Teacher education as stakeholder: teacher educator perspectives on the integration of computational thinking into mathematics and science courses

References

• Adeolu, A. S. (2022). Preservice teachers’ construction of computational thinking practices through mathematical modeling activities [ Doctoral dissertation], Montana State University, Theses and Dissertations at Montana State University (MSU). https://scholarworks.montana.edu/xmlui/handle/1/17388
   Google Scholar
• Adler, R. F., & Kim, H. (2018). Enhancing future K-8 teachers’ computational thinking skills through modeling and simulations. Education and Information Technologies, 23(4), 1501–1514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9675-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, R. (2022). Block-based programming and computational thinking in a collaborative setting: A case study of integrating programming into a maths subject. Acta Didactica, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.5617/adno.9169
   Google Scholar
• Azeka, S., & Yadav, A. (2022). A computational thinking integration model for primary and secondary classrooms. In A. Yadav & U. D. Berthelsen (Eds.), Computational thinking in education: A pedagogical perspective (pp. 41–56). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bocconi, S., Chioccariello, A., Kampylis, P., Dagienė, V., Wastiau, P., Engelhardt, K., Earp, J., Horvath, M., Jasutė, E., Malagoli, C., Masiulionytė-Dagienė, V., & Stupurienė, G. (2022). Reviewing computational thinking in compulsory education: State of play and practices from computing education. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/126955
   Google Scholar
• Bower, M., & Falkner, K. (2015, January 27-30). Computational thinking, the notional machine, preservice teachers, and research opportunities. In Proceedings of the 17th Australasian Computing Education Conference (ACE 2015), Sydney, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Bråting, K., & Kilhamn, C. (2021). Exploring the intersection of algebraic and computational thinking. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 23(2), 170–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2020.1779012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012, April 13–17). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking [ Paper presentation]. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association meeting, Vancouver, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Broley, L., Buteau, C., & Sardella, J. (2023). When preservice and inservice teachers join forces: A collaborative way to support the enactment of new coding curricula in mathematics classrooms. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202318636
   Google Scholar
• Bungum, B., & Mogstad, E. (2022). Building and programming a weather station: Teachers’ views on values and challenges in a comprehensive STEM project. Research in Science & Technological Education, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2022.2103108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, D., & Leahy, M. (2021). Developing preservice teachers’ understanding of computational thinking: A constructionist approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(3), 1060–1077. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cetin, I. (2016). Preservice teachers’ introduction to computing: Exploring utilization of scratch. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54(7), 997–1021. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633116642774
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dagienė, V., Jevsikova, T., Stupurienė, G., & Juškevičienė, A. (2022). Teaching computational thinking in primary schools: Worldwide trends and teachers’ attitudes. Computer Science and Information Systems, 19(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.2298/CSIS201215033D
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engen, B. K., Giæver, T. H., & Mifsud, L. (2015). Guidelines and regulations for teaching digital competence in schools and Teacher education: A weak link? Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 10(2), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1891-943X-2015-02-02
   Google Scholar
• Gadanidis, G. (2017). Five affordances of computational thinking to support elementary mathematics education. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 36(2), 143–151.
   Google Scholar
• Gadanidis, G., Cendros, R., Floyd, L., & Namukasa, I. (2017). Computational thinking in mathematics teacher education. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 17(4), 458–477.
   Google Scholar
• Gleasman, C., & Kim, C. (2020). Pre-service teacher’s use of block-based programming and computational thinking to teach elementary mathematics. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 6(1), 52–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-019-00056-1
   Google Scholar
• Grover, S. (2021). ‘CTIntegration’: A conceptual framework guiding design and analysis of integration of computing and computational thinking into school subjects. EdArxiv, Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/eg8n5
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, Y.-C., Irie, N. R., & Ching, Y.-H. (2019). Computational thinking educational policy initiatives (CTEPI) across the globe. TechTrends, 63(3), 260–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00384-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurt, T., Greenwald, E., Allan, S., Cannady, M. A., Krakowski, A., Brodsky, L., Collins, M. A., Montgomery, R., & Dorph, R. (2023). The computational thinking for science (CT-S) framework: Operationalizing CT-S for K–12 science education researchers and educators. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00391-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaipal-Jamani, K., & Angeli, C. (2017). Effect of robotics on elementary preservice teachers’ self-efficacy, science learning, and computational thinking. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(2), 175–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9663-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelentrić, M., Helland, K., & Arstorp, A.-T. (2017). Professional digital competence framework for teachers. https://www.udir.no/globalassets/filer/in-english/pfdk_framework_en_low2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kravik, R., Berg, T. K., & Siddiq, F. (2022). Teachers’ understanding of programming and computational thinking in primary education – A critical need for professional development. Acta Didactica Norden, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.5617/adno.9194
   Google Scholar
• Li, Q. (2020). Computational thinking and teacher education: An expert interview study. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.224
   Google Scholar
• Loureiro, A. C., Meirinhos, M., Osório, A. J., & Valente, L. (2022). Computational thinking in teacher digital competence frameworks. Prisma Social, 38(3), 78–93.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education and Research. (2019). Læreplanverket [the curriculum]. Established as regulations. The National Curriculum for the Knowledge Promotion 2020. https://www.udir.no/laring-og-trivsel/lareplanverket/
   Google Scholar
• Moon, P. F., Himmelsbach, J., Weintrop, D., & Walkoe, J. (2023). Developing preservice teachers’ intuitions about computational thinking in a mathematics and science methods course. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202318599
   Google Scholar
• Nordby, S. K., Bjerke, A. H., & Mifsud, L. (2022). Primary mathematics teachers’ understanding of computational thinking. KI - Künstliche Intelligenz, 36(1), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-021-00750-6
   Google Scholar
• Ocak, C., Yadav, A., Vogel, S., & Patel, A. (2023). Teacher education faculty’s perceptions about computational thinking integration for pre-service Education. Journal of Technology & Teacher Education, 31(3), 299–349.
   Google Scholar
• Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., Yadav, A., & Mouza, C. (2022). Preparing the next generation of teachers: Revamping teacher education for the 21st century. In A. Yadav & U. D. Berthelsen (Eds.), Computational thinking in education: A pedagogical perspective (pp. 151–171). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez, A. (2018). A framework for computational thinking dispositions in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 49(4), 424–461. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.49.4.0424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajapakse Mohottige, N. U. S., Andersen, R., & Bjerke, A. H. (in press). Introducing computational thinking into the Norwegian teacher education: An analysis of mathematics and science course descriptions. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy.
   Google Scholar
• Rich, K. M., Yadav, A., & Schwarz, C. V. (2019). Computational thinking, mathematics, and science: Elementary teachers’ perspectives on integration. Journal of Technology & Teacher Education, 27(2), 165–205.
   Google Scholar
• Shute, V. J., Sun, C., & Asbell-Clarke, J. (2017). Demystifying computational thinking. Educational Research Review, 22, 142–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tondeur, J., Aesaert, K., Prestridge, S., & Consuegra, E. (2018). A multilevel analysis of what matters in the training of pre-service teacher’s ICT competencies. Computers & Education, 122, 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tondeur, J., Scherer, R., Baran, E., Siddiq, F., Valtonen, T., & Sointu, E. (2019). Teacher educators as gatekeepers: Preparing the next generation of teachers for technology integration in education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3), 1189–1209. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umutlu, D. (2021). An exploratory study of pre-service teachers’ computational thinking and programming skills. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2021.1922105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasconcelos, L., & Kim, C. (2020). Preparing preservice teachers to use block-based coding in scientific modeling lessons. Instructional Science, 48(6), 765–797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-020-09527-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinnervik, P., & Bungum, B. (2022). Computational thinking as part of compulsory education: How is it represented in Swedish and Norwegian curricula? Nordina, 18(3), 384–400. https://doi.org/10.5617/nordina.9296
   Google Scholar
• Voon, X. P., Wong, S. L., Wong, L. H., Khambari, M. N. M., & Syed-Abdullah, S. I. S. (2023). Developing pre-service teachers’ computational thinking through experiential learning: Hybridisation of plugged and unplugged approaches. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 18(6) . https://doi.org/10.58459/rptel.2023.18006
   Google Scholar
• Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., Horn, M., Orton, K., Jona, K., Trouille, L., & Wilensky, U. (2016). Defining computational thinking for mathematics and science classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(1), 127–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9581-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadav, A., Mayfield, C., Zhou, N., Hambrusch, S., & Korb, J. T. (2014). Computational thinking in elementary and secondary teacher education. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 14(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/2576872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadav, A., Stephenson, C., & Hong, H. (2017). Computational thinking for teacher education. Communications of the ACM, 60(4), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1145/2994591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Žanko, Ž., Mladenovi, M., & Krpan, D. (2022). Analysis of school students’ misconceptions about basic programming concepts. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(3), 719–730. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar