Tactile Attention in One-to-One Performance: The effects of touch on participant experience

REFERENCES

• Arlander, Annette, Barton, Bruce, Dreyer-Lude, Melanie and Spatz, Ben, eds (2017) Performance as Research: Knowledge, methods, impact, New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, Bruce (2015) Personal Interview with Natalia Esling, 9 June. Unpublished.
   Google Scholar
• Breel, Astrid (2015) ‘Audience agency in participatory performance’, Participations: Journal of audience and reception 12(1): 368–87.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, Christine E. (2009a) ‘Tactile attention’, in Marc D. Binder, Nobutaka Hirokawa and Uwe Windhorst (eds) Encyclopedia of Neuroscience, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 3,990–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-29678-2_5864
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, Christine E. (2009b) ‘Active touch’, in Marc D. Binder, Nodutaka Hirokawa and Uwe Windhorst (eds) Encyclopedia of Neuroscience, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 35–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-29678-2_67
   Google Scholar
• Durt, Christoph, Fuchs, Thomas and Tewes, Christian, eds (2017) Embodiment, Enaction, and Culture: Investigating the constitution of the shared world, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, Jennifer (2007) ‘Tangible acts: Touch performances’, in Sally Banes and André Lepecki (eds) The Senses in Performance, New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 166–78.
   Google Scholar
• Frieze, James, ed. (2016) Reframing Immersive Theatre: The politics and pragmatics of participatory performance, London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Fulkerson, Matthew (2020 [2015]) ‘Touch’, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://stanford.io/3mubGLD, 6 May, last accessed 3 December 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Gallace, Alberto, and Spence, Charles (2014) In Touch with the Future: The sense of touch from cognitive neuroscience to virtual reality, Oxford: Oxford Scholarship Online. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199644469.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, Barney G. and Strauss, Anselm L. (2017) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for qualitative research, New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gomme, Rachel (2015) ‘Not-so-close encounters: Searching for intimacy in one-to-one performance’, Participations: Journal of audience and reception studies 12(1): 281–300.
   Google Scholar
• Haseman, Brad (2006) ‘A manifesto for performative research’, Media International Australia incorporating Cultural Policy, theme issue ‘Practice-led research’ 118: 98–106. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X0611800113
   Google Scholar
• Heddon, Deirdre, Iball, Helen and Zerihan, Rachel (2012) ‘Come closer: Confessions of intimate spectators in one to one performance’, Contemporary Theatre Review 22(1): 120–33. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10486801.2011.645233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogarth, Sarah, Bramley, Emma and Howson-Griffiths, Teri (2018) ‘Immersive worlds: An exploration into how performers facilitate the three worlds in immersive performance’, Theatre, Dance and Performance Training 9(2): 189–202. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/19443927.2018.1450780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howells, Adrian (2012) ‘Foot washing for the sole’, Performance Research 17(2): 128–31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13528165.2012.671082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwamura, Yoshiaki (2009) ‘Tactile senses—Touch’, in Marc D. Binder, Nodutaka Hirokawa and Uwe Windhorst (eds) Encyclopedia of Neuroscience, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 4,005–9. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-29678-2_5873
   Google Scholar
• Julien, Martin (2015) Personal Interview with Natalia Esling, 20 May. Unpublished.
   Google Scholar
• Machon, Josephine (2009) (Syn)aesthetics: Redefining visceral performance, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Machon, Josephine (2013) Immersive Theatres: Intimacy and immediacy in contemporary performance, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Machon, Josephine (2016) ‘On Being Immersed: The Pleasure of Being: Washing, Feeding, Holding’, in James Frieze (ed.) Reframing Immersive Theatre: The politics and pragmatics of participatory performance, London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 29–42.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, Laura (2002) ‘Introduction’, in Touch: Sensuous theory and multisensory media, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. ix–xxii.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, Robin (2013) Practice as Research in the Arts: Principles, protocols, pedagogies, resistances, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, Nathanial (2013) Interactive Art and Embodiment: The implicit body as performance, Canterbury UK: Gylphi Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Welton, Martin (2010) ‘Listening-as-touch: Paying attention to Rosemary Lee’s common dance’, Performance Research 15(3): 47–54. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13528165.2010.527203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, Gareth (2013) Audience Participation in Theatre: Aesthetics of the invitation, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Zerihan, Rachel (2020) ‘Strange duets: On the genealogy and efficacy of one-to-one performance’, Contemporary Theatre Review 30(1): 46–66. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10486801.2019.1696318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar