Short-term and long-term relationships between reflection and performance in teams: evidence from a four-wave longitudinal study

References

• Ancona, D. G., Goodman, P. S., Lawrence, B. S., & Tushman, M. L. (2001). Time: A new research lens. Academy of Management Review, 26, 645–663. doi:10.5465/amr.2001.5393903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bliese, P. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability. In K. Klein & S. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multi-level theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 349–381). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A., & Curran, P. J. (2004). Autoregressive latent trajectory (ALT) models: A synthesis of two traditions. Sociological Methods & Research, 32, 336–383. doi:10.1177/0049124103260222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A., & Curran, P. J. (2006). Latent curve models: A structural equation perspective. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W., MacCallum, R. C., Kim, C.-T., Andersen, B. L., & Glaser, R. (2002). When fit indices and residuals are incompatible. Psychological Methods, 7, 403–421. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.7.4.403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. J. (1988). Task complexity: A review and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 13, 40–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1981). Attention and self-regulation: A control-theory approach to human behavior. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, D., & Schmitt, N. (2000). Interindividual differences in intraindividual changes in proactivity during organizational entry: A latent growth modeling approach to understanding newcomer adaptation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 190–210. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, G. (2005). Newcomer adaptation in teams: Multilevel antecedents and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 101–116. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2005.15993147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, L. M. (2006). Analysis of longitudinal data: The integration of theoretical model, temporal design, and statistical model. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 505–528. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costigan, R. D., Insinga, R. C., Kranas, G., Ilter, S. S., Kureshov, V. A., & Berman, J. J. (2005). A study of Russian, Polish, and U.S. self- and peer raters: Moderators of rating agreement. International Journal of Commerce & Management, 15, 205–220. doi:10.1108/10569210580000197
   Google Scholar
• Cronin, M. A., Weingart, L. R., & Todorova, G. (2011). Dynamics in groups: Are we there yet? The Academy of Management Annals, 5, 571–612. doi:10.1080/19416520.2011.590297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckardt, G. H., Selen, W., & Wynder, M. (2015). Recognising the effects of costing assumptions in educational business simulation games. e-Journal of Business Education & Scholarship of Teaching, 9, 43–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faria, A. J., Hutchinson, D., Wellington, W. J., & Gold, S. (2009). Developments in business gaming: A review of the past 40 years. Simulation & Gaming, 40, 464–487. doi:10.1177/1046878108327585
   Google Scholar
• Funk, C. A., & Kulik, B. W. (2012). Happily ever after: Toward a theory of late-stage group performance. Group and Organization Management, 37, 36–66. doi:10.1177/1059601111426008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebert, D., Boerner, S., & Kearney, E. (2010). Fostering team innovation: Why is it important to combine opposing action strategies? Organization Science, 21, 593–608. doi:10.1287/orsc.1090.0485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, J. M., & Jones, G. R. (2000). The role of time in theory and theory building. Journal of Management, 26, 657–684. doi:10.1177/014920630002600404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gersick, C. J. (1988). Time an transition in work teams: toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 9–41. doi:10.2307/256496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gersick, C. J. (1989). Marking time: Predictable transitions in task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 274–309. doi:10.2307/256363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gevers, J. M. P., Rutte, C. G., & Van Eerde, W. (2006). Meeting deadlines in work groups: Implicit and explicit mechanisms. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 55, 52–72. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2006.00228.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurtner, A., Tschan, F., Semmer, N. K., & Nägele, C. (2007). Getting groups to develop good strategies: Effects of reflexivity interventions on team process, team performance, and shared mental models. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102, 127–142. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackman, J. R., & Wageman, R. (2005). A theory of team coaching. The Academy of Management Review, 30, 269–287. doi:10.5465/AMR.2005.16387885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajcak, G., & Foti, D. (2008). Errors are aversive: Defensive motivation and the error-related negativity. Psychological Science, 19, 103–108. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02053.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamade, R. F., Artail, H. A., & Jaber, M. Y. (2007). Evaluating the learning process of mechanical CAD students. Computers & Education, 49, 640–661. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann, D. A., Jacobs, R., & Baratta, J. (1993). Dynamic criteria and the measurement of change. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 194–204. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.2.194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollenbeck, J. R., Ellis, A. P. J., Humphrey, S. E., Garza, A., & Ilgen, D. R. (2011). Asymmetry in structural adaptation: The differential impact of centralizing versus decentralizing team decision-making structures. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 114, 64–74. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphrey, S. E., & Aime, F. (2014). Team microdynamics: Toward an organizing approach to teamwork. The Academy of Management Annals, 8, 443–503. doi:10.1080/19416520.2014.904140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilgen, D. R., Hollenbeck, J. R., Johnson, M., & Jundt, D. (2005). Teams in organizations: From input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 517–543. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaramillo, F., Carrillat, F. A., & Locander, W. B. (2005). A meta-analytic comparison of managerial ratings and self-evaluations. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 25, 315–328. doi:10.1080/08853134.2005.10749067
   Google Scholar
• Kenny, D. A., & Milan, S. (2012). Identification: A non-technical discussion of a technical issue. In R. Hoyle, D. Kaplan, G. Marcoulides, & S. West (Eds.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 145–163). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, H. J. (1989). An integrated control theory model of work motivation. Academy of Management Review, 14, 150–172. doi:10.2307/258414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konradt, U., Otte, K.-P., Schippers, M. C., & Steenfatt, C. (2016). Reflexivity in teams: A review and new perspectives. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 150, 153–174. doi:10.1080/00223980.2015.1050977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konradt, U., Schippers, M. C., Garbers, Y., & Steenfatt, C. (2015). Effects of guided reflexivity and team feedback on team performance improvement: The role of team regulatory processes and cognitive emergent states. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24, 777–795. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2015.1005608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, S. W. J., Gully, S. M., Nason, E. R., & Smith, E. M. (1999). Developing adaptive teams: A theory of compilation and performance across levels and time. In D. R. Ilgen & E. D. Pulakos (Eds.), The changing nature of performance: Implications for staffing, motivation, and development (pp. 240–292). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• LePine, J. A., Piccolo, R. F., Jackson, C. L., Mathieu, J. E., & Saul, J. R. (2008). A meta-analysis of teamwork processes: Tests of a multidimensional model and relationships with team effectiveness criteria. Personnel Psychology, 61, 273–307. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00114.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsley, D. H., Brass, D. J., & Thomas, J. B. (1995). Efficacy-performance spirals - a multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Review, 20, 645–678. doi:10.2307/258790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llorens, S., Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2007). Does a positive gain spiral of resources, efficacy beliefs and engagement exist? Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 825–841. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.11.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorinkova, N., Pearsall, M. J., & Sims, H. P. (2013). Examining the differential longitudinal performance of directive versus empowering leadership in teams. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 573–596. doi:10.5465/amj.2011.0132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mabe, P. A., & West, S. G. (1982). Validity of self-evaluation of ability: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 280–296. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.67.3.280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26, 356–376. doi:10.2307/259182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Muthén, B. O., Asparouhov, T., Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A., Morin, A. J. S., & Trautwein, U. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling, integrating CFA and EFA: Application to students’ evaluations of university teaching. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16, 439–476. doi:10.1080/10705510903008220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McArdle, J. J. (1989). Structural modeling experiments using multiple growth functions. In P. Ackerman, R. Kanfer, & R. Cudeck (Eds.), Learning and individual differences: Abilities, motivation, and methodology (pp. 71–117). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• McGrath, J. E., Arrow, H., Gruenfeld, D. H., Hollingshead, A. B., & O’Connor, K. M. (1993). Groups, tasks, and technology: The effects of experience and change. Small Group Research, 24, 406–420. doi:10.1177/1046496493243007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, T. R., & James, L. R. (2001). Building better theory: Time and the specification of when things happen. Academy of Management Review, 26, 530–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moors, A., De Houwer, J., Hermans, D., & Eelen, P. (2005). Unintentional processing of motivational valence. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 58, 1043–1063. doi:10.1080/02724980443000467
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreland, R. L., & McMinn, J. G. (2010). Group reflexivity and performance. In S. R. Thye & E. Lawler (Eds.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 27, pp. 63–95). Bingley, UK: Emerald Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morin, A. J. S., Maïano, C., Marsh, H. W., Janosz, M., & Nagengast, B. (2011). The longitudinal interplay of adolescents’ self-esteem and body image: A conditional autoregressive latent trajectory analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46, 157–201. doi:10.1080/00273171.2010.546731
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, K. R. (1989). Is the relationship between cognitive ability and job performance stable over time? Human Performance, 2, 183–200. doi:10.1207/s15327043hup0203_3
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, B., & Asparouhov, T. (2009). Growth mixture analysis: Models with non-Gaussian random effects. In G. Fitzmaurice, M. Davidian, G. Verbeke, & G. Molenberghs (Eds.), Advances in longitudinal data analysis (pp. 143–165). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2014). Mplus user’s guide 7.1. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Ployhart, R. E., & Hakel, M. D. (1998). The substantive nature of performance variability: Predicting interindividual differences in intraindividual performance. Personnel Psychology, 51, 859–901. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1998.tb00744.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12, 531–544. doi:10.1177/014920638601200408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schippers, M., Homan, A. C., & van Knippenberg, D. (2013). To reflect or not to reflect: Prior team performance as a boundary condition of the effects of reflexivity on learning and final team performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, 6–23. doi:10.1002/job.1784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schippers, M. C., den Hartog, D. N., & Koopman, P. L. (2007). Reflexivity in teams: A measure and correlates. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 56, 189–211. doi:10.1111/apps.2007.56.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schippers, M. C., den Hartog, D. N., Koopman, P. L., & Van Knippenberg, D. (2008). The role of transformational leadership in enhancing team reflexivity. Human Relations, 61, 1593–1616. doi:10.1177/0018726708096639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schippers, M. C., Edmondson, A. C., & West, M. A. (2014). Team reflexivity as an antidote to team information processing failures. Small Group Research, 45, 731–769. doi:10.1177/1046496414553473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, N., Strack, F., Hippler, H.-J., & Bishop, G. (1991). The impact of administration mode on response effects in survey measurement. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5, 193–212. doi:10.1002/acp.2350050304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tschan, F., McGrath, J. E., Semmer, N. K., Arametti, M., Bogenstaetter, Y., & Marsch, S. U. (2009). Temporal aspects of processes in ad-hoc groups: A conceptual schema and some research examples. In R. A. Roe, M. J. Waller, & S. R. Clegg (Eds.), Time in organizational research (pp. 42–61). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• West, M. A. (1996). Reflexivity and work group effectiveness: A conceptual integration. In M. A. West (Ed.), Handbook of work group psychology (pp. 555–579). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• West, M. A. (2000). Reflexivity, revolution, and innovation in work teams. In M. M. Beyerlein, D. Johnson, & S. T. Beyerlein (Eds.), Product development teams (Vol. 5, pp. 1–29). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiedow, A., & Konradt, U. (2011). Evidence for a two-dimensional structure of team process improvement: Team reflection and team adaptation. Small Group Research, 42, 32–54. doi:10.1177/1046496410377358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolley, A. W. (2009). Putting first things first: Outcome and process focus in knowledge work teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 427–452. doi:10.1002/job.578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2009). Reciprocal relationships between job resources, personal resources, and work engagement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74, 235–244. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2008.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zyphur, M. J., Chaturvedi, S., & Arvey, R. D. (2008). Job performance over time is a function of latent trajectories and previous performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 217–224. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar