Exploring patterns of technology use in UK college students: a cluster analysis of learners’ digital practices

References

• Becta. 2008. Survey of FE Learners and E-Learning. Coventry: Becta Research Reports. http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/8298/1/fe_learners_report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Beetham, H., and M. Oliver. 2010. “The Changing Practices of Knowledge and Learning.” In Rethinking Learning for a Digital Age, edited by R. Sharpe, H. Beetham, and S. de Freitas, 157–171. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Benini, S., and L. Murray. 2014. “Challenging Prensky’s Characterization of Digital Natives and Digital Immigrants in a Real-World Classroom Setting.” In Digital Literacies in Foreign and Second Language Education, edited by J. P. Guikema and L. Williams, 69–86. San Marco, TX: CALI.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatt, I. 2012. “Digital Literacy Practices and Their Layered Multiplicity.” Educational Media International 49 (4): 289–301. doi:10.1080/09523987.2012.741199.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, H. May 2014. Further Education Reimagined: Preparing For The Future Workforce. Gazelle Group. https://www.slideshare.net/Microsofteduk/fe-reimagined-2014
   Google Scholar
• Coralesce. July 2014. Review of Learning Technology Self-Assessment: Baseline Report. Coralesce. http://www.coralesce.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Bound-ETF-Learning-Technology-Self-Assessment-Baseline-Report-proofed-5th-August.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Creer, A. 2017. “Communicative Interactions in Everyday and College Assessed Digital Literacy Practices: Transcribing and Analysing Multi-Modal Texts.” Research in Post-Compulsory Education 22 (3): 315–333. doi:10.1080/13596748.2017.1358510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, C. 2010. Research and Development to Support the Next Stage of Harnessing Technology Strategy: The Learner and Their Context - Synthesis of Overall Project Findings and Recommendations. Oxford: University of Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, C., and R. Eynon. 2013. Teenagers and Technology. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• ECORYS UK. Jan 2016. Digital Skills for the Digital Economy. London: DBIS and Department for Culture and Media.
   Google Scholar
• ETF (Education and Training Foundation). Mar 2014. Strategic Consultation on Technology in Teaching and Learning. London: Education and Training Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• FELTAG (Further Education Learning Technology Action Group). 2013. Paths Forward to a Digital Future for Further Education and Skills - Recommendations: FELTAG.
   Google Scholar
• Fordham, I., and N. Martin. 2014. Digital Colleges: The Journey so Far. London: Education Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Gosper, M., J. Malfroy, and J. McKenzie. 2013. “Students’ Experiences and Expectations of Technologies: An Australian Study Designed to Inform Planning and Development Decisions.” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 29 (2): 268–282. doi:10.14742/ajet.127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gourlay, L., and M. Oliver. 2018. Student Engagement in the Digital University: Sociomaterial Assemblages. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, M., N. Selwyn, and R. Aston. 2017. “What Works and Why? Student Perceptions of ‘Useful’ Digital Technology in University Teaching and Learning.” Studies in Higher Education 42 (8): 1567–1579. doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1007946.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jisc. 2007. Revised Learner Profile Tool. https://wiki.brookes.ac.uk/display/JISCle2/2007/06/06/Revised+learner+profile+tool
   Google Scholar
• Jones, C. R., R. Ramanau, S. Cross, and G. Healing. 2010. “Net Generation or Digital Natives: Is There a Distinct New Generation Entering University?” Computers and Education 5 (4): 722–732. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.022.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, G., T. Judd, B. Dalgarno, and J. Waycott. 2010. “Beyond Natives and Immigrants: Exploring Types of Net Generation Students.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 26 (5): 332–343. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00371.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lea, M. R. 2009. Digital Literacies in Higher Education: Project Report. Swindon: Economic and Social Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• LSIS (Learning and Skills Improvement Service). 2013. Talking Learner Voice: A Practice Guide for Leaders, Managers and Practitioners. Coventry: LSIS.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, B., E. Spencer, and G. Claxton. 2012. How to Teach Vocational Education: A Theory of Vocational Pedagogy. London: City and Guilds Centre for Skills Development.
   Google Scholar
• Mannion, G., K. Miller, I. Gibb, and R. Goodman. 2009. “Reading, Writing, Resonating: Striking Chords across the Contexts of Students’ Every Day and College Lives.” Pedagogy, Culture and Society 17 (3): 323–329. doi:10.1080/14681360903194343.
   Google Scholar
• Margaryan, A., A. Littlejohn, and G. Vojt. 2011. “Are Digital Natives a Myth or Reality? University Students’ Use of Digital Technologies.” Computers and Education 2: 429–440. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.004.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, K., and C. Satchwell. 2006. “The Effect of Beliefs about Literacy on Teacher and Student Expectations: A Further Education Perspective.” Journal of Vocational Education and Training 58 (2): 135–150. doi:10.1080/13636820600799551.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, T., and H. Beetham. 2017. Student Digital Experience Tracker 2017: The Voice of 22,000 UK Learners. Bristol: Jisc.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, A. 2017. “Accessibility and Use of VLEs by Students in Further Education.” Research in Post-Compulsory Education 22 (2): 271–288. doi:10.1080/13596748.2017.1314684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rebbeck, G., N. Ecclesfield, and F. Garnett 2012. “Exploring Practitioner Attitudes to the Use of Technology in the Further Education and Skills Sector - the Case of the Curious and the Confident.” LSIS. http://www.geoffrebbeck.com/uploads/1/6/3/9/16394320/the_digital_practitioner_report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Salajan, F. D., D. J. Schönwetter, and B. M. Cleghorn. 2010. “Student and Faculty Inter-Generational Digital Divide: Fact or Fiction?” Computers and Education 55 (3): 1393–1403. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulmeister, R. 2010. “Students, Internet, eLearning and Web 2.0.” In Looking toward the Future of Technology-Enhanced Education: Ubiquitous Learning and the Digital Native, edited by M. Ebner and M. Schiefner, 13–36. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N., and S. Gorard. 2016. “Students’ Use of Wikipedia as an Academic resource—Patterns of Use and Perceptions of Usefulness.” The Internet and Higher Education 28: 28–34. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.08.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, P. 2013. “The Digital Natives as Learners: Technology Use Patterns and Approaches to Learning.” Computers and Education 65: 12–33. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar