Reflexive professionalism: reclaiming the voice of authority in shaping the discourses of education policy

References

• Archer, M. (2007). Making our way though the world: Human reflexivity and social mobility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. (2010). Introduction: The reflexive re-turn. In M. Archer (Ed.), Conversations about reflexivity (pp. 1–14). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2011). National professional standards for teachers. Melbourne: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Bacchi, C. (2012). Introducing the “What’s the problem represented to be”? Approach. In A. Bletsas & C. Beasley (Eds.), Engaging with Carol Bacchi: Strategic interventions and exchanges (pp. 21–24). Adelaide, SA: University of Adelaide Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. (Ed.). (1990). Foucault and education: Disciplines and knowledge. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. (1993). What is policy? Texts, trajectories and toolboxes. Discourse, 13(2), 10–17.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. (1994). Education reform: A critical and post-structural approach. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barber, M., & Mourshed, M. (2007). How the world’s best-performing schools come out on top. London: McKinsey and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, J. (2009). Appropriating professionalism: Restructuring the official knowledge base of England’s “modernised” teaching profession. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 30(1), 3–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloomfield, D. (2006, November). A new discourse for teacher professionalism: Ramsey, standards and accountability. Paper presented at the AARE 2006 Conference, Adelaide. Retrieved from http://publications.aare.edu.au/06pap/blo06777.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Council of Australian Governments. (2008). National partnership agreement on improving teacher quality. Canberra: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Crowley, R. (1998). A class act: An inquiry into the status of the teaching profession. Canberra: Senate Employment Education and Training References Committee.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (1992). Creating standards of practice and delivery for learner-centred schools. Stanford Law and Policy Review, 4, 37–52.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (1999). Reshaping teaching policy, preparation and practice: Influences on the National Board for Teaching Professional Standards. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2001). Standard setting in teaching: Changes in licensing, certification and assessment. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 751–776). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Dawkins, J. (1988). Strengthening Australia’s schools: A consideration of the focus and content of schooling. Canberra: Australian Government.
   Google Scholar
• Day, C. (2002). School reform and transitions in teacher professionalism and identity. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(8), 677–692.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Employment, Education and Training. (1994). Agreement between the Commonwealth Government and the teaching profession through their unions: Providing for an accord to advance the quality of teaching and learning. Canberra: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Dwyer, P.J. (1995). Foucault, docile bodies and post-compulsory education in Australia. British Journal of Sociology, 16(4), 467–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, L. (2008). Professionalism, professionality and the development of education professionals. British Journal of Educational Studies, 56(1), 20–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, L. (2011). The “shape” of teacher professionalism in England: Professional standards, performance management, professional development and the changes proposed by the 2010 White Paper. British Educational Research Journal, 37(5), 851–870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evetts, J. (2009). The management of professionalism: A contemporary paradox. In S. Gewirtz, P. Mahony, I. Hextall, & A. Cribb (Eds.), Changing teacher professionalism: International trends, challenges and ways forward (pp. 19–30). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. London: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1980). Questions on geography. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977 (pp. 63–77). New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1984). Nietzsche, genealogy, history. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault reader (pp. 76–100). New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Freeland, J. (1994, July). Teacher education in the late 1990s: Fighting for a place on the post-pluralist political agenda. Paper presented at the 24th Teacher Education Association (ATEA) Conference, Brisbane.
   Google Scholar
• Freidson, E. (2001). Professionalism, the third logic: On the practice of knowledge. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Furlong, J., Barton, L., Miles, S., Whiting, C., & Whitty, G. (2000). Teacher education in transition: Reforming professionalism. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gale, T. (1999). Policy trajectories: Treading the discursive path of policy analysis. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 20(3), 393–407.
   Google Scholar
• Gale, T. (2007). Critical policy sociology: Historiography, archaeology and genealogy as methods of policy analysis. In S.J. Ball, I.F. Goodson, & M. Maguire (Eds.), Education, globalisation and new times (pp. 148–166). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gale, T., & Densmore, K. (2003). Engaging teachers: Towards a radical democratic agenda for schooling. Maidenhead, PA: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gewirtz, S., Mahony, P., Hextall, I., & Cribb, A. (2009). Changing teacher professionalism: International trends, changes and ways forward. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goode, W.J. (1957). Community within a community: The professions. American Sociological Review, 22(2), 194–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodson, I. (1999, January). Towards a principled professionalism for teaching. Keynote address at the Conference on New Professionalism in Teaching, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar
• Goodson, I. (2000). The principled professional. Prospects, 30(2), 181–188.
   Google Scholar
• Goodson, I., & Hargreaves, A. (1996). Teachers’ professional lives: Aspirations and actualities. In I.F. Goodson & A. Hargreaves (Eds.), Teachers’ professional lives (pp. 1–27). London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A. (2000). Four ages of professionalism and professional learning. Teachers and Teaching, 6(2), 151–182.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (1998). What’s worth fighting for out there? New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A., & Lo, L. (2000). The paradoxical profession: Teaching at the turn of the century. Prospects in Education, 30(2), 167–180.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, D.H. (1994). The new professionalism: The synthesis of professional and institutional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 10(4), 423–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2003, October). Teachers make a difference. What is the research evidence? Paper presented at the Australian Council for Educational Research Annual Conference on Building Teacher Quality, Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Helsby, G. (1995). Teacher’s construction of professionalism in England in the 1990s. Journal of Education for Teaching, 21(3), 317–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilferty, F. (2008). Theorising teacher professionalism as an enacted discourse of power. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 29(2), 161–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holroyd, C. (2000). Are assessors professional? Active Learning in Higher Education, 1(1), 28–44.
   Google Scholar
• Hoyle, E. (1974). Professionality, professionalism and control in teaching. London Educational Review, 3, 13–19.
   Google Scholar
• Ingvarson, L. (1995). Professional credentials: Standards for primary and secondary science teaching in Australia. Canberra: Australian Science Teachers Association.
   Google Scholar
• Ingvarson, L. (2010). Recognising accomplished teachers in Australia: Where have we been? Where are we heading? Australian Journal of Education, 54(1), 46–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, B. (2010). What teachers want: Better teacher management. Melbourne: Grattan Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Leaton Gray, S., & Whitty, G. (2010). Social trajectories or disrupted identities? Changing and competing models of teacher professionalism under New Labour. Cambridge Journal of Education, 40(1), 5–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahony, P., & Hextall, I. (2000). Reconstructing teaching: Standards, performance and accountability. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Marginson, S. (1997). Educating Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, C. (1996). Handbook for beginning teachers. Melbourne: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, T.H. (1939). The recent history of the professionalism. Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, 5, 325–340.
   Google Scholar
• Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs. (2003). A national framework for professional standards for teaching. Melbourne: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs. (2008). Melbourne declaration on educational goals for young Australians. Melbourne: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future. (1996). What matters most: Teaching for America’s future. New York, NY: Author.
   Google Scholar
• O’Farrell, C. (2005). Michel Foucault. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2005). Teachers matter: Attracting, developing and retaining effective teachers. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2009, December). Teacher evaluation: A conceptual framework and examples of country practices. Paper presented at the OECD-Mexico Workshop, towards a teacher evaluation framework in Mexico: International practices, criteria and mechanisms, Mexico City.
   Google Scholar
• Ozga, J. (1990). Policy research and policy theory: A comment on Fitz and Halpin. Journal of Education Policy, 5(4), 359–362.
   Google Scholar
• Ozga, J. (1995). Deskilling a profession: Professionalism, deprofessionalisation and new managerialism. In H. Busher & R. Saran (Eds.), Managing teachers as professionals in schools (pp. 21–37). London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, T. (1954). Essays in sociological theory. Glencoe: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Purvis, J. (1973). Schoolteaching as a professional career. British Journal of Sociology, 24, 43–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Queensland College of Teachers. (2006). Professional standards for Queensland teachers. Brisbane: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, S.L. (1996). Teachers’ work, restructuring and postFordism: Constructing the new “professionalism”. In I. Goodson & A. Hargreaves (Eds.), Teachers’ professional lives (pp. 28–55). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, M.E., & Bourke, T. (2013). The teacher as reflexive professional: Making visible the excluded discourse in teacher standards. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 34(3), 411–423.
   Google Scholar
• Sachs, J. (2001). Teacher professional identity: Competing discourses, competing outcomes. Journal of Educational Policy, 16(2), 149–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sachs, J. (2003). The activist teaching profession. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sachs, J. (2005, August). Professional standards: Quality teachers for the future. Keynote address presented at Sharing Experience: Ways forward on standards conference, hosted by NIQTSL, Hilton Hotel, Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Scheurich, J. (1994). Policy archaeology: A new policy studies methodology. Journal of Education Policy, 9(4), 297–316.
   Google Scholar
• Stinnett, T.M., & Huggett, A.J. (1963). Professional problems of teachers. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Swann, M., McIntyre, D., Pell, T., Hargreaves, L., & Cunningham, M. (2010). Teachers’ conceptions of teacher professionalism in England in 2003 and 2006. British Educational Research Journal, 36(4), 549–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. (1997). Critical policy analysis: Exploring contexts, texts and consequences. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 18(1), 23–25.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, S. (2005). Taking teachers out of the equation: Constructions of teachers in education policy documents over a ten-year period. Australian Educational Researcher, 32(3), 45–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Travers, P.D., & Rebore, R.W. (1990). Foundations of education: Becoming a teacher. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Troman, G. (1996). The rise of the new professionals? The restructuring of primary teachers’ work and professionalism. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 17(4), 473–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilensky, H. (1964). Professionalisation for everyone. American Journal of Sociology, 70, 137–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winch, C., & Foreman-Peck, L. (2005, May). What do we mean by teachers’ professionalism and professional knowledge? How useful are these concepts? Paper presented at the Changing teachers’ roles, identities and professionalism seminar series, Seminar 3: Conceptions of professionalism and professional knowledge, King’s College, London.
   Google Scholar
• Yinger, R., & Hendricks-Lee, M.S. (2000). The language of standards and teacher education reform. Educational Policy, 14(1), 94–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar