The constitution of the ‘able’ and ‘less able’ student in physical education in Norway

References

• Aasland, E., & Engelsrud, G. (2017). ‘Det er lett å se hvem som har god innsats’. Om elevers innsats og lærerens blikk i kroppsøving [‘It’s easy to spot who among you really trying’. About student effort and the teacher’s gaze in physical education]. Journal for Research in Arts and Sports Education, 1(3), 5–17.
   Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., & Kärreman, D. (2005). At arbeide med mysterier og sammenbrudd: Empirisk materiale som kritisk samtalepartner i teoriudvikling [Working with mysteries and breakdown: Empirical material as critical interlocutor in theory development]. In M. Järvinen & N. Mik-Meyer (red.), Kvalitative metoder i et interaktionistisk perspektiv. Interview, observationer og documenter [ Qualitative methods within an interactionist perspective: Interview, observations, documents] (pp. 121–144). Danmark: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2008). Tolkning och reflektion. Vetenskapsfilosofi och kvalitativ metod. andra upplagan [ Interpretation and reflection: The Philosophy of Science and Qualitative Methods, second edition]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Annerstedt, C., & Larsson, S. (2010). ‘I have my own picture of what the demands are … ’: Grading in Swedish PEH – problems of validity, comparability and fairness. European Physical Education Review, 16(2), 97–115. doi: 10.1177/1356336X10381299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnesen, T. E., Nilsen, A. K., & Leirhaug, P. E. (2013). ‘Den læreplanen som ikkje kan tilpassast mi undervisning, finst ikkje’. Vurdering og undervisning i kroppsøving etter Kunnskapsløftet [‘There is no curriculum that can’t be adapted to my teaching methods’: Assessment and teaching in physical education under the knowledge promotion]. Tidsskriftet FOU i praksis, 7(3), 9–32.
   Google Scholar
• Augestad, P. (2003). Skolering av kroppen. Om kunnskap og makt i kroppsøvingsfaget [Schooling Bodies: Knowledge and Power in Physical Education]. PhD diss., Universitetet i Oslo, Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, R., Tan, J. E. C., & Morley, D. (2004). Talented pupils in physical education: Secondary school teachers’ experiences of identifying talent within the ‘excellence in cities’ scheme. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 9(2), 133–148. doi: 10.1080/1740898042000294958
   Google Scholar
• Börjesson, M. (2003). Diskurser och konstruktioner. En sorts metodbok [ Discourses and Constructions. A Type of Method Book]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Cale, L., Harris, J., & Chen, M. H. (2014). Monitoring health, activity and fitness in physical education: Its current and future state of health. Sport, Education and Society, 19(4), 376–397. doi: 10.1080/13573322.2012.681298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carabine, J. (2001). Unmarried motherhood 1830–1990: A genealogical analysis. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. J. Yates (Eds.), Discourse as data: A guide for analysis (pp. 267–310). London: The Open University: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and power: Society, the person and sexual politics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. (2004). Making a difference? Education and ‘ability’ in physical education. European Physical Education Review, 10(1), 95–108. doi: 10.1177/1356336X04042158
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J., & Penney, D. (2008). Levels on the playing field: The social construction of physical ‘ability’ in the physical education curriculum. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 13(1), 31–47. doi: 10.1080/17408980701345576
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, H. (2005). Still feeling like a spare piece of luggage? Embodied experiences of (dis)ability in physical education and school sport. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 10(1), 41–59. doi: 10.1080/1740898042000334908
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1972). The archeaology of knowledge and the discourse on language. New York: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality, volume 1: An introduction. New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977. New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gurholt, K. P., & Jenssen, R. (2007). Reformpedagogikkens innpass i kroppsøvingsfaget [The introduction of the pedagogical reform in physical education]. Norsk Pedagogisk Tidsskrift, 91(6), 447–459.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S. (2001). Foucault: Power, knowledge and discourse. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. Yates (Eds.), Discourse theory and practice (pp. 72–81). London: Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, P. J. (2008). The social construction of abilities and conduct of assessment in senior PE (PhD diss.). The University of Queensland, Brisbane.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, P. J. & lisahunter (2006). ‘Please Mr Hay, what are my poss(abilities)?’: Legitimation of ability through physical education practices. Sport, Education and Society, 11(3), 293–310. doi: 10.1080/13573320600813481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, P. J., & Macdonald, D. (2010). Evidence for the social construction of ability in physical education. Sport, Education and Society, 15(1), 1–18. doi: 10.1080/13573320903217075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, L. (2004). Bourdieu and the social space of the PE class: Reproduction of doxa through practice. Sport, Education and Society, 9(2), 175–192. doi: 10.1080/1357332042000175863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, M., & Phillips, L. (2002). Discourse analysis as theory and method. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kirk, D. (2010). Physical education futures. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, H. (2013). Sport physiology research and governing gender in sport – a power–knowledge relation? Sport, Education and Society, 18(3), 334–348. doi: 10.1080/13573322.2011.582095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson, H., & Nyberg, G. (2017). ‘It doesn’t matter how they move really, as long as they move’. Physical education teachers on developing their students’ movement capabilities. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 22(2), 137–149. doi: 10.1080/17408989.2016.1157573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leirhaug, P. E., & Annerstedt, C. (2016). Assessing with new eyes? Assessment for learning in Norwegian physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 21(6), 616–631. doi: 10.1080/17408989.2015.1095871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leirhaug, P. E., & MacPhail, A. (2015). ‘It’s the other assessment that is the key’: Three Norwegian physical education teachers’ engagement (or not) with assessment for learning. Sport, Education and Society, 20(5), 624–640. doi: 10.1080/13573322.2014.975113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López-Pastor, V. M., Kirk, D., Lorente-Catalán, E., MacPhail, A., & Macdonald, D. (2013). Alternative assessment in physical education: A review of international literature. Sport, Education and Society, 18(1), 57–76. doi: 10.1080/13573322.2012.713860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundvall, S. (2016). Approaching a gender neutral PE-culture? An exploration of the phase of a divergent PE-culture. Sport in Society, 19(5), 640–652. doi: 10.1080/17430437.2015.1073944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, G., & Fox, K. (2004). Building bridges. The possibility of analytic dialogue between ethnography, conversation analysis and Foucault. In D. Silvermann (Ed.), Qualitative research. Theory, method and practice (2nd ed., pp. 35–54). London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Moen, K. M., Westlie, K., Bjørke, L., & Brattli, V. H. (2018). Når ambisjon møter tradisjon. En nasjonal kartleggingsstudie av kroppsøvingsfaget i grunnskolen (5.–10 trinn) [When ambition meets tradition: A national survey of physical education in lower secondary school]. Oppdragsrapport nr. 1–2018. Høgskolen i Innlandet.
   Google Scholar
• Penney, D. (2013). Points of tension and possibility: Boundaries in and of physical education. Sport, Education and Society, 18(1), 6–20. doi: 10.1080/13573322.2012.713862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penney, D., & Evans, J. (2005). Policy, power and politics in physical education. In K. Green & K. Hardman (Eds.), Physical education: Essential issues (pp. 21–38). London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Penney, D, & lisahunter. (2006). (Dis)Abling the (health and) physical in education: Ability, curriculum and pedagogy. Sport, Education and Society, 11(3), 205–209. doi: 10.1080/13573320600813358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redelius, K., Fagrell, B., & Larsson, H. (2009). Symbolic capital in physical education and health: To be, to do, or to know? That is the gendered question. Sport, Education and Society, 14(2), 245–260. doi: 10.1080/13573320902809195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redelius, K., Quennerstedt, M., & Öhman, M. (2015). Communicating aims and learning goals in physical education: Part of a subject for learning? Sport, Education and Society, 20(5), 641–655. doi: 10.1080/13573322.2014.987745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rønholt, H. (2002). ‘It’s only the sissies … ’: Analysis of teaching and learning processes in physical education: A contribution to the hidden curriculum. Sport, Education and Society, 7(1), 25–36. doi: 10.1080/13573320120113558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utdanningsdirektoratet. (2015a). Curriculum for physical education. Retrieved from https://www.udir.no/kl06/KRO1-04?lplang=http://data.udir.no/kl06/eng
   Google Scholar
• Utdanningsdirektoratet. (2015b). Changes in the subject physical education. Udir–8–2012. Retrieved from https://www.udir.no/regelverkstolkninger/opplaring/Innhold-i-opplaringen/Udir-8-2012/
   Google Scholar
• Utdanningsdirektoratet. (2015c). Guide to the curriculum. Retrieved from https://www.udir.no/laring-og-trivsel/lareplanverket/veiledning-til-lp/kroppsoving-veiledning/
   Google Scholar
• van Amsterdam, N, Knoppers, A, Claringbould, I, & Jongmans, M. (2012). It's just the way it is ...' or not? How physical education teachers categorise and normalise differences. Gender and Education, 24(7), 783–798. doi: 10.1080/09540253.2012.677013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walseth, K. (2015). Muslim girls’ experiences in physical education in Norway: What role does religiosity play? Sport, Education and Society, 20(3), 304–322. doi: 10.1080/13573322.2013.769946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, J. (1996). The construction of complementarity in physical education. Gender and Education, 8(1), 61–80. doi: 10.1080/713668480
   Google Scholar
• Wright, J., & Burrows, L. (2006). Re-conceiving ability in physical education: A social analysis. Sport, Education and Society, 11(3), 275–291. doi: 10.1080/13573320600813440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar