References
- BMJ. (undated). BMJ Policy. http://www.bmj.com/about-bmj/resources-authors/peer-review-process.
- Brito, M., A. Fink, C. Friend, A. Heidebrink-Bruno, R. Moe, K. M. Shaffer, V. Robin, and R. Wharton. 2014. “Love in the Time of Peer Review.” Hybrid Pedagogy. November 14. http://www.hybridpedagogy.com/journal/love-time-peer-review/.
- Brookfield, S. D. 2007. “Diversifying Curriculum as the Practice of Repressive Tolerance.” Teaching in Higher Education 12 (5&6): 557–568. doi:10.1080/13562510701595085.
- Cohen, P. 2010. “Scholars Test Web Alternative to Peer Review.” New York Times, August 23. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/24/arts/24peer.html?ref=patriciacohen&_r=.
- Evans, L., and M. Homer. 2014. Academic Journal Editors’ Professionalism: Perceptions of Power, Proficiency, and Personal Agendas: Final Report. Society for Research into Higher Education. https://www.srhe.ac.uk/downloads/EvansHomerReport.pdf.
- Harnad, S. 1998. “The Invisible Hand of Peer Review.” Nature. http://cogprints.org/1646/1/nature2.html.
- Jaeger, S. 2014. Origins of Courteous Review. Illinois Program for Research in the Humanities blog [weblog]. April 10. https://iprh.wordpress.com/2014/04/10/origins-of-courteous-review/.
- Morris, S. M. 2013. “Collaborative Peer Review: Gathering the Academy's Orphans.” Hybrid Pedagogy. December 10. http://www.hybridpedagogy.com/journal/collaborative-peer-review-gathering-the-academys-orphans/.
- Smith, R. 2006. “Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals.” Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 99 (4): 178–182. http://jrs.sagepub.com/content/99/4/178.short. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.99.4.178
- Van Rooyen, S., T. Delamothe, and S. J. W. Evans. 2010. “Effect on Peer Review of Telling Reviewer that their Signed Reviews Might Be Posted on the Web: Randomised Controlled Trial.” BMJ 341: c5729. doi:10.1136/bmj.c5729.