The route to ‘inclusive counselling’: counsellors' perceptions of disability inclusion in Turkey

References

• Ainscow, M. 2002. Understanding the Development of Inclusive Schools. 2nd ed. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ainscow, M. 2005. “Developing Inclusive Education Systems: What are the Levers for Change?” Journal of Educational Change 6 (2): 109–124. doi: 10.1007/s10833-005-1298-4
   Google Scholar
• Ainscow, M., and T. Booth, eds. 2005. From Them to Us: An International Study of Inclusion in Education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ainscow, M., T. Booth, A. Dyson, P. Farrell, J. Frankham, F. Gallannaugh, A. Howes, and R. Smith. 2006. Improving Schools, Developing Inclusion. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ainscow, M., and A. Howes. 2006. “Leading Developments in Practice: Barriers and Possibilities.” In Improving Urban Schools: Collaboration and Leadership, edited by M. Ainscow and M. West, 35–46. Berkshire: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aksit, N. 2007. “Educational Reform in Turkey.” International Journal of Educational Development 27 (2): 129–137. doi: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2006.07.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ates, S., K. Yildirim, and M. Yildiz. 2010. “Opinions of Classroom Teachers and Prospective Classroom Teachers about the Learning Difficulties Encountered in the Teaching Process of Reading and Writing.” Elementary Education Online 9 (1): 44–51.
   Google Scholar
• Attride-Stirling, J. 2001. “Thematic Networks: An Analytic Tool for Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Research 1 (3): 385–405. doi: 10.1177/146879410100100307
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. 2008. The Education Debate. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barbarasch, B., and M. J. Elias. 2009. “Fostering Social Competence in Schools.” In School-based Mental Health: A Practitioner’s Guide to Comparative Practices, edited by R. W. Christner and R. B. Mennuti, 125–148. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, C., M. Oliver, and L. Barton. 2002. Disability Studies Today. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, S. 2002. The Micropolitics of Inclusive Education: An Ethnography. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biklen, D. P., D. M. Straut, and P. Kluth. 2003. “Academics, Access and Action.” In Access to Academics for All Students: Critical Approaches to Inclusive Curriculum, Instruction and Policy, edited by P. Kluth, D. M. Straut and D. P. Biklen, 185–197. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Burnett, J. A., D. Hamel, and L. L. Long. 2004. “Service Learning in Graduate Counselor Education: Developing Multicultural Counseling Competency.” Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development 32 (3): 180–191. doi: 10.1002/j.2161-1912.2004.tb00370.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, A. 2009. What Works with Children, Adolescents, and Adults? A Review of the Effectiveness of Psychotherapy. Hove, East Sussex: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chinapah, V. 1989. “Mainstream Schooling for the Physically Handicapped: How Can Counselling Help?” International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling 12 (3): 223–236. doi: 10.1007/BF00120587
   Google Scholar
• Connor, D., and B. A. Ferri. 2007. “The Conflict within: Resistance to Inclusion and Other Paradoxes in Special Education.” Disability & Society 22 (1): 63–77. doi: 10.1080/09687590601056717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., L. Manion, and K. Morrison. 2000. Research Methods in Education. 5th ed. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., and A. Strauss, eds. 2008. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 2009. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Culham, A., and M. Nind. 2003. “Deconstructing Normalisation: Clearing the Way for Inclusion.” Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability 28 (1): 65–78. doi: 10.1080/1366825031000086902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vos, A. S., H. Strydom, C. B. Fouche, and C. S. L. Delport. 2002. Research at Grass Roots: For the Social Sciences and Human Professions. Pretoria, South Africa: Van Schaik Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Dogan, S. 1998a. “The Historical Development of Counseling in Turkey.” International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling 22 (1): 57–67. doi: 10.1023/A:1005474126819
   Google Scholar
• Dogan, S. 1998b. “Counseling in Turkey: Current Status and Future Challenges.” Education Policy Analysis Archives 6 (12): 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Dogan, S. 2000. “Okul Rehberligi ve Danismanligi Alaninda Çagdas bir Yaklaşım: Kapsamlı Rehberlik Program Modeli. [A modern approach in school guidance and counselling: Comprehensive guidance and counselling programs].” Türk Psikolojik Danisma ve Rehberlik Dergisi 2 (13): 56–64.
   Google Scholar
• Dollarhide, C. T. 2003. “School Counselors as Program Leaders: Applying Leadership Contexts to School Counseling.” Professional School Counseling 6 (5): 304–309.
   Google Scholar
• Dyson, A., P. Farrell, F. Polat, G. Hutcheson, and F. Gallanaugh. 2004. Inclusion and Pupil Achievement. London: DfES.
   Google Scholar
• Erkilic, M., and S. Durak. 2013. “Tolerable and Inclusive Learning Spaces: An Evaluation of Policies and Specifications for Physical Environments that Promote Inclusion in Turkish Primary Schools.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 17 (5): 462–479. doi: 10.1080/13603116.2012.685333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, P. T., and K. Venables. 2009. “Can Educational Psychologists be Inclusive.” In Psychology for Inclusive Education, edited by P. Hick, R. Kershner, and P. T. Farrell, 117–127. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Florian, L., and M. Rouse. 2010. “Teachers’ Professional Learning and Inclusive Practice.” In Confronting Obstacles to Inclusion: International Responses to Developing Inclusive Education, edited by R. Rose, 185–99. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Garbarino, J., and B. Ganzel. 2000. “The Human Ecology of Early Risk.” In Handbook of Early Intervention, edited by J. P. Shonkoff and S. J. Meisels, 76–93. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geldard, D. 1998. Basic Personal Counselling. Sydney: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Greenstein, A. 2014. “Is This Inclusion? Lessons from a Very ‘Special’ Unit.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 18 (4): 379–391. doi: 10.1080/13603116.2013.777130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, D. H. 2003. Education Epidemic: Transforming Secondary Schools Through Innovation Networks. London: Demos.
   Google Scholar
• Herr, E. L. 2002. “School Reform and Perspectives on the Role of School Counselors: A Century of Proposals for Change.” Professional School Counseling 5 (4): 220–234.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, P., and L. Goetz. 1997. “Research on Inclusive Educational Programs, Practices, and Outcomes for Students with Severe Disabilities.” The Journal of Special Education 31 (1): 3–29. doi: 10.1177/002246699703100102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessler, R. C., P. Berglund, O. Demler, R. Jin, K. R. Merikangas, and E. E. Walters. 2005. “Lifetime Prevalence and Age-of-Onset Distributions of DSM-IV Disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication.” Archives of General Psychiatry 62 (6): 593–602. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.593
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kourkoutas, E. E., and M. R. Xavier. 2010. “Counseling Children at Risk in a Resilient Contextual Perspective: A Paradigmatic Shift of School Psychologists’ Role in Inclusive Education.” Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 5: 1210–1219. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.263
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C. C. 2001. “Culturally Responsive School Counselors and Programs: Addressing the Needs of All Students.” Professional School Counseling 4 (4): 257–261.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., and E. G. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, K. 2001. “Creating a Dialogue Between Sociological and Egalitarian Theory in Education.” International Studies in Sociology of Education 11 (3): 237–260. doi: 10.1080/09620210100200077
   Google Scholar
• MEB (Milli Egitim Bakanligi (MEB [Ministry of National Education])). 2001. Republic of Turkey Ministry of National Education, Guidance and Psychological Counselling Services Regulation. Accessed January, 2013. http://mevzuat.meb.gov.tr/html/68.html
   Google Scholar
• MEB (Milli Egitim Bakanligi (MEB [Ministry of National Education])). 2004. Republic of Turkey Ministry of National Education, Inclusive Practices Regulation. Accessed March, 2013. http://www.egitimmevzuat.com/index.php/201012311723/2004/kaynatrma-uygulamalar-20047-genelge.html
   Google Scholar
• MEB (Milli Egitim Bakanligi (MEB [Ministry of National Education])). 2005. Republic of Turkey Ministry of National Education, Special Educational Services Regulation. Accessed January, 2013. http://orgm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2014_01/23121514_zeleitimverehberlikhizynetmeliktasla.pdf
   Google Scholar
• MEB (Milli Egitim Bakanligi (MEB [Ministry of National Education])). 2008. Republic of Turkey Ministry of National Education, Regulation of Educational Practices through Inclusion. Accessed March, 2013. http://mebk12.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/45/03/353203/dosyalar/2012_12/26103815_kaynastirma.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Melekoglu, M. A., O. Cakiroglu, and K. W. Malmgren. 2009. “Special Education in Turkey.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 13 (3): 287–298. doi: 10.1080/13603110701747769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, S., and N. Singal. 2010. “The Education for All and Inclusive Education Debate: Conflict, Contradiction or Opportunity?” International Journal of Inclusive Education 14 (1): 1–15. doi: 10.1080/13603110802265125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, D., and I. Desai. 2003. “Inclusive Education for Students with Special Needs.” In International Handbook of Educational Research in the Asia-Pacific Region, edited by J. P. Keeves and R. Watanabe, 203–215. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Mittler, P. 2000. Working Towards Inclusive Education. London: David Fulton.
   Google Scholar
• Odom, S. L., and K. E. Diamond. 1998. “Inclusion of Young Children with Special Needs in Early Childhood Education: The Research Base.” Early Childhood Research Quarterly 13 (1): 3–25. doi: 10.1016/S0885-2006(99)80023-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. 1996. Understanding Disability: From Theory to Practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. 1998. “Theories of Disability in Health Practice and Research.” British Medical Journal 317 (7170): 1446–1449. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7170.1446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oral, K. U. 2003. “Ogrenme bozuklugu ve ozel egitim [Learning difficulties and special education].” In Farkli gelisen cocuklar [Differently developing children], edited by A. Kulaksizoglu, 141–171. Istanbul, Turkey: Epsilon Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ozgur, I. 2004. Engelli Cocuklar ve Egitimi: Ozel Egitim [Children with disabilities and their education: Special education]. Adana: Karahan Kitabevi.
   Google Scholar
• Pattison, S. 2006. “Beyond the Classroom: The Inclusion of Young People with Learning Disabilities in UK Mainstream Counselling Services.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 10 (6): 547–564. doi: 10.1080/13603110500256020
   Google Scholar
• Polat, F. 2001. “Changing Attitudes of School Psychologists Towards Pupils with Special Educational Needs in Turkey.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 16 (1): 55–64. doi: 10.1080/08856250150501806
   Google Scholar
• Porter, L., ed. 2002. Educating Young Children with Special Needs. Crows West: Allen Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Rakap, S., and L. Kaczmarek. 2010. “Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Inclusion in Turkey.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 25 (1): 59–75. doi: 10.1080/08856250903450848
   Google Scholar
• Robson, C. 2011. Real World Research: A Resource for Users of Social Research Methods in Applied Settings. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Rossman, G. B., H. D. Corbett, and W. A. Firestone, eds. 1988. Change and Effectiveness in Schools: A Cultural Perspective. Albany: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sakiz, H., and C. Woods. Forthcoming. “Achieving Inclusion of Students with Disabilities in Turkey: Current Challenges and Future Prospects.” International Journal of Inclusive Education doi:10.1080/13603116.2014.902122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakiz, H., and C. Woods. 2014. “From Thinking to Practice: School Staff Views on Disability Inclusion in Turkey.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 29 (2): 135–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, T. E., ed. 1998. The Disability Reader: Social Sciences Perspectives. London: Cassell.
   Google Scholar
• Skrtic, T. M. 1995. Disability and Democracy: Reconstructing (Special) Education for Postmodernity. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, G., and A. Loxley. 2007. Deconstructing Special Education and Constructing Inclusive Education. 2nd ed. London: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2000. Education for All: Meeting Our Collective Commitments. Notes on the Dakar Framework for Action. Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2001. Open File on Inclusive Education: Support Materials for Managers and Administrators. France: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2009. Policy Guidelines on Inclusion in Education. France: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Urquhart, I. 2009. “The Psychology of Inclusion: The Emotional Dimension.” In Psychology for Inclusive Education, edited by P. Hick, R. Kershner and P. T. Farrell, 66–81. Routledge: London and New York.
   Google Scholar
• Yildiz, M., K. Yildirim, S. Ates, and T. Rasinski. 2012. “Perceptions of Turkish Parents with Children Identified as Dyslexic about the Problems that They and Their Children Experience.” Reading Psychology 33 (5): 399–422. doi: 10.1080/02702711.2010.515907
   Google Scholar