Understanding schema incongruity as a process in advertising: Review and future recommendations

REFERENCES

• Alden, D.L., A.Mukherjee, and W.D.Hoyer. 2000. The effects of incongruity, surprise and positive moderators on perceived humor in television advertising. Journal of Advertising29, no. 2: 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, N.H.1988. A functional approach to person cognition. In A dual process model of impression formation, ed. T.K.Srull and R.S.WyerJr, 37–51. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Arias-Bolzmann, L., G.Chakraborty, and J.C.Mowen. 2000. Effects of absurdity in advertising: The moderating role of product category attitude and the mediating role of cognitive responses. Journal of Advertising29, no. 1: 35–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babin, B.J., and L.Babin. 2001. Seeking something different? A model of schema typicality, consumer affect, purchase intentions and perceived shopping value. Journal of Business Research54, no. 2: 89–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagozzi, R.P.1991. Further thoughts on the validity of measures of elation, gladness, and joy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology61: 98–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A.1977. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review84, no. 2: 191–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barthes, R.1985. The rhetoric of the image. In The responsibility of forms, 21–40. New York: Hill and Wang.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, F.C.1932. Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R.F., and B.J.Bushman. 2008. Social psychology and human nature. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Beals, D.E.1998. Reappropriating schema: Conceptions of development from Bartlett and Bakhtin. Mind, Culture and Activity5, no. 1: 3–24.
   Google Scholar
• Berlyne, D.E.1960. Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Block, J.1957. Studies in the phenomenology of emotions. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology64: 358–63.
   Google Scholar
• Camerer, C., and M.Weber. 1992. Recent developments in modeling preferences: Uncertainty and ambiguity. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty5, no. 4: 325–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J.B., and C.S.Areni. 1991. Affect and consumer behavior. In Handbook of consumer behavior, ed. T.S.Robertson and H.H.Kassarjian, 188–240. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlén, M.2005. The medium as a contextual cue: Effects of creative media choice. Journal of Advertising34, no. 3: 89–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlén, M., and L.Lange. 2004. To challenge or not to challenge: Ad-brand incongruency and brand familiarity. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice12, no. 3: 20–35.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlén, M., S.Rosengren, F.Törn, and N.Öhman. 2008. Could placing ads wrong be right? Advertising effects of thematic incongruence. Journal of Advertising37, no. 3: 57–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dardis, F.E.2009. Attenuating the negative effects of perceived incongruence in sponsorship: How message repetition can enhance evaluations of an ‘incongruent’ sponsor. Journal of Promotion Management15, no. 1–2: 36–56.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, M.S.1971. That's interesting! Towards a phenomenology of sociology and a sociology of phenomenology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences1: 309–44.
   Google Scholar
• Dimofte, C.V., M.R.Forehand, and R.Deshpandé. 2004. Ad schema incongruity as elicitor of ethnic self-awareness and differential advertising response. Journal of Advertising32, no. 4: 7–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edell, J.A., and M.C.Burke. 1987. The power of feelings in understanding advertising effects. Journal of Consumer Research14, no. 3: 421–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filipowicz, A.2006. From positive affect to creativity: The surprising role of surprise. Creativity Research Journal18, no. 2: 141–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske, S.T.1982. Schema-triggered affect: Applications to social perception. In Affect and cognition: 17th annual Carnegie symposium on cognition, ed. M.S.Clark and S.T.Fiske, 55–78. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Fiske, S.T., and M.A.Pavelchak. 1986. Category-based versus piecemeal-based affective responses: Developments in schema-triggered affect. In The handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior, ed. R.M.Sorrentino and E.T.Higgins, 167–203. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flaherty, K., M.G.Weinberger, and C.S.Gulas. 2004. The impact of perceived humor, product type, and humor style in radio advertising. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising26, no. 1: 25–36.
   Google Scholar
• Fleck, N., and V.Maille. 2010. Thirty years of conflicting studies on the influence of congruence as perceived by the consumer: Overview, limitations and avenues for research. Recherche et Applications en Marketing (English edition)25, no. 4: 69–92.
   Google Scholar
• Furnham, A., and T.Ribchester. 1995. Tolerance of ambiguity: A review of the concept, its measurement and applications. Current Psychology14, no. 3: 179–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, M.P., A.A.Mitchell, and J.E.Russo. 1985. Low involvement strategies for processing advertisements. Journal of Advertising14, no. 2: 4–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H.1967. Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, G.S.1980. Picture memory: How the action schema affects retention. Cognitive Psychology12, no. 4: 473–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwald, A.G.1968. Cognitive learning, cognitive response to persuasion, and attitude change. In Psychological foundations of attitudes, ed. A.G.Greenwald, T.C.Brock, and T.M.Ostrom, 147–70. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guido, G.2001. The salience of marketing stimuli: An incongruity salience hypothesis on consumer awareness. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Halkias, G., and F.Kokkinakia. 2011. Increasing advertising effectiveness through incongruity-based tactics: The moderating role of consumer involvement. Journal of Marketing Communications. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13527266.2011.592346 (accessed March 10, 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Hastie, R., and P.A.Kumar. 1979. Person memory: Personality traits as organizing principles in memory for behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology37, no. 1: 25–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebb, D.O.1949. The organization of behavior. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• HebbD.O.. 1955. Drives and the CNS (Conceptual Nervous System). Psychological Review62, no. 4: 243–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckler, S.E., and T.L.Childers. 1992. The role of expectancy and relevancy in memory for verbal and visual information: What is incongruency?Journal of Consumer Research18, no. 4: 475–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschman, E.1980. Innovativeness, novelty seeking, and consumer creativity. Journal of Consumer Research7, no. 3: 283–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyer, W.D., and D.J.MacInnis. 2004. Consumer behavior. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Hung, K.2000. Narrative music in congruent and incongruent TV advertising. Journal of Advertising29, no. 1: 25–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izard, C.E.1977. Human emotions. New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jain, S.P., and D.Maheswaran. 2000. Motivated reasoning: A depth-of-processing perspective. Journal of Consumer Research26, no. 4: 358–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, B.F.1993. A neural resolution of the incongruity-resolution and incongruity theories of humor. Connection Science5, no. 1: 59–75.
   Google Scholar
• Labott, S.M., and R.B.Martin. 1988. Weeping: Evidence for a cognitive theory. Motivation and Emotion12, no. 3: 205–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange, F., and M.Dahlén. 2003. Let's be strange: Brand familiarity and ad-brand incongruency. Journal of Product and Brand Management12, no. 7: 449–61.
   Google Scholar
• Lasswell, H.1948. The structure and function of communication in society: The communication of ideas. New York: The Institute for Religious and Social Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, M.1995. Effects of schema congruity and involvement on product evaluations. Advances in Consumer Research22, no. 1: 210–6.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Y.H., and C.Mason. 1999. Responses to information incongruency in advertising: The role of expectancy, relevancy, and humor. Journal of Consumer Research26, no. 2: 156–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, E., and D.W.Schumann. 2004. Explaining the special case of incongruity in advertising: Combining classic theoretical approaches. Marketing Theory4: 59–90.
   Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, S.B., R.J.Lutz, and G.E.Belch. 1986. The role of attitude toward the ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: A test of competing explanations. Journal of Marketing Research23, no. 2: 130–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandler, G.1982. The structure of value: Accounting for taste. In Affect and cognition: The 17th annual Carnegie symposium on cognition, ed. M.S.Clark and S.T.Fiske, 3–36. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Maoz, E., and A.M.Tybout. 2002. The moderating role of involvement and differentiation in the evaluation of brand extensions. Journal of Consumer Psychology12, no. 2: 119–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R.A.2007. The psychology of humor: An integrative approach. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• McGhee, P.E.1979. Humor: Its origin and development. San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• McQuarrie, E.F., and D.G.Mick. 1992. On resonance: A critical pluralistic inquiry into advertising rhetoric. Journal of Consumer Research19, no. 2: 180–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrabian, A., and J.A.Russell. 1974. An approach to environmental psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyers-Levy, J., and A.M.Tybout. 1989. Schema congruity as a basis for product evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research16, no. 1: 39–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, D.L., and J.W.Hutchinson. 1985. The influence of affective reactions to advertising. In Psychological processes and advertising effects, ed. L.F.Alwitt and A.A.Mitchell, 65–87. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsen, D.F.1993. Humor scholarship: A research bibliography. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peracchio, L.A., and J.Meyers-Levy. 1994. How ambiguous cropped objects in ad photos can affect product evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research21, no. 1: 190–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peracchio, L.A., and A.M.Tybout. 1996. The moderating role of prior knowledge in schema-based product evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research23, no. 3: 177–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R.E., and J.T.Cacioppo. 1984. The effects of involvement on response to argument quantity and quality: Central and peripheral routes to persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology46, no. 1: 69–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, B.J.1997. Thinking into it: Consumer interpretation of complex advertising images. Journal of Advertising26, no. 2: 77–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PhillipsB.J.. 2000. The impact of verbal anchoring on consumer response to image ads. Journal of Advertising29, no. 1: 15–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, B.J., and E.F.McQuarrie. 2002. The development, change, and transformation of rhetorical style in magazine advertisements 1954–1999. Journal of Advertising31, no. 4: 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raju, P.S.1980. Optimum stimulation level: Its relationship to personality demographics, and exploratory behavior. Journal of Consumer Research7, no. 3: 272–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reece, B.B., B.G.Vanden Bergh, and H.Li. 1994. What makes a slogan memorable and who remembers it?Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising16, no. 2: 41–57.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E.M.1995. Diffusion of innovation. New York: Free press.
   Google Scholar
• Rothbart, M.K.1976. Incongruity, problem-solving, and laughter. In Humor and laughter: Theory, research and applications, ed. A.J.Chapman and H.C.Foot, 37–54. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Schachter, S.1959. The psychology of affiliation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schutzwohl, A., and K.Borgstedt. 2005. The processing of affectively valenced stimuli: The role of surprise. Cognition and Emotion19, no. 4: 583–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speck, P.S.1990. The humorous message taxonomy: A framework for the study of humorous ads. Current Issues and Research in Advertising13, no. 1: 1–44.
   Google Scholar
• Srivastava, K., and N.K.Sharma. 2011. Consumer attitude towards brand-extension incongruity: The moderating role of need for cognition and need for change. Journal of Marketing Management. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0267257X.2011.558383 (accessed March 10, 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Stein, N.L., and L.J.Levine. 1987. Thinking about feelings: The development and organization of emotional knowledge. In Aptitude, learning, and instruction Vol. 3: Conative and affective process analysis, ed. R.E.Snow and M.J.Farr, 165–97. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Sternthal, B., and C.S.Gulas. 1992. The impact of humor in advertising: A review. Journal of Advertising21, no. 4: 35–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sujan, M.1985. Consumer knowledge: Effects on evaluation strategies mediating consumer judgments. Journal of Consumer Research12, no. 1: 31–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sujan, M., J.R.Bettman, and H.Sujan. 1986. Effects of consumer expectations on information processing in selling encounters. Journal of Marketing Research23: 346–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suls, J.M.1972. A two-stage model for the appreciation of jokes and cartoons. In The psychology of humor: Theoretical perspectives and empirical issues, ed. J.H.Goldstein and P.E.McGhee, 81–100. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suls, J.1983. Cognitive processes in humor appreciation. In Handbook of humor research: Basic issues, eds. McGheeP.E. and GoldsteinJ.H., 39–57. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Weinberger, M.G., and C.S.Gulas. 1992. The impact of humor in advertising: A review. Journal of Advertising21, no. 4: 35–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyer, R.S., and T.K.Srull. 1989. Memory and cognition in its social context. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Zuckerman, M.1979. Sensation seeking: Beyond the optimal level of arousal. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• ZuckermanM.. 1995. Good and bad humors: Biochemical bases of personality and its disorders. Psychological Science6: 325–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar