Mentor perspectives on the place of undergraduate research mentoring in academic identity and career development: an analysis of award winning mentors

References

• Baker, V. L., Pifer, M. J., Lunsford, L. G., Greer, J., & Ihas, D. (2015). Faculty as mentors in undergraduate research, scholarship, and creative work: Motivating and inhibiting factors. Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 23(5), 394–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behar-Horenstein, L. S., Roberts, K. W., & Dix, A. C. (2010). Mentoring undergraduate researchers: An exploratory study of students’ and professors’ perceptions. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 18(3), 269–291.10.1080/13611267.2010.492945
   Google Scholar
• Brew, A., & Cahir, J. (2014). Achieving sustainability in learning and teaching initiatives. International Journal for Academic Development, 19(4), 341–352.10.1080/1360144X.2013.848360
   Google Scholar
• Brew, A., & Jewell, E. (2012). Enhancing quality learning through experiences of research-based learning: Implications for academic developers. International Journal for Academic Development, 17(1), 47–58.10.1080/1360144X.2011.586461
   Google Scholar
• Buddie, A. M., & Collins, C. L. (2011). Faculty perceptions of undergraduate research. PURM: Perspectives on Mentoring Undergraduate Researchers, 1(1), 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., & Felten, P. (2014). Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching: A guide for faculty. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Business Innovation & Skills. (2016). Success as knowledge economy: Teaching excellence, social mobility and student choice. London: Williams Lea Group.
   Google Scholar
• Eagan, K. M., Sharkness, J., Hurtado, S., Mosqueda, C., & Chang, M. J. (2011). Engaging undergraduates in science research: Not just about faculty willingness. Research in Higher Education, 52(2), 151–177.10.1007/s11162-010-9189-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2016). Students as partners: Reflections on a conceptual model. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 4(2), 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensel, N. (2012). Characteristics of excellence in undergraduate research. Washington DC: Council on Undergraduate Research.
   Google Scholar
• Kuh, G. (2008). High-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
   Google Scholar
• Laursen, S., Hunter, A., Seymour, E., Thiry, H., & Melton, G. (2010). Undergraduate research in the sciences: Engaging students in real science. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Laursen, S., Seymour, E., & Hunter, A. (2012). Learning, teaching and scholarship: Fundamental tensions of undergraduate research. Change, 44(2), 30–37.10.1080/00091383.2012.655217
   Google Scholar
• Lieff, S., Baker, L., Mori, B., Egan-Lee, E., Chin, K., & Reeves, S. (2012). Who am I? Key influences on the formation of academic identity within a faculty development program. Medical Teacher, 34(3), e208–e215.10.3109/0142159X.2012.642827
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopatto, D. (2010). Undergraduate research as a high-impact student experience. Peer Review, 12, 27–30.
   Google Scholar
• Macfarlane, B., & Hughes, G. (2009). Turning teachers into academics? The role of educational development in fostering synergy between teaching and research. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46(1), 5–14.10.1080/14703290802646214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitten, C., & Ross, D. (2016, November). Sustaining a commitment to teaching in a research-intensive university: What we learn from award-winning faculty. Studies in Higher Education. doi:10.1080/03075079.2016.1255880
   Google Scholar
• Osborn, J., & Karukstis, K. (2009). The benefits of undergraduate research, scholarship, and creative activity. In M. K. Boyd & J. L. Wesemann (Eds.), Broadening participation in undergraduate research: Fostering excellence and enhancing the impact (pp. 41–53). Washington, DC: Council on Undergraduate Research.
   Google Scholar
• Pfund, C., Pribbenow, C. M., Branchaw, J., Lauffer, S., & Handelsman, J. (2006). The merits of training mentors. Science, 311(5760), 473–474.10.1126/science.1123806
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quigley, S. A. (2011). Academic identity: A modern perspective. Educate, 11(1), 20–30.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, A., & Petocz, P. (2003). Enhancing academic work through the synergy between teaching and research. International Journal for Academic Development, 8(1–2), 105–117.10.1080/1360144042000277982
   Google Scholar
• Shanahan, J. O., Ackley-Holbrook, E., Hall, E., Stewart, K., & Walkington, H. (2015). Ten salient practices of undergraduate research mentors: A review of the literature. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 23(5), 359–376.10.1080/13611267.2015.1126162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shellito, C., Shea, K., Mueller-Solger, A., & Davis, W. (2001). Successful mentoring of undergraduate researchers: Tips for creating positive student research experiences. Journal of College Science Teaching, 30(7), 460–464.
   Google Scholar
• Spronken-Smith, R., Walker, R., Batchelor, J., O’Steen, B., & Angelo, T. (2011). Enablers and constraints to the use of inquiry-based learning in undergraduate education. Teaching in Higher Education, 16(1), 15–28.10.1080/13562517.2010.507300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandermaas-Peeler, M., Miller, P. C., & Peeples, T. (2015). “Mentoring is sharing the excitement of discovery”: Faculty perceptions of undergraduate research mentoring. Mentoring & Tutoring, 23(5), 377–393.10.1080/13611267.2015.1126163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimbardi, K., & Myatt, P. (2014). Embedding undergraduate research experiences within the curriculum: A cross-disciplinary study of the key characteristics guiding implementation. Studies in Higher Education, 39(2), 233–250.10.1080/03075079.2011.651448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar