Challenge and learning in honours education: a quantitative and qualitative study on students’ and teachers’ perceptions

References

• Beijaard, D., J. Van Driel, and N. Verloop. 1999. “Evaluation of Story-Line Methodology in Research on Teachers’ Practical Knowledge.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 25 (1): 47–62.
   Google Scholar
• Brekelmans, M., T. Mainhard, P. Den Brok, and T. Wubbels. 2011. “Teacher Control and Affiliation: Do Students and Teachers Agree?” The Journal of Classroom Interaction 46 (1): 17–26.
   Google Scholar
• Coppoolse, R., M. Wolfensberger, P. Van Eijl, L. Hermsen, H. Ten Berge, and G. Kinkhorst. 2013. “Honours Teaching.” In Hoogvliegers. Ontwikkeling Naar Professionele Excellentie [High Flyers. Development Toward Professional Excellence], edited by R. Coppoolse, P. van Eijl, and A. Pilot, 127–146. Rotterdam: Rotterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. 2000. Beyond Boredom and Anxiety. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Day, I. N. Z., F. M. Van Blankenstein, P. M. Westenberg, and W. F. Admiraal. 2018. “Teacher and Student Perceptions of Intermediate Assessment in Higher Education.” Educational Studies 44 (4): 449–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Hei, M., J. Strijbos, E. Sjoer, and W. Admiraal. 2016. “Thematic Review of Approaches to Design Group Learning Activities in Higher Education: The Development of a Comprehensive Framework.” Educational Research Review 18: 33–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Den Brok, P., T. Bergen, and M. Brekelmans. 2006. “Convergence and Divergence Between Teachers’ and Students’ Perceptions of Instructional Behaviour in Dutch Secondary Education.” In Contemporary Approaches to Research on Learning Environments: World Views, edited by D. Fisher, and M. Khine, 125–160. Singapore: World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Den Brok, P. J., J. Levy, R. Rodriguez, and T. Wubbels. 2002. “Perceptions of Asian-American and Hispanic-American Teachers and Their Students on Teacher Interpersonal Communication Style.” Teaching and Teacher Education 18 (4): 447–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elen, J., and J. Lowyck. 2000. “Instructional Metacognitive Knowledge: A Qualitative Study on Conceptions of Freshmen About Instruction.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 32 (3): 421–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N. J. 1991. “Approaches to Learning and Perceptions of the Learning Environment.” Higher Education 22 (3): 201–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorham, J., and W. R. Zakahi. 1990. “A Comparison of Teacher and Student Perceptions of Immediacy and Learning: Monitoring Process and Product.” Communication Education 39 (4): 354–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Könings, K. D., T. Seidel, S. Brand-Gruwel, and J. J. G. Van Merriënboer. 2014. “Differences Between Students’ and Teachers’ Perceptions of Education: Profiles to Describe Congruence and Friction.” Instructional Science 42 (1): 11–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lizzio, A., K. Wilson, and R. Simons. 2002. “University Students’ Perceptions of the Learning Environment and Academic Outcomes: Implications for Theory and Practice.” Studies in Higher Education 27 (1): 27–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, J. L., and W. Baker. 2007. “Teacher-Written Feedback: Student Perceptions, Teacher Self-Assessment, and Actual Teacher Performance.” Journal of Second Language Writing 16 (2): 82–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsden, P. 1997. “The Context of Learning in Academic Departments.” The Experience of Learning 2: 198–216.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Gallardo, J. R., E. Ruiz, and N. Ureña. 2013. “La evaluación en la formación inicial del profesorado: Qué creemos hacer y qué perciben los alumnos [The Assessment in Initial Teacher Training: What we do and What Students Perceive].” Cultura, Ciencia Y Deporte 8 (22): 17–29.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., and E. L. Deci. 2000a. “Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 25 (1): 54–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., and E. L. Deci. 2000b. “Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being.” American Psychologist 55 (1): 68–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., and E. L. Deci. 2020. “Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation from a Self-Determination Theory Perspective: Definitions, Theory, Practices, and Future Directions.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 61: 101860. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scager, K., S. F. Akkerman, A. Pilot, and T. Wubbels. 2012. “Challenging High-Ability Students.” Studies in Higher Education 39 (4): 659–679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scager, K., S. F. Akkerman, A. Pilot, and T. Wubbels. 2013. “How to Persuade Honors Students to go the Extra Mile: Creating a Challenging Learning Environment.” High Ability Studies 24 (2): 115–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scager, K., S. F. Akkerman, A. Pilot, and T. Wubbels. 2017. “Teacher Dilemmas in Challenging Students in Higher Education.” Teaching in Higher Education 22 (3): 318–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoller, R. 2004. “Honors Selection Processes: A Typology and Some Reflections.” Journal of the National Collegiate Honors Council 5 (1): 79–86.
   Google Scholar
• Trigwell, K., M. Prosser, and F. Waterhouse. 1999. “Relations Between Teachers’ Approaches to Teaching and Students’ Approaches to Learning.” Higher Education 37 (1): 57–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Akker, J. J. H. 1997. “The Science Curriculum: Between Ideals and Outcomes.” The International Handbook of Science Education, edited by B. Fraser and K. Tobin, 421–447. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Van Eijl, P., and A. Pilot. 2019. “Good Practices in Honors Education with Examples to Follow.” Journal of the European Honors Council 3 (1): 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Van Eijl, P. J., A. Pilot, V. Gelink, and N. Dibo. 2017. “Promoting Talent Development in Honours: The Honours Experience.” Journal of the European Honors Council 1 (9).
   Google Scholar
• Van Ginkel, S., P. J. Van Eijl, J. Zubizarreta, and A. Pilot. 2012. “Honors in the Master’s: A New Perspective?” Journal of the National Collegiate Honors Council 13 (2): 265–278.
   Google Scholar
• Vermunt, J. D., and N. Verloop. 1999. “Congruence and Friction Between Learning and Teaching.” Learning and Instruction 9 (3): 257–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visser-Wijnveen, G. J., J. H. Van Driel, R. M. Van Der Rijst, A. Visser, and N. Verloop. 2012. “Relating Academics’ Ways of Integrating Research and Teaching to Their Students’ Perceptions.” Studies in Higher Education 37 (2): 219–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfensberger, M. V. C. 2012. “Teaching for Excellence. Honors Pedagogies Revealed. Münster u.a: Waxmann Verlag GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfensberger, M. V. C., N. De Jong, and L. Drayer. 2012. Leren Excelleren, Excellentieprogramma’s in het HBO [Learning to Excel: Programs for Excellence in the Universities for Applied Sciences]. Groningen: Hanzehogeschool/Universiteit Utrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfensberger, M. V. C., P. J. Van Eijl, and A. Pilot. 2004. “Honours Programmes as Laboratories of Innovation: A Perspective from the Netherlands.” Journal of the National Collegiate Honors Council 5 (1): 115.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfensberger, M. V. C., P. J. Van Eijl, and A. Pilot. 2012. “Laboratories for Educational Innovation: Honors Programs in the Netherlands.” Journal of the National Collegiate Honors Council 13 (2): 149.
   Google Scholar
• Zhan, L. 2016. “Written Teacher Feedback: Student Perceptions, Teacher Perceptions, and Actual Teacher Performance.” English Language Teaching 9 (8): 73.
   Google Scholar