The classroom in turmoil: teachers’ perspective on unplanned controversial issues in the classroom

References

• Advisory Group on Citizenship. (1998). Education for citizenship and the teaching of democracy in schools. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/014473949901900204.
   Google Scholar
• Aho, E., Haverinen, H. L., Juuso, H., Laukka, S. J., & Sutinen, A. (2010). Teacher’s principles of decision-making and classroom management; A case study and a new observation method. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9 , 395–402. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.171
   Google Scholar
• Alexakos, K., Pride, L. D., Amat, A., Tsetsakos, P., Lee, K. J., Paylor-Smith, C., Zapata, C., Wright, S., & Smith, T. (2016). Mindfulness and discussing “thorny” issues in the classroom. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(3), 741–769. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-015-9718-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badri, S. A. (2015). Teaching controversial issues in the classroom: Key issues and debates. Citizenship Education Research Journal, 5(1), 73–83. https://books.google.com/books?id=EiV2ke6BDc8C&pgis=1
   Google Scholar
• Baer, J. (2012). Domain specificity and the limits of creativity theory. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(1), 16–29. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbour, R. S. (2000). The role of qualitative research in broadening the “evidence base” for clinical practice. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 6(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2753.2000.00213.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beijaard, D., Verloop, N., & Vermunt, J. D. (2000). Teachers’ perceptions of professional identity: An exploratory study from a personal knowledge perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(7), 749–764. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00023-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, W., Graeffe, L., & Holden, C. (2003). Teaching controversial issues: A European perspective. http://www.unl.ac.uk/ipse/cice
   Google Scholar
• Besson, B., Huber, J., Mompoint-Gaillard, P. S., & Rohmann, S. (2015). Education for Change Change for Education, Manifesto. Council of Europe. https://edoc.coe.int/en/teacher-education/6733-eduquer-au-changement-changer-leducation.html
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. (2009). What kind of citizenship for European higher education? Beyond the competent active citizen. European Educational Research Journal, 8(2), 146–158. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2009.8.2.146
   Google Scholar
• Britzman, D. P. (2003). Practice makes practice: A critical study of learning to teach. State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32(7), 513–531. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14195/0870-4147-48-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookfield, S. D. (2006). The skillful teacher: On technique, trust, and responsiveness in the classroom (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, P. R. (2007). Experiencing democracy through neoliberalism: The role of social justice in democratic education. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 5(2), 1–21. http://www.jceps.com/print.php?articleID=104
   Google Scholar
• Castillo-Montoya, M. (2016). Preparing for interview research: The interview protocol refinement framework. How To Article, 21(5), 811–831. http://nsuworks.nova.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2337&context=tqr
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2012). The power and potential of grounded theory. Medical Sociology Online, 6(3), 2–15. http://www.medicalsociologyonline.org/resources/Vol6Iss3/MSo-600x_The-Power-and-Potential-Grounded-Theory_Charmaz.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chenail, R. J. (2011). Interviewing the investigator: Strategies for addressing instrumentation and researcher boas concerns in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 16(1), 255–262. http://nsuworks.nova.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1051&context=tqr/%0Ahttps://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol16/iss1/16
   Google Scholar
• Claire, H., & Holden, C. (2007). The challenge of teaching controversial issues. Trentham Books.
   Google Scholar
• Collard, P., & Looney, J. (2014). Nurturing creativity in education. European Journal of Education, 49(3), 348–364. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotton, D. R. E. (2006). Teaching controversial environmental issues: Neutrality and balance in the reality of the classroom. Educational Research, 48(2), 223–241. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00131880600732306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dovidio, J. F., Hewstone, M., Glick, P., & Esses, V. M. (2010). Prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination: Theoretical and empirical overview J. F. Dovidio, M. Hewstone, P. Glick, and V. M. Esses , The SAGE handbook of prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination 3–28). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446200919.n1
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, A. H., Sondel, B., & Baggett, H. C. (2019). “I don’t want to come off as pushing an agenda”: How contexts shaped teachers’ pedagogy in the days after the 2016 U.S. Presidential election. American Educational Research Journal April, 56(2), 444–476. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218794892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2015). Informal meeting of European Union Education Ministers, Paris, Tuesday 17 March 2015. Declaration on Promoting citizenship and the common values of freedom, tolerance and non-discrimination through education. https://ec.europa.eu/assets/eac/education/news/2015/documents/citizenship-education-declaration_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Finkenauer, C., Engels, R. C. M. E., Meeus, W., & Oosterwegel, A. (2002). Self and identity in early adolescence: The pains and gains of knowing who and what you are R. P. Lipka, and T. M. Brinthaupt , Understanding early adolescent self and identity. State University of New York Press, 25–56 .
   Google Scholar
• Hahn, C. L. (2012). The citizenship teacher and teaching controversial issues: A comparative perspective J. Brown, H. Ross, and P. Munn , Democratic citizenship in schools. Dunedin Academic Press, 48–59 .
   Google Scholar
• Hand, M., & Levinson, R. (2012). Discussing controversial issues in the classroom. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44(6), 614–629. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00732.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, D. E. (2004). Controversies about controversial issues in democratic education. Political Science and Politics 37 2 , 257–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallio, H., Pietilä, A. M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: Developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954–2965. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelchtermans, G. (1993). Getting the story, understanding the lives: From career stories to teachers’ professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 9(5–6), 443–456. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(93)90029-G
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelchtermans, G. (2009, April). Who I am in how I teach is the message: Self-understanding vulnerability, and reflection. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(2), 257–272. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-3687(2013)0000019021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kello, K. (2016). Sensitive and controversial issues in the classroom: Teaching history in a divided society. Teachers and Teaching, 22(1), 35–53. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1023027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, T. (1986). Discussing controversial issues: Four perspectives on the teacher’s role. Theory and Research in Social Education, 14(2), 113–138. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.1986.10505516
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, T. (1989). Leading class discussions of controversial issues. Social Education, 53(6), 368–370. http://uolibraries.worldcat.org/title/leading-class-discussions-of-controversial-issues/oclc/425926452&referer=brief_results
   Google Scholar
• Lipka, R. P., & Brinthaupt, T. M. (Eds.). (2002). Understanding early adolescent self and identity. State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, D. J., & McKenna, M. C. (1990). Teaching controversial material: New issues for teachers. Social Education, 54(5), 317.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, M. A., & Saldana, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Mockler, N. (2011). Beyond “what works”: Understanding teacher identity as a practical and political tool. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 17(5), 517–528. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2011.602059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oulton, C., Day, V., Dillon, J., & Grace, M. (2004). Controversial issues: Teachers’ attitudes and practices in the context of citizenship education. Oxford Review of Education, 30(4), 489–507. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0305498042000303973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pace, J. L. (2019). Contained risk-taking: Preparing preservice teachers to teach controversial issues in three countries. Theory & Research in Social Education, 47(2), 228–260. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2019.1595240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plano Clark, V. L., & Creswell, J. W. (2014). Understanding research: A consumer’s guide (2nd ed.). Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Price, B. (2002). Laddered questions and qualitative data research interviews. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 37(3), 273–281. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02086.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, S. (2010). Revisiting the teachers’ lounge: Reflections on emotional experience and teacher identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3), 616–621. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shelton, L. G. (2019). The Bronfenbrenner primer: A guide to develecology. In The Bronfenbrenner primer. Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315136066
   Google Scholar
• Stradling, R., Noctor, M., & Baines, B. (1984). Teaching controversial issues. Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• The Economist. (2019). Democracy Index 2019: A year of democratic setbacks and popular protest. The Economist Intelligence Unit. (Issue 1). http://www.eiu.com/Handlers/WhitepaperHandler.ashx?fi=Democracy-Index-2019.pdf&mode=wp&campaignid=democracyindex2019
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Alstein, M. (2019). Controversy and polarisation in the classroom. Flemish Peace Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Verma, R. (2012). Between spaces of “otherness” and belonging: Lessons on global citizenship in the classroom J. Brown, H. Ross, and P. Munn , Democratic citizenship in schools. Dunedin Academic Press, 74–87 .
   Google Scholar
• Versfeld, R. (2005). Teaching controversial issues. New Africa Books.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, E. (2017). Unexpected questions: Reflecting on the teacher’s experience of responding in class. The High School Journal, 101(1), 49–61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1353/hsj.2017.0015
   Google Scholar
• Wellington, J. J. (Ed.). (1986). Controversial issues in the curriculum. Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Whiting, L. (2008). Semi-structured interviews for novice researhers. Nursing Standard, 22(23), 35–40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7748/ns2008.02.22.23.35.c6420
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Woolley, R. (2011). Controversial Issues: Identifying the concerns and priorities of student teachers. Policy Futures in Education, 9(2), 280–291. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2011.9.2.280
   Google Scholar
• Zembylas, M., & Kambani, F. (2012). The teaching of controversial issues during elementary-level history instruction: Greek-Cypriot teachers’ perceptions and emotions. Theory & Research in Social Education, 40(2), 107–133. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2012.670591
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, J., & Robertson, E. (2017). The case for contention: Teaching controversial issues in American schools. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226456485.001.0001
   Google Scholar