Pedagogies of mattering: re-conceptualising relational pedagogies in higher education

References

• Ahmed, S. 2017. Living a Feminist Life. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alaimo, S., and S. Hekman. 2008. Material Feminisms. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. 2003. “Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter.” Signs 28 (3): 801–831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, K. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. 2014. “Diffracting Diffraction: Cutting Together-apart.” Parallax 20: 168–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnacle, R., and G. Dall’Alba. 2017. “Committed to Learn: Student Engagement and Care in Higher Education.” Higher Education Research & Development 36: 1326–1338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J., and C. Tang. 2011. Teaching for Quality Learning at University. What the Student Does. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Bloxham, S. 2008. “How Can We Use Assessment to Support Transitions Into and Through Higher Education?” Keynote Presentation at the Transitions and Transformations: Developing Learners and Learning Environments Conference. Edge Hill University.
   Google Scholar
• Bottrell, D., and C. Manathunga. 2019. Resisting Neoliberalism in Higher Education Volume 1: Seeing Through the Cracks. Cham: Palgrave Critical University Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Bovill, C. 2020. Co-creating Learning and Teaching: Towards Relational Pedagogy in Higher Education. St Albans: Critical publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bozalek, V., A. Bayat, D. Gachago, S. Motala, and V. Mitchell. 2018. “A Pedagogy of Response-ability.” In Socially Just Pedagogies: Posthumanist, Feminist and Materialist Perspectives in Higher Education, edited by V. Bozalek, R. Braidotti, T. Shefer, and M. Zembylas, 97–112. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Bozalek, V., and M. Zembylas. 2017. “Towards a Response-able Pedagogy Across Higher Education Institutions in Post-apartheid South Africa: An Ethico-Political Analysis.” Education as Change 21 (2): 62–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. 2013. The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R., and S. Bignall. 2019. Posthuman Ecologies: Complexity and Process After Deleuze. London: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, K., and S. Larmar. 2020. “Acknowledging Another Face in the Virtual Crowd: Reimagining the Online Experience in Higher Education Through an Online Pedagogy of Care.” Journal of Further and Higher Education. doi:10.1080/0309877X.2020.1804536
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Care Collective. 2020. The Care Manifesto: The Politics of Interdependence. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Coole, D. H., and S. Frost. 2010. New Materialisms. Ontology, Agency and Politics. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. 1997. Essays Critical and Clinical. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Doll, W. E. 1993. A Post-modern Perspective on Curriculum. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ecclestone, K. 2012. “From Emotional and Psychological Well-being to Character Education: Challenging Policy Discourses of Behavioural Science and ‘Vulnerability’.” Research Papers in Education 27 (4): 463–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairchild, N. 2017. “Segments and Stutters: Early Years Teachers and Becoming-professional.” Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood 18 (3): 294–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairchild, N., and C. A. Taylor. 2019. “Karen Barad.” In Atkinson, P., Delamont, S., Cernat, A., Sakshaug, J. W. and Williams, R. A. Eds. SAGE Research Methods Foundations [online]. Accessed 4 October 2019. http://methods.sagepub.com/foundations/barad-karen.
   Google Scholar
• Felten, P., and L. Lambert. 2020. Relationship-rich Education: How Human Connections Drive Success. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrando, F. 2019. Philosophical Posthumanism. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Gilligan, C. 1982. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodson, I. F. 1994. Studying Curriculum: Cases and Methods. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gourlay, L. 2021. Posthumanism and the Digital University. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Gourlay, L., and M. Oliver. 2018. Student Engagement in the Digital University: Sociomaterial Assemblages. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gourlay, L., and J. Stevenson. 2017. “Teaching Excellence in Higher Education: Critical Perspectives.” Teaching in Higher Education 22 (4): 391–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gravett, K., and R. Ajjawi. 2021. “Belonging as Situated Practice.” Studies in Higher Education. doi:10.1080/03075079.2021.1894118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gravett, K., and I. M. Kinchin. 2020. “Revisiting ‘A Teaching Excellence for the Times we Live in’: Posthuman Possibilities.” Teaching in Higher Education 25 (8): 1028–1034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gravett, K., I. M. Kinchin, and N. E. Winstone. 2020. “More Than Customers: Conceptions of Students as Partners Held by Students, Staff, and Institutional Leaders.” Studies in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1623769
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gravett, K., and N. E. Winstone. 2020. “Making Connections: Alienation and Authenticity Within Students’ Relationships in Higher Education.” Higher Education Research and Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1842335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. J. 1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies 14 (3): 575–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. J. 1997. Modest_witness@second_millennium. FemaleMan©_meets_OncoMouse™: Feminism and Technoscience. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. J. 2004. The Haraway Reader. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 2016. Staying With the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, M., F. G. Wallace, and J. Bazzul. 2019. “Staying with the Trouble in Science Education: Towards Thinking With Nature – A Manifesto.” In Posthumanism and Higher Education: Reimagining Pedagogy, Practice and Research, edited by C. A. Taylor, and A. Bayley, 155–164. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hultman, K., and H. Lenz Taguchi. 2010. “Challenging Anthropocentric Analysis of Visual Data: A Relational Materialist Methodological Approach to Educational Research.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 23 (5): 525–542.
   Google Scholar
• Kinchin, I. 2020. “Care as a Threshold Concept for Teaching in the Salutogenic University.” Teaching in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1704726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lygo-Baker, S., I. M. Kinchin, and N. E. Winstone. 2019. Engaging Student Voices in Higher Education: Diverse Perspectives and Expectations in Partnership. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mulcahy, D. 2018. “Assembling Spaces of Learning ‘In’ Museums and Schools: A Practice-Based Sociomaterial Perspective.” In Spaces of Teaching and Learning, Understanding Teaching-learning Practice, edited by E. Ellis, and P. Goodyear, 13–29. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, M. 2015. “Unsettling Care: Troubling Transnational Itineraries of Care in Feminist Health Practices.” Social Studies of Science 45 (5): 717–737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murris, K., and C. Borcherds. 2019. “Body as Transformer: ‘Teaching Without Teaching’ in a Teacher Education Course.” In Posthumanism and Higher Education: Reimagining Pedagogy, Practice and Research, edited by C. A. Taylor, and A. Bayley, 1–27. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Noddings, N. 2005. The Challenge to Care in Schools: An Alternative Approach to Education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Noddings, N. 2012. “The Caring Relation in Teaching.” Oxford Review of Education 38: 771–781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pryor, J., and B. Crossouard. 2008. “A Socio-cultural Theorisation of Formative Assessment.” Oxford Review of Education 34 (1): 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puig de la Bellacasa, M. 2017. Matters of Care: Speculative Ethics in More Than Human Worlds. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raaper, R. 2019. “Students as Consumers? A Counter Perspective from Student Assessment as a Disciplinary Technology.” Teaching in Higher Education 24 (1): 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. T. E., J. Mittelmeier, and B. Rienties. 2020. “The Role of Gender, Social Class and Ethnicity in Participation and Academic Attainment in UK Higher Education: An Update.” Oxford Review of Education 46 (3): 346–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sambell, K. 2008. “Getting Involved: What Can We Learn From Student Perspectives of Assessment for Learning?” Keynote Presentation at the Transitions and Transformations: Developing Learners and Learning Environments Conference. Edge Hill University.
   Google Scholar
• Slattery, P. 2006. Curriculum Development in the Postmodern Era: Teaching and Learning in an Age of Accountability. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. A. 2018. “Each Intra-Action Matters: Towards a Posthuman Ethics for Enlarging Response-ability in Higher Education Pedagogic Practice-ings.” In Socially Just Pedagogies: Posthumanist, Feminist and Materialist Perspectives in Higher Education, edited by V. Bozalek, R. Braidotti, T. Shefer, and M. Zembylas, 81–96. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. A., and N. Fairchild. 2020. “Towards a Posthumanist Institutional Ethnography: Viscous Matterings and Gendered Bodies.” Ethnography and Education. doi:10.1080/17457823.2020.1735469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. A., N. Fairchild, M. Koro-Ljungberg, A. Benozzo, N. Carey, and C. Elmenhorst. 2019. “Improvising Bag Choreographies: Disturbing Normative Ways of Doing Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 25 (1): 17–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. A., S. Gannon, G. Adams, H. Donaghue, S. Hannam-Swain, J. Harris-Evans, J. Healey, and P. Moore. 2020. “Grim Tales: Meetings, Matterings and Moments of Silencing and Frustration in Everyday Academic Life.” International Journal of Educational Research. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2019.101513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker-Gleaves, C. 2019. “Is Caring Pedagogy Really so Progressive? Exploring the Conceptual and Practical Impediments to Operationalizing Care in Higher Education.” In Higher Education and Hope: Institutional, Pedagogical and Personal Possibilities, edited by P. Gibbs, and A. Peterson, 93–112. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, C. 2016. Posthuman Ethics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar