Evolving team cognition: The impact of team situation models on team effectiveness

REFERENCES

• Arrow, H. (1997). Stability, bistability, and instability in small group influence patterns. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 75–85. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.75
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrow, H., Poole, M. S., Henry, K. B., Wheelan, S., & Moreland, R. (2004). Time, change, and development: The temporal perspective on groups. Small Group Research, 35, 73–105. doi:10.1177/1046496403259757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bliese, P. D., & Halverson, R. R. (1998). Group size and measures of group-level properties: An examination of eta-squared and ICC values. Journal of Management, 24, 157–172. doi:10.1016/S0149-2063(99)80058-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, C. S., Stagl, K. C., Salas, E., Pierce, L., & Kendall, D. L. (2006). Understanding team adaptation: A conceptual analysis and model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1189–1207. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E. (2001). Reflections on shared cognition. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 195–202. doi:10.1002/job.82
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, N. J., Gorman, J. C., Duran, J. L., & Taylor, A. R. (2007). Team cognition in experienced command-and-control teams. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 13, 146–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, N. J., Kiekel, P. A., & Helm, E. E. (2001). Measuring team knowledge during skill acquisition of a complex task. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 5, 297–315. doi:10.1207/S15327566IJCE0503_10
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, N. J., Kiekel, P. A., Salas, E., Stout, R., Bowers, C., & Cannon-Bowers, J. (2003). Measuring team knowledge: A window to the cognitive underpinnings of team performance. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 7, 179–199. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.7.3.179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, N. J., Salas, E., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Stout, R. (2000). Measuring team knowledge. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 42, 151–173. doi:10.1518/001872000779656561
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, N. J., Salas, E., Kiekel, P. A., & Bell, B. (2004). Advances in measuring team cognition. In E. Salas & S. M. Fiore (Eds.), Team cognition: Understanding the factors that drive process and performance (pp. 83–106). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, N. J., Stout, R., & Salas, E. (1997). Expanding the measurement of situation awareness through cognitive engineering methods. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 41st Annual Meeting, 1, 215–219.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, N. J., Stout, R. J., & Salas, E. (2001). A knowledge elicitation approach to the measurement of team situation awareness. In M. McNeese, M. Endsley, & E. Salas (Eds.), New trends in cooperative activities: System dynamics in complex settings (pp. 114–139). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors.
   Google Scholar
• Cronin, M. A., Weingart, L. R., & Todorova, G. (2011). Dynamics in groups: Are we there yet? The Academy of Management Annals, 5, 571–612. doi:10.1080/19416520.2011.590297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeChurch, L. A., & Mesmer-Magnus, J. R. (2010). The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 32–53. doi:10.1037/a0017328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decuyper, S., Dochy, F., & Van den Bossche, P. (2010). Grasping the dynamic complexity of team learning: An integrative model for effective team learning in organisations. Educational Research Review, 5, 111–133. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2010.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, B. D., Day, E. A., Arthur, W., & Bell, S. T. (2006). Relationships among team ability compositions, team mental models, and team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 727–736. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.727
   Google Scholar
• Endsley, M. R. (1995a). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 37, 32–64. doi:10.1518/001872095779049543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endsley, M. R. (1995b). Measurement of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 37, 65–84. doi:10.1518/001872095779049499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericksen, J., & Dyer, L. (2004). Right from the start: Exploring the effects of early team events on subsequent project team development and performance effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49, 438–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, D. C. (1984). The development and enforcement of group norms. Academy of Management Review, 9, 47–53. doi:10.2307/258231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, A. P. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Gersick, C. J. G. (1988). Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 9–41. doi:10.2307/256496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gersick, C. J. G. (1989). Marking time: Predictable transitions in task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 274–309. doi:10.2307/256363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gersick, C. J. G. (1991). Revolutionary change theories: A multilevel exploration of the punctuated equilibrium paradigm. Academy of Management Review, 16, 10–36. doi:10.2307/258605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geveke, H., Huizing, Y., Stijger, E., Sybrandi, F., & Temme, B. (2008). Handboek voorbereiding rampenbestrijding. Structureren documentatie rampenbestrijding. The Hague: Ministry of Interior and Kingdom Relations.
   Google Scholar
• Ginnett, R. C. (1987). The formation process of airline crews. In R. S. Jensen (Ed.), Proceedings, fourth international symposium on aviation psychology (pp. 399–405). Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hallgren, K. A. (2012). Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: An overview and tutorial. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 8, 23–34.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harrison, D. A., & Klein, K. J. (2007). What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1199–1228. doi:10.5465/AMR.2007.26586096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, J., Butler, B. S., & King, W. R. (2007). Team cognition: Development and evolution in software project teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24, 261–292. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222240210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, M. P., Hodgkinson, G. P., & Teo, S. (2009). The role of transactive memory in the performance of multiteam systems. In Proceedings of the ninth bi-annual international conference on naturalistic decision making (pp. 53–59). London: British Computer Society.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, J. H. (1998). Emergence: From chaos to order. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Houghton, S., Simon, M., Aquino, K., & Goldberg, C. (2000). No safety in numbers: Persistence of biases and their effects on team risk perception and team decision making. Group and Organization Management: An International Journal, 25, 325–353. doi:10.1177/1059601100254002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilgen, D. R., Hollenbeck, J. R., Johnson, M., & Jundt, D. (2005). Teams in organizations: From input–process–output models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 517–543. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, R. L., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85–98. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.69.1.85
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, R. L., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1993). R-sub(wg): An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 306–309. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.2.306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janis, I. L. (1972). Victims of group think. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
   Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Ilgen, D. R. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7, 77–124. doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00030.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions, Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology Frontiers Series (pp. 3–90). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• LeBreton, J. M., & Senter, J. L. (2008). Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 815–852. doi:10.1177/1094428106296642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J., & Roe, R. A. (2012). Introducing an intra-team longitudinal approach to the study of team process dynamics. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 21, 718–748. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2012.660749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, B., & Klein, K. J. (2006). Team mental models and team performance: A field study of the effects of team mental model similarity and accuracy. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 403–418. doi:10.1002/job.387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, M. A., DeChurch, L., Mathieu, J. E., Panzer, F. J., & Alonso, A. (2005). Teamwork in multiteam systems. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 964–971. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.964
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26, 356–376. doi:10.5465/AMR.2001.4845785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, M. A., Sabella, M. J., Burke, C. S., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2002). The impact of cross-training on team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 3–13. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, M. A., Zaccaro, S. J., & Mathieu, J. E. (2000). Performance implications of leader briefings and team-interaction training for team adaptation to novel environments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 971–986. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.6.971
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathieu, J., Maynard, M. T., Rapp, T., & Gilson, L. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997–2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34, 410–476. doi:10.1177/0149206308316061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathieu, J. E., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. F., Cannon-Bowers, J. A. & Salas, E. (2005). Scaling the quality of teammates’ mental models: Equifinality and normative comparisons. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 37–56. doi:10.1002/job.296
   Google Scholar
• Mathieu, J. E., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2000). The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 273–283. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., & DeChurch, L. A. (2009). Information sharing and team performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 535–546. doi:10.1037/a0013773
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammed, S., Ferzandi, L., & Hamilton, K. (2010). Metaphor no more: A 15-year review of the team mental model construct. Journal of Management, 36, 876–910. doi:10.1177/0149206309356804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, B. B., Salas, E., & Glickman, A. S. (1993). An analysis of team maturation and evolution. The Journal of General Psychology 130, 277–291. doi:10.1080/00221309.1993.9711148
   Google Scholar
• Morgeson, F. P., & Hofmann, D. A. (1999). The structure and function of collective constructs: Implications for multilevel research and theory development. Academy of Management Review, 24, 249–265. doi:10.5465/AMR.1999.1893935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2, 175–220. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175
   Google Scholar
• Perrin, B. M., Barnett, B. J., Walrath, L., & Grossman, J. D. (2001). Information order and outcome framing: An assessment of judgment bias in a naturalistic decision making context. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 43, 227–238. doi:10.1518/001872001775900968
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rentsch, J. R., Small, E. E., & Hanges, P. J. (2008). Cognitions in organizations and teams: What is the meaning of cognitive similarity? In I. B. Smith (Ed.), The people make the place: Dynamic linkages between individuals and organizations (pp. 127–155). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Rico, R., Sánchez-Manzanares, M., Gil, F., & Gibson, C. (2008). Team implicit coordination processes: A team knowledge-based approach. Academy of Management Review, 33, 163–184. doi:10.5465/AMR.2008.27751276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roe, R. A. (2008). Time in applied psychology: Studying what happens rather than what is. The European Psychologist, 13, 37–52. doi:10.1027/1016-9040.13.1.37
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roe, R. A. (2009). Perspectives on time and the chronometric study of what happens in organizations. In R. A. Roe, M. J. Waller, & S. Clegg (Eds.), Time in organizational research (pp. 291–313). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Roe, R. A., Gockel, C., & Meyer, B. (2012). Time and change in teams: Where we are and where we are moving. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 21, 629–656. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2012.729821
   Google Scholar
• Salas, E., Burke, C. S., & Samman, S. N. (2001). Understanding command and control teams operating in complex environments. Information, Knowledge, Systems Management, 2, 311–323.
   Google Scholar
• Salas, E., Cooke, J. C., & Rosen, M. A. (2008). On teams, teamwork, and team performance: Discoveries and developments. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 50, 540–547. doi:10.1518/001872008X288457
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salas, E., & Fiore, S. M. (2004). Team cognition: Understanding the factors that drive process and performance. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Smith-Jentsch, K. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Kraiger, K. (2005). Investigating linear and interactive effects of shared mental models on safety and efficiency in a field setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 523–535. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.3.523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanton, N. A., Salmon, P. M., Walker, G. H., & Jenkins, D. (2009). Genotype and phenotype schemata as models of situation awareness in dynamic command and control teams. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 39, 480–489. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2008.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1467–1478. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.48.6.1467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 384–399. doi:10.1037/h0022100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uitdewilligen, S., Waller, M. J., & Zijlstra, F. R. H. (2010). Team cognition and adaptability in dynamic settings: A review of pertinent work. In G. P. Hodgkinson & J. K. Ford (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 293–353). Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Ven, A. H. (2007). Engaged scholarship: A guide to organizational and social research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Ven, A. H., & Poole, M. S. (2005). Alternative approaches for studying organizational change. Organization Studies, 26, 1377–1404. doi:10.1177/0170840605056907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Bossche, P., Gijselaers, W., Segers, M., & Kirschner, P. A. (2006). Social and cognitive factors driving teamwork in collaborative learning environments: Team learning beliefs and behaviors. Small Group Research, 37, 490–521. doi:10.1177/1046496406292938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Haar, S., Segers, M., & Jehn, K. A. (2013). Measuring the effectiveness outcome of emergency management teams: Scale development and validation. International Journal of Emergency Management, 3, 258–275. doi:10.1504/IJEM.2013.058547
   Google Scholar
• Webber, S. S., Chen, G., Payne, S. C., Marsh, S. M., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2000). Enhancing team mental model measurement with performance appraisal practices. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 307–322. doi:10.1177/109442810034001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittenbaum, G. M., Hollingshead, A. B., & Botero, I. C. (2004). From cooperative to motivated information sharing in groups: Moving beyond the hidden profile paradigm. Communication Monographs, 71, 286–310. doi:10.1080/0363452042000299894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolley, A. W. (2009). Putting first things first: Outcome and process focus in knowledge work teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 427–452. doi:10.1002/job.578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zijlstra, F. R. H., Waller, M. J., & Phillips, S. I. (2012). Setting the tone: Early interaction patterns in swift-starting teams as a predictor of effectiveness. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 21, 749–777. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2012.690399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar