Students as scholars and the scholarship of student learning

References

• Andresen, Lee W. 2000a. “A Useable, Trans-disciplinary Conception of Scholarship.” Higher Education Research & Development 19 (2): 137–153. doi:10.1080/072943600445619.
   Google Scholar
• Andresen, Lee W. 2000b. “Teaching Development in Higher Education as Scholarly Practice: A Reply to Rowland et al. ‘Turning Academics Into Teachers?” Teaching in Higher Education 5 (1): 23–31. doi:10.1080/135625100114939.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, Ernest L. 1990. Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
   Google Scholar
• The Boyer Commission. 1998. Reinventing Undergraduate Education: A Blueprint for America’s Research Universities. Stony Brook, NY: Carnegie Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Brew, Angela. 2010. “Transforming Academic Practice Through Scholarship.” International Journal for Academic Development 15 (2): 105–116. doi:10.1080/13601441003737618.
   Google Scholar
• Brookfield, Stephen. 2009. “The Concept of Critical Reflection: Promises and Contradictions.” European Journal of Social Work 12 (3): 293–304. doi:10.1080/13691450902945215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fichte, Johann Gottlieb. 1987. “Some Lectures Concerning the Scholar’s Vocation.” In Philosophy of German Idealism, edited by Ernst Behler, 1–38. New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, Paul. 1962. The Community of Scholars. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Guilherme, Alex. 2016. “Do we Have a Right to Education or a Duty to Educate Ourselves? An Enquiry Based on Fichte’s Views on Education.” Power and Education 8 (1): 3–18. doi:10.1177/1757743815624116.
   Google Scholar
• Harland, Tony. 2017. “The Contemporary Research University and the Contest for Deliberative Space.” In Big Data and Learning Analytics in Higher Education: Current Theory and Practice, edited by Ben Kei Daniel, 73–86. Basel: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Harland, Tony. 2020. University Challenge: Critical Issues for Teaching and Learning. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harland, Tony, and Navé Wald. 2018. “Curriculum, Teaching and Powerful Knowledge.” Higher Education 76 (4): 615–628. doi:10.1007/s10734-017-0228-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, Mick, and Alan Jenkins. 2009. Developing Undergraduate Research and Inquiry. York: The Higher Education Academy.
   Google Scholar
• James, David. 2010. “Fichte on the Vocation of the Scholar and the (mis)use of History.” The Review of Metaphysics 63 (3): 539–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, Jean, and Etienne Wenger. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge university press.
   Google Scholar
• Lea, Mary R. 2005. “Communities of Practice in Higher Education.” In Beyond Communities of Practice: Language, Power and Social Context, edited by David Barton and Karin Tusting, 180–197. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Nicolette, and Daniel Loton. 2019. “Capstone Purposes Across Disciplines.” Studies in Higher Education 44 (1): 134–150. doi:10.1080/03075079.2017.1347155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macfarlane, Bruce. 2018. “What Does it Mean to be a S.C.H.O.L.A.R.? Or, Why a Good Teacher is No Different from a Good Researcher.” Teaching in Higher Education 23 (8): 1011–1012. doi:10.1080/13562517.2018.1498831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mezirow, Jack. 1994. “Understanding Transformation Theory.” Adult Education Quarterly 44 (4): 222–223. doi:10.1177/074171369404400403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, Susan. 1971. “Students in a Community of Scholars.” Human Organization 30 (3): 313–315.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, Robert, and Phillip Dawson. 2017. “Competition, Education and Assessment: Connecting History with Recent Scholarship.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (2): 304–315. doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1105932.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulsen, Michael B., and Kenneth A. Feldman. 1995. “Toward a Reconceptualization of Scholarship.” The Journal of Higher Education 66 (6): 615–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Elizabeth. 2011. “Teaching Critical Reflection.” Teaching in Higher Education 16 (2): 211–223. doi:10.1080/13562517.2010.515022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tight, Malcolm. 2015. “Theory Application in Higher Education Research: The Case of Communities of Practice.” European Journal of Higher Education 5 (2): 111–126. doi:10.1080/21568235.2014.997266.
   Google Scholar
• Wald, Navé, and Tony Harland. 2017. “A Framework for Authenticity in Designing a Research-based Curriculum.” Teaching in Higher Education 22 (7): 751–765. doi:10.1080/13562517.2017.1289509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger, Etienne. 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, Etienne. 2000. “Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems.” Organization 7 (2): 225–246. doi:10.1177/135050840072002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheelahan, Leesa. 2007. “How Competency-based Training Locks the Working Class Out of Powerful Knowledge: A Modified Bernsteinian Analysis.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 28 (5): 637–651. doi:10.1080/01425690701505540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheelahan, Leesa. 2010. Why Knowledge Matters in Curriculum: A Social Realist Argument. Abington: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Joanna. 2016. “A Critical Exploration of Changing Definitions of Public Good in Relation to Higher Education.” Studies in Higher Education 41 (4): 619–630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, Michael. 2013. “Powerful Knowledge: An Analytically Useful Concept or Just a ‘Sexy Sounding Term’? A Response to John Beck’s ‘Powerful Knowledge, Esoteric Knowledge, Curriculum Knowledge’.” Cambridge Journal of Education 43 (2): 195–198. doi:10.1080/0305764X.2013.776356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, Michael, and Johan Muller. 2013. “On the Powers of Powerful Knowledge.” Review of Education 1 (3): 229–250. doi:10.1002/rev3.3017.
   Google Scholar