On Hybridity in Puppetry

REFERENCES

• Astles, Cariad (2009) ‘Wood and waterfall: Puppetry training and its anthropology’, Performance Research 14(2): 54–9, DOI: 10.1080/13528160903319521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astles, Cariad (2019) ‘Postcolonialism and hybridity in British puppetry’, Critical Stages (June): 19, https://bit.ly/345I2UU, 15 June, accessed 19 April 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, Marvin (2003) The Haunted Stage: The theatre as memory machine, Michigan: The University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick, Andrew (2017) The Hybrid Media System: Politic and power, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fazan, Katarzyna (2019) Kantor. Nie/Obecność (Kantor.Non/ Presence), Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
   Google Scholar
• Ferraz, Renata (2016) ‘The body, the moving image and the puppet: The contemporary scene arising from [in]animated forms’, Revista Brasileira de Estudos da Presença (Brazilian Journal on Presence Studies) 6(2): 226–41, DOI: 10.1590/2237-266062562.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer-Lichte, Erika (2008), The Transformative Power of Performance: A new aesthetics, trans. Saskya I. Jain, London and New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Impe, Anaëlle (2016) ‘The grotesque as a paradigm of the puppet theater in the 21st century. Through an analysis of Ilka Schönbein’s show, The Old Lady and the Beast’, in Kamil Kopania (ed.) Dolls and Puppets as Artistic and Cultural Phenomena (19th–21st Centuries), Białystok: The Aleksander Zelwerowicz National Academy of Dramatic Art in Warsaw, The Department of Puppetry Art in Białystok, pp. 164–79.
   Google Scholar
• Kantor, Tadeusz (1993) A Journey through Other Spaces: Essays and manifestos 1944–1990, ed. and trans. Michal Kobialka, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kantor, Tadeusz (2005a) Pisma. T.1. Metamorfozy. Teksty o latach 1934–1974 (Writings. T1. Metamorphosis. Texts about the years 1934-1974), selected and edited by: K. Pleśniarowicz, Wrocław–Kraków: Ossolineum; Cricoteka.
   Google Scholar
• Kavrakova-Lorenz, Konstanza (1989) ‘Das Puppenspiel als synergetische Kunstform. Thesen über das Zusammenspiel und die Wechselwirkungen von Bildgestalt und Darstellungsweise im kommunikativen Gestaltungsprozeß des Puppenspielers’ (Puppetry as a synergetic genre of art. Theses about the interplay and interactions of image and mode of representation in the process of communication of the puppeteer), in Manfred Wegner (ed.) Die Spiele der Puppe. Beiträge zur Kunst und Sozialgeschichte des Figurentheaters im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert (Puppetry. Contributions to the artistic and social history of puppet theater in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries), Köln: Prometh, pp. 230–41.
   Google Scholar
• Kobialka, Michal (2009) Further on, Nothing: Tadeusz Kantor’s theatre, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kościuczuk, Krzysztof (2015) ‘Tadeusz Kantor machine: A review’, https://bit.ly/3o0Gx2j, 6 November, accessed 10 April 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, Jerold (1990) Music, Art, and Metaphysics: Essays in philosophical aesthetics, London: Ithaka.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, Sammi (2018) Curator Denise Greber and Puppeteers Duda Paiva and Chad Williams on the 8th La MaMa Puppet Festival, https://bit.ly/358VcQF, 5 November, accessed 10 February 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Lorentz, Noémie (2016) ‘The puppet as a paradigm of the contemporary living body – An inquiry into the traditional question of artificial life in contemporary puppetry’, in Kamil Kopania (ed.) Dolls and Puppets as Artistic and Cultural Phenomena (19th–21st Centuries), Białystok: The Aleksander Zelwerowicz National Academy of Dramatic Art in Warsaw, The Department of Puppetry Art in Białystok, pp. 180–99.
   Google Scholar
• Maubert, Oriane (2019) ‘Puppet and dancer, choreography of object-body: Meeting, control and vertigo’, in Marzenna Wiśniewska and Karol Suszczyński (eds) Puppetry in the 21th Century: Reflection and challenges, Białystok: The Aleksander Zelwerowicz National Academy of Dramatic Art in Warsaw, The Department of Puppetry Art in Białystok, pp. 38–53.
   Google Scholar
• Niziołek, Grzegorz (2013) Polski teatr Zagłady (The Polish Theatre of the Holocaust), Warszawa: Instytut Teatralny im. Z. Raszewskiego; Krytyka Polityczna.
   Google Scholar
• Orenstein, Claudia (2017) ‘Our puppets, our selves: Puppetry changing paradigms’, Mime Journal 26: 90–109, DOI: 105642/mimejournal.20172601.12.
   Google Scholar
• Pieterse, Jan Nederveen (2001) ‘Hybridity, so what?’, Theory, Culture & Society 18(2–3): 219–45, DOI: 10.1177/026327640101800211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piris, Paul Charles R. T. (2011) The Rise of Manipulacting. The puppet as a figure of the other, PhD dissertation, University of London: Central Scholl of Speech and Drama.
   Google Scholar
• Posner, Dassia N., Orenstein, Claudia and Bell, John, eds (2014) The Routledge Companion to Puppetry and Material Performance, London and New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tillis, Steve (1992) Toward an Aesthetics of the Puppet: Puppetry as a theatrical art, New York, NY: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waszkiel, Halina (2013) ‘Lalkarz-performer’ (Puppeteer as performer), in Ewa Bal and Wanda Świątkowska (eds) Performans, performatywność, performer. Próby definicji i analizy krytyczne (Performance, performativity, performer. The attempts towards a definition and critical analyses), Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, s. 347–56.
   Google Scholar
• Wiśniewska, Marzenna (2015a) ‘Multimedialne strategie inscenizacyjne i wyzwanie intermedialności w polskim teatrze lalek’ (Multimedia stage practices and intermediality as a challenge in Polish puppet theatre), in Halina Waszkiel (ed.) O polskim teatrze lalek w Szczecinie (About Polish puppet theatre in Szczecin), Szczecin: Teatr Lalek Pleciuga, pp. 47–66.
   Google Scholar
• Wiśniewska, Marzenna (2015b) ‘Performatywność lalek teatralnych’ (Performativity of puppets), in Artur Duda, Marzenna Wiśniewska and Bartłomiej Oleszek (eds) Teatr wśród mediów (Theatre among media), Toruń: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UMK, pp. 109–24.
   Google Scholar