References
- Becker, B. M., Bromme, R., & Jucks, R. (2008). College students’ knowledge of concepts related to the metabolic syndrome. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 13, 367–379.10.1080/13548500701405525
- Corner, A., & Hahn, U. (2009). Evaluating science arguments: Evidence, uncertainty, and argument strength. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 15, 199–212.
- Gardner, B., Davies, A., McAteer, J., & Michie, S. (2010). Beliefs underlying UK parents’ views towards MMR promotion interventions: A qualitative study. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 15, 220–230.
- Hahn, U., Harris, A. J. L., & Corner, A. J. (2009). Argument content and argument source: An exploration. Informal Logic, 29, 337–367.
- Hyland, K. (2000). Hedges, boosters and lexical invisibility: Noticing modifiers in academic texts. Language Awareness, 9, 179–197.10.1080/09658410008667145
- Lewin, B. A. (2005). Hedging: An exploratory study of authors’ and readers’ identification of “toning down” in scientific texts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4, 163–178.10.1016/j.jeap.2004.08.001
- Prince, E. F., Frader, J., & Bosk, C. (1982). On hedging in physician–physician discourse. In: R. J. Di Prieto (Ed.), Linguistics and the professions (pp. 83–97). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
- Strømsø, H. I., Bråten, I., & Britt, M. A. (2010). Reading multiple texts about climate change: The relationship between memory for sources and text comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 20, 192–204.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.001
- Thomm, E., & Bromme, R. (2012). “It should at least seem scientific!” Textual features of “scientificness” and their impact on lay assessments of online information. Science & Education, 96, 187–211.
- Wiley, J., Goldman, S. R., Graesser, A. C., Sanchez, C. A., Ash, I. K., & Hemmerich, J. A. (2009). Source evaluation, comprehension, and learning in internet science inquiry tasks. American Educational Research Journal, 46, 1060–1106.10.3102/0002831209333183