Student–teacher dialectic in the co-creation of a zone of proximal development: an example from kindergarten mathematics

References

• Abtahi, Y., M. Graven, and S. Lerman. 2017. “Conceptualising the More Knowledgeable Other Within a Multi-Directional ZPD.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 96 (3): 275–287. doi: 10.1007/s10649-017-9768-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goos, M., P. Galbraith, and P. Renshaw. 2002. “Socially Mediated Metacognition: Creating Collaborative Zones of Proximal Development in Small Group Problem Solving.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 49 (2): 193–223. doi: 10.1023/A:1016209010120
   Google Scholar
• Hussain, M. A., J. Monaghan, and J. Threlfall. 2013. “Teacher-Student Development in Mathematics Classrooms: Interrelated Zones of Free Movement and Promoted Actions.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 82 (2): 285–302. doi: 10.1007/s10649-012-9426-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John-Steiner, V. 2000. Creative Collaboration. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levykh, M. G. 2008. “The Affective Establishment and Maintenance of Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development.” Educational Theory 58 (1): 83–101. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-5446.2007.00277.x
   Google Scholar
• Meira, L., and S. Lerman. 2009. “Zones of Proximal Development as Fields for Communication and Dialogue.” In Challenges and Strategies for Studying Human Development in Cultural Contexts, edited by C. Lightfoot, and M. Lyra, 199–219. Rome: Firera Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N. 2000. Words and Minds: How We Use Language to Think Together. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Radford, L. 2013. “Sensuous cognition.” In Visual mathematics and cyberlearning, edited by D. Martinovic, V. Freiman, and Z. Karadag, 141–162. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Radford, L. 2014. “On Teachers and Students: An Ethical Cultural-Historical Perspective.” In Proceedings of the 38th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, edited by P. Liljedahl, C. Nicol, S. Oesterle, and D. Allan, 1–20. Vancouver, Canada: PME.
   Google Scholar
• Radford, L., J. Marin-Tamayo, and A. Simbagoye. 2018. Bien-être, résilience, intelligence émotionnelle. Rapport de Recherche. Sudbury: Université Laurentienne.
   Google Scholar
• Radford, L., and W. M. Roth. 2011. “Intercorporeality and Ethical Commitment: An Activity Perspective on Classroom Interaction.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 77 (2-3): 227–245. doi: 10.1007/s10649-010-9282-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, W. M., and L. Radford. 2011. A Cultural-Historical Perspective on Mathematics Teaching and Learning. Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Valsiner, J., and J. van der Veer. 1993. “The Encoding of Distance: The Concept of the “Zone of Proximal Development” and Its Interpretations.” In The Development and Meaning of Psychological Distance, edited by R. R. Cocking, and K. A. Renninger, 35–62. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence-Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Veresov, N. 2004. “Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD): The Hidden Dimension?” In Språk som kultur – brytningar i tid och rum [Language as Culture – Tensions in Time and Space], edited by A. L. Ostern, and R. Heila-Ylikallio, 13–30. Vasa: Åbo Akademi.
   Google Scholar
• Veresov, N. N. 2017. “ZBR and ZPD: Is There a Difference?” Cultural-Historical Psychology 13 (1): 23–36. doi: 10.17759/chp.2017130102
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1987. “Thinking and Speech.” In The Collected Works of L.S. Vygotsky, edited by R. W. Rieber, and A. S. Carton, 37–285. New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, G. 1999. Dialogic Inquiry: Towards a Socio-Cultural Practice and Theory of Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. V. 1984. “The Zone of Proximal Development: Some Conceptual Issues.” New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development 8 (23): 7–18. doi: 10.1002/cd.23219842303
   Google Scholar
• Zack, V., and B. Graves. 2002. “Making Mathematical Meaning Through Dialogue: “Once You Think of it, the Z Minus Three Seems Pretty Weird”.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 46 (1): 229–271.
   Google Scholar