Supporting academic literacies: university teachers in collaboration for change

References

• Aagaard Nielsen, K., and L. Svensson, eds. 2006. Action and Interactive Research: Beyond Practice and Theory. Maastricht: Shaker.
   Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M. 2011. Interpreting Interviews. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., and K. Sköldberg. 2009. Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Argyris, C. 1993. Knowledge for Action: A Guide to Overcoming Barriers to Organizational Change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, R. 2010. “The Role and Efficacy of Generic Learning and Study Support: What Is the Experience and Perspective of Academic Staff?” Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education 2: 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. 1984. Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics. Translated and edited by C. Emerson. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bergman, L. 2014. “The Research Circle as a Resource in Challenging Academics’ Perceptions of How to Support Students’ Literacy Development in Higher Education.” Canadian Journal of Action Research 15 (2): 3–20.
   Google Scholar
• Blåsjö, M. 2004. Studenters skrivande i två kunskapsbyggande miljöer [Students’ Writing in Two Knowledge Constructing Settings]. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
   Google Scholar
• Blythman, M., and S. Orr. 2002. “A Joined-up Policy Approach to Student Support.” In Failing Students in Higher Education, edited by M. Peelo and T. Wareham, 45–55. Buckingham: Open University Press and the Society for Research in Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Bruce, C. D., T. Flynn, and S. Stagg-Peterson. 2011. “Examining What We Mean by Collaboration in Collaborative Action Research: A Cross Case Analysis.” Educational Action Research 19 (4): 433–452. doi:10.1080/09650792.2011.625667.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, D., and J. Pieterick. 2010. Giving Students Effective Feedback. London: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Capobianco, B. M. 2007. “Science Teachers’ Attempts at Integrating Feminist Pedagogy Through Collaborative Action Research.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 44 (1): 1–32. doi:10.1002/tea.20120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chanock, K. 2000. “Comments on Essays: Do Students Understand What Tutors Write?” Teaching in Higher Education 5 (1): 95–105. doi:10.1080/135625100114984.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., L. Manion, and K. Morrison. 2007. Research Methods in Education. 6th ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Duff, P. 2010. “Language Socialization into Academic Discourse Communities.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 30: 169–192. doi:10.1017/S0267190510000048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dysthe, O., F. Hertzberg, and T. L. Hoel. 2011. Skriva för att lära [Writing to Learn]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Dysthe, O., A. Samara, and K. Westrheim. 2006. “Multivoiced Supervision of Master's Students: A Case Study of Alternative Supervision Practices in Higher Education.” Studies in Higher Education 31 (3): 299–318. doi:10.1080/03075070600680562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P., and E. R. Hayes. 2011. Language and Learning in the Digital Age. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haggis, T. 2006. “Pedagogies for Diversity. Retaining Critical Challenge Amidst Fears of ‘Dumbing Down’.” Studies in Higher Education 31 (5): 521–535. doi:10.1080/03075070600922709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handal, G. 1999. Kritiske venner: Bruk av interkollegial kritik innen universiteten [Critical Friends: The Use of Intercollegiate Critique Within the University]. NyIng. Rapport nr. 9. Linköping: Linköping University.
   Google Scholar
• Hoel, T. L. 2010. Skriva på universitet och högskolor: En bok för lärare och studenter [Writing in Higher Education: A Book for Teachers and Students]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Hoel, T. L., and O. K. Haugaløkken. 2004. “Response Groups as Learning Resources When Working with Portfolios.” Journal of Education for Teaching: International Research and Pedagogy 30 (3): 225–241. doi:10.1080/0260747042000309466.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. 2004. Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. London: Longman/University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. 2006. English for Academic Purposes. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ivanič, R. 1998. Writing and Identity: The Discoursal Construction of Identity in Academic Writing. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Ivanič, R., R. Clark, and R. Rimmershaw. 2000. “What Am I Supposed to Make of This? The Message Conveyed to Students by Tutors’ Written Comments.” In Student Writing in Higher Education: New Contexts, edited by M. Lea and B. Steirer, 47–65. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kreber, C. 2005. “Reflection on Teaching and the Scholarship of Teaching: Focus on Science Instructors.” Higher Education 50 (2): 323–359. doi:10.1007/s10734-004-6360-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreber, C. 2009. “Supporting Students Learning in the Context of Diversity, Complexity and Uncertainty.” In The University and its Disciplines. Teaching and Learning Within and Beyond Disciplinary Boundaries, edited by C. Kreber, 3–18. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S. 2009. Interviews. Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lea, M. R., and B. V. Street. 1998. “Student Writing in Higher Education: An Academic Literacies Approach.” Studies in Higher Education 23 (2): 157–172. doi:10.1080/03075079812331380364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lillis, T. M. 2001. Student Writing: Access, Regulation, Desire. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lillis, T. M., and M. Scott. 2007. “Defining Academic Literacies’ Research: Issues of Epistemology, Ideology and Strategy.” Journal of Applied Linguistics 4 (1): 5–32. doi:10.1558/japl.v4i1.5.
   Google Scholar
• Lindholm, Y. 2008. Mötesplats skolutveckling: Om hur samverkan med forskare kan bidra till att utveckla pedagogers kompetens att bedriva utvecklingsarbete [Meetingplace School Development: How Collaboration with Researchers May Contribute to Developing Educators’ Competence for Developmental Work]. Stockholm: Stockholm University.
   Google Scholar
• Lotman, J. M. 1990. Universe of the Mind. A Semiotic Theory of Culture. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lycke, H. K., and G. Handal. 2012. “Refleksjon over egen undervisningspraksis – et ledd i kvalitetsutvikling?” [“Reflections on Teaching Practice – A Part of Quality Improvement?”]. In Utdanningskvalitet og undervisningskvalitet under press? Spenninger i høgere utdanning, edited by T. L. Hoel, B. Hanssen, and D. Husebø, 157–183. Trondheim: Tapir Akademisk Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Mälkki, K. 2011. Theorizing the Nature of Reflection. Helsinki: University Print.
   Google Scholar
• Mälkki, K., and S. Lindholm-Ylänne. 2012. “From Reflection to Action? Barriers and Bridges Between Higher Education Teachers’ Thoughts and Actions. Studies in Higher Education 37(1): 33–50. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2010.492500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mezirow, J. 1991. Transformative Dimensions of Adult Learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Mezirow, J. 1998. “On Critical Reflection.” Adult Education Quarterly 48 (3): 185–198. doi:10.1177/074171369804800305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mezirow, J., and Associates. 2000. Learning as Transformation: Critical Perspectives on a Theory in Progress. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Northhedge, A., and J. McArthur. 2009. “Guiding Students into a Discipline: The Significance of the Teacher. In The University and Its Disciplines. Teaching and Learning Within and Beyond Disciplinary Boundaries, edited by C. Kreber, 107–118. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Persson, S. 2009. Research Circles – A Guide. Malmö: Centre for Diversity in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, L. 2012. “Understanding Resistance: An Analysis of Discourses in Academic Staff Development. Studies in Higher Education 37 (1): 69–83. doi:10.1080/03075079.2010.497837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rommetveit, R. 1974. On Message Structure: A Framework for the Study of Language and Communication. London: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Somekh, B. 2006. Action Research: A Methodology for Change and Development. New York: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, E. W. 2007. “An Update of Transformative Learning Theory: A Critical Review of the Empirical Research (1999–2005).” International Journal of Lifelong Education 26 (2): 173–191. doi:10.1080/02601370701219475.
   Google Scholar
• Topping, K. 2009. “Peer Assessment.” Theory Into Practice 48 (1): 20–27. doi:10.1080/00405840802577569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vetenskapsrådet [Swedish Research Council]. 2015. CODEX ‒ regler och riktlinjer för forskning [CODEX ‒ Rules and Guidelines for Research]. July 20. http://codex.vr.se/.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. 1991. Voices of the Mind: A Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. 1998. Mind as Action. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wingate, U. 2006. “Doing Away with ‘Study Skills’.” Teaching in Higher Education 11 (4): 457–469. doi:10.1080/13562510600874268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar