A Non-optimized Utopia

REFERENCES

• Bloch, Ernst (1986) The Principle of Hope, trans Neville Plaice, Stephen Plaice and Paul Knight, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, Ian (1997) ‘The problem of the body in Deleuze and Guattari, or, what can a body do?’ Body & Society 3(3): 73–91. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X97003003004
   Google Scholar
• Butler, Judith (1988) ‘Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory’, Theatre Journal 40(4): 519–31. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/3207893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crary, Jonathan (2013) 24/7: Late capitalism and the ends of sleep, London and New York, NY: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Cull, Laura (2013) Theatres of Immanence. Deleuze and the ethics of performance, Houndmills: Palgrave McMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, Gilles (2004) Difference and Repetition, trans. Paul Patton, London and New York, NY: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Dolan, Jill (2005) Utopia in Performance: Finding hope at the theater, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Entwistle, Joanne (2000) The Fashioned Body: Fashion, dress and modern social theory, Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Federici, Sylvia (2018 [1975]) ‘Wages against housework’, in Mariana Otero Verzier and Nick Axel (eds) Work, Body, Leisure, Berlin: Hatje Cantz, pp. 175–81.
   Google Scholar
• Garforth, Lisa (2009) ‘No intentions? Utopian theory after the future’, Journal for Cultural Research 13(1): 5–27. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14797580802674787
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, Erving (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, New York, NY: Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Jameson, Fredric (2005) Archaeologies of the Future. The desire called utopian and other science fictions, London and New York, NY: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, Meredith (2008) Skintight: An anatomy of cosmetic surgery, Oxford and New York, NY: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Kwon, Miwon (2002) One Place After Another: Site-specific art and locational identity, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levitas, Ruth (2000) ‘For utopia: The (limits of the) utopian function in late capitalist society’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 3(2–3): 25–43. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230008403311
   Google Scholar
• Levitas, Ruth (2011 [1990]) The Concept of Utopia, Witney: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Levitas, Ruth (2013) Utopia as Method: The imaginary reconstitution of society, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, Sophie (2019) Full Surrogacy Now: Feminism against family, London and New York, NY: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Marcuse Herbert (1978) The Aesthetic Dimension: Toward a critique of Marxist aesthetics, Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, Doreen (1994) Space, Place and Gender, Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mauss, Marcel (1992) ‘Techniques of the body’, in Jonathan Crary and Stanford Kwinter (eds) Incorporations, New York, NY: Zone, pp. 455–77.
   Google Scholar
• Moylan, Tom (2008) ‘Making the present impossible: On the vocation of utopian science fiction’, ARENA Journal 31: 79–108.
   Google Scholar
• Moylan, Tom (2014 [1985]) Demand the Impossible: Science fiction and the utopian imagination, Oxford: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz, José Esteban (2009) Cruising Utopia. The then and there of queer futurity, New York, NY and London: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, Simon (2001) ‘The aesthetics of affect: Thinking art beyond representation’, Angelaki: Journal of theoretical humanities 6(3): 125–35. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09697250120087987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raether, Johannes Paul (2013) Johannes Paul Raether at Venus & Apoll, performance at the Julia Stoschek Foundation, Düsseldorf, 22 May, https://youtu.be/CggqeuQOhgg, accessed 9 September 2020; translations from this performance are the author’s own.
   Google Scholar
• Raether, Johannes Paul (2015) Forking Horizon II: Insomation of the Totipotential, performance at ‘Inhuman’ exhibition and symposium at Fridericianum, Kassel, 25 May, https://youtu.be/Bgr8iMYrtUY, accessed 9 September 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Raether, Johannes Paul (2017) ‘A full manual to understand Identitecture’, https://bit.ly/3gtSywa, accessed 9 September 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Raether, Johannes Paul (2018) ‘Worldwidewitches, ritual and technology’, artist talk at Click Festival, Elsinore, May.
   Google Scholar
• Raether, Johannes Paul (2019) 'Propositions #9 - Day 3 - Transformella Malor & Bini Adamczak', Utrecht, 15 November, https://youtu.be/TRZAGmJZG38, accessed 28 May 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Sack, Daniel (2015) After Live: Possibility, potentiality, and the future of performance, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sargisson, Lucy (2012) Fool’s Gold, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Spatz, Ben (2015) What a Body Can Do. Technique as knowledge, practice as research, London and New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, Edward Palmer (2011 [1955]) William Morris: Romantic to revolutionary, Pontypool: Merlin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, Victor (1987) The Anthropology of Performance, New York, NY: PAJ Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Wegenstein, Bernadette (2012) The Cosmetic Gaze: Body modification and the construction of beauty, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Raymond (1980) Culture and Materialism. Selected essays, London and New York, NY: Verso.
   Google Scholar