A scoping review of action research in higher education: implications for research-based teaching

References

• Alotumi, M. 2018. The effect of CALL-based instruction on students’ score attainment on the TOEFL iBT in a Yemeni context. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching (IJCALLT) 8, no. 1: 50–64. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCALLT.2018010104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arksey, H., and L. O'Malley. 2005. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 8, no. 1: 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
   Google Scholar
• Banerjee, S. 2013. Adaptation of bharatanatyam dance pedagogy for multicultural classrooms: Questions and relevance in a north American university setting. Research in Dance Education 14, no. 1: 20–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/14647893.2012.712102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellefontaine, S.P., and C.M. Lee. 2014. Between black and white: Examining grey literature in meta-analyses of psychological research. Journal of Child and Family Studies 23, no. 8: 1378–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-013-9795-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland, D., and B. Atweh. 2007. Students as researchers: Engaging students’ voices in PAR. Educational Action Research 15, no. 3: 337–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790701514259
   Google Scholar
• Brew, A. 1999. Research and teaching: Changing relationships in a changing context. Studies in Higher Education 24, no. 3: 291–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079912331379905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brew, A. 2012. Teaching and research: new relationships and their implications for inquiry-based teaching and learning in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development 31, no. 1: 101–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.642844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burress, M.D., and J.M. Peters. 2015. Collaborative learning in a Japanese language course: student and teacher experiences. SAGE Open 5, no. 2: 2158244015581016. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015581016
   Google Scholar
• Cabaroglu, N. 2014. Professional development through action research: impact on self-efficacy. System 44, no. 1: 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.03.003.
   Google Scholar
• Cabrera-Solano, P., A. Quinonez-Beltran, P. Gonzalez-Torres, C. Ochoa-Cueva, and L. Castillo-Cuesta. 2020. Enhancing EFL students’ active learning by using ‘formative’ on mobile devices. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) 15, no. 13: 252–63. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i13.13975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colquhoun, H.L., D. Levac, K.K. O'Brien, S. Straus, A.C. Tricco, L. Perrier, and D. Moher. 2014. Scoping reviews: Time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 67, no. 12: 1291–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., and J. Oakes. 2021. Preparing teachers for deeper learning. Cambridge: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duenkel, N., and J. Pratt. 2013. Ecological education and action research: A transformative blend for formal and nonformal educators. Action Research 11, no. 2: 125–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750313477156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrich, K., G.K. Freeman, S.C. Richards, I.C. Robinson, and S. Shepperd. 2002. How to do a scoping exercise: Continuity of care. Research, Policy and Planning 20, no. 1: 25–9.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, K.A. 1987. Research productivity and scholarly accomplishment of college teachers as related to their instructional effectiveness: A review and exploration. Research in Higher Education 26, no. 3: 227–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992241
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, P., P. Cartney, K. Wilkinson, J. Parkinson, S. Cunningham, C. James-Reynolds, and A. Pitt. 2017. Literature review on the use of action research in higher education. Educational Action Research 25, no. 1: 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2015.1124046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths, R. 2004. Knowledge production and the research–teaching nexus: The case of the built environment disciplines. Studies in Higher Education 29, no. 6: 709–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/0307507042000287212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, M.V.A., M.A.N. Adasme, and A. Westmacott. 2019. Collaborative reflective practice: Its influence on preservice EFL teachers’ emerging professional identities. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research 7, no. 3: 53–70. https://doi.org/10.30466/ijltr.2019.120736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajdarpasic, A., A. Brew, and S. Popenici. 2015. The contribution of academics’ engagement in research to undergraduate education. Studies in Higher Education 40 (4), no. 4: 644–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.842215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday, A.J., M.L. Kern, D.K. Garrett, and D.A. Turnbull. 2019. The student voice in well-being: A case study of participatory action research in positive education. Educational Action Research 27, no. 2: 173–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2018.1436079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanfstingl, B., G. Abuja, G. Isak, C. Lechner, and E. Steigberger. 2020. Continuing professional development designed as second-order action research: work-in-progress. Educational Action Research 28, no. 1: 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2018.1490660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., and H.W. Marsh. 1996. The relationship between research and teaching: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research 66, no. 4: 507–42. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543066004507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazaea, A.N. 2020. Fostering critical intercultural awareness among EFL students through critical discourse analysis. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura 25, no. 1: 17–33. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v25n01a06
   Google Scholar
• Healey, M. 2005. Linking research and teaching to benefit student learning. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 29, no. 2: 183–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260500130387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, M., A. Jenkins, and J. Lea. 2014. Developing research-based curricula in college-based higher education. York: The Higher Education Academy. https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/developing-research-based-curricula-college-based-higher-education.
   Google Scholar
• Hodson, D. 1992. An exploration of some issues relating to integration in science and science education. International Journal of Science Education 14, no. 5: 541–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069920140506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoskins, S. L., and Mitchell, J. (2015). Innovative pedagogies: Research-based learning, taking it a step further. The University of Portsmouth: Higher Education Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, H.M., U. Rauch, and S.S. Liaw. 2010. Investigating learners’ attitudes toward virtual reality learning environments: Based on a constructivist approach. Computers & Education 55, no. 3: 1171–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennings, G., S. Kensbock, and U. Kachel. 2010. Enhancing ‘education about and for sustainability in a tourism studies enterprise management course: An action research approach. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism 10, no. 2: 163–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/15313221003792019
   Google Scholar
• Jones, J., and R. Masika. 2021. Appreciative inquiry as a developmental research approach for higher education pedagogy: Space for the shadow. Higher Education Research & Development 40, no. 2: 279–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1750571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalsoom, Q., and A. Khanam. 2017. Inquiry into sustainability issues by preservice teachers: A pedagogy to enhance sustainability consciousness. Journal of Cleaner Production 164: 1301–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalsoom, Q., N. Qureshi, M. Shiraz, and M. Imran. 2021. Undergraduate research: A vehicle of transforming epistemological beliefs of preservice teachers. The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Educational Studies 16, no. 2: 2. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-011X/CGP/v16i02/11-27
   Google Scholar
• Kashef, S.H., A. Viyani, N. Ghabool, and A. Damavand. 2012. Examining the effect of a learning-centered Reading instruction on Iranian students’ Reading comprehension: An action research. English Language Teaching 5, no. 10: 58–63. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n10p58
   Google Scholar
• Kee, C.P., K. Osman, and F. Ahmad. 2013. Challenge in enhancing the teaching and learning of variable measurements in quantitative research. International Education Studies 6, no. 6: 15–22. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v6n6p15
   Google Scholar
• Kinkead, J. 2012. What’s in a name? A brief history of undergraduate research. CUR Quarterly 33, no. 1: 20–9.
   Google Scholar
• Kurek, M., and A. Müller-Hartmann. 2019. The formative role of teaching presence in blended virtual exchange. Language Learning & Technology 23, no. 3: 52–73. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/44696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levac, D., H. Colquhoun, and K.K. O'Brien. 2010. Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implementation Science 5, no. 1: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, B. 2000. Putting students at the centre in education reform. Journal of Educational Change 1, no. 2: 155–72. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010024225888
   Google Scholar
• Lew, M.M., and M. Mohsin. 2011. Action research project in teacher education programme: Pre-service teachers’ competency and weaknesses. International Journal of Learning 18: 1. https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9494/CGP/v18i01/47455
   Google Scholar
• Lew, M.M., and M. Mohsin. 2013. Action research project in teacher education curriculum: A tool for developing professional construct among pre-service teachers. International Journal of Learning in Higher Education 19, no. 1: 13–23. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-7955/CGP/v19i01/48671
   Google Scholar
• Li, R., A. Lund, and A. Nordsteien. 2021. The link between flipped and active learning: A scoping review. Teaching in Higher Education, 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1943655
   Google Scholar
• Liao, W. 2020. Using collaborative video-cued narratives to study professional learning: A reflective analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920949335
   Google Scholar
• Little, C. 2020. Undergraduate research as a student engagement springboard: Exploring the longer-term reported benefits of participation in a research conference. Educational Research 62, no. 2: 229–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2020.1747360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAllister, M., F. Oprescu, T. Downer, M. Lyons, F. Pelly, and N. Barr. 2013. Evaluating STAR – A transformative learning framework: interdisciplinary action research in health training. Educational Action Research 21, no. 1: 90–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2013.763434
   Google Scholar
• McKenney, S., and T.C. Reeves. 2021. Educational design research: Portraying, conducting, and enhancing productive scholarship. Medical Education 55, no. 1: 82–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlan, T. 2021. Facilitating factors in cultivating diverse online communities of practice: A case of international teaching assistants during the COVID-19 crisis. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology 38, no. 2: 177–195. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-05-2020-0074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMorland, J., B. Carroll, S. Copas, and J. Pringle. 2003, May. Enhancing the practice of PhD supervisory relationships through first-and second-person action research/peer partnership inquiry. Forum: Qualitative Social Research 4, no. 2: 1–19. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-4.2.710
   Google Scholar
• McTaggart, R. 1994. Participatory action research: Issues in theory and practice. Educational Action Research 2, no. 3: 313–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965079940020302
   Google Scholar
• McTaggart, R., R. Nixon, and S. Kemmis. 2017. Critical participatory action research. In The Palgrave international handbook of action research, edited by Lonnie L. Rowell, Catherine D. Bruce, Joseph M. Shosh, and Margaret M. Riel, 21–35. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Miño-Puigcercós, R., M. Domingo Coscollola, and J.M. Sancho-Gil. 2018. Transforming the teaching and learning culture in higher education from a DIY perspective. Educación XX1 22, no. 1: 139–60. https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.20057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nel, C., and E. Marais. 2020. Preservice teachers use of WhatsApp to explain subject content to school children during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning 21, no. 5: 629–41.
   Google Scholar
• Page, M.J., J.E. McKenzie, P.M. Bossuyt, I. Boutron, T.C. Hoffmann, C.D. Mulrow, and D. Moher. 2021. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. International Journal of Surgery 88: 105906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadopoulou, M. 2021. A student, a practitioner or a researcher? An attempt to reconcile the three roles through an undergraduate action research module. Educational Action Research 29, no. 2: 206–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2021.1886959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavez, P. 2021. Dialogic education in the interpreting classroom: action research for developing simultaneous interpreting quality assessment tools. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 15, no. 3: 360–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750399X.2021.1906078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowland, S. 1996. Relationships between teaching and research. Teaching in Higher Education 1, no. 1: 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/1356251960010102
   Google Scholar
• Ruohotie-Lyhty, M., and J. Moate. 2015. Proactive and reactive dimensions of life-course agency: Mapping student teachers’ language learning experiences. Language and Education 29, no. 1: 46–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2014.927884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos, I.M., N. Ali, and A. Hill. 2016. Students as co-designers of a virtual learning commons: Results of a collaborative action research study. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 42, no. 1: 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2015.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satchwell, C., H. Partington, L. Barnes, R. Gurjee, S.L. Ramsdale, J. Dodding, and K. Drury. 2015. ‘Our breadcrumb trail through the woods’: Reflections on the use of a secret Facebook group as a strategy for surviving and thriving on the doctoral journey. International Journal of Doctoral Studies 10: 465–82. https://doi.org/10.28945/2306
   Google Scholar
• Schissel, J.L., M. López-Gopar, C. Leung, J. Morales, and J.R. Davis. 2019. Classroom-based assessments in linguistically diverse communities: A case for collaborative research methodologies. Language Assessment Quarterly 16, no. 4–5: 393–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2019.1678041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, J. 2020. Self-directed learning in music teacher education: Perspectives from pre-service music teachers in South Korea. Malaysian Journal of Music 9: 29–41. https://doi.org/10.37134/mjm.vol9.3.2020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stack, S. 2003. Research productivity and student evaluation of teaching in social science classes: A research note. Research in Higher Education 44, no. 5: 539–56. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025439224590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stringer, E.T. 2014. Action research: A Handbook for Practitioners (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Strømsø, H. 2016. Forskningsbasert undervisning (research based teaching). In Når læring er det viktigste – undervisning i høyere utdanning (When learning is the most important – teaching in higher education), eds. H. Strømsø, K. H. Lycke, and P. Lauvås, 40–56. Oslo: Cappelen Akademiske Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Threlfall, S.J. 2014. E-journals: towards critical and independent reflective practice for students in higher education. Reflective Practice 15, no. 3: 317–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2014.900012
   Google Scholar
• van Swet, J., B.H. Smit, L. Corvers, and I. van Dijk. 2009. Critical friendship as a contribution to master’s-level work in an international programme of study. Educational Action Research 17, no. 3: 339–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790903093292
   Google Scholar
• Visser-Wijnveen, G.J., J.H. Van Driel, R.M. Van der Rijst, N. Verloop, and A. Visser. 2010. The ideal research-teaching nexus in the eyes of academics: Building profiles. Higher Education Research & Development 29, no. 2: 195–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360903532016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wette, R. 2010. Evaluating student learning in a university-level EAP unit on writing using sources. Journal of Second Language Writing 19, no. 3: 158–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2010.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar