Double indemnity: dualities, tensions and loss in the moral economies of feedback

References

• Ajjawi, R., & Boud, D. (2018). Examining the nature and effects of feedback dialogue. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1–14. doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1434128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, A. (2014). Benign violence: Education in and beyond the age of reason. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Arthur, J., Kristjánsson, K., Cooke, S., Brown, E., & Carr, D. (2015). The good teacher: Understanding virtues in practice. (). Birmingham: Jubilee Centre for Character and Virtues.
   Google Scholar
• Askew, S., & Lodge, C. (2000). Gifts, ping-pong and loops-linking feedback and learning. In S. Askew (Ed.), Feedback for Learning, 1–17. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (2000). Performativities and fabrications in the education economy: Towards the performative society? The Australian Educational Researcher, 27(2), 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (2017). The education debate. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (2020). The errors of redemptive sociology or giving up on hope and despair. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 41(6), 870–880.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin, J. (1998). Shadow of the other: Intersubjectivity and gender in psychoanalysis. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, D. (2016). Currency of desire: Libidinal economy, psychoanalysis and sexual revolution. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, D. (2017). Metaphors of desire: Neoliberalism and libidinal economy. English Language and Literature, 63(1), 3–21.
   Google Scholar
• Berlant, L. (2011). Cruel optimism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. London: Granada Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Bojesen, E. (2019). Forms of education: Rethinking educational experience against and outside the humanist legacy. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2012). Feedback in higher and professional education: Understanding it and doing it well. London. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Britzman, D. (1991). Practice makes practice: A critical study of learning to teach. Albany, NY: SUNY.
   Google Scholar
• Carless, D., Salter, D., Yang, M., & Lam, J. (2011). Developing sustainable feedback practices. Studies in Higher Education, 36(4), 395–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carusi, F. T. (2017). Why bother teaching? Despairing the ethical through teaching that does not follow. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 36(6), 633–645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, M. (2012). The (absent) politics of neo-liberal education policy. Critical Studies in Education, 53(3), 297–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, M. (2020). Eyes wide shut: The fantasies and disavowals of education policy. Journal of Education Policy, 35(2), 151–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clouder, L., & Adefila, A. (2016). The ‘Gift exchange’: A metaphor for understanding the relationship between educator commitment and student effort on. International Journal of Practice-Based Learning in Health and Social Care, 2(2), 54–64.
   Google Scholar
• Day, C. (2002). School reform and transitions in teacher professionalism and identity. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(8), 677–692.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, A., Foy, M., Monrouxe, L., & Rees, C. (2018). Exploring trainer and trainee emotional talk in narratives about workplace-based feedback processes. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 23(1), 75–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DfE. (2012). Teachers’ standards: Guidance for school leaders, school staff and governing bodies. Crown: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Donald, J. (1992). Sentimental education: Schooling, popular culture and the regulation of liberty. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Ellsworth, E. (1997). Teaching positions: Difference, pedagogy and the power or address. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eva, K. W., Armson, H., Holmboe, E., Lockyer, J., Loney, E., Mann, K., & Sargeant, J. (2012). Factors influencing responsiveness to feedback: On the interplay between fear, confidence, and reasoning processes. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 17(1), 15–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felman, S. (1987). Jacques Lacan and the adventure of insight: Psychoanalysis in contemporary culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, I. A. (2016). Being a teacher: Altruistic and narcissistic expectations of pre-service teachers. Teachers and Teaching, 22(5), 625–648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glover, C., & Brown, E. (2006). Written feedback for students: Too much, too detailed or too incomprehensible to be effective? Bioscience Education, 1(7), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Haig, B. D., & Evers, C. W. (2015). Realist inquiry in social science. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times: Teachers’ work and culture in the postmodern age. London: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, E. (2005). Assessment for learning? Thinking outside the (black) box. Cambridge Journal of Education, 35(2), 213–224.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Clarke, S. (2018). Visible learning: Feedback. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinz, M. (2015). Why choose teaching? An international review of empirical studies exploring student teachers’ career motivations and levels of commitment to teaching. Educational Research and Evaluation, 21(3), 258–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jers, C. O., & Wärnsby, A. (2018). Assessment of situated orality: The role of reflection and revision in appropriation and transformation of research ethos. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(4), 586–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, C. E., Keating, J. L., Boud, D. J., Dalton, M., Kiegaldie, D., Hay, M., … Nestel, D. (2016). Identifying educator behaviours for high quality verbal feedback in health professions education: Literature review and expert refinement. BMC Medical Education, 16(1), 96.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kahu, E. R. (2008). Feedback: The heart of good pedagogy. New Zealand Annual Review of Education, 17, 187–197.
   Google Scholar
• Kirton, A., Hallam, S., Peffers, J., Robertson, P., & Stobart, G. (2007). Revolution, evolution or a trojan horse? Piloting assessment for learning in some scottish primary schools. British Educational Research Journal, 33(4), 605–627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotsko, A. (2018). Neoliberalism’s demons: On the political theology of late capital. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lacey, C. (1977). The socialisation of teachers. London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (2001). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics (2nd ed.). London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Löfström, E., & Poom-Valickis, K. (2013). Beliefs about teaching: Persistent or malleable? A longitudinal study of prospective student teachers’ beliefs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 35, 104–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lortie, D. C. (2002). Schoolteacher: A sociological study (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Pong, W. Y. (2005). On the unit of description in phenomenography. Higher Education Research & Development, 24(4), 335–348.
   Google Scholar
• McArthur, J. (2018). Assessment for social justice: Perspectives and practices within higher education. Great Britain: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mislevy, R. J. (2012). Four metaphors we need to understand assessment [Unpublished Manuscript].
   Google Scholar
• Molloy, E., & Boud, D. (2013). Seeking a different angle on feedback in clinical education: The learner as seeker, judge and user of performance information. Medical Education, 47(3), 227–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, A. (2006). Recognising desire: A psychosocial approach to understanding education policy implementation and effect. Oxford Review of Education, 32(4), 487–503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, A., & Clarke, M. (2016). ‘Cruel optimism’: Teacher attachment to professionalism in an era of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 31(5), 666–677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myrick, F. (2004). Pedagogical integrity in the knowledge economy. Nursing Philosophy, 5(1), 23–29.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nicol, D. (2010). From monologue to dialogue: Improving written feedback processes in mass higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 501–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, D., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2004). Rethinking formative assessment in HE: A theoretical model and seven principles of good feedback practice Enhancing Student Learning Though Effective Formative Feedback, York, the Higher Education Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Nietzsche, F. (1971 [1873]). On truth and lie in an extra-moral sense. In W. Kaufmann (Ed.), The portable Nietzsche. London: The Viking Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oser, F. K. (2014). Professional morality: A discourse approach (the case of the teaching profession). In K. Heinrichs, F. Oser, & T. Lovat (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development (pp. 213–250). Hillsdale, NJ: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pantić, N., & Florian, L. (2015). Developing teachers as agents of inclusion and social justice. Education Inquiry, 6(3), 27311.
   Google Scholar
• Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 91–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, M., Handley, K., Millar, J., & O’Donovan, B. (2010). Feedback: All that effort, but what is the effect? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3), 277–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramaprasad, A. (1983). On the definition of feedback. Behavioral Science, 28(1), 4–13.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, P. W., & Watt, H. M. (2006). Who chooses teaching and why? Profiling characteristics and motivations across three australian universities. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 34(1), 27–56.
   Google Scholar
• Sachs, J. (2016). Teacher professionalism: Why are we still talking about it? Teachers and Teaching, 22(4), 413–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sambell, K. (2016). Assessment and feedback in higher education: Considerable room for improvement? Student Engagement in Higher Education, 1(1), 1-14.
   Google Scholar
• Santoro, D. A. (2018). Demoralized: Why teachers leave the profession they love and how they can stay. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sayer, A. (2000). Moral economy and political economy. Studies in Political Economy, 61(1), 79–103.
   Google Scholar
• Steen-Utheim, A., & Hopfenbeck, T. N. (2019). To do or not to do with feedback. A study of undergraduate students’ engagement and use of feedback within a portfolio assessment design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(1), 80–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stronach, I., Corbin, B., McNamara, O., Stark, S., & Warne, T. (2002). Towards an uncertain politics of professionalism: Teacher and nurse identities in flux. Journal of Education Policy, 17(1), 109–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Kleij, F., & Adie, L. (2020). Towards effective feedback: An investigation of teachers’ and students’ perceptions of oral feedback in classroom practice. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 27(3), 252–270.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, P., & Crawshaw, P. (2014). A tale of two economies: The political and the moral in neoliberalism. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 34(1/2), 19–34.
   Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedded formative assessment. Bloomington: Solution Tree Press.
   Google Scholar
• Willis. (2018). The efficacy of phenomenography as a cross-cultural methodology for educational research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 41(5), 483–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, M., & Carless, D. (2013). The feedback triangle and the enhancement of dialogic feedback processes. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(3), 285–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar