Analysing the state of student participation in two Eco-Schools using Engeström’s Second Generation Activity Systems Model

References

• Arnold, H. E., F. G. Cohen, and A. Warner. 2009. “Youth and Environmental Action: Perspectives of Young Environmental Leaders on their Formative Influences.” The Journal of environmental education 40(3): 27–36. doi:10.3200/JOEE.40.3.27-36.
   Google Scholar
• Breiting, S., M. Mayer, and F. Mogensen. 2005. Quality Criteria for ESD-Schools: Guidelines to Enhance the Quality of Education for Sustainable Development. Vienna: Austrian Federal Ministry of Education, Science and Culture.
   Google Scholar
• Berglund, T., Gericke, N. N., and S. N. Chang Rundgren. 2014. “The Implementation of Education for Sustainable Development in Sweden: Investigating the Sustainability Consciousness among Upper Secondary Students.” Research in Science & Technological Education 32 (3): 318–339. doi:10.1080/02635143.2014.944493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berk, L. E., and A. Winsler. 1995. Scaffolding Children’s Learning: Vygotsky and Early Childhood Education. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
   Google Scholar
• Blunden, A. 2015. “Lecture 9. The Object of Activity in Leontyev, Engeström and Vygotsky.” Concepts of Cultural Historical Activity Theory, March 14. Accessed 3 August 2017. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oek0RDjkT_c&t=2658s.
   Google Scholar
• Boeve‐de Pauw, J., and P. Van Petegem. 2013. “The Effect of Eco-Schools on Children’s Environmental Values and Behaviour.” Journal of Biological Education 47 (2): 96–103. doi:10.1080/00219266.2013.764342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boeve‐de Pauw, J. and P. Van Petegem. 2017. “Eco-school Evaluation Beyond Labels: The Impact of Environmental Policy, Didactics and Nature at School on Student Outcomes.” Environmental Education Research 24(9):1250–1267. doi:10.1080/13504622.2017.1307327.
   Google Scholar
• Boeve‐de Pauw, J., and P. Van Petegem. 2018. “Eco-School Evaluation beyond Labels: The Impact of Environmental Policy, Didactics and Nature at School on Student Outcomes.” Environmental Education Research 24 (9): 1250–1267. doi:10.1080/13504622.2017.1307327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boeve‐de Pauw, J., and P. Van Petegem. 2011. “The Effect of Flemish Eco-Schools on Student Environmental Knowledge, Attitudes, and Affect.” International Journal of Science Education 33 (11): 1513–1538. doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.540725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center on International Education Benchmarking (CIEB). 2017. “Netherlands Overview.” Accessed 7 November 2017. http://ncee.org/what-we-do/center-on-international-education-benchmarking/top-performing-countries/netherlands-overview/.
   Google Scholar
• Cincera, J., J. Boeve-de Pauw, D. Goldman, and P. Simonova. 2019. “Emancipatory or Instrumental? Students’ and Teachers’ Perceptions of the Implementation of the EcoSchool Program.” Environmental Education Research 25 (7): 1083–1104. doi:10.1080/13504622.2018.1506911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cincera, J., and J. Krajhanzl. 2013. “Eco-Schools: What Factors Influence Pupils’ Action Competence for Pro-Environmental Behavior?” Journal of Cleaner Production 61 (25): 117–121. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.06.030.
   Google Scholar
• Cincera, J., and V. Maskova. 2011. “GLOBE in the Czech Republic: A Program Evaluation.” Environmental Education Research 17 (4): 499–517. doi:10.1080/13504622.2011.557497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corcoran, P. B., J. P. Weakland, and A. E. J. Wals. 2017. Envisioning Futures for Environmental and Sustainability Education. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Eco-Schools. 2017a. “About Eco-Schools.” Accessed 29 April 2017. http://www.ecoschools.global/how-does-it-work/
   Google Scholar
• Eco-Schools. 2017b. Eco-Schools Handbook - Engaging the Youth of Today to Protect the Climate of Tomorrow. Copenhagen: FEE Eco-Schools.
   Google Scholar
• Eco-SchoolsNL. 2017. “Over Eco-Schools.” Accessed 13 November 2017. https://eco-schools.nl/over-eco-schools.
   Google Scholar
• Eilam, E., and T. Trop. 2010. “ESD Pedagogy: A Guide for the Perplexed.” The Journal of Environmental Education 42 (1): 43–64. doi:10.1080/00958961003674665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. 1987. Learning by Expanding - An Activity Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. 2000. “Activity Theory as a Framework for Analyzing and Redesigning Work.” Ergonomics 43 (7): 960–974. doi:10.1080/001401300409143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freire, P. 1970. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Frenzel, A. C., T. Goetz, O. Lüdtke, R. Pekrun, and R. E. Sutton. 2009. “Emotional Transmission in the Classroom: Exploring the Relationship between Teacher and Student Enjoyment.” Journal of Educational Psychology 101 (3): 705–716. doi:10.1037/a0014695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan, D., A. Gal, R. Könczey, and A. Varga. 2019. “Do Eco-Schools Really Help Implementation of ESD?: A Comparison between Eco-School Systems of Hungary and Israel.” Hungarian Educational Research Journal 9 (4): 628–653. doi:10.1556/063.9.2019.4.53.
   Google Scholar
• Glesne, C. 2005. Becoming Qualitative Researchers: An Introduction. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, D., O. Ayalon, D. Baum, and B. Weiss. 2018. “Influence of ‘Green School Certification’on Students’ Environmental Literacy and Adoption of Sustainable Practice by Schools.” Journal of Cleaner Production 183: 1300–1313. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, J., and N. Thorogood. 2014. Qualitative Methods for Health Research. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Hallfredsdóttir, S. 2011. “Eco-Schools: Are They Really Better? Comparison of Environmental Knowledge, Attitudes and Actions between Students in Environmentally Certified Schools and Traditional Schools in Iceland.” Master’s thesis., Reykjavik University.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, L. G. 2008. The whole-school approach to education for sustainable development: From pilot projects to systemic change. Policy & Practice - A Development Education Review 6.
   Google Scholar
• Hedefalk, M., J. Almqvist, and M. Lidar. 2014. “Teaching for Action Competence.” SAGE Open 4 (3): 1–8. 215824401454378. doi:10.1177/:.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, K., and D. Tilbury. 2004. Whole-School Approaches to Sustainability: An International Review of Sustainable School Programs. Report Prepared by the Australian Research Institute in Education for Sustainability (ARIES) for the Department of the Environment and Heritage. Australian Government.
   Google Scholar
• Hickman, G. and M. Riemer. 2016. “A Theory of Engagement for Fostering Collective Action in Youth Leading Environmental Change.” Ecopsychology 8(3): 167–173. doi:10.1089/eco.2016.0024.
   Google Scholar
• Hofman, M. 2015. “What is an Education for Sustainable Development Supposed to Achieve—a Question of What, How and Why.” Journal of Education for Sustainable Development 9 (2): 213–228. doi:10.1177/0973408215588255.
   Google Scholar
• Jennings, P. A., and M. T. Greenberg. 2009. “The Prosocial Classroom: Teacher Social and Emotional Competence in Relation to Student and Classroom Outcomes.” Review of Educational Research 79 (1): 491–525. doi:10.3102/0034654308325693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, B. B., and K. Schnack. 1997. “The Action Competence Approach in Environmental Education.” Environmental Education Research 3 (2): 163–178. doi:10.1080/1350462970030205.
   Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D. H., and L. Rohrer-Murphy. 1999. “Activity Theory as a Framework for Designing Constructivist Learning Environments.” Educational Technology Research and Development 47 (1): 61–79. doi:10.1007/BF02299477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaptelinin, V. 2005. “The Object of Activity: Making Sense of the Sense-Maker.” Mind, Culture, and Activity 12 (1): 4–18. doi:10.1207/s15327884mca1201_2.
   Google Scholar
• Krasny, M. 2020. Advancing Environmental Education Practice. Ithaca, NY: Comstock Publishing Associates, an imprint of Cornell.
   Google Scholar
• Krnel, D., and S. Naglic. 2009. “Environmental Literacy Comparison between Eco-Schools and Ordinary Schools in Slovenia.” Science Education International 20: 5–24.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, R. 2011. Research Methodology - A Step-by-Step Guide for Beginners. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Lace-Jeruma, L., and R. Birzina. 2019. “The Improvement of Eco-School Students’ Environmental Awareness in the Context of Education for Sustainable Development.” In Rural Environment. Education. Personality.(REEP). Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference (Latvia). Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies. doi:10.22616/REEP.2019.010.
   Google Scholar
• Mack, N., K. Woodsong, K. M. Macqueen, and G. Guest. 2005. Qualitative Research Methods: A Data Collector’s Field Guide. Durham, NC: USAID.
   Google Scholar
• Mathar, R. 2014. “The Concept of Whole School Approach – A Platform for School Development with Focus on Sustainable Development.” Accessed 27 March 2017. https://esd-expert.net/files/ESD-Expert/pdf/Concept-Paper-Mathar.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment. 2014. Kernwaarden van de Nederlandse Samenleving. The Hague: Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment and ProDemos.
   Google Scholar
• Mogensen, F., and M. Mayer. 2005. ECO-Schools: Trends and Divergences - A Comparative Study on ECO-School Development Processes in 13 Countries. Vienna: Austrian Federal Ministry of Education, Science and Culture.
   Google Scholar
• Mogensen, F., and K. Schnack. 2010. “The Action Competence Approach and the ‘New’ Discourses of Education for Sustainable Development, Competence and Quality Criteria.” Environmental Education Research 16 (1): 59–74. doi:10.1080/13504620903504032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mogren, A., and N. Gericke. 2017. “ESD Implementation at the School Organization Level, Part 1 – Investigating the Quality Criteria Guiding School Leaders’ Work at Recognized ESD Schools.” Environmental Education Research 23 (7): 972–992. doi:10.1080/13504622.2016.1226265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mogren, A., N. Gericke, and H. Scherp. 2019. “Whole School Approaches to Education for Sustainable Development: A Model That Links to School Improvement.” Environmental Education Research 25 (4): 508–531. doi:10.1080/13504622.2018.1455074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mogren, A. 2019. “Guiding Principles of Transformative Education for Sustainable Development in Local School Organisations: Investigating Whole School Approaches through a School Improvement Lens.” Doctoral thesis., Karlstad University Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Mwanza, D. 2002. “Conceptualising Work Activity for CAL Systems Design.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 18 (1): 84–92. doi:10.1046/j.0266-4909.2001.00214.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mwanza, D. 2001. “Where Theory Meets Practice: A Case for an Activity Theory Based Methodology to Guide Computer System Design.” Paper Presented at the Eighth IFIP TC 13 Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Tokio, 9–13 July.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson, D., N. Gericke, J. Boeve-de Pauw, T. Berglund, and T. Chang. 2019. “Green Schools in Taiwan–Effects on Student Sustainability Consciousness.” Global Environmental Change 54: 184–194. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.11.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson, D., N. Gericke, and S. N. Chang Rundgren. 2016. “The Effect of Implementation of Education for Sustainable Development in Swedish Compulsory Schools–Assessing Pupils’ Sustainability Consciousness.” Environmental Education Research 22 (2): 176–202. doi:10.1080/13504622.2015.1005057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauw, Jelle, Niklas Gericke, Daniel Olsson, and Teresa Berglund. 2015. “The Effectiveness of Education for Sustainable Development.” Sustainability 7 (11): 15693–15717. doi:10.3390/su71115693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Punch, K. F., and A. Oancea. 2014. Introduction to Research Methods in Education. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Red Andaluza de Ecoescuelas (RAE). 2015. “¿Qué es una Ecoescuela?” Accessed 2 November 2017. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EXt9IpbxdbM.
   Google Scholar
• Regional Government of Andalusia (RGA). 2016a. Educational Success Plan of Andalusia 2016-2020 (Plan de Éxito Educativo 2016-2020). Seville: Education Department, Regional Government of Andalusia (RGA).
   Google Scholar
• Regional Government of Andalusia (RGA). 2016b. ALDEA - Catalogue School Year 2016/17. Seville: Regional Government of Andalusia (RGA), Ministry of Education & Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning.
   Google Scholar
• Regional Government of Andalusia (RGA). 2016c. Information Dossier ALDEA, Environmental Education for the Educational Community 2016/17 (Dossier informativo ALDEA, Educación Ambiental para la Comunidad Educativa 2016/2017). Seville: Regional Government of Andalusia (RGA).
   Google Scholar
• Regional Government of Andalusia (RGA). 2016d. Theoretical Framework of Reference - ALDEA Programme. Environmental Education for the Educational Community (Marco Teórico de Referencia - Programa ALDEA. Educación Ambiental Para la Comunidad Educativa). Seville: Regional Government of Andalusia (RGA).
   Google Scholar
• Reid, A., B. B. Jensen, J. Nikel, and V. Simovska. 2008. Participation and Learning: Developing Perspectives on Education and the Environment, Health and Sustainability. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schusler, T. M., M. E. Krasny, and D. J. Decker. 2017. “The Autonomy-Authority Duality of Shared Decision-Making in Youth Environmental Action.” Environmental Education Research 23 (4): 533–552. doi:10.1080/13504622.2016.1144174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shallcross, T., and J. Robinson. 2008. “Sustainability Education, Whole School Approaches, and Communities of Action.” In Participation and Learning: Developing Perspectives on Education and the Environment, Health and Sustainability, edited by A. Reid, B. B. Jensen, J. Nikel, and V. Simovska, 299–320. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Silo, N. 2011. “Exploring Opportunities for Action Competence Development through Learners’ Participation in Waste Management Activities in Selected Primary Schools in Botswana.” Doctor of Philosophy, Rhodes University.
   Google Scholar
• Van Poeck, K. and J. Vandenabeele. 2014. “Education as a Response to Sustainability Issues.” European Journal for Research on the Education and Learning of Adults 5(2): 221–236. doi:10.3384/rela.2000-7426.rela0111.
   Google Scholar
• Tilbury, D., and D. Wortman. 2005. “Whole School Approaches to Sustainability.” Geographical Education 18 (2005): 22–30.
   Google Scholar
• Wals, A. E. J., and J. P. Corcoran. 2012. Learning for Sustainability in Times of Accerlerating Change. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Yamagata-Lynch, L. C. 2010. Activity Systems Analysis Methods - Understanding Complex Learning Environments. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar