‘The principal character’: the triad approach and improvisation in teaching

References

• Atkins, G. 1994. Improve! A Handbook for the Actor. Portsmouth, MI: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1997. Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W. H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, L., and H. Borko. 2011. “Conclusion: Presence and the art of Improvisational Teaching.” In Structure and Improvisation in Creative Teaching, edited by R. K. Sawyer, 279–298. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barone, T., and E. Eisner. 1997. “Arts-based Educational Research.” Complementary Methods for Research in Education 2: 75–116.
   Google Scholar
• Barone, T., and E. Eisner. 2011. Arts Based Research. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1990. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1996. Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. New York: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 1934. Art as Experience. New York: Perigee Book.
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. 1979. The Educational Imagination: on the Design and Evaluation of a School Program. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. 1985. “Aesthetic Modes of Knowing.” In Learning and Teaching the Ways of Knowing, edited by E. Eisner, 23–36. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frost, A., and R. Yarrow. 1990. Improvisation in Drama. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• George, D. E. R. 1986. “Letter to a Poor Actor.” New Theatre Quarterly 2 (8): 352–363. doi: 10.1017/S0266464X00002360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday Anchor.
   Google Scholar
• Hoy, A. W., and R. B. Spero. 2005. “Changes in Teacher Efficacy During the Early Years of Teaching: A Comparison of Four Measures.” Teaching and Teachers Education 21 (4): 343–356. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2005.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnstone, K. 1979. Impro: Improvisation and the Theatre. New York: Theatre Arts Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lather, Patti. (1993). Fertile Obsession: Validity after Poststructuralism. The Sociological Quarterly, 34(4), 673–693. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.1993.tb00112.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leep, J. 2008. Theatrical Improvisation: Short Form, Long Form and Sketch-based Improve. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Orian, A. 1998. The Open Circle. Tel-Aviv: The Room Theatre and Hapoalim Press. [in Hebrew].
   Google Scholar
• Peretz, A. 2003. “Teaching and Improvisation Women Teachers and Their Relation to the Concept of Improvisation in the Israeli Education System: Existential Necessity or Liberated Element.” MA thesis, University of Leeds – Israel Extension. [in Hebrew]
   Google Scholar
• Pineau, E. L. 1994. “Teaching is Performance: Reconceptualizing a Problematic Metaphor.” American Educational Research Journal 31 (1): 3–25. doi: 10.3102/00028312031001003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolling Jr, James H. 2010. “A Paradigm Analysis of Arts-based Research and Implications for Education.” Studies in Art Education 51 (2): 102–114.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, K. 2001. Creating Conversations: Improvisation in Everyday Discourse. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. Reviewed in Journal of Pragmatics.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, K. 2004. “Creative Teaching: Collaborative Discussion as Disciplined Improvisation.” Educational Researcher 33 (2): 12–20. doi: 10.3102/0013189X033002012
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, K. 2011. “What Makes Good Teachers Great? The Artful Balance of Structure and Improvisation.” In Structure and Improvisation in Creative Teaching, edited by R. K. Sawyer, 1–24. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schonmann, S. 2005. “Theatrical Representations of Teaching as Performance.” In Learning from Research on Teaching: Perspective, Methodology, and Representation: Advances in Research on Teaching 11, edited by J. Brophy and S. Pinnegar, 283–311. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Shem-Tov, N. 2011. “Improvisational Teaching as Mode of Knowing.” The Journal of Aesthetic Education 45 (3): 103–113. doi: 10.5406/jaesteduc.45.3.0103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shem-Tov, N. 2015. “Improvisation is the Heart of Creativity.” Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance 20 (3): 306–309. doi: 10.1080/13569783.2015.1060849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spolin, V. 1963. Improvisation for Theatre. Chicago: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., and D. R. Caruso. 1985. “Practical Modes of Knowing.” In Learning and Teaching: The Ways of Knowing, edited by E. Eisner, 133–158. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Timpson, W. M., and D. N. Tobin. 1982. Teaching as Performing: A Guide to Energizing Your Public Presentation. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar