Teaching as creating space for participation – establishing a learning community in diverse classrooms

References

• Allan, J. (2010). The inclusive teacher educator: Spaces for civic engagement. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 31, 411–422. doi:10.1080/01596306.2010.504359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. (2010). Why ‘what works’ still won’t work: From evidence-based education to value-based education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 29, 491–503. doi:10.1007/s11217-010-9191-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cazden, C. B. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, F. (1996). Going for the zone: The social and cognitive ecology of teacher–student interaction in classroom conversation. In D. Hicks (Ed.), Discourse, learning, and schooling (pp. 29–62). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, F., Shultz, J., & Shultz, J. J. (1982). The counselor as gatekeeper: Social interaction in interviews. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2004). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Journal of Sociology, 12, 117–142.
   Google Scholar
• Grøver Aukrust, V. (2003). Samtaledeltakelse i norske klasserom – en studie av deltakerstrukturer og samtalebevegelser [Participation in classroom conversations in Norwegian classrooms. A study of particpation structures and conversation movements]. In K. Klette (Ed.), Klasserommets praksisformer etter Reform 97 [Classroom practices after Reform 97] (pp. 77–110). Oslo: Pedagogisk forskningsinstitutt.
   Google Scholar
• Hagtvedt, B. E., & Wold, A. H. (2003). On the dialogical basis of meaning: Inquiries into Ragnar Rommetveit’s writings on language, thought, and communication. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 10, 186–204.
   Google Scholar
• Helgevold, N., (2011) Å lære å kommunisere i det moderne klasserommet: en kvalitativ studie av interaksjonsformer på ungdomstrinnet [Learning to communicate in the modern classroom. A qualitative study of interactions in lower secondary] ( PhD thesis). Stavanger: University of Stavanger.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, P. W. (1968). Life in classrooms. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Klette, K. (2007). Trends in research on teaching and learning in schools. Didactics meets classroom studies. European Educational Research Journal, 6, 147–159.
   Google Scholar
• Lundgren, U. P. (1977). Model analysis of pedagogical processes. Lund: Gleerup.
   Google Scholar
• Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mehan, H. (1997). Students’ interactional competence in the classroom. In O. A. Vasquez, E. F. Mortimer, & Y. Engeström (Eds.), Mind, culture, and activity: Seminal papers from the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition (pp. 235–240). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mortimer, E. F., & Wertsch, J. V. (2003). Architecture and dynamics of intersubjectivity in science classrooms. Mind, Culture and Activity, 10, 230–244.
   Google Scholar
• Øye, S. (1999). Eg samtalar, altså er eg [I speak, therefore I am]. Apollon, 4. Oslo: University of Oslo. Retrieved from http://www.apollon.uio.no/portretter/1999/ragnar-rommetveit.html
   Google Scholar
• Rommetveit, R. (1974). On message structure: A framework for the study of language and communication. London: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Rommetveit, R. (1991). Epistemic responsibility in human communication. In H. Rønning & K. Lundby (Eds.), Media and communication: Readings in methodology, history and culture (pp. 13–30). Oslo: Norwegian University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rommetveit, R. (2003). On the role of “a psychology of the second person” in studies of meaning, language, and mind. Mind, Culture and Activity, 10, 205–218.
   Google Scholar
• Rommetveit, R. (2008). Språk, Individuell Psyke og Kulturelt Kollektiv [Language, individual psyche and cultural collectiveness]. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlström, F. (2001). Likvärdighetens produktionsvilkor [The production of equity]. In S. Lindblad & F. Sahlström (Eds.), Interaction in pedagogical relations (pp. 91–110). Stockholm: Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, J. M., & Coulthard, R. M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• von Wright, M. (2006). The punctual fallacy of participation. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38, 159–170.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, G. (2001). Action, talk, and text: Learning and teaching through inquiry. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, G., & Auraz, R. M. (2006). Dialogue in the classroom. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15, 379–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. V. (2003). Introduction. Ragnar Rommetveit: His work and influence. Mind, Culture and Activity, 10, 183–185.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar