Lecturers’ curational behaviour in higher education

References

• Ajzen, I. 1991. “‘The Theory of Planned Behavior.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50 (2): 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. 2005. Attitudes, Personality and Behavior. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. 2011. “The Theory of Planned Behaviour: Reactions and Reflections.” Psychology & Health 26 (9): 1113–1127. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2011.613995.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Algers, A., and A. Silva-Fletcher. 2015. “Teachers’ Perceived Value, Motivations for and Adoption of Open Educational Resources in Animal and Food Sciences.” International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) 10 (2): 35–45. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v10i2.4427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, Steven W. 2015. Content Curation. How to Avoid Information Overload. Corwin Connected Educator Series. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Arksey, Hilary, and Lisa O’Malley. 2005. “Scoping Studies: Towards a Methodological Framework.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 8 (1): 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616.
   Google Scholar
• Armitage, Christopher J., and Mark Conner. 2001. “Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A Meta-Analytic Review.” British Journal of Social Psychology 40 (4): 471–499. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466601164939.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, Jeffrey G. 1999. “Academics' Motivation and Self-Efficacy for Teaching and Research.” Higher Education Research & Development 18 (3): 343–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436990180305.
   Google Scholar
• Balzer, David. 2015. Curationism. How Curating Took Over the Art World and Everything Else. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barbera, Elena, Iolanda Garcia, and Marc Fuertes-Alpiste. 2017. “A Co-Design Process Microanalysis: Stages and Facilitators of an Inquiry-Based and Technology-Enhanced Learning Scenario.” International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 18 (6): 104–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, Georges-Louis, and Solène Zablot. 2015. “Research on Educational Media and Resources in the Field of French Vocational Education. The Case of Automobile Maintenance.” IARTEM E-Journal 7 (3): 25–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bel, E., and E. Bradburn. 2008. ‘Refraining Teachers’ Conceptions of Accessible e-Learning Designs’. In Proceedings - The 8th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT 2008, 1028–1029. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2008.179.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, Michael. 2016. Curation. The Power of Selection in a World of Excess. London: Piatkus.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatt, Ibrar. 2017. Assignments as Controversies: Digital Literacy and Writing in Classroom Practice. New York/London: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatt, Ibrar, and Alison MacKenzie. 2019. “Just Google It! Digital Literacy and the Epistemology of Ignorance.” Teaching in Higher Education 24 (3): 302–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1547276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonk, Curtis J., Meina Zhu, Minkyoung Kim, Shuya Xu, Najia Sabir, and Annisa R. Sari. 2018. “Pushing Toward a More Personalized MOOC: Exploring Instructor Selected Activities, Resources, and Technologies for MOOC Design and Implementation.” International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 19 (4): 92–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschman, Ferry, Joke Voogt, Susan McKenney, and Jules M. Pieters. 2015. “Teacher Design Knowledge and Beliefs for Technology Enhanced Learning Materials in Early Literacy: Four Portraits.” ELearning Papers (44).
   Google Scholar
• Cafolla, Ralph. 2006. “Project MERLOT: Bringing Peer Review to Web-Based Educational Resources.” Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 14 (2): 313–323.
   Google Scholar
• Deschaine, Mark E., and Sue Ann Sharma. 2015. “The Five Cs of Digital Curation: Supporting Twenty-First-Century Teaching and Learning.” InSight: A Journal of Scholarly Teaching 10: 19–24.
   Google Scholar
• Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture and Sciences. 2015. The Value of Knowledge. Strategic Agenda for Higher Education and Research 2015-2025. https://www.government.nl/documents/reports/2015/07/01/the-value-of-knowledge.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman-Maggor, Y., A. Rom, and I. Tuvi-Arad. 2016. “Integration of Open Educational Resources in Undergraduate Chemistry Teaching – a Mapping Tool and Lecturers' Considerations.” Chemistry Education Research and Practice 17 (2): 283–295. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5rp00184f.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flintoff, K., P. Mellow, and K. P. Clark. 2014. Digital Curation: Opportunities for Learning, Teaching, Research and Professional Development. Perth. http://clt.curtin.edu.au/events/conferences/tlf/tlf2014/refereed/flintoff.html.
   Google Scholar
• Gilje, Øystein. 2019. “The Influence of 1:1 Technology on Learners' Understanding and Meaning Making Requires an Investigation Beyond its Effects on Students' Achievement.” Paper presented at the International Association for Research on Textbooks and Educational Media Conference, UCL University College, Odense, Denmark, 11 September 2019. https://iartemblog.files.wordpress.com/2019/09/iartem2019_gilje_slides.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gold, A. U., T. S. Ledley, S. M. Buhr, S. Fox, M. Mccaffrey, F. Niepold, C. Manduca, and S. E. Lynds. 2012. “Peer-Review of Digital Educational Resources—A Rigorous Review Process Developed by the Climate Literacy and Energy Awareness Network (CLEAN).” Journal of Geoscience Education 60 (4): 295–308. https://doi.org/10.5408/12-324.1.
   Google Scholar
• Griffioen, D. M. E., U. de Jong, and S. Jak. 2013. “Research Self-Efficacy of Lecturers in Non-University Higher Education.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 50 (1): 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2012.746512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gros, B., and M. López. 2016. “Students as Co-Creators of Technology-Rich Learning Activities in Higher Education.” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 13: 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0026-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haney, Jodi J., Charlene M. Czerniak, and Andrew T. Lumpe. 1996. “Teacher Beliefs and Intentions Regarding the Implementation of Science Education Reform Strands.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 33 (9): 971–993. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199611)33:9<971::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-S.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, Thomas Illum, and Stig Toke Gissel. 2017. “Quality of Learning Materials.” IARTEM E-Journal 9 (1): 122–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn, E. A., R. Anderson, and K. Pierick. 2018. “Open Educational Resources (OERs) in Self-Directed Competency-Based Education.” Information Discovery and Delivery 46 (4): 197–203. https://doi.org/10.1108/IDD-02-2018-0005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, Sihua, Kaitlin T. Torphy, Amanda Opperman, Kimberly Jansen, and Yun-Jia Lo. 2018. “What Do Teachers Share Within Socialized Knowledge Communities: A Case of Pinterest.” Journal of Professional Capital and Community 3 (2): 97–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, Henry, Ravi Purushotma, Margaret Weigel, Katie Clinton, and Alice J. Robison. 2009. Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture. Media Education for the 21st Century. The John D. and Catherine T. MacArtur Foundation Reports on Digital Media and Learning. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, Mary M. 2002. “Knowledge and Teaching.” Teachers and Teaching 8 (3): 355–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/135406002100000495.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, Sadia, and Ibrar Bhatt. 2019. "Curation." In The International Encyclopedia of Media Literacy, edited by Renee Hobbs and Paul Mihailidis. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118978238.ieml0047.
   Google Scholar
• King, Thomas William. 2017. “Postgraduate Students as OER Capacitators.” Open Praxis 9 (2): 223–234. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.9.2.566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolling da Rocha, C. F. C, Ennes da Silva, G. Thiesen Schneider, I. Vargas Ramos, L. H. Rauber, M. Becon Lauzer, and P. B. Scherer Bassani. 2018. Mapping Teaching Authorship and Learning Practices in Higher Education Settings: First Step in Creating a Knowledge Base Through Sharing. Vol. 10924 LNCS. Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91743-6_31.
   Google Scholar
• Korthagen, Fred A. J. 2010. “Situated Learning Theory and the Pedagogy of Teacher Education: Towards an Integrative View of Teacher Behavior and Teacher Learning.” Teaching and Teacher Education 26 (1): 98–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littlejohn, Andrew. 2011. “The Analysis of Language Teaching Materials: Inside the Trojan Horse.” In Materials Development in Language Teaching, edited by B. Tomlinson, 179–211. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marquis, Elizabeth, Rachel Guitman, Christine Black, Mick Healey, Kelly E. Matthews, and Lucie Sam Dvorakova. 2019. “Growing Partnership Communities: What Experiences of an International Institute Suggest About Developing Student-Staff Partnership in Higher Education.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 56 (2): 184–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2018.1424012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, Jeffrey J., and Pamela Hodges Kulinna. 2004. “Self-Efficacy Theory and the Theory of Planned Behavior: Teaching Physically Active Physical Education Classes.” Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 75 (3): 288–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2004.10609161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEachan, Rosemary, Robin Charlotte, Mark Conner, Natalie Jayne Taylor, and Rebecca Jane Lawton. 2011. “Prospective Prediction of Health-Related Behaviours with the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A Meta-Analysis.” Health Psychology Review 5 (2): 97–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2010.521684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, M. 2014. ‘Finding and Sharing Educational Resources Using Twitter, Hashtags and Storify’. In Proceedings of ASCILITE 2014 - Annual Conference of the Australian Society for Computers in Tertiary Education, 678–82. ASCILITE. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84955262441&partnerID=40&md5=68c34cb0a3a8e63c5f7698bc90cabfe0.
   Google Scholar
• Mihailidis, Paul, and James Cohen. 2013. “Exploring Curation as a Core Competency in Digital and Media Literacy Education.” Journal of Interactive Media in Education 2013: 1. https://doi.org/10.5334/2013-02.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, Michael V. 2009. “Integrating Online Multimedia Into College Course and Classroom: With Application to the Social Sciences.” MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching 5 (2): 395–423.
   Google Scholar
• Moher, David, Alessandro Liberati, Jennifer Tetzlaff, Douglas G. Altman, and The PRISMA Group. 2009. “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement.” PLOS Medicine 6 (7): e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, A. P., D. V. Hayward, W. Dunn, M. Carbonaro, and C. G. Amrhein. 2015. “Blending for Student Engagement: Lessons Learned for MOOCs and Beyond.” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 31 (6): 657–670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mtebe, J. S., and R. Raisamo. 2014. “Challenges and Instructors’ Intention to Adopt and use Open Educational Resources in Higher Education in Tanzania.” The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 15 (1): 249–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, Helle Lykke. 2014. “Curating and Nudging in Virtual CLIL Environments.” The EUROCALL Review 22 (1): 40–46.
   Google Scholar
• Nikonova, E. I., I. A. Sharonov, S. N. Sorokoumova, O. V. Suvorova, and E. A. Sorokoumova. 2016. “Modern Functions of a Textbook on Social Sciences and Humanities as an Informational Management Tool of University Education.” International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 11 (10): 3764–3774.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, John. 2012. Digital Media and Learner Identity: The New Curatorship. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Reichenberg, Monica, and Rune Andreassen. 2017. “‘Similar but Not the Same: Comparing Norwegian and Swedish Teachers’ Influence on Textbook Selection and Involvement in Text Discussions’.” IARTEM E-Journal 9 (1): 4–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, Steven. 2011. Curation Nation. How to Win in a World Where Consumers Are Creators. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• San, T. P. 2015. “‘Aggregating Digital Resources in an E-Learning Platform: A Case Study of a Malaysian Public University’s Compliance with Copyright’.” Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science 20 (1): 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos-Hermosa, Gema. 2014. “ORIOLE, in the Search for Evidence of OER in Teaching. Experiences in the Use, Re-Use and the Sharing and Influence of Repositories.” Qualitative Research in Education 3 (2): 232–268.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, Cynthia Luna. 2015. ‘The Futures of Learning 1: Why Must Learning Content and Methods Change in the 21st Century?’ ERF Working Paper Series. UNESCO Education Research and Foresight. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000234807.
   Google Scholar
• Seitzinger, Joyce. 2014. “Curate Me! Exploring Online Identity through Social Curation in Networked Learning.” In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Networked Learning, edited by S. Bayne, C. Jones, M. de Laat, T. Ryberg and C. Sinclair.
   Google Scholar
• Sheeran, Paschal, Peter M. Gollwitzer, and John A. Bargh. 2013. “Nonconscious Processes and Health.” Health Psychology 32 (5): 460–473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd, Clive. 2012. “The Trainer as Curator.” Talent Development 2012: 66–71.
   Google Scholar
• Siemens, George. 2007. ‘Networks, Ecologies, and Curational Teaching’. Connectivism (blog). 2007. http://www.connectivism.ca/?p=93.
   Google Scholar
• Siemens, George. 2008. “Learning and Knowing in Networks: Changing Roles for Educators and Designers.” ITFORUM for Discussion 27: 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Snelson, Chareen. 2018. “Video Production in Content-Area Pedagogy: A Scoping Study of the Research Literature.” Learning, Media and Technology 43 (3): 294–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2018.1504788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sniehotta, Falko F., Justin Presseau, and Vera Araújo-Soares. 2014. “Time to Retire the Theory of Planned Behaviour.” Health Psychology Review 8 (1): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2013.869710.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, Ilona. 2015. “Discourses of 'curation' in Digital Times.” In Discourse and Digital Practices: Doing Discourse Analysis in the Digital Age, edited by Rodney H. Jones, Alice Chik, and Christoph A. Hafner, 209–225. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sohrabi, Babak, and Hamideh Iraj. 2016. “Implementing Flipped Classroom Using Digital Media: A Comparison of Two Demographically Different Groups Perceptions.” Computers in Human Behavior 60 (July): 514–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.056.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Shirley, and Peter Todd. 1995. “Decomposition and Crossover Effects in the Theory of Planned Behavior: A Study of Consumer Adoption Intentions.” International Journal of Research in Marketing 12 (2): 137–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8116(94)00019-K.
   Google Scholar
• Tobias, Vicki. 2009. ‘Digital Resources in Instruction and Research: Assessing Faculty Discovery, Use and Needs–Final Summary Report’. MINDS@UW. MINDS@UW. e-mail: [email protected]. http://minds.wisconsin.edu/.eric. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=ED522207&site=ehost-live.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, Brian. 2001. ‘Materials Development’. In The Cambridge Guide to Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages, Edited by Ronald Carter and David Nunan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tondeur, Jo, Johan van Braak, Peggy A. Ertmer, and Anne Ottenbreit-Leftwich. 2017. “Understanding the Relationship Between Teachers’ Pedagogical Beliefs and Technology use in Education: a Systematic Review of Qualitative Evidence.” Educational Technology Research and Development 65 (3): 555–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trigwell, Keith, Michael Prosser, and Paul Ginns. 2005. “Phenomenographic Pedagogy and a Revised Approaches to Teaching Inventory.” Higher Education Research & Development 24 (4): 349–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360500284730.
   Google Scholar
• Underwood, Paul R. 2012. “Teacher Beliefs and Intentions Regarding the Instruction of English Grammar Under National Curriculum Reforms: A Theory of Planned Behaviour Perspective.” Teaching and Teacher Education 28 (6): 911–925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ungerer, Leona M. 2016. “Digital Curation as a Core Competency in Current Learning and Literacy: A Higher Education Perspective.” The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 17: 5. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i5.2566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wieringa, N., F. J. J. M. Janssen, and J. H. van Driel. 2013. “Het Gebruik van Doelsystemen Om de Interpretatie En Implementatie van Concept-Contextonderwijs Door Biologiedocenten Te Begrijpen.” Pedagogische Studiën 90 (3): 37–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff, Annika, and Paul Mulholland. 2013. ‘Curation, Curation, Curation’. In Proceedings of the 3rd Narrative and Hypertext Workshop, 1:1–1:5. NHT ‘13. New York, NY: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2462216.2462217.
   Google Scholar