., P. Johnson, and J. Sprague. 2004. Political Disagreement: The Survival of Diverse Opinions Within Communication Networks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huckfeldt, R., and J. Sprague. 1995. Citizens, Politics, and Social Communication: Information and Influence in an Election Campaign. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Humanes, M. L. 2014. “Exposición selectiva y partidismo de las audiencias en España. El consumo de información política durante las campañas electorales de 2008 y 2011.” Palabra Clave 17 (3): 773–802.
   Google Scholar
• Humanes, M. L. 2020. Audiencias y uso político de los medios de comunicación. Teoría de la exposición selectiva. La comunicación política en la era de la mediatización, 155–180. Salamanca: Comunicación Social.
   Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., and K. S. Hahn. 2009. “Red Media, Blue Media: Evidence of Ideological Selectivity in Media Use.” Journal of Communication 59 (1): 19–39. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., M. D. Peters, and D. R. Kinder. 1982. “Experimental Demonstrations of the “Not-so-Minimal” Consequences of Television News Programs.” The American Political Science Review 76 (4): 848–858. doi:10.1017/S000305540018966X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., G. Sood, and Y. Lelkes. 2012. “Affect, Not Ideology. A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization.” Public Opinion Quarterly 76 (3): 405–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobloch-Westerwick, S. 2012. “Selective Exposure and Reinforcement of Attitudes and Partisanship Before a Presidential Election.” Journal of Communication 62 (4): 628–642. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01651.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobloch-Westerwick, S. 2014. Choice and Preference in Media use: Advances in Selective Exposure Theory and Research. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Koehler, D. 2014. “The Radical Online: Individual Radicalization Processes and the Role of the Internet.” Journal for Deradicalization 1: 116–134.
   Google Scholar
• Krosnick, J. A., and D. R. Kinder. 1990. “Altering the Foundations of Support for the President through Priming.” American Political Science Review 84 (2): 497–512. doi:10.2307/1963531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ksiazek, T. B. 2016. “Partisan Audience Polarization: Beyond Selective Exposure.” Atlantic Journal of Communication 24 (4): 216–227. doi:10.1080/15456870.2016.1208658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Layman, G. C., T. M. Carsey, and J. M. Horowitz. 2006. “Party Polarization in American Politics: Characteristics, Causes, and Consequences.” Annual Review of Political Science 9 (1): 83–110. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.9.070204.105138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarsfeld, P. F., B. Berelson, and H. Gaudet. 1944. The People's Choice: How the Voter Makes up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. K., J. Choi, C. Kim, and Y. Kim. 2014. “Social Media, Network Heterogeneity, and Opinion Polarization.” Journal of Communication 64 (4): 702–722. doi:10.1111/jcom.12077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levendusky, M. 2013. Partisan News That Matters: How Partisan News Impact American Politics. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levendusky, M., and N. Malhotra. 2016. “Does Media Coverage of Partisan Polarization Affect Political Attitudes?” Political Communication 33 (2): 283–301. doi:10.1080/10584609.2015.1038455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobera, J. 2015. “From Movements to Political Parties. The Electoral Crystallization of Protest.” Revista Española de Sociología 24: 97–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobera, J., and V. Sampedro. 2018. “New Intermediations of the Electoral Information Flows: Changes in the Digital Public Sphere in Election Campaigns in Spain (2008–15).” Social Science Information 57 (4): 553–572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López-García, G., and L. Valera-Ordaz. 2017. Pantallas electorales: el discurso de partidos, medios y ciudadanos en la campaña de 2015. Barcelona: UOC.
   Google Scholar
• Marcos-Marne, H., C. Plaza-Colodro, and T. Freyburg. 2020. “Who Votes for New Parties? Economic Voting, Political Ideology and Populist Attitudes.” West European Politics 43 (1): 1–21. doi:10.1080/01402382.2019.1608752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcos-Marne, H., C. Plaza-Colodro, and K. Hawkins. 2020. “Is Populism the Third Dimension? The Quest for Political Alliances in Post-Crisis Spain.” Electoral Studies 63. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2019.102112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin-Llaguno, M., and M. R. Berganza-Conde. 2001. “Voters and Mass Media During 1996 Spanish National Election Campaign: Selective Exposure or Media Influence?” Communications & Society 14 (1): 51–70.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, L. 2013. “The Rise of Uncivil Agreement. Issue versus Behavioral Polarization in the American Electorate.” American Behavioral Scientist 57 (1): 140–159. doi:10.1177/0002764212463363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melki, M., and A. Pickering. 2014. “Ideological Polarization and the Media.” Economics Letters 125 (1): 36–39. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2014.08.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Micó, J., and J. Carbonell. 2017. “The Catalan Political Process for Independence: An Example of the Partisan Media System.” American Behavioral Scientist 61 (4): 428–440. doi:10.1177/0002764217693277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Micó, J. L., and A. Casero-Ripollés. 2014. “Political Activism Online: Organization and Media Relations in the Case of 15M in Spain. Information.” Communication & Society 17 (7): 858–871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orriols, L., and G. Cordero. 2016. “The Breakdown of the Spanish Two-Party System. The Upsurge of Podemos and Ciudadanos in the 2015 General Election.” South European Society and Politics 21 (4): 469–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. 2018. In Western Europe, Populist Parties tap Anti-Establishment Frustration but Have Little Appeal Across Ideological Divide. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2018/07/Pew-Research-Center_Western-Europe-Political-Ideology-Report_2018-07-12.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Prior, M. 2007. Post-broadcast Democracy: How Media Choiceincreases Inequalityin Political Involvement and Polarizeselections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prior, M. 2013. “Media and Political Polarization.” Annual Review of Political Science 16 (1): 101–127. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-100711-135242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramírez-Dueñas, J. M., and M. L. Vinuesa-Tejero. 2020. “Selective Exposure and its Effects on Citizens’ Electoral Behavior: The Influence of Media Consumption on Voting in the Spanish General Elections of 2015 and 2016.” Palabra Clave 23 (4). doi:10.5294/pacla.2020.23.4.6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinke, E. M., and J. Lück. 2010. “Cognitive Style, Selectivity, and Reinforcement.” In Politische kommunikation heute. Beiträge des 5. Düsseldorfer forums politische kommunikation, edited by K. Mok and M. Stahl, 219–234. Berlin, Germany: Frank & Timme.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Virgili, J., and J. Serrano-Puche. 2019. “Medios de comunicación y opinión pública en España: una aproximación desde la teoría de Agenda Setting.” Panorama Social 30: 27–39.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, C. G., J. P. Moskowitz, R. M. Salem, and P. H. Ditto. 2017. “Partisan Selective Exposure: The Role of Party, Ideology and Ideological Extremity Over Time.” Translational Issues in Psychological Science 3 (3): 254–271. doi:10.1037/tps0000121.
   Google Scholar
• Roskon-Ewoldsen, D. R., B. Roskon-Ewoldsen, and F. D. Carpentier. 2009. “Media Priming: An Updated Synthesis.” In Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research, edited by Jennings Bryant and Mary Beth Oliver, 74–93. New York: Routledge. https://books.google.es/books?hl=en&lr=&id=2BeOAgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA74&ots=M5v-pLv0ik&sig=IwnQk54EJDIAqSuPxzsWEim39kE&redir_esc=y#v=onep.
   Google Scholar
• Sampedro, V., and M. Martínez-Avidad. 2018. “The Digital Public Sphere: An Alternative and Counterhegemonic Space? The Case of Spain.” International Journal of Communication 12: 23–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampedro, V., and L. Mosca. 2018. “Digital Media, Contentious Politics and Party Systems in Italy and Spain.” Journal of the European Institute for Communication and Culture. doi:10.1080/13183222.2018.1423959.
   Google Scholar
• Santana, A., and J. Rama. 2018. “Electoral Support for Left Wing Populist Parties in Europe: Addressing the Globalization Cleavage.” European Politics and Society 19 (5): 558–576. doi:10.1080/23745118.2018.1482848.
   Google Scholar
• Sears, D. O., and J. L. Freedman. 1967. “Selective Exposure to Information: A Critical Review.” Public Opinion Quarterly 31 (2): 194–213. doi:10.1086/267513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroud, N. 2008. “Media Use and Political Predispositions: Revisiting the Concept of Selective Exposure.” En Political Behavior 30 (3): 341–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroud, N. J. 2010. “Polarization and Partisan Selective Exposure.” Journal of Communication 60 (3): 556–576. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01497.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R. 2007. Republic.com 2.0. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsfati, Y., N. J. Stroud, and A. Chotiner. 2014. “Exposure to Ideological News and Perceived Opinion Climate: Testing the Media Effects Component of Spiral-of-Silence in a Fragmented Media Landscape.” The International Journal of Press/Politics (1): 3–23. doi:10.1177/1940161213508206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valera-Ordaz, L. 2018. “Media, National Identity and Selective Exposure: Predictors of Media Preferences among the Catalan Population.” Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas (REIS) 164: 135–154. doi:10.5477/cis/reis.164.135.
   Google Scholar
• Vraga, E. K. 2015. “How Party Affiliation Conditions the Experience of Dissonance and Explains Polarization and Selective Exposure.” Social Science Quarterly 96: 487–502. doi:10.1111/ssqu.12138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waisbord, S. 2020. “Is it Valid to Attribute Political Polarization to Digital Communication? On Bubbles, Platforms and Affective Polarization.” SAAP 14 (2): 249–279. doi:10.46468/rsaap.14.2.A1.
   Google Scholar