Is being gifted always an advantage? Peer relations and self-concept of gifted students

References

• Ablard, K. (1997). Self-perceptions and needs as a function of type of academic ability and gender. Roeper Review, 20, 110–115. doi:10.1080/02783199709553870
   Google Scholar
• Austin, A. B., & Draper, D. C. (1984). The relationship among peer acceptance, social impact, and academic achievement in middle childhood. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 597–604. doi:10.3102/00028312021003597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bain, S. K., & Bell, S. M. (2004). Social self-concept, social attributions, and peer relationships in fourth, fifth, and sixth graders who are gifted compared to high achievers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48, 167–178. doi:10.1177/001698620404800302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, J. A. (1996). Everyday stressors of academically gifted adolescents. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 7, 356–368. doi:10.1177/1932202X9600700203
   Google Scholar
• Callahan, C. M. (2000). Intelligence and giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence (pp. 159–175). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511807947
   Google Scholar
• Carman, C. A. (2013). Comparing apples and oranges: Fifteen years of definitions of giftedness in research. Journal of Advanced Academics, 24, 52–70. doi:10.1177/1932202X12472602
   Google Scholar
• Chan, D. W. (2001). Global and specific self-concepts of gifted adolescents in Hong Kong. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 24, 344–364. doi:10.1177/016235320102400404
   Google Scholar
• Chan, D. W. (2003). Dimensions of emotional intelligence and their relationships with social coping among gifted adolescents in Hong Kong. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 32, 409–418. doi:10.1023/A:1025982217398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, D. W. (2004). Social coping and psychological distress among Chinese gifted students in Hong Kong. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48, 30–41. doi:10.1177/001698620404800104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, D. W. (2010). Perfectionism among Chinese gifted and nongifted students in Hong Kong: The use of the Revised Almost Perfect Scale. Journal for the Education for the Gifted, 34, 68–98. doi:10.1177/016235321003400104
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, R., Duncan, M., & Cohen, S. L. (1994). Classroom peer relations of children participating in a pull-out enrichment program. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 33–37. doi:10.1177/001698629403800105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18, 557–570. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.18.4.557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, L. J., & Cross, T. L. (1988). Is being gifted a social handicap? Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 11, 41–56. doi:10.1177/016235328801100406
   Google Scholar
• Cross, T. L. (1997). Psychological and social aspects of educating gifted students. Peabody Journal of Education, 72, 180–200. doi:10.1080/0161956X.1997.9681873
   Google Scholar
• Cross, T. L., Adams, C., Dixon, F., & Holland, J. (2004). Psychological characteristics of academically gifted adolescents attending a residential academy: A longitudinal study. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28, 159–181. doi:10.1177/016235320402800203
   Google Scholar
• Cross, T. L., Coleman, L. J., & Stewart, R. A. (1995). Psychosocial diversity among gifted adolescents: An exploratory study of two groups. Roeper Review, 17, 181–185. doi:10.1080/02783199509553655
   Google Scholar
• Cross, T., Coleman, L., & Terhaar-Yonkers, M. (1991). The social cognition of gifted adolescents in schools: Managing the stigma of giftedness. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 15, 44–55. doi:10.1177/016235329101500106
   Google Scholar
• Cross, J. R., O’Reilly, C., Kim, M., Mammadov, S., & Cross, T. L. (2015). Social coping and self-concept among young gifted students in Ireland and the United States: A cross-cultural study. High Ability Studies, 26, 39–61. doi:10.1080/13598139.2015.1031881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham, L. G., & Rinn, A. N. (2007). The role of gender and previous participation in a summer program on gifted adolescents’ self-concepts over time. Journal of the Education of the Gifted, 30, 326–352. doi:10.1177/016235320703000303
   Google Scholar
• EACEA. (2012). Key data on education in Europe 2012. Brussels: Eurydice.
   Google Scholar
• Foust, R. C., Rudasill, K. M., & Callahan, C. M. (2006). An investigation into the gender and age differences in the social coping of academically advanced students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 18, 60–80. doi:10.4219/jaa-2006-346
   Google Scholar
• Frederickson, N. L., & Furnham, A. F. (2001). The long-term stability of sociometric status classification: A longitudinal study of included pupils who have moderate learning difficulties and their mainstream peers. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 581–592. doi:10.1017/S0021963001007260
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, J. (2006). Giftedness in the long term. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 29, 384–403. doi:10.4219/jeg-2006-246
   Google Scholar
• Garland, A. F., & Zigler, E. (1999). Emotional and behavioral problems among highly intellectually gifted youth. Roeper Review, 22, 41–44. doi:10.1080/02783199909553996
   Google Scholar
• Hatzichristou, C., & Hopf, D. (1996). A multiperspective comparison of peer sociometric status groups in childhood and adolescence. Child Development, 67, 1085–1102. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01784.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoge, R. D., & Renzulli, J. S. (1993). Exploring the link between giftedness and self-concept. Review of Educational Research, 63, 449–465. doi:10.3102/00346543063004449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juriševič, M. (2012). Nadarjeni učenci v slovenski šoli [Gifted students in Slovenian schools]. Ljubljana, SI: Pedagoška fakulteta.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, B. A., Colangelo, N., & Gaeth, J. (1988). Gifted adolescents' attitudes toward their giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32, 245–247. doi:10.1177/001698628803200201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Košir, K., Sočan, G., & Pečjak, S. (2007). The role of interpersonal relationships with peers and with teachers in students’ academic achievement. Review of Psychology, 14, 43–58.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S.-Y., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Turner Thomson, D. (2012). Academically gifted students' perceived interpersonal competence and peer relationships. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56, 90–104. doi:10.1177/0016986212442568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., & Paek, I. (2014). In search of the optimal number of response categories in a rating scale. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 32, 663–673. doi:10.1177/0734282914522200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limont, W., Dreszer-Drogorob, J., Bedyńska, S., Śliwińska, K., & Jastrzębska, D. (2014). ‘Old wine in new bottles’? Relationships between overexcitabilities, the Big Five personality traits and giftedness in adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 69, 199–204. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litster, K., & Roberts, J. (2011). The self-concepts and perceived competencies of gifted and non-gifted students: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 11, 130–140. doi:10.1111/j.1471-3802.2010.01166.x
   Google Scholar
• LoCicero, K. A., & Ashby, J. S. (2000). Multidimensional perfectionism in middle school age gifted students: A comparison to peers from the general cohort. Roeper Review, 22, 182–185. doi:10.1080/02783190009554030
   Google Scholar
• López, V., & Sotillo, M. (2009). Giftedness and social adjustment: Evidence supporting the resilience approach in Spanish‐speaking children and adolescents. High Ability Studies, 20, 39–53. doi:10.1080/13598130902860739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luftig, R. L., & Nichols, M. L. (1990). Assessing the social status of gifted students by their age peers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 34, 111–115. doi:10.1177/001698629003400305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W. (1992). Self-description questionnaire II: Manual. Sydney: University of Western Sydney, SELF Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Parada, R. H., & Ayotte, V. (2004). A multidimensional perspective of relations between self-concept (self description questionnaire II) and adolescent mental health (youth self-report). Psychological Assessment, 16, 27–41. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.16.1.27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, L. T., Burns, R. M., & Schonlau, M. (2010). Mental disorders among gifted and nongifted youth: A selected review of the epidemiologic literature. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54, 31–41. doi:10.1177/0016986209352684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, C. E. (2009). Protective factors as barriers to depression in gifted and nongifted adolescents. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53, 3–14. doi:10.1177/0016986208326552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muńiz, J., Garcia-Cueto, E., & Lozano, L. M. (2005). Item format and the psychometric properties of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 61–69. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2004.03.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neihart, M. (1999). The impact of giftedness on psychological well-being: What does the empirical literature say? Roeper Review, 22, 10–17. doi:10.1080/02783199909553991
   Google Scholar
• Neihart, M. (2002). Risk and resilience in gifted children: A conceptual framework. In M. Neihart, S. Reis, N. M. Robinson, & S. M. Moon (Eds.), The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know? (pp. 113–122). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ollendick, T. H., Weist, M. D., Borden, M. C., & Greene, R. W. (1992). Sociometric status and academic, behavioral, and psychological adjustment: A five-year longitudinal study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60, 80–87. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.60.1.80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, C. M., Rennie, D., Cook, D., Dickersin, K., Flanagin, A., Hogan, J. W., … Pace, B. (2002). Publication bias in editorial decision making. JAMA, 287, 2825–2828. doi:10.1001/jama.287.21.2825
