Exploring international collaborative writing groups’ potential for community-based academic development around public SoTL

References

• Avdeev, S. (2021). International collaboration in higher education research: A gravity model approach. Scientometrics, 126(7), 5569–5588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04008-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. https://www.umces.edu/sites/default/files/al/pdfs/BoyerScholarshipReconsidered.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, E. L. (1996). The scholarship of engagement. Journal of Public Service and Outreach, 1(1), 11–20.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Chick, N. L., & Friberg, J. C. (Eds.). (2022). Going public reconsidered: Engaging with the world beyond academe through the scholarship of teaching and learning. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen, S. H., Juebei, C., & Xiangyun, D. (2023). Cross-institutional collaboration in engineering education–a systematic review study. European Journal of Engineering Education, 48(6), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2023.2228727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felten, P., & Geertsema, J. (2023). Recovering the heart of SoTL: Inquiring into teaching and learning ‘as if the world mattered’. Innovative Higher Education, 48(6), 1095–1112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-023-09675-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geertsema, J. (2016). Academic development, SoTL and educational research. International Journal for Academic Development, 21(2), 122–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2016.1175144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, M. (2017). Reflections on the development of international collaborative writing groups (ICWGs) about teaching and learning in higher education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences Elsevier BV, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2017.2.3
   Google Scholar
• Healey, M., & Matthews, K. E. (2017). Learning together through international collaborative writing groups. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 5(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.5.1.2
   Google Scholar
• Huijser, H., Sim, K. N., & Felten, P. (2020). Change, agency, and boundary spanning in dynamic contexts. International Journal for Academic Development, 25(2), 91–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2020.1753919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, S. (2016). Community development today: Engaging challenges through cosmopolitanism? Community Development Journal, 51(1), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsv058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koris, R., & McKinnon, S. (2022). No time to wait in a crisis: Developing an informal approach to academic development through international online conversations. International Journal for Academic Development, 27(2), 121–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2022.2082440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowalczuk-Walędziak, M., & Underwood, J. M. (2021). International communities of practice: What makes them successful vehicles for teachers’ professional development? Educational Studies, 49(6), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2021.1927673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, V. S., DeZure, D., Debowski, S., Ho, A., & Li, K. (2013). Enhancing international collaboration among academic developers in established and emerging contexts: Moving toward a post-colonial perspective. International Journal for Academic Development, 18(1), 89–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2011.616590
   Google Scholar
• Marquis, E., Mårtensson, K., & Healey, M. (2017). Leadership in an international collaborative writing groups (ICWG) initiative: Implications for academic development. International Journal for Academic Development, 22(3), 211–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2017.1291429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, K. E., Marquis, B., & Healey, M. (2017). International collaborative writing groups as communities of practice. In J. McDonald & A. Cater-Steele (Eds.), Implementing communities of practice in higher education: Dreamers and schemers (pp. 597–617). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• McIntosh, E., & Nutt, D. (Eds.). (2022). The impact of the integrated practitioner in higher education: Studies in third space professionalism. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlan, T. (2021). Facilitating factors in cultivating diverse online communities of practice: A case of international teaching assistants during the COVID-19 crisis. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 38(2), 177–195. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-05-2020-0074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse, J. M. (2010). Simultaneous and sequential qualitative mixed method designs. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6), 483–491. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410364741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkinson, T., McDonald, K., & Quinlan, K. M. (2020). Reconceptualising academic development as community development: Lessons from working with Syrian academics in exile. Higher Education, 79(2), 183–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00404-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roxå, T., & Mårtensson, K. (2017). Agency and structure in academic development practices: Are we liberating academic teachers or are we part of a machinery supressing them? International Journal for Academic Development, 22(2), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2016.1218883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Said, E. (1994). Representation of the intellectual: The 1993 Reith lectures. Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• Sturm, S. (2022). What hope for academic academic development? International Journal for Academic Development, 27(4), 341–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2022.2140343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trigwell, K. (2013). Evidence of the impact of scholarship of teaching and learning purposes. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 1(1), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.1.1.95
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice. Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger-Trayner, B., Wenger-Trayner, E., Cameron, J., Eryigit-Madzwamuse, S., & Hart, A. (2019). Boundaries and boundary objects: An evaluation framework for mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(3), 321–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689817732225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger-Trayner, E., Fenton O’Creevy, M., & Hutchinson, S., Kubiak, C., & Wenger-Trayner, B. (Eds.). (2014). Learning in landscapes of practice: Boundaries, identity, and knowledgeability in practice-based learning. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger-Trayner, E., Wenger, E., & Wenger-Trayner, B. (2020). Learning to make a difference: Value creation in social learning spaces. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, I., & Strivens, J. (2015). Academic developers and international collaborations: The importance of personal abilities and aptitudes. International Journal for Academic Development, 20(4), 333–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2015.1083434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar