Boys who score low in mathematics at toddler age: How are their math skills compared with those of low-performing girls?

References

• Arden, R., and R. Plomin. 2006. “Sex Differences in Variance of Intelligence Across Childhood.” Personality and Individual Differences 41 (1): 39–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aunio, P., J. Hautamäki, N. Sajaniemi, and J. E. H. Van Luit. 2009. “Early Numeracy in Low-Performing Young Children.” British Educational Research Journal 35 (1): 25–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aunola, K., E. Leskinen, M.-K. Lerkkanen, and J.-E. Nurmi. 2004. “Developmental Dynamics of Math Performance from Preschool to Grade 2.” Journal of Educational Psychology 96 (4): 699–713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagnato, S. J. 2007. Authentic Assessment for Early Childhood Intervention: Best Practices. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bagnato, S., D. Goins, K. Pretti-Frontczak, and J. T. Neisworth. 2014. “Authentic Assessment as "Best Practice" for Early Childhood Intervention: National Consumer Social Validity Research.” Topics in Early Childhood Special Education 34 (2): 116–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedard, K., and I. Cho. 2010. “Early Gender Test Score Gaps Across OECD Countries.” Economics of Education Review 29 (3): 348–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blakemore, J. E., S. A. Berenbaum, and L. S. Liben. 2009. Gender Development. New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bliksvær, T., I. Fylling, B. C. Hustad, and T. Korneliussen. 2017. “Læreres forståelser av årsaker til en høy forekomst av spesialundervisning.” Tidsskrift for velferdsforskning 20 (1): 27–44.
   Google Scholar
• Brandlistuen, R. E., S. Schjølberg, K. Tambs, H. Aase, and M. V. Wang. 2016. Skolestudien: Læringsmiljø, skoleferdigheter og utviklingsvansker.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Dalvang, T., and H. Skaar Davidsen. 2009. Bruk av MIO – et observasjonsmateriell for barnehager. Bergen: Caspar forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, G. J., C. J. Dowsett, A. Claessens, K. Magnuson, A. C. Huston, P. Klebanov, L. S. Pagani, et al. 2007. “School Readiness and Later Achievement.” Developmental Psychology 43 (6): 1428–1446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fosse, T., T. Lange, M. Hope Lossius, and T. Meaney. 2018. “Mathematics as the Trojan Horse in Norwegian Early Childhood Policy?” Research in Mathematics Education 20 (2): 166–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritz, C. O., P. E. Morris, and J. J. Richler. 2012. “Effect Size Estimates: Current Use, Calculations, and Interpretation.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 141 (1): 2–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geary, D. C. 2010. Male, Female. The Evolution of Human Sex Differences. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Geary, D. C., C. O. Hamson, and M. K. Hoard. 2000. “Numerical and Arithmetical Cognition: a Longitudinal Study of Process and Concept Deficits in Children with Learning Disability.” Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 77 (3): 236–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gersten, R., N. C. Jordan, and J. R. Flojo. 2005. “Early Identification and Interventions for Students with Mathematics Difficulties.” Journal of Learning Disabilities 38 (4): 293–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, B. G. 2010. “Reversing Fortunes or Content Change? Gender Gaps in Math-Related Skill Throughout Childhood.” Social Science Research 39 (4): 540–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginsburg, H. P., and S. L. Golbeck. 2004. “Thoughts on the Future of Research on Mathematics and Science Learning and Education.” Early Childhood Research Quarterly 19 (1): 190–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halpern, D. F., C. P. Benbow, D. C. Geary, C. R. Gur, J. S. Hyde, and M. A. Gernsbacher. 2007. “The Science of Sex Differences in Science and Mathematics.” Psychological Science in the Public Interest 8 (1): 1–51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hodgetts, K. 2008. “Underperformance or ‘Getting It Right’? Constructions of Gender and Achievement in the Australian Inquiry into Boys’ Education.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 29 (5): 465–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBM-Corporation. 2013. IBM SPSS statistics for windows. Armonk, NY: IBM Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, N. C., D. Kaplan, M. N. Locuniak, and C. Ramineni. 2007. “Predicting First-Grade Math Achievement from Developmental Number Sense Trajectories.” Learning Disabilities Research & Practice 22 (1): 36–46.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, N. C., D. Kaplan, C. Ramineni, and M. N. Locuniak. 2009. “Early Math Matters: Kindergarten Number Competence and Later Mathematics Outcomes.” Developmental Psychology 45 (3): 850–867.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keilty, B., D. J. LaRocco, and F. B. Casell. 2009. “Early Interventionists’ Reports of Authentic Assessment Methods Through Focus Group Research.” Topics in Early Childhood Special Education 28 (4): 244–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovas, Y., C. M. Haworth, S. A. Petrill, and R. Plomin. 2007. “Mathematical Ability of 10-Year-Old Boys and Girls Genetic and Environmental Etiology of Typical and Low Performance.” Journal of Learning Disabilities 40 (6): 554–567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lachance, J. A., and M. M. Mazzocco. 2006. “A Longitudinal Analysis of Sex Differences in Math and Spatial Skills in Primary School age Children.” Learning and Individual Differences 16 (3): 195–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. S., and H. P. Ginsburg. 2009. “Early Childhood Teachers’ Misconceptions About Mathematics Education for Young Children in the United States.” Australasian Journal of Early Childhood 34 (4): 37–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, S. C., J. Huttenlocher, A. Taylor, and A. Langrock. 1999. “Early Sex Differences in Spatial Skill.” Developmental Psychology 35 (4): 940–949.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litty, C. G., and J. A. Hatch. 2006. “Hurry Up and Wait: Rethinking Special Education Identification in Kindergarten.” Early Childhood Education Journal 33 (4): 203–208.
   Google Scholar
• Løge, I. K., and O. Lunde. 2008. Statistisk analyse av observasjonspunktene i MIO.
   Google Scholar
• Lynn, R., J. Allik, and O. Must.2000. “Sex Differences in Brain Size, Stature and Intelligence in Children and Adolescents: Some Evidence from Estonia.” Personality and Individual Differences 29 (3): 555–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzocco, M. M. 2005. “Challenges in Identifying Target Skills for Math Disability Screening and Intervention.” Journal of Learning Disabilities 38 (4): 318–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzocco, M. M., and G. F. Myers. 2003. “Complexities in Identifying and Defining Mathematics Learning Disability in the Primary School-age Years.” Annals of Dyslexia 53 (1): 218–253.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mazzocco, M. M., and R. E. Thompson. 2005. “Kindergarten Predictors of Math Learning Disability.” Learning Disabilities Research & Practice 20 (3): 142–155.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McFarland, J., B. Hussar, X. Wang, J. Zhang, K. Wang, A. Rathbun, and F. Bullock Mann. 2018. E Condition of Education 2018 (NCES 2018-144). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Mononen, R., and P. Aunio. 2013. “Early Mathematical Performance in Finnish Kindergarten and Grade One.” LUMAT (2013–2015 Issues) 1 (3): 245–261.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, P. L., G. Farkas, and W. Qiong. 2009. “Five-Year Growth Trajectories of Kindergarten Children with Learning Difficulties in Mathematics.” Journal of Learning Disabilities 42 (4): 306–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, M. M., M. M. Mazzocco, L. B. Hanich, and M. C. Early. 2007. “Cognitive Characteristics of Children with Mathematics Learning Disability (MLD) Vary as a Function of the Cutoff Criterion Used to Define MLD.” Journal of Learning Disabilities 40 (5): 458–478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NMAP. 2008. Foundations for Success: The Final Report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel: US Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• NOU 2019: 3. 2019. Nye sjanser – bedre læring. Kjønnsforskjeller i skoleprestasjoner og utdanningsløp. Oslo: Kunnskapsdepartementet.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2016. PISA 2015 Results (Volume 1): Excellence and Equity in Education, PISA. Retrieved from Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Ostad, S. A. 2008. Strategier, strategiobservasjon og strategiopplæring - Med fokus på elever med matematikkvansker. Trondheim: Læreboka forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Reikerås, E. 2008. “Observasjonspunktene.” In MIO. Matematikken - Individet - Omgivelsene. Håndbok, edited by H. Skaar Davidsen, I. K. Løge, O. Lunde, E. Reikerås, and T. Dalvang, 30–47. Oslo: Aschehoug & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Reikerås, E., I. K. Løge, and A.-M. Knivsberg. 2012. “The Mathematical Competencies of Toddlers Expressed in Their Play and Daily Life Activities in Norwegian Kindergartens.” International Journal of Early Childhood 44 (1): 91–114.
   Google Scholar
• Reikerås, E., and T. Salomonsen. 2017. “Weak Mathematical Skills at an Early Age: Persistent or Temporary? Children with Weak Mathematical Skills and Their Development from Toddlers to Preschoolers.” Early Child Development and Care 189 (4): 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, N. M., R. D. Abbott, V. W. Berninger, and J. Busse. 1996. “The Structure of Abilities in Math-Precocious Young Children: Gender Similarities and Differences.” Journal of Educational Psychology 88 (2): 341–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salomonsen, T., and E. Reikerås. submitted. Gender Differences in Toddler and Preschool Children's Early Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Skaar Davidsen, H., I. Løge, O. Lunde, E. Reikerås, and T. Dalvang. 2008. MIO-Matematikken-Individet-Omgivelsene. Observasjonsark. [MIO—The Mathematics, the individual and the environment. Registration form]. Oslo: Aschehoug.
   Google Scholar
• Stoet, G., and D. C. Geary. 2013. “Sex Differences in Mathematics and Reading Achievement are Inversely Related: Within- and Across-Nation Assessment of 10 Years of PISA Data.” PLoS One 8 (3): e57988.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoet, G., and D. C. Geary. 2015. “Sex Differences in Academic Achievement Are Not Related to Political, Economic, or Social Equality.” Intelligence 48: 137–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teisl, J. T., M. M. Mazzocco, and G. F. Myers. 2001. “The Utility of Kindergarten Teacher Ratings for Predicting Low Academic Achievement in First Grade.” Journal of Learning Disabilities 34 (3): 286–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Udir. 2017. Rammeplan for barnehagen. Forskrift om rammenplan for barnehagens innhold og oppgaver.
   Google Scholar
• Udir. 2018. Utdanningsspeilet 2017: Tall og analyse av barnehager og grunnopplæringen i Norge.
   Google Scholar
• Wendelborg, C., J. Caspersen, A. M. Kittelsaa, S. Svendsen, A. S. Haugset, T. Kongsvik, and R. B. Reiling. 2015. Barnehagetilbudet til barn med særlige behov: Undersøkelse av tilbudet til barn med særlige behov under opplæringspliktig alder. (November 15 Mangfold og inkludering).
   Google Scholar
• Willingham, W. W., and N. S. Cole. 1997. Research on Gender Differences. Gender and Fair Assessment. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., P. Rasanen, T. Koponen, K. Aunola, M. K. Lerkkanen, and J. E. Nurmi. 2018. “Early Cognitive Precursors of Children's Mathematics Learning Disability and Persistent Low Achievement: A 5-Year Longitudinal Study.” Child Development 00: 1–21.
   Google Scholar