280
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The construction of the political agenda on Twitter and Facebook during the 2016 Spanish elections: issues, frame and users’ interest

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Aalberg, T, J Strömbäck, and C H De Vreese. 2012. “The framing of politics as strategy and game: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings” Journalism 13 (2): 162–178.
  • Ahmed, S., and M. M. Skoric. 2014. “My Name is Khan: The use of Twitter in the Campaign for 2013 Pakistan General Election.” In HICSS 2014: Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Science, edited by R. H. Sprague Jr, 2242–2251. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2014.282.
  • Alonso-Muñoz, L. 2019. “The ‘More is More’ Effect: a Comparative Analysis of the Political Agenda and the Strategy on Twitter of the European Populist Parties.” European Politics and Society, 1–15. doi:10.1080/23745118.2019.1672921.
  • Alonso-Muñoz, L., and A. Casero-Ripollés. 2018. “Communication of European Populist Leaders on Twitter: Agenda Setting and the ‘More is Less’ Effect.” El Profesional de la Información 27 (6): 1193–1202. doi:10.3145/epi.2018.nov.03.
  • Anduiza, E., M. Cantijoch, and A. Gallego. 2009. “Political Participation and the Internet: a Field Essay.” Information, Communication & Society 12 (6): 860–878. doi:10.1080/13691180802282720.
  • Barberà, O., A. Barrio, and J. Rodríguez-Teruel. 2019. “New Parties’ Linkages with External Groups and Civil Society in Spain: A Preliminary Assessment.” Mediterranean Politics 24 (5): 646–664. doi:10.1080/13629395.2018.1428146.
  • Baviera, T., D. Calvo, and G. Llorca-Abad. 2019. “Mediatisation in Twitter: an Exploratory Analysis of the 2015 Spanish General Election.” The Journal of International Communication 25 (2): 275–300. doi:10.1080/13216597.2019.1634619.
  • Bene, M. 2017. “Go Viral on the Facebook! Interactions Between Candidates and Followers on Facebook During the Hungarian General Election Campaign of 2014.” Information, Communication & Society 20 (4): 513–529. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2016.1198411.
  • Blumler, J. G., and D. Kavanagh. 1999. “The Third Age of Political Communication: Influences and Features.” Political Communication 16 (3): 209–230. doi:10.1080/105846099198596.
  • Bossetta, M. 2018. “The Digital Architectures of Social Media: Comparing Political Campaigning on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat in the 2016 U.S. Election.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 95 (2): 471–496. doi:10.1177/1077699018763307.
  • Cammaerts, B. 2012. “Protest Logic and the Mediation Opportunity Structure.” Journal of Communication 17 (2): 117–134. doi:10.1177/0267323112441007.
  • Cappella, J. N., and K. H. Jamieson. 1997. Spiral of Cynicism: The Press and the Public Good. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Casero-Ripollés, A. 2018. “Research on Political Information and Social Media: Key Points and Challeges for de Future.” El Profesional de la Información 27 (5): 964–974. doi:10.3145/epi.2018.sep.01.
  • Casero-Ripollés, A., R. A. Feenstra, and S. Tormey. 2016. “Old and New Media Logics in an Electoral Campaign. The Case of Podemos and the Two-Way Street Mediatization of Politics.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 21 (3): 378–397. doi:10.1177/1940161216645340.
  • Castells, M. 2009. Comunicación y Poder. Barcelona, SP: UOC.
  • Chadwick, A. 2017. The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Chaqués-Bonafont, L., A. M. Palau, and F. R. Baumgarther. 2015. Agenda Dynamics in Spain. London, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
  • Coromina, O., E. Prado, and A. Padilla. 2018. “The Grammatization of Emotions on Facebook in the Elections to the Parliament of Catalonia 2017.” El Profesional de la Información 27 (5): 1004–1011. doi:10.3145/epi.2018.sep.05.
  • Dahlgren, P. 2005. “The Internet, Public Spheres, and Political Communication: Dispersion and Deliberation.” Political Communication 22 (2): 147–162. doi:10.1080/10584600590933160.
  • Elishar-Malka, V., Y. Ariel, and G. Weimann. 2020. “Rethinking Political Communication in the Digital Sphere.” The Journal of International Communication. doi:10.1080/13216597.2020.1771397
  • Enli, G. 2017. “Twitter as Arena for the Authentic Outsider: Exploring the Social Media Campaigns of Trump and Clinton in the 2016 US Presidential Election.” European Journal of Communication 32 (1): 50–61. doi:10.1177/0267323116682802.
  • Enli, G., and E. Skogerbø. 2013. “Personalized Campaigns in Party-Centred Politics: Twitter and Facebook as Arenas for Political Communication.” Information, Communication & Society 16 (5): 757–774. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2013.782330.
  • Farrell, D., and P. Webb. 2000. “Political Parties as Campaign Organisation.” In Parties Without Partisans, edited by R. Dalton, and M. Wattenberg, 102–128. Oxford, UK: OUP.
  • Fenoll, V., and L. Cano-Orón. 2017. “Citizen Engagement on Spanish Political Partie's Facebook Pages: Analysis of the 2015 Electoral Campaign Comments.” Communication & Society 30 (4): 131–148. doi:10.15581/003.30.3.131-148.
  • Fiske, J., and J. Hartley. 2003. Reading Television. London: Routledge.
  • Gainous, J., and K. M. Wagner. 2014. Tweeting to Power. The Social Media Revolution in American Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Gerbaudo, P. 2012. Tweets and the Streets. London: Pluto Press.
  • Gladwell, M. 2010, October 4. Small Change: Why the Revolution Will not be Tweeted. The New Yorker. Retrieved from https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2010/10/04/small-change-malcolm-gladwell.
  • Haro-de-Rosario, A., A. Sáez-Martin, and M. C. Caba-Pérez. 2016. “Using Social to Enhance Citizen Engagement with Local Government: Twitter or Facebook?” New Media & Society 20 (1): 29–49. doi:10.1177/1461444816645652.
  • Karpf, D. 2012. The MoveOn Effect: The Unexpected Transformation of American Political Advocacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Kiousis, S. 2002. “Interactivity: A Concept Explication.” New Media & Society 4 (3): 355–383. doi:10.1177/146144480200400303.
  • Krug, S. 2016. Reactions Now Available Globally. Facebook Newsroom. Retrieved from http://newsroom.fb.com/news/2016/02/reactions-now-available-globally/.
  • Larsson, A. O. 2013. “Rejected Bits of Program Code: why Notions of “Politics 2.0” Remain (Mostly) Unfulfilled.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 10 (1): 72–85. doi:10.1080/19331681.2012.719727.
  • Larsson, A. O. 2017. “The News User on Social Media: A Comparative Study of Interacting with Media Organizations on Facebook and Instagram.” Journalism Studies, 1–18. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2017.1332957.
  • Larsson, A. O., and B. Kalsnes. 2014. ““Of Course we are on Facebook”: Use and non-use of Social Media among Swedish and Norwegian Politicians.” European Journal of Communication 29 (6): 653–667. doi:10.1177/0267323114531383.
  • Lavezzolo, S., and L. Ramiro. 2018. “Stealth Democracy and the Support for new and Challenger Parties.” European Political Science Review 10 (2): 267–289. doi:10.1017/S1755773917000108.
  • López-García, G. 2016. “‘Nuevos’ y ‘Viejos’ Liderazgos: la Campaña de las Elecciones Generales Españolas de 2015 en Twitter.” Communication & Society 29 (3): 149–167.
  • López-Meri, A., S. Marcos-García, and A. Casero-Ripollés. 2017. “What do Politicians do on Twitter? Functions and Communication Strategies in the Spanish Electoral Campaign of 2016.” El Profesional de la Información 26 (5): 795–804. doi:10.3145/epi.2017.sep.02.
  • Lüfkens, M. 2018. Twiplomacy Study 2017. Twiplomacy. Retrieved from https://twiplomacy.com/blog/twiplomacy-study-2018/.
  • Marcos-García, S., and L. Alonso-Muñoz. 2019. “¿Elecciones del Cambio? Gestión Estratégica de Twitter en los Comicios Municipales de Madrid 2015.” In Comunicación, Cultura de paz e Igualdad. Tejiendo Ciudadanía Comunicativa, edited by C. C. Flores, A. I. Arévalo Salinas, and A. Barranquero Carretero, 70–80. Zacatecas (México): Universidad.
  • Marcos-García, S., L. Alonso-Muñoz, and A. Casero-Ripollés. 2017. “Usos Ciudadanos de Twitter en Eventos Políticos rElevantes. La #SesiónDeInvestidura de Pedro Sánchez.” Comunicación y Hombre (13): 25–49.
  • Marcos-Marne, H., C. Plaza-Colodro, and T. Freyburg. 2020. “Who Votes for new Parties? Economic Voting, Political Ideology and Populist Attitudes.” West European Politics 43 (1): 1–21. doi:10.1080/01402382.2019.1608752.
  • Margolis, M., D. Resnick, and C. C. Tu. 1996. “Campaigning on the Internet: Parties and Candidates on the World Wide Web in the 1996 Primary Season.” The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 2 (1): 59–78.
  • Mazzoleni, G. 2010. La Comunicación Política. Madrid, SP: Alianza.
  • Mazzoleni, G., and A. Sfardini. 2009. Politica pop. Da «Porta a Porta» a «L'isola dei Famosi». Bolonia, IT: Il Mulino.
  • McCombs, M. E., and D. L. Shaw. 1972. “The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media.” Public Opinion Quarterly 36 (2): 176–187. doi:10.1086/267990.
  • McNair, B. 2011. An Introduction to Political Communication. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Miquel-Segarra, S., L. Alonso-Muñoz, and S. Marcos-García. 2017. “Buscando la Interacción. Partidos y Candidatos en Twitter Durante las Elecciones Generales de 2015.” Prisma Social (18): 34–54.
  • Mollen, A., and H. Wilson. 2010. “Engagement, Telepresence and Interactivity in Online Consumer Experience: Reconciling Scholastic and Managerial Perspectives.” Journal of Business Research 63 (9-10): 919–925. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.05.014.
  • Morozov, E. 2012. The net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom. New York, NY: Public Affairs.
  • Norris, P. 2000. A Virtous Circle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Orriols, L., and G. Cordero. 2016. “The Breakdown of the Spanish two-Party System: the Upsurge of Podemos and Ciudadanos in the 2015 General Election.” South European Society and Politics 21 (4): 469–492. doi:10.1080/13608746.2016.1198454.
  • Parmelee, J. H., and S. L. Bichard. 2011. Politics and the Twitter Revolution: How Tweets Influence the Relationship Between Political Leaders and the Public. Plymouth: Lexington Books.
  • Patterson, T. E. 1993. Out of Order. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.
  • Pavón-Guinea, A. 2017. “The Empirical Factors of Twitter Adoption by World Governments: the Impact of Regime Type and Time on Diffusion.” The Journal of International Communication 24 (1): 138–161. doi:10.1080/13216597.2017.1405833.
  • Rahat, G., and T. Sheafer. 2007. “The Personalization(s) of Politics: Israel, 1949- 2003.” Political Communication 24 (1): 65–80.
  • Simón, P. 2017. “The Challenges of the new Spanish Multipartism: Government Formation Failure and the 2016 General Election.” South European Society and Politics 21 (4): 493–517. doi:10.1080/13608746.2016.1268292.
  • Stieglitz, S., and L. Dang-Xuan. 2012. “Political Communication and Influence Through Microblogging–An Empirical Analysis of Sentiment in Twitter Messages and Retweet Behavior.” 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System sciences (p. 3500-3509). IEEE. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2012.476
  • Stier, S., A. Bleier, H. Lietz, and M. Strohmaier. 2018. “Election Campaigning on Social Media: Politicians, Audiences, and the Mediation of Political Communication on Facebook and Twitter.” Political Communication 35 (1): 50–74. doi:10.1080/10584609.2017.1334728.
  • Stromer-Galley, J. 2014. Presidential Campaigning in the Internet Age. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Thelwall, M., and B. Cugelman. 2017. “Monitoring Twitter Strategies to Discover Resonating Topics: The Case of the UNDP.” El Profesional de la Información 26 (4): 649–661. doi:10.3145/epi.2017.jul.09.
  • Zugasti, R., and J. Pérez. 2016. “Los Temas de Campaña en Twitter de @PPopular y @Ahorapodemos Para las Elecciones Europeas de 2014.” adComunica. Revista Científica de Estrategias, Tendencias e Innovación en Comunicación (12): 205–223. doi:10.6035/2174-0992.2016.12.12.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.