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olszewski-Kubilius, P., Subotnik, R. F., & Worrell, F. C. (2015). Conceptualizations of giftedness and the development of talent: Implications for counselors. Journal of Counseling & Development, 93, 143–152. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6676.2015.00190.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peairs, K. F. (2010). The social world of gifted adolescents: Sociometric status, friendship and social network centrality (Unpublished dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest dissertation & thesis.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeiffer, S. I. (2009). The gifted: Clinical challenges for child psychiatry. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 48, 787–790. doi:10.1097/CHI.0b013e3181aa039d
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeiffer, S. I. (2012). Current perspectives on the identification and assessment of gifted students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 30, 3–9. doi:10.1177/0734282911428192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preckel, F., Goetz, T., Pekrun, R., & Kleine, M. (2008). Gender differences in gifted and average-ability students comparing girls’ and boys’ achievement, self-concept, interest, and motivation in mathematics. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52, 145–159. doi:10.1177/0016986208315834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston, C. C., & Colman, A. M. (2000). Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: Reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta Psychologica, 104, 1–15. doi:10.1016/S0001-6918(99)00050-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis, S. M., & Renzulli, J. S. (2004). Current research on the social and emotional development of gifted and talented students: Good news and future possibilities. Psychology in the Schools, 41, 119–130. doi:10.1002/pits.10144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J. S. (1977). The enrichment triad model: A guide for developing defensible programs for the gifted and talented. Wethersfield, CT: Creative Learning Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rimm, S. (2002). Peer pressures and social acceptance of gifted students. In M. Neihart, S. Reis, N. M. Robinson, & S. M. Moon (Eds.), The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know? (pp. 13–18). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robins, R. W., Hendin, H. W., & Trzesniewski, K. H. (2001). Measuring global self-esteem: Construct validation of a single-item measure and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 151–161. doi:10.1177/0146167201272002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, N. M. (2002). Introduction. In M. Neihart, S. Reis, N. M.Robinson, & S. M. Moon (Eds.), The social and emotional development of gifted children. What do we know? (pp. xi–xxiv). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shapka, J. D., & Keating, D. P. (2005). Structure and change in self-concept during adolescence. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des Sciences du comportement, 37, 83–96. doi:10.1037/h0087247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J., & Stanton, G. C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407–441. doi:10.3102/00346543046003407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman, L. K. (2002). Asynchronous development. In M. Neihart, S. Reis, N. M. Robinson, & S. M. Moon (Eds.), The social and emotional development of gifted children. What do we know? (pp. 31–37). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strokovni svet RS za splošno izobraževanje. (1999). Koncept: Odkrivanje in delo z nadarjenimi učenci v devetletni osnovni šoli [Concept of Identification of and Work with Gifted Students in a nine-year Elementary School].
   Google Scholar
• Swiatek, M. A. (2001). Social coping among gifted high school students and its relationship to self-concept. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 30, 19–39. doi:10.1023/A:1005268704144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swiatek, M. A., & Dorr, R. M. (1998). Revision of the social coping questionnaire: Replication and extension of previous findings. Journal of Advanced Academics, 10, 252–259. doi:10.1177/1932202X9801000105
   Google Scholar
• Terman, L. M. (1925). Genetic studies of genius: Vol. 1. Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Terman, L. M., & Oden, M. H. (1947). The gifted group grows up: Twenty five years’ follow-up of a superior group. Genetic studies of genius, Vol. 4. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Terman, L. M., & Oden, M. H. (1959). The gifted group at mid-life: 35 years’ follow up of the superior child. Genetic studies of genius, Vol. 5. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Terry, R. (2000). Recent advances in measurement theory and the use of sociometric techniques. In A. H. N. Cillessen & W. M. Bukowski (Eds.), Recent advances in the measurement of acceptance and rejection in the peer system (pp. 27–53). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Wanous, J. P., Reichers, A. E., & Hudy, M. J. (1997). Overall job satisfaction: How good are single-item measures? Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 247–252. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.82.2.247
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wentzel, K. R. (1991). Relations between social competence and academic achievement in early adolescence. Child Development, 62, 1066–1078. doi:10.2307/1131152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wentzel, K. R. (1993). Does being good make the grade? Social behavior and academic competence in middle school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 357–364. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.85.2.357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wentzel, K. R., & Asher, S. R. (1995). The academic lives of neglected, rejected, popular, and controversial children. Child Development, 66, 754–763. doi:10.2307/1131948
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wentzel, K. R., & Caldwell, K. (1997). Friendships, peer acceptance, and group membership: Relations to academic achievement in middle school. Child Development, 68, 1198–1209. doi:10.2307/1132301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar