The ‘uncanny valley’ and spectating animated objects

REFERENCES

• Astles, Cariad (2009) ‘Wood and waterfall: Puppetry training and its anthropology’, Performance Research 14(2): 54–9. doi: 10.1080/13528160903319521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron-Cohen, Simon, Alan M. Leslie and Uta Frith (1985) ‘Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”?’ Cognition 21: 37–46. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(85)90022-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, John (1997) ‘Puppets and performing objects in the twentieth century’, Performing Arts Journal 19(2): 29–46.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, Susan (2009) The Origin of Concepts: Oxford Series in Cognitive Development, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Castelli, Fulvia, Francesca Happé, Uta Frith and Chris Frith (2000) ‘Movement and mind: A functional imaging study of perception and interpretation of complex intentional movement patterns’, NeuroImage 12: 314–25. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2000.0612
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, Matthew Issac (2007) ‘Puppetry and the destruction of the object’, Performance Research 12(4): 123–31. doi: 10.1080/13528160701822742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furse, Anna (2008) ‘Committed to the Other: The ethical nature of work with puppets’, Puppet Notebook 13: 19–21.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, Shaun (2001) ‘The practice of mind: Theory, simulation, or interaction?’ Journal of Consciousness Studies 8: 83–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, Shaun (2004) ‘Understanding problems in autism: Interaction theory as an alternative to theory of mind’, Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 11: 199–217. doi: 10.1353/ppp.2004.0063
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, Jerome J. (1979) The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, Noah, Tomer D. Ullman and Joshua B. Tenenbaum (2011) ‘Learning a theory of causality’, Psychological Review 118(1): 110–19. doi: 10.1037/a0021336
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, Kenneth (2011) Puppet: An essay on uncanny life, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guizzo, Erico (2010) ‘Who's afraid of the uncanny valley?’ IEEE Spectrum (on-line), spectrum.ieee.org/automaton/ robotics/humanoids/040210-who-is-afraid-of-the-uncanny-valley, accessed 19 June 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Halpern, Joseph Y. and Judea Pearl (2005a) ‘Causes and explanations: A structural model approach; Part I: Causes’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 56: 843–87. doi: 10.1093/bjps/axi147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halpern, Joseph Y. and Judea Pearl (2005b) ‘Causes and explanations: A structural model approach; Part II: Explanations’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 56: 889–911. doi: 10.1093/bjps/axi148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, David, Andrew Olney, Ismar A. Pereira and Marge Zielke (2005) ‘Upending the uncanny valley’, 20th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence 4: 1728–9.
   Google Scholar
• Hedger, Joseph A. and William V. Fabricius (2011) ‘True belief belies false belief: Recent findings of competence in infants and limitations in 5-year-olds, and implications for theory of mind development’, The Review of Philosophy and Psychology 2(3): 429–47. doi: 10.1007/s13164-011-0069-9
   Google Scholar
• Heider, Fritz and Marianne Simmel (1944) ‘An experimental study of apparent behavior’, The American Journal of Psychology 57(2): 243–55. doi: 10.2307/1416950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitchcock, Christopher (2007) ‘Three concepts of causation’, Philosophy Compass 2(3): 508–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2007.00084.x
   Google Scholar
• Hutto, Daniel D. (2004) ‘The limits of spectatorial folk psychology’, Mind & Languag, 19: 548–73. doi: 10.1111/j.0268-1064.2004.00272.x
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Susan, Virginia Slaughter and Susan Carey (2002) ‘Whose gaze will infants follow? The elicitation of gaze following in 12-month-olds’, Developmental Science 1(2): 233–8. doi: 10.1111/1467-7687.00036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kean, Sam (2014) ‘Beyond the damaged brain’, The New York Times, http://nyti.ms/1iTxL0t accessed 3 May 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Lohmann, Heidemarie, Malinda Carpenter and Josep Call (2005) ‘Guessing versus choosing – and seeing versus believing – in false belief tasks’, British Journal of Developmental Psychology 23: 451–69. doi: 10.1348/026151005X26877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michotte, Albert (1962 [1946]) The Perception of Causality, Andover, MA: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Mori, Masahiro (1970) ‘The uncanny valley’, Energy 7(4): 33–5 (in Japanese) and Masahiro Mori (2012) ‘The uncanny valley’, trans. Karl F. MacDorman and Nomi Kageki, IEEE Spectrum (on-line), spectrum.ieee.org/ automaton/robotics/humanoids/the-uncanny-valley, accessed 7 June 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Proschan, Frank (1983) ‘The semiotic study of puppets, masks, and performing objects’, Semiotica 1(4): 3–44.
   Google Scholar
• Saxe, Rebecca and Susan Carey (2006) ‘The perception of causality in infancy’, Acta Psychologica 123: 144–65. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.05.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlottmann, Anne (1999) ‘Seeing it happen and knowing how it works: How children understand the relation between perceptual causality and underlying mechanism’, Developmental Psychology 35(5): 303–17. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.35.1.303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlottmann, Anne and David R. Shanks (1992) ‘Evidence for a distinction between judged and perceived causality’, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 44(A)(2): 321–42. doi: 10.1080/02724989243000055
   Google Scholar
• Schlottmann, Anne and Luca Surian (1999) ‘Do 9-month-olds perceive causation-at-a-distance?’ Perception 28: 1105–13. doi: 10.1068/p2767
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholl, Brian J. and Patrice D. Tremoulet (2000) ‘Perceptual causality and animacy’, Trends in Cognitive Science 4/8: 299–309. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01506-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, Lawrence (2007) ‘The embodied cognition research program’, Philosophy Compass 2(2): 338–46. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2007.00064.x
   Google Scholar
• Simms, Eva-Marie (1996) ‘Uncanny dolls: Images of death in Rilke and Freud’, New Literary History 27(4): 663–77. doi: 10.1353/nlh.1996.0056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spaulding, Shannon (2010) ‘Embodied cognition and mindreading’, Mind & Language 25(1): 119–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0017.2009.01383.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spaulding, Shannon (2011) ‘A critique of embodied simulation’, Review of Philosophy and Psychology 2: 579–99. doi: 10.1007/s13164-011-0071-2
   Google Scholar
• Tenenbaum, Joshua B., Charles Kemp, Thomas L. Griffiths and Noah D. Goodman (2011) ‘How to grow a mind: Statistics, structure, and abstraction’, Science 331: 1279–85. doi: 10.1126/science.1192788
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wimmer, Heinz and Josef Perner (1983) ‘Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception’, Cognition 13(1): 103–28. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(83)90004-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamir, Tzachi (2010) ‘Puppets’, Critical Inquiry 36(3): 386–409. doi: 10.1086/653406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar