Young children’s interactions with a social robot during a drawing task

References

• Abe, K., T. Nagai, C. Hieida, T. Omori, and M. Shiomi. 2020. “Estimating Children’s Personalities Through Their Interaction Activities with a Tele-Operated Robot.” Journal of Robotics and Mechatronics 32: 21–31. doi:10.20965/jrm.2020.p0021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad, S. F., M. K. Rahmat, M. S. Mubarik, M. M. Alam, and S. I. Hyder. 2021. “Artificial Intelligence and its Role in Education.” Sustainability 13: 12902. doi:10.3390/su132212902.
   Google Scholar
• Baron, N. S. 2015. “Shall we Talk? Conversing with Humans and Robots.” The Information Society 31 (3): 257–264. doi:10.1080/01972243.2015.1020211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartneck, C., and J. Forlizzi. 2004. “A Design-Centred Framework for Social Human-Robot Interaction.” Robot and Human Interactive Communication. 13th IEEE, 591 - 594. doi:10.1109/ROMAN.2004.1374827.
   Google Scholar
• Bartneck, C., D. Kulić, E. Croft, and S. Zoghbi. 2009. “Measurement Instruments for the Anthropomorphism, Animacy, Likeability, Perceived Intelligence, and Perceived Safety of Robots.” International Journal of Social Robotics 1: 71–81. doi:10.1007/s12369-008-0001-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartneck, C., T. Nomura, T. Kanda, T. Suzuki, and K. Kennsuke. 2005. “A Cross-Cultural Study on Attitudes Towards Robots.” Proceedings of the HCI International, Las Vegas. doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.35929.11367.
   Google Scholar
• Bartneck, C., T. Suzuki, T. Kanda, and T. Nomura. 2007. “The Influence of People’s Culture and Prior Experiences with Aibo on Their Attitude Towards Robots.” AI & Society 21 (1–2): 217–230. http://www.bartneck.eu/publications/2007/nars/bartneckSuzukiAISociety2006.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, P., E. Ashurst, R. Read, J. Kennedy, and T. Belpaeme. 2017. “Robot Education Peers in a Situated Primary School Study: Personalisation Promotes Child Learning.” PLoS One 12 (5): e0178126. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id = 10.1371journal.pone.0178126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belpaeme, T., P. Baxter, J. Greeff, J. Kennedy, R. Read, R. Looije, M. Neerincx, I. Baroni, and M. Zelati. 2013. “Child-Robot Interaction: Perspectives and Challenges.” In Social Robotics. ICSR 2013, edited by G. Herrmann, M. J. Pearson, A. Lenz, P. Bremner, A. Spiers, and U. Leonards, 8239, 452–459. Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-02675-6_45
   Google Scholar
• Belpaeme, T., J. Kennedy, A. Ramachandran, B. Scassellati, and F. Tanaka. 2018a. “Social Robots for Education: A Review.” Science Robotics 3 (21): 1–9. doi:10.1126/scirobotics.aat5954.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belpaeme, T., P. Vogt, R. van den Berghe, K. Bergmann, T. Goksun, M. de Haas, J. Knero, … A. K. Pandey. 2018b. “Guidelines for Designing Social Robots as Second Language Tutors.” International Journal of Social Robotics 10: 325–341. doi:10.1007/s12369-018-0467-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloodgood, J. W. 1999. “What’s in a Name? Children’s Name Writing and Literacy Acquisition.” Reading Research Quarterly 34: 342–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breazeal, C. 2003. “Emotion and Sociable Humanoid Robots.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 59: 119–155. doi:10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00018-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Causo, A., G. T. Vo, I. M. Chen, and S. H. Yeo. 2016. “Design of Robots Used as Education Companion and Tutor.” In J. O. Gazeau, M. Labribi, & S. Zeghloul, (Eds.) Robotics and Mechatronics, 75–84. Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-22368-1_8.
   Google Scholar
• Chandra, S., P. Dillenbourg, and A. Paiva. 2020. “Children Teach Handwriting to a Social Robot with Different Learning Competencies.” International Journal of Social Robotics 12: 721–748. doi:10.1007/s12369-019-00589-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charisi, V., E. Gomez, G. Mier, L. Merino, and R. Gomez. 2020. “Child-robot Collaborative Problem-Solving and the Importance of Child's Voluntary Interaction: A Developmental Perspective.” Frontiers in Robotics and AI 7. doi:10.3389/frobt.2020.00015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooney, M., and M. Menezes. 2018. “Design for an art Therapy Robot: An Explorative Review of the Theoretical Foundations for Engaging in Emotional and Creative Painting with a Robot.” Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 2 (3): 52. doi:10.3390/mti2030052.
   Google Scholar
• Crompton, H., K. Gregory, and D. Burke. 2018. “Humanoid Robots Supporting Children’s Learning in an Early Childhood Setting.” British Journal of Educational Technology 49: 911–927. doi:10.1111/bjet.12654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crystal, D. 2008. A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. 6th ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. doi:10.1002/9781444302776.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education and Training. 2019. “Belonging, Being & Becoming: The Early Years Learning Framework for Australia.” https://www.acecqa.gov.au/sites/default/files/2018-02/belonging_being_and_becoming_the_early_years_learning_framework_for_australia.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Deublein, A., A. Pfeifer, K. Merbach, K. Bruckner, C. Mengelkamp, and B. Lugrin. 2018. “Scaffolding of Motivation in Learning Using a Social Robot.” Computers & Education 125. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Wit, J., T. Schodde, B. Willemsen, K. Bergmann, M. de Haas, S. Kopp, E. Krahmer, and P. Vogt. 2018. “The Effect of a Robot’s Gestures and Adaptive Tutoring on Children’s Acquisition of Second Language Vocabularies.” In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 50–58. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Fridin, M. 2014. “Storytelling by a Kindergarten Social Assistive Robot: A Tool for Constructive Learning in Preschool Education.” Computers & Education 70: 53–64. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gargot, T., T. Asselborn, I. Zammouri, J. Brunelle, W. Johal, P. Dillenbourg, D. Archambault, M. Chetouani, D. Cohen, and S. M. Anzalone. 2021. “It is not the Robot who Learns, it is me.” Treating Severe Dysgraphia Using Child-Robot Interaction.” Frontiers in Psychiatry 12: 596055. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.596055.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heuer, T., and J. Stein. 2020. “From HCI to HRI: About Users, Acceptance and Emotions.” In International Conference on Human Systems Engineering and Design: Future Trends and Applications (pp.149–153) Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-27928-8_23
   Google Scholar
• Hollingshead, A. B. 1975. Four Factor Index of Social Status [unpublished manuscript]. New Haven, CT: Dept of Sociology, Yale University.
   Google Scholar
• Hoorn, J. F., I. S. Huang, E. A. Konijn, and L. van Buuren. 2021. “Robot Tutoring of Multiplication: Over one-Third Learning Gain for Most, Learning Loss for Some.” Robotics 10 (1): 16. https://www.mdpi.com/2218-6581/10/1/16/pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ioannou, A., E. Andreou, and M. Christofi. 2015. “Preschoolers’ Interest and Caring Behaviour Around a Humanoid Robot.” TechTrends 59 (2): 23–26.
   Google Scholar
• Johal, W. 2020. “Research Trends in Social Robots for Learning.” Current Robotics Reports, 1–9. doi:10.1007/s43154-020-00008-3.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, J., P. Baxter, and T. Belpaeme. 2015. “The Robot Who Tried Too Hard: Social Behaviour of a Robot Tutor Can Negatively Affect Child Learning.” In: Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human–Robot Interaction (HRI). ACM, NY, USA, (pp 67–74). doi:10.1145/2696454.2696457
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, J., P. Baxter, E. Senft, and T. Belpaeme. 2016. “Social Robot Tutoring for Child Second Language Learning.” Paper presented at the The Eleventh ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, L., and K. Dooley. 2015. “Drawing and Writing on the Screen.” In Dooley, K., Knight, L., Dezuanni, M., & Gattenhof, S. (Eds.) iPads in the early years: Developing literacy and creativity pp. 44–65. Routledge, United Kingdom.
   Google Scholar
• Kory Westlund, J., and C. Breazeal. 2015. “The Interplay of Robot Language Level with Children's Language Learning During Storytelling.” In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction Extended Abstracts, 65–66. doi:10.1145/2701973.2701989
   Google Scholar
• Kory Westlund, J., S. Jeong, H. W. Park, S. Ronfard, A. Adhikari, P. L. Harris, D. DeSteno, and C. L. Breazeal. 2017. “Flat vs. Expressive Storytelling: Young Children’s Learning and Retention of a Social Robot’s Narrative.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 11: 295. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2017.00295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kucirkova, N., D. W. Rowe, L. Oliver, and L. E. Piestrzynski. 2019. “Systematic Review of Young Children's Writing on Screen: What do we Know and What do we Need to Know.” Literacy 53 (4): 216–225. doi:10.1111/lit.12173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemaignan, S., A. Jacq, D. Hood, and F. Garcia. 2016. “Learning by Teaching a Robot: The Case of Handwriting.” IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine 23 (2), doi:10.1109/MRA.2016.2546700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, D., P. Rau, and Y. Li. 2010. “A Cross-Cultural Study: Effect of Robot Appearance and Task.” International Journal of Social Robotics 2 (2): 175–186. https://www.academia.edu/download/50390967/s12369-010-0056-920161118-5034-zxhkuq.pdf.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, J., D. Yamada-Rice, J. Bishop, J. Lahmar, F. Scott, L. Plowman, M. Piras, et al. 2015. “Exploring Play and Creativity in Pre-Schoolers’ Use of Apps: Technology and Play.” Economic and Social Research Council. http://www.techandplay.org/tap-media-pack.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzoni, E., and M. Benvenuti. 2015. “A Robot-Partner for Preschool Children LearningEnglish Using Socio-Cognitive Conflict.” Journal of Educational Technology and Society 18: 474–485.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, M. M. 2018a. “Maternal Scaffolding of Preschoolers’ Writing Using Tablet and Paper-Pencil Tasks: Relations with Emergent Literacy Skills.” Journal of Research in Childhood Education 32: 67–80. doi:10.1080/02568543.2017.1386740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann, M. M. 2018b. “Using Tablets and Apps to Enhance Emergent Literacy Skills in Young Children.” Early Childhood Research Quarterly 42: 239–246. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2017.10.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann, M. M. 2020a. “Social Robots and Young Children’s Early Language and Literacy Learning.” Early Childhood Education Journal 48 (2): 157–170. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007s10643-019-00997-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann, M. M. 2020b. “Emergent Writing Assessment App (EWAa).” https://apps.apple.com/au/app/ewaa-emergent-writing/id1457520769.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, M. M. 2021. “: Exploring and Mapping Young Children’s Digital Emergent Writing on Tablets.” Early Years: An International Research Journal, 1–15. doi:10.1080/09575146.2021.1999214.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, M. M., M. Hood, and D. L. Neumann. 2009. “The Scaffolding of Emergent Literacy Skills in the Home Environment: A Case Study.” Early Childhood Education Journal 36 (4): 313–319. https://www.academia.edu/download/30988922/59672_1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, M. M., and D. L. Neumann. 2016. “An Analysis of Mother-Child Interactions During an iPad Activity.” In K. Alvarez (Ed.), Parent-child Interactions and Relationships: Perceptions, Practices, and Developmental Outcomes, 133–148. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Obaid, M., G. E. Baykal, A. E. Yantaç, and W. Barendregt. 2018. “Developing a Prototyping Method for Involving Children in the Design of Classroom Robots.” International Journal of Social Robotics 2: 279–291. doi:10.1007/s12369-017-0450-7.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2021. “Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development: Play, Create and Learn: What Matters Most for Five-Year-Olds.” https://www.oecd.org/education/school/early-learning-and-child-well-being-study.
   Google Scholar
• Oranç, C., and A. C. Küntay. 2020. “Children’s Perception of Social Robots as a Source of Information Across Different Domains of Knowledge.” Cognitive Development 54), doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2020.100875.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto, G., and O. Incognito. 2021. “The Relationship Between Emergent Drawing, Emergent Writing, and Visual-Motor Integration in Preschool Children.” Infant and Child Development, doi:10.1002/icd.2284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajan, K., and A. Saffiotti. 2017. “Towards a Science of Integrated AI and Robotics.” Artificial Intelligence 247: 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.artint.2017.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, D. W., and S. Wilson. 2015. “The Development of a Descriptive Measure of Early Childhood Writing: Results from the Write Start! Writing Assessment.” Journal of Literacy Research 47: 245–292. doi:10.1177/1086296X15619723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharkey, A. J. C. 2016. “Should we Welcome Robot Teachers?” Ethics and Information Technology 18: 283–297. doi:10.1007/s10676-016-9387-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starcic, A. I., I. Bratko, and V. Rosanda. 2021. “Are pre-Service Teachers Disinclined to Utilise Embodied Humanoid Social Robots in the Classroom?” British Journal of Educational Technology 52. doi:10.1111/bjet.13144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szafir, D., and B. Mutlu. 2021. “Pay attention! Designing Adaptive Agents that Monitor and Improve User Engagement.” In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 11–20. doi:10.1145/2207676.2207679.
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka, F., A. Cicourel, and J. R. Movellan. 2007. “Socialization Between Toddlers and Robots at an Early Childhood Education Center.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104: 17954–17958. doi:10.1073/pnas.0707769104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka, F., and S. Matsuzoe. 2012. “Children Teach a Care-Receiving Robot to Promote Their Learning: Field Experiments in a Classroom for Vocabulary Learning.” Journal of Human-Robot Interaction 1. doi:10.5898/JHRI.1.1.
   Google Scholar
• Thomaz, A., G. Hoffman, and M. Cakmak. 2016. “Computational Human-Robot Interaction.” Foundations and Trends in Robotics 4: 104–223. doi:10.1561/2300000049.
   Google Scholar
• Tolksdorf, Nils. F., C. E. Crawshaw, F. E. Viertel, and K. J. Rohlfing. 2021b. “Comparing the Effects of a Different Social Partner (Social Robot vs. Human) on Children's Social Referencing in Interaction.” Frontiers in Education 4. doi:10.3389/feduc.2020.569615.
   Google Scholar
• Tolksdorf, N. F., S. Siebert, I. Zorn, I. Horwath, and K. J. Rohlfing. 2020. “Ethical Considerations of Applying Robots in Kindergarten Settings: Towards an Approach from a Macroperspective.” International Journal of Social Robotics, 1–12. doi:10.1007/s12369-020-00622-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolksdorf, Nils. F., F. E. Viertel, and K. J. Rohlfing. 2021a. “Do shy Preschoolers Interact Differently When Learning Language with a Social Robot? An Analysis of Interactional Behavior and Word Learning.” Frontiers in Robotics and AI 8: 0–137. doi:10.3389/frobt.2021.676123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhagen, J., R. van den Berghe, O. Oudgenoeg-Paz, A. Küntay, and P. Leseman. 2019. “Children’s Reliance on the non-Verbal Cues of a Robot Versus a Human.” PLoS ONE 14 (12): e0217833. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0217833.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogt, P., R. van den Berghe, and M. de Haas. 2019. “Second Language Tutoring Using Social Robots: A Large-Scale Study.” In 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) (pp.497-505). IEEE. doi:10.1109/HRI.2019.8673077.
   Google Scholar
• Vollmer, A.-L., R. Read, D. Trippas, and T. Belpaeme. 2018. “Children Conform, Adults Resist: A Robot Group Induced Peer Pressure on Normative Social Conformity.” Science Robotics 3 (21): 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind and Society: The Development of Higher Mental Processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X. V., and L. Wang. 2021. “A Literature Survey of the Robotic Technologies During the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Journal of Manufacturing Systems 60: 823–836. doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.02.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., N. Yin, and Z. Zhang. 2021. “Smart Design of Intelligent Companion Toys for Preschool Children.” Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 35: 151–164. doi:10.1017/S0890060420000499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welsch, J. G., A. Sullivan, and L. M. Justice. 2003. “That’s my Letter!: What Preschoolers’ Name Writing Representations Tell us About Emergent Literacy Knowledge.” Journal of Literacy Research 35: 757–776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, L. J., K. Dautenhahn, A. Rainer, B. Robins, H. Lehmann, and D. S. Syrdal. 2013. “Robot-mediated Interviews: How Effective is a Humanoid Robot as a Tool for Interviewing Young Children?” PLoS ONE 8 (3): e59448. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0059448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia, Y., and G. LeTendre. 2021. “Robots for Future Classrooms: A Cross-Cultural Validation Study of “Negative Attitudes Toward Robots Scale” in the US Context.” International Journal of Social Robotics 13 (4): 703–714. doi:10.1007/s12369-020-00669-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhexenova, Z., A. Amirova, M. Abdikarimova, K. Kudaibergenov, N. Baimakhan, B. Tleubayev, T. Asselborn, et al. 2020. “A Comparison of Social Robot to Tablet and Teacher in a new Script Learning Context.” Frontiers in Robotics and AI 7. doi:10.3389/frobt.2020.00099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar