Engaging with mathematics in the kindergarten. Orchestrating a fairy tale through questioning and use of tools

References

• Ainley, J. 1988. “Perceptions of Teachers’ Questioning Styles.” In Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, edited by A. Borbás, 92–99. Veszprém: International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.
   Google Scholar
• Beauchamp, G., S. Kennewell, H. Tanner, and S. Jones. 2010. “Interactive Whiteboards and All that Jazz: The Contribution of Musical Metaphors to the Analysis of Classroom Activity with Interactive Technologies.” Technology, Pedagogy and Education 19 (2): 143–157. doi: 10.1080/1475939X.2010.491217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsen, M., I. Erfjord, and P. S. Hundeland. 2010. “Orchestration of Mathematical Activities in the Kindergarten: The Role of Questions.” In Proceedings of the Sixth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education. January 28th - February 1st 2009, edited by V. Durand-Guerrier, S. Soury-Lavergne, and F. Arzarello, 2567–2576. Lyon: Institut National De Recherche Pédagogique.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, J.-P. 1992. “Subitizing: The Discontinuity after Three.” In Pathways t Number. Children's Developing Numerical Abilities, edited by J. Bideaud, C. Meljac, and J.-P. Fisher, 191–208. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Freudenthal, H. 1991. Revisiting Mathematics Education: China Lectures. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Goodchild, S. 2008. “A Quest for ‘Good’ Research.” In International Handbook on Mathematics Teacher Education, Vol. 4: Individuals, Teams, Communities and Networks, edited by B. Jaworski, and T. Wood, 201–220. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Gravemeijer, K. 1994. “Educational Development and Developmental Research in Mathematics Education.” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 25 (5): 443–471. doi: 10.2307/749485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaworski, B. 2007. “Learning Communities in Mathematics: Research and Development in Mathematics Teaching and Learning.” In Relating Practice and Research in Mathematics Education. Proceedings of Norma05, Fourth Nordic Conference on Mathematics Education, edited by C. Bergsten, B. Grevholm, H. S. Måsøval, and F. Rønning, 71–96. Trondheim: Tapir Akademisk Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Kennewell, S. 2001. “Using Affordances and Constraints in Evaluate the Use of Information and Communications Technology in Teaching and Learning.” Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education 10 (1&2): 101–116. doi: 10.1080/14759390100200105
   Google Scholar
• Mason, J. 2000. “Asking Mathematical Questions Mathematically.” International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 31 (1): 97–111. doi: 10.1080/002073900287426
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N. 2000. Words & Minds. How we Use Language to Think Together. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education and Research. 2006. Framework Plan for the Content and Tasks of Kindergartens [Rammeplan for barnehagens innhold og oppgaver]. Oslo: Ministry of Education and Research.
   Google Scholar
• O'Connor, M. C., and S. Michaels. 1996. “Shifting Participant Frameworks: Orchestrating Thinking Practices in Group Discussion.” In Discourse, Learning and Schooling, edited by D. Hicks, 63–103. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2006. Starting Strong II. Early Childhood Education and Care. Paris: OECD Publishing. Accessed February 24, 2011. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/14/32/37425999.pdf
   Google Scholar
• van Oers, B. 2002. “Teachers’ Epistemology and the Monitoring of Mathematical Thinking in Early Years Classrooms.” European Early Childhood Education Research Journal 10 (2): 19–30. doi: 10.1080/13502930285208931
   Google Scholar
• Rogoff, B. 1990. Apprenticeship in Thinking. Cognitive Development in Social Context. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, W.-M. 1996. “Teacher Questioning in an Open-inquiry Learning Environment: Interactions of Context, Content, and Student Responses.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 33 (7): 709–736. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199609)33:7<709::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-R
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, W.-M., and Y. J. Lee. 2004. “Interpreting Unfamiliar Graphs: A Generative, Activity Theoretic Model.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 57: 265–290. doi: 10.1023/B:EDUC.0000049276.37088.e4
   Google Scholar
• Thiel, O. 2010. “Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Mathematics in Early Childhood Education.” European Early Childhood Education Research Journal 18 (1): 105–115. doi: 10.1080/13502930903520090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1986. Thought and Language. New York: M.I.T. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, J. 1997. “The Unavoidable Intervention of Educational Research: A Framework for Reconsidering Research-practitioner Cooperation.” Educational Researcher 26 (7): 13–22. doi: 10.3102/0013189X026007013
   Google Scholar
• Wells, G. 1999. Dialogic Inquiry: Towards a Sociocultural Practice and Theory of Education. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, G. 2002. “The Role of Dialogue in Activity Theory.” Mind, Culture and Activity 9 (1): 43–66. doi: 10.1207/S15327884MCA0901_04
   Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. V. 1998. Mind as Action. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar