Choreography as Concept, Dancing as Material

REFERENCES

• Adolphe, Jean-Marc and Mayen, Gérard (2004) ‘The “nondance” is still dancing’, Movement 1 (May). Translation: SARMA, http://sarma.be/docs/784, accessed 28 December 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, Danjel (2017) ‘I had a dream’, in Danjel Adresson, Mette Edvardsen and Marten Spångberg (eds) Post-Dance, Stockholm: MDT, 13–17.
   Google Scholar
• Brannigan, Erin (2015) ‘Choreography and the Gallery: Curation as Revision’, Dance Research Journal 47(1): 5–25. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0149767715000054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brannigan, Erin (2017) ‘Context, discipline and understanding: The poetics of Shelley Lasica’s gallery-based work’, Performance Paradigm 13: 97–117.
   Google Scholar
• Brannigan, Erin (2019) ‘Talking back: What dance might make of Badiou’s philosophical project’, Performance Philosophy 4(2): 354–73. doi: https://doi.org/10.21476/PP.2019.42240
   Google Scholar
• Brannigan, Erin and Newton, Rhiannon (2018) ‘Propositions for doing dancing’, Runway 36, http://runway.org.au/propositions-dancing/, accessed 30 April 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Buchloh, Benjamin (1990) ‘Conceptual art 1962–1969: From the aesthetic of administration to the critique of institutions’, October 55: 105–43. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/778941
   Google Scholar
• Burrows, Jonathan (2017) ‘Keynote address for the Postdance Conference in Stockholm’, in Danjel Adresson, Mette Edvardsen and Marten Spångberg (eds) Post-Dance, Stockholm: MDT, 83–100.
   Google Scholar
• Burt, Ramsay (2017) Ungoverning Dance, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cvejić, Bojana (2015) Choreographing Problems: Expressive concepts in European dance and performance, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• De Baere, Bart, curator (1994) This Is the Show and the Show Is Many Things / Extra Muros, Museum of Contemporary Art, Ghent, 17 September–27 November.
   Google Scholar
• De Baere, Bart and Esche, Charles (2017) ‘Exhibitions histories talk: Bart De Baere’, Afterall Online, https://bit.ly/3AjOXI4, 30 March, accessed 4 December 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Flynt, Henry (1963) ‘Concept art’, in La Monte Young and Jackson Mac Low (eds) An Anthology of Chance Operations, New York, NY: La Monte Young and Jackson Mac Low, n.p.
   Google Scholar
• Flynt, Henry (1982) ‘Structure art and pure mathematics (1960)’, in Henry Flynt: Fragments and reconstructions from a destroyed ouevre, 1959-1963, catalog. edited by Henry Flynt, New York, NY: Backworks, n.p.
   Google Scholar
• Forsythe, William (2011) ‘Choreographic objects’, in Steven Spier (ed.) William Forsythe and the Practice of Choreography: It starts from any point, London: Routledge, 90–2.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, Sally (2014) ‘Choreography, or framed kinaesthetics’, in Hannah Mathews (ed.) Framed Movements, Melbourne: Australian Centre for Contemporary Art, n.p.
   Google Scholar
• Ingvartsen, Mette (2009) Everybody’s Group Self-Interviews, Everybodys Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Joseph, Branden (2011) Beyond the Dream Syndicate: Tony Conrad and the arts after cage (a ‘minor’ history), New York, NY: Zone Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kunst, Bojana (2017) ‘Some thoughts on the labour of a dancer’, in Danjel Adresson, Mette Edvardsen and Marten Spångberg (eds) Post-Dance, Stockholm: MDT, 116–34.
   Google Scholar
• Lacey, Jennifer (2000) ‘Artist statement’, Foundation for Contemporary Arts, https://bit.ly/3zh9yLD, accessed 29 March 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Laermans, Rudi (2015) Moving Together: Theorizing and making contemporary dance, Amsterdam: Valiz.
   Google Scholar
• Lepecki, André (2004) ‘Concept and presence: The contemporary European dance scene’, in Alexandra Carter (ed.) Rethinking Dance History: A reader, London: Routledge, 170–81.
   Google Scholar
• Lepecki, André (2010) ‘Dramaturging: A quasi-objective gaze on anti-memory [1992–98]’, in Jeroen Peeters (ed.) Are We Here Yet? Damaged goods and Meg Stuart, Dijon: Les Presses du Reél, 64–71.
   Google Scholar
• LeWitt, Sol (1967) ‘Paragraphs on conceptual art’, Artforum 5(10): 79–83.
   Google Scholar
• Lippard, Lucy and Chandler, John (1971) ‘The dematerialization of art’, in Lucy Lippard (ed.) Changing: Essays in art criticism, New York, NY: E.P. Dutton & Co, 255–76.
   Google Scholar
• Lista, Marcella (2017) ‘Dance is hard to see. Introduction’, in Marcella Lista (ed.) A Different Way to Move: Minimalismes, New York, 1960–1980, Berlin: Hatje Cantz, 16–23.
   Google Scholar
• Massumi, Brian (1995) ‘The autonomy of affect’, Cultural Critique 31: 83–109. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/1354446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, Peter (2002) ‘Survey’, in Peter Osborne (ed.) Conceptual Art, London: Phaidon Press Limited, 12–51.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, Peter (2014) ‘The postconceptual condition or, the cultural logic of high capitalism today’, Radical Philosophy 184: 19–27.
   Google Scholar
• Parkinson, Chyrsa, ed. (2014) The Dancer as Agent Collective Series, Stockholm: DOCH School of Dance and Circus.
   Google Scholar
• Peeters, Jeroen (2014) Through the Back: Situating vision between moving bodies, Helsinki: Theatre Academy of the University of the Arts.
   Google Scholar
• Praznik, Katja (2004) ‘What about “post contemporary” dance?’ Maska 19: 84–5.
   Google Scholar
• Prynne, Jeremy (2010) ‘Poetic thought’, Textual Practice 24(4): 595–606. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0950236X.2010.499640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rainer, Yvonne (1981) ‘Looking myself in the mouth’, October 17: 65–76. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/778251
   Google Scholar
• Serra, Richard (1971) ‘Verb list (1967–68)’, Avalanche 2: 20.
   Google Scholar
• Stuart, Meg (2010a) ‘Dear Ann Hamilton’, in Jeroen Peeters (ed.) Are We Here Yet? Damaged goods and Meg Stuart, Dijon: Les Presses du Reél, 81.
   Google Scholar
• Stuart, Meg (2010b) ‘Meeting foreign languages’, in Jeroen Peeters (ed.) Are We Here Yet? Damaged goods and Meg Stuart, Dijon: Les Presses du Reél, 82–5.
   Google Scholar
• Stuart, Meg (2010c) ‘This is the show and the show is many things’, in Jeroen Peeters (ed.) Are We Here Yet? Damaged goods and Meg Stuart, Dijon: Les Presses du Reél, 118.
   Google Scholar
• Wavelet, Christophe, Bel, Jérôme and Le Roy, Xavier (2008) ‘Which body for which collective, which collective for which body?’ trans. Melissa Thackway, in Peripheral Vision and Collective Body, Bolzano: Museion, 83–116.
   Google Scholar
• Weiner, Lawrence (1970) Tracce/Traces, Torino: Sperone Editore.
   Google Scholar