‘Accountable to whom, for what, and through what means’: educational developers in the audit culture

References

• Apple, M. W. (2005). Education, markets, and an audit culture. Critical Quarterly, 47(1‐2), 11–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0011-1562.2005.00611.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bamber, V., & Stefani, L. (2016). Taking up the challenge of evidencing value in educational development: From theory to practice. International Journal for Academic Development, 21(3), 242–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2015.1100112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beerkens, M. (2018). Evidence-based policy and higher education quality assurance: Progress, pitfalls and promise. European Journal of Higher Education, 8(3), 272–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2018.1475248
   Google Scholar
• Bergami, R. (2019). Twenty-first century Feudalism in Australian universities. In D. Borrell & C. Manathunga (Eds.), Resisting neoliberalism in higher education, Volume I: Seeing through the cracks (pp. 37–58)). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bovens, M. (2006). Analysing and assessing public accountability: A conceptual framework. European Governance Papers (EUROGOV), CONNEX and EUROGOV Networks, No. C-06-01. https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/erpeurogo/p0005.htm
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Burke, J. C. (2004). Achieving accountability in higher education: Balancing public, academic and market demands. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Capano, G. (2010). A Sisyphean task: Evaluation and institutional accountability in Italian higher education. Higher Education Policy, 23, 39–62. https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2009.19
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, M. (2010). Audit cultures and quality assurance mechanisms in England: A study of their perceived impact on the work of academics. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(3), 259–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562511003740817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collini, S. (2010). Browne’s gamble. London Review of Books, 32(21), 23–25. https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v32/n21/stefan-collini/browne-s-gamble.
   Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., & Felten, P. (2014). Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching: A guide for faculty. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, R., Amernic, J., & Tourish, D. (2014). Perverse audit culture and accountability of the modern public university. Financial Accountability & Management, 30(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12025
   Google Scholar
• Dressel, P. L. (1980). The autonomy of public colleges. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• El-Khawas, E. (2006). Accountability and quality assurance: New issues for academic inquiry. In J. J. F. Forest & P. G. Altbach (Eds.), International handbook of higher education (pp. 23–37). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison., Trans. Alan Sheridan. Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977. Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G. (2010). Dimensions of quality. Higher Education Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G. (2013). Reflections on the changing nature of educational development. International Journal for Academic Development, 18(1), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2013.751691
   Google Scholar
• Giri, A. (2000). Audited accountability and the imperative of responsibility: Beyond the primacy of the political. In M. Strathern (Ed.), Audit cultures: Anthropological studies in accountability, ethics and the academy (pp. 173–195)). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gunn, A., & Mintrom, M. (2017). Five things to consider when designing a policy to measure research impact. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/five-things-to-consider-when-designing-a-policy-to-measure-research-impact-71078
   Google Scholar
• Huisman, J., & Currie, J. (2004). Accountability in higher education: Bridge over troubled water? Higher Education, 48(4), 529–551. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HIGH.0000046725.16936.4c
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kai, J. (2009). A critical analysis of accountability in higher education. Chinese Education and Society, 42(2), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.2753/CED1061-1932420204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacRury, I. (2007). Institutional creativity and pathologies of potential space: The modern university. Psychodynamic Practice, 13(2), 119–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/14753630701273058
   Google Scholar
• Manathunga, C. (2007). ‘Unhomely’ academic developer identities: More post-colonial explorations. International Journal for Academic Development, 12(1), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/13601440701217287
   Google Scholar
• Manathunga, C. (2011). The field of educational development: Histories and critical questions. Studies in Continuing Education, 33(3), 347–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2011.613375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCowan, T. (2018). Five perils of the impact agenda in higher education. London Review of Education, 16(2), 279–295. https://doi.org/10.18546/LRE.16.2.08
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Mahony, M. (2020). Measuring performance and accountability in higher education: A review article on productivity in higher education. International Productivity Monitor, 38, 145–154. http://www.csls.ca/ipm/38/O'Mahony.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Power, M. (1994). The audit explosion. White Dove Press.
   Google Scholar
• Power, M. (2003). Evaluating the audit explosion. Law & Policy, 25(3), 185–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9930.2003.00147.x
   Google Scholar
• Schwandt, T. A. (2015). The SAGE dictionary of qualitative inquiry (4th ed. ed.). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Shore, C., & Wright, S. (1999). Audit culture and anthropology: Neoliberalism and British higher education. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 5(4), 557–575. https://doi.org/10.2307/2661148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shore, C., & Wright, S. (2000). Coercive accountability: The rise of audit culture in higher education. In M. Strathern (Ed.), Audit cultures: Anthropological studies in accountability, ethics and the academy (pp. 57–89)). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shore, C. (2008). Audit culture and illiberal governance: Universities and the politics of accountability. Anthropological Theory, 8(3), 278–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499608093815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, B., & McGannon, K. R. (2018). Developing rigor in qualitative research: Problems and opportunities within sport and exercise psychology. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 11(1), 101–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2017.1317357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, S., Ward, V., & House, A. (2011). “Impact” in the proposals for the UK’s research excellence framework: Shifting the boundaries of academic autonomy. Research Policy, 40(10), 369–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spooner, M. (2015). Higher education’s silent killer. Briarpatch (pp. 4–7). Briarpatch Magazine. https://briarpatchmagazine.com/articles/view/higher-educations-silent-killer
   Google Scholar
• Spooner, M. (2020). Technologies of governance in context: Four global windows into neoliberalism and audit culture in higher education. Qualitative Inquiry, 26(7), 743–747. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800419878750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strathern, M. (1997). Improving ratings: Audit in the British university system. European Review (Chichester, England), 5(3), 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1002/%28SICI%291234-981X%28199707%295%3A3%3C305%3A%3AAID-EURO184%3E3.0.CO%3B2-4
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, L. (2021). Evaluation of the Impact of the Evidence for Enhancement: Improving the Student Experience Enhancement Theme. Quality Assurance Agency (QAA) Scotland.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsoukas, H. (1997). The tyranny of light: The temptations and the paradoxes of the information society. Futures, 29(9), 827–843. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(97)00035-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zumeta, W. M. (2011). What does it mean to be accountable? Dimensions and implications of higher education’s public accountability. The Review of Higher Education, 35(1), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2011.0037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